Scientists sound warning over Trump cuts — and 75% consider leaving the U.S.
This week, in response to President Trump's ongoing cuts to scientific research and staffing at federal agencies, nearly 2,000 of the country's leading scientists signed a letter urging the administration to 'cease its wholesale assault on U.S. science.'
'We see real danger in this moment,' the letter, which was signed by a number of Nobel Prize winners, stated. 'We hold diverse political beliefs, but we are united as researchers in wanting to protect independent scientific inquiry. We are sending this SOS to sound a clear warning: the nation's scientific enterprise is being decimated.'
Last week, the journal Nature published a poll it conducted of more than 1,600 U.S. scientists.
'Are you a US researcher who is considering leaving the country following the disruptions to science prompted by the Trump administration?' the poll asked the group.
In response, 75.3% of those polled said yes, while 24.7% said no.
The poll was conducted prior to Tuesday's announcement by the Department of Health and Human Services that it was laying off 10,000 employees, including scientists from agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration and the National Cancer Institute, among others. The mass firing followed Trump administration cuts to research funded by the National Institutes of Health.
'We're scared that these blanket mandates could erase decades of progress fighting cancer,' Anjee Davis, the CEO of Fight Colorectal Cancer, a patient advocacy group, told CBS News. 'This isn't about politics. It's about protecting the progress we've fought so hard to achieve in cancer care and research over the past two decades.'
In a post to social media on Tuesday, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. described the job and funding cuts as a way to improve health outcomes.
'This overhaul is about realigning HHS with its core mission: to stop the chronic disease epidemic and Make America Healthy Again,' Kennedy wrote. 'It's a win-win for taxpayers, and for every American we serve.'
Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler sharply disagreed.
'We are less safe today because of these cuts that have happened the last several days,' Kessler said in a Wednesday interview with MSNBC. 'I always thought that things were fixable. You could fix things. I am very concerned that if these cuts are not rescinded, these will have an effect for decades.'
On Wednesday, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit against NIH on behalf of several scientists laid off in the HHS purge.
'Our case is specifically addressing NIH's lawless grant terminations and their upending of the grant review process for applicants,' Olga Akselrod, senior counsel at the ACLU Racial Justice Program, told NBC News. 'These sweeping actions have disrupted hundreds of research grants, derailed really crucial research and are upending the careers of the most promising scientists in the United States with really no clear rationale.'
While the Trump administration has taken a dim view of federal science spending, cutting agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association and the National Weather Service, a 2023 paper published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas found that government research and development funding accounted for more than one-fifth of U.S. productivity growth over the last 80 years.
'For over 80 years, wise investments by the US government have built up the nation's research enterprise, making it the envy of the world,' the letter sent this week from the nearly 2,000 scientists stated. 'Astoundingly, the Trump administration is destabilizing this enterprise by gutting funding for research, firing thousands of scientists, removing public access to scientific data, and pressuring researchers to alter or abandon their work on ideological grounds.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
24 minutes ago
- Axios
MAGA's blue-collar base waits patiently for populist payoff
President Trump 's second term has been a payday for the powerful, exposing a disconnect in his promise to deliver for "the forgotten man" of America's working class. Why it matters: The populist paradox at the heart of MAGA — a movement fueled by economic grievance and championed by a New York billionaire — has never been more pronounced. Trump's blue-collar base remains fiercely loyal, energized by his hardline stances on immigration, trade and culture — and patient that his economic "Golden Age" will materialize. But so far, the clearest financial rewards of Trump's tenure are flowing upward — to wealthy donors, family members, insiders and the president himself. The big picture: Trump's inner circle has shattered norms around profiting from the presidency, dulling public outrage to the point where even the most brazen access schemes draw only fleeting scrutiny. Take crypto: The top holders of Trump's meme coin were granted an exclusive dinner last month at the president's Virginia golf club, where some paid millions for access. The White House refused to release the guest list, but wealthy foreigners — including a Chinese billionaire who faced SEC charges under the Biden administration — were among those revealed to be in attendance. Trump's sons, meanwhile, are spearheading a family crypto venture that has raked in hundreds of millions of dollars. Trump Media, the parent company of Truth Social, is raising $2.5 billion to buy Bitcoin. All of this — plus a flurry of lucrative real estate deals overseas — is playing out as Trump presides over U.S. foreign policy and the fate of crypto regulation. Zoom in: Now take Trump's relationship with his donors. His Cabinet is the wealthiest in American history, stocked with mega-donors whose combined net worth reaches well into the billions — even discounting estranged former adviser Elon Musk. Trump has granted pardons or clemency to a stream of white-collar criminals and wealthy tax cheats, many of whom hired lobbyists, donated to the president or raised money on his behalf. The Wall Street Journal found that the biggest corporate and individual donors to Trump's inauguration later received relief from investigations, U.S. market access and plum postings in the administration. The other side: Trump officials wholly reject the premise that the administration's policies don't benefit the working-class Americans who voted for the president en masse. The White House points to cooling inflation, plummeting border crossings, and the tariff-driven re-shoring of manufacturing as evidence of Trump delivering on his core promises. They frame his crypto push, AI acceleration and deregulatory agenda as driving forces behind a pro-growth tide that will lift all boats — including for middle- and working-class Americans. Reality check: Inflation may remain benign for now, but there are growing signs businesses are experiencing higher prices and passing some or all of those costs directly through to consumers, Axios managing editor for business Ben Berkowitz notes. While companies have made encouraging public statements about re-shoring, in almost all of those cases it's too soon for any shovels to be in the ground. What to watch: Trump's "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" is packed with populist red meat, including the extension of his first-term tax cuts, the elimination of taxes on tips and overtime, and $1,000 " Trump Accounts" for newborns. "All his hopes and dreams on that front are pinned to that reconciliation bill," one MAGA operative told Axios, characterizing it as "the bulk" of Trump's legislative agenda for the middle class. "The president expects the Senate to quickly pass the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, codifying huge tax cuts that will mean permanent savings for hardworking Americans," White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said. Between the lines: Several independent analyses project that the wealthiest Americans would benefit most from the bill. A Penn Wharton study that found the top 10% of earners would reap 70% of the legislation's total value. The Congressional Budget Office projects that Medicaid work requirements and other health care cuts would leave about 11 million people uninsured by 2034. Millions could also be forced off of food stamps. "Medicaid, you gotta be careful," former Trump adviser Steve Bannon said on his "War Room" podcast in February. "Because a lot of MAGAs are on Medicaid, I'm telling you. If you don't think so, you are dead wrong." Factory investments in red districts are expected to suffer most from the bill's rollback of clean energy credits included in President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The bottom line: Inside the MAGA movement, there's little concern about who's getting rich as long as Trump keeps fighting the culture wars, deporting immigrants and tearing down liberal institutions.


CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Sellers: US under Trump is ‘drifting towards authoritarianism' – full interview
CNN Political Commentators Bakari Sellers, Xochitl Hinojosa, Kristen Soltis Anderson, and Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis join CNN's Dana Bash to respond to President Trump's decision to federalize thousands of National Guard troops and deploy them to Los Angeles.


CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
GOP Sen. Johnson: Trump's bill ‘just doesn't go far enough' to cut spending
Republican Sen. Ron Johnson tells CNN's Dana Bash that "nothing's really changed" in his criticism of President Trump's spending and tax cut bill.