
How do male chimps ask for sex? It depends on their local dialect
When a male chimpanzee wants to hit on a female without causing a scene, he sometimes has to get a little creative.
"The alpha male, he can mate with whoever he wants, whenever he wants, and he gets at least half of the offspring," Catherine Crockford of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology told As It Happens host Nil Köksal.
"The subordinate males, they want to have their go. But, you know, they can't if the alpha male spots them."
To avoid the alpha's wrath, Crockford says males use covert physical gestures — which she calls "the sneakies" — to solicit sex. These mating moves, which she and her colleagues documented for a new study, vary between chimpanzee communities, suggesting chimp populations have their own distinct dialects.
Crockford says the findings, published in the journal Current Biology, show that chimpanzee conservation is about more than protecting animals; it's about safeguarding entire cultures.
Northern knuckle-knockers
Crockford and her colleagues looked at the use of mating signals over the course of 45 years among chimpanzees at the Taï National Park in Ivory Coast.
Four groups of chimps call the park home, identified by which area of the park they inhabit: north, south, east and northeast.
The researchers observed four distinct ways males signalled a desire for sex: knocking their knuckles on a hard surface, kicking their heels, tearing strips from a leaf and waving a branch.
While all four groups perform the branch and heel gestures, only the chimps in the northeastern part of the park knuckle-knock and only the southeastern chimps use the leaves.
It's a surprising difference for two populations who have a shared gene pool and live just 500 kilometres apart in the same habitat, Crawford said.
"The only way that this can come about is that the young males must learn from watching the older males," she said.
Julie Teichroeb, who studies primate behaviour at the University of Toronto Scarborough, says she's not surprised by the findings.
After all, she says, differences in vocal communications have been well-documented in many different types of animals.
Different populations of whales and songbirds, for example, are known to have unique regional dialects. Recent research suggests elephants may even have their own distinct names for each other.
Chimpanzees, too, have been shown to have geographic differences in their "pant hoots" which are loud, long-distance calls. In that case, Teichroeb notes, it's unclear whether the differences are cultural or genetic.
Culture is fragile
In the case of the Taï National Park study, Crockford says there's clearly a cultural factor at play. And cultures, she says, can be lost.
In fact, the scientists have already seen this play out.
One of Crockford's colleagues, field assistant Honora Néné Kpazahi, first noticed decades ago that males in the park's northern population were knocking their knuckles to get females' attention.
But over time, the gesture's prevalence declined as several disease outbreaks, some spilled over from humans, ravaged the population until only two males were left.
Illegal poachers killed one of those males, Marius, in 2004. With only one male left standing, the gesture was no longer needed, and it's been lost to that group ever since. Now, only the northeastern chimpanzees do it.
The same thing, she says, can happen to other learned behaviours, like the use of tools, which also varies between populations.
"The sad thing is that we now know that not only does [poaching] kill chimpanzees, but it kills the cultures," she said. "These cultures can take generations to emerge, we think. And, you know, if you lose those skills, then it might actually impact your survival."
Teichroeb said in an email the loss of that knuckle-knocking gesture among Ivory Coast chimps shows "how fragile animal culture is, just like human culture."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CTV News
5 days ago
- CTV News
First evidence of ‘living towers' made of worms discovered in nature
A 10-millimetre (0.4-inch) nematode tower twists and folds as the mass of worms reaches for the lid of its petri dish. (Perez et al. 2025/Current Biology via CNN Newsource) Nature seems to offer an escape from the hustle and bustle of city life, but the world at your feet may tell another story. Even in the shade of a fruit tree, you could be surrounded by tiny skyscrapers — not made of steel or concrete, but of microscopic worms wriggling and writhing into the shape of long, vertical towers. Even though these miniature architects, called nematodes, are found all over Earth's surface, scientists in Germany recently witnessed their impressive building techniques in nature for the first time. After months of closely inspecting rotten pears and apples in local orchards, researchers from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior and the University of Konstanz were able to spot hundreds of the 1-millimetre-long (0.04-inch) worms climbing onto one another, amassing structures up to 10 times their individual size. To learn more about the mysterious physics of the soft, slimy towers, the study team brought samples of nematodes called Caenorhabditis elegans into a lab and analyzed them. There, the scientists noticed the worms could assemble in a matter of hours, with some reaching out from the twisting mass as exploratory 'arms' sensing the environment and building accordingly. But why the worms formed the structures wasn't immediately clear. The team's findings, published Thursday in the journal Current Biology, show that even the smallest animals can prompt big questions about the evolutionary purpose of social behaviours. 'What we got was more than just some worms standing on top of each other,' said senior study author Serena Ding, a Max Planck research group leader of genes and behaviour. 'It's a coordinated superorganism, acting and moving as a whole.' Living towers: A closer look To find out what was motivating the nematodes' building behaviour, the study team tested the worms' reactions to being poked, prodded and even visited by a fly — all while stacked in a tower formation. 'We saw that they are very reactive to the presence of a stimulus,' said the study's first author, Daniela Perez, who is a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior. 'They sense it, and then the tower goes towards this stimulus, attaching itself to our metal pick or a fly buzzing around.' This coordinated reaction suggests the hungry nematodes may be joining together to easily hitch a ride on larger animals such as insects that transport them to (not so) greener pastures with more rotten fruit to feast on, Perez said. 'If you think about it, an animal that is 1 millimetre long cannot just crawl all the way to the next fruit 2 metres (6.6 feet) away. It could easily die on the way there, or be eaten by a predator,' Perez explained. Nematodes are capable of hitchhiking solo too, she added, but arriving to a new area in a group may allow them to continue reproducing. The structures themselves may also serve as a mode of transport, as evidenced by how some worms formed bridges across gaps within the petri dishes to get from one surface to another, Perez noted. 'This discovery is really exciting,' said Orit Peleg, an associate professor of computer science who studies living systems at the University of Colorado Boulder's BioFrontiers Institute. 'It's both establishing the ecological function of creating a tower, and it really opens up the door to do more controlled experimentation to try to understand the perceptual world of these organisms, and how they communicate within a large group.' Peleg was not involved in the study. The unknowns in stacks of worms As the next step, Perez said her team would like to learn whether the formation of these structures is a cooperative or competitive behaviour. In other words, are the towering nematodes behaving socially to help each other out, or are their towers more akin to a Black Friday sale stampede? Studying the behaviours of other self-assembling creatures could offer clues to the social norms of nematodes and help answer this question, Ding said. Ryan Greenway Study coauthor Ryan Greenway, a technical assistant at Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany, sets up a field microscope that could record videos of the natural worm towers. (Serena Ding via CNN Newsource) Ants, which assemble to form buoyant rafts to survive floodwaters, are among the few creatures known to team up like nematodes, said David Hu, a professor of mechanical engineering and biology at Georgia Tech. Hu was not involved in the study. 'Ants are incredibly sacrificial for one another, and they do not generally fight within the colony,' Hu said. 'That's because of their genetics. They all come from the same queen, so they are like siblings.' Like ants, nematodes didn't appear to display any obvious role differentiation or hierarchy within the tower structures, Perez said. Each worm from the base to the top of the structure was equally mobile and strong, indicating no competition was at play. However, the lab-cultivated worms were basically clones of one another, so it's not clear whether role differentiation occurs more often in nature, where nematode populations could have more genetic differences, she noted. Additionally, socially co-operative creatures tend to use some form of communication, Peleg said. In the case of ants, it may be their pheromone trails, while honeybees rely on their ritual dance routines and slime molds use their pulsing chemical signals. With nematodes, however, it's still not clear how they might communicate — or if they are communicating at all, Ding said. 'The next steps for (the team) are really just choosing the next questions to ask.' Notably, there has been a lot of interest in studying cooperative animal behaviours among the robotics community, Hu said. It's possible that one day, he added, information about the complex sociality of creatures like nematodes could be used to inform how technology, such as computer servers or drone systems, communicates. By Kameryn Griesser, CNN


CBC
05-05-2025
- CBC
Scientists discover 18th-century Austrian mummy was embalmed through the rectum
Scientists have figured out how the body of an 18th-century Austrian vicar has remained so well-preserved for nearly 300 years — and it's unlike anything they've seen before. Kept in a church crypt in a remote Austrian village, he's long been known as the "air-dried chaplain." But according to a recent CT scan he was, in fact, dried from the inside out. "We got a look into the inside of the body, and there we found that the abdominal and pelvic cavities were almost completely stuffed with some mysterious material," Andreas Nerlich, the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich pathologist who led the research, told As It Happens host Nil Kӧksal. A partial autopsy revealed the stuffing is a mix of wood chips, twigs, dried plants and fabrics, which would have soaked up all the bodily fluids and moisture that normally cause decay. But, unlike in other cases of intentional mummification, there were no visible incisions anywhere on the man's body. "The only way for this insertion was the anal canal, which they had used for all the stuffing of this material inside the body," Nerlich said. The findings, published in the journal Frontiers in Medicine, describe a previously unheard-of embalming technique. A newly discovered embalming technique Scientists found traces of zinc chloride in the rectal stuffing, which Nerlich says would have had a drying effect, while also killing bacteria that emerges in the decaying process. There was no internal damage to his upper body cavities, suggesting the material was inserted from below. The study concludes the embalmer most likely had to cut through the upper rectum or colon. Andrew Nelson, chair of the department of anthropology at Western University in London, Ont., called it "extremely interesting." "Somebody knew what they were doing," said Nelson, who was not involved in the research. Nelson says some ancient Egyptian and Peruvian mummification practices involved "eviscerating" the anus — cutting it open to remove organs and entrails. But he's never seen anything quite like this. "It certainly highlights the sort of thing that every time you do a CT scan of a mummy, you never know what you're going to find," he said. Who was he? The man in question is believed to be Austrian vicar Franz Xaver Sidler von Rosenegg, an aristocratic monk who died from infectious disease in 1746 at the age of 37. His body has long rested at St. Thomas am Blasenstein, a church north of the Danube River in Austria. A few years after his death, rumours began swirling about his remarkably intact body, Nerlich said. According to CNN, the mysterious preservation drew pilgrims to the village who believed the remains might bestow healing properties. The new study confirms a lot of local knowledge about the man. Radiocarbon dating shows he died between 1734 and 1780, likely 30 to 50 years, as expected. An analysis of his bone, skin and teeth reveal a diet rich in grain and meat, in keeping with the food supply of a local parish vicar. His skeleton showed no signs of stress, which would be typical of the relatively comfortable life of a man of the cloth. How did he die? In the year 2000, a pharmacologist from the University of Vienna scanned the vicar's body with a portable X-ray machine and found a small round object nestled in his lower bowel, leading to speculation he'd swallowed a poisonous capsule. The truth turned out to be much more mundane. The item is, in fact, "a little glass pearl" commonly used to embroider fabrics. "It must have been coming to the body just by chance during this stuffing," Nerlich said. The study concludes the vicar most likely died from complications from tuberculosis, as his body showed several signs of the disease. Why was he embalmed that way? Just because the unusual embalming technique has never been documented before doesn't mean it was rare, says Nerlich. He suspects it has been a method of preserving bodies in the short term when moving them from one place to another. In this case, the vicar's remains may have been prepared for transport to his original monasteryin Waldhausen im Strudengau, but ended up remaining in the village crypt for unknown reasons. Nerlich says a number of stars had to align for him and his team to make this discovery. Had the man been buried rather than left in a dry Alpine crypt, he likely would have decayed. What's more, his team only performed these tests because the church needed some upkeep, and they were able to borrow the body for study during renovations. Canadian bioarchaeologist Heather Gill-Frerking says the study is an example of how modern technology is "vital to unravelling ancient mysteries." But she says she wishes the researchers had not opened up the body to examine what they found in their scans. "This particular project revealed some valuable information, but I am not a proponent of the invasive, destructive autopsy approach to the analysis of mummies," she told CBC in an email. Nelson says it's always important, when studying mummies, to centre their humanity. "It's kind of titillating to think of, you know, stuffing things up his rectum. But something that's always important to recognize is that these are people," he said.


CBC
28-04-2025
- CBC
Did Roman gladiators really fight animals? This one has the bite marks to prove it
In one ancient battle between man and beast, it appears the beast reigned supreme. Researchers have identified bite marks, most likely from a lion, on the pelvis of a man buried in what is believed to be a cemetery for ancient Roman gladiators in England. This may not seem surprising to anyone who's studied ancient Roman texts, or even watched a modern gladiator movie, both of which depict a society that pitted men against animals for bloodsport. But the authors of a new study say these bite marks are, in fact, the first known physical evidence of human-animal combat in ancient Roman times. "We certainly have within our kind of cultural understanding the sense of gladiator combat, and that gladiators fight each other and were fighting big animals all the time," lead author Tim Thompson, a forensic anthropologist at Maynooth University in Ireland, told As It Happens host Nil Kӧksal. "Actually, the evidence for that is scant. This is the first time that we've actually found physical evidence on a body." The findings were published in the journal PLOS One. Who was he, and how did he die? The remains were excavated about 20 years ago near the English city of York, or as it was known during the Roman Empire, Eboracum. They belong to a man in his late twenties or early thirties who lived during the 3rd century AD, when Eboracum was an important town and military base in the north of the Roman province of Britannia. The researchers suspect he was a gladiator because he was found at a gravesite alongside many other men, all killed over the course of several generations, all decapitated just before or after their deaths, and most bearing signs of repeated physical trauma from fighting. The tooth marks were found on both of his hips, Thomas says, suggesting that whatever bit him "really kind of grabbed onto that pelvis." The "unusual" placement of the bite mark, he says, suggests it was not the killing blow. "I'm going to paint a slightly grim image of what may have happened to this poor individual," Thompson said. The man, he says, was probably already incapacitated during the bloody battle by bites that tore through his flesh, but didn't leave marks on his bones. "Then what the lion has done is bitten him on his hip and dragged that body away ... to scavenge and eat the remains," he said. The body was also decapitated, Thompson said, sliced through the neck from the back to the front. This could have been an execution, or the coup de grace after injury and defeat in the arena. "But that, for sure, is the last blow that occurred to the body," Thompson said. Ancient Romans were into 'pretty gory things' To identify the tooth marks, Thompson and his colleagues made a 3D model of them, and compared it with bite marks left by various large animals at a zoo. "For sure we can say it's a big cat, a big animal. We think it is most likely to be a lion," he said. Seth Bernard, a professor of ancient history at the University of Toronto who was not involved in the study, said it's really exciting to see physical evidence of a phenomenon historians have long known about from literature. The role of animals in gladiator battles, he says, is well-documented. Gladiator fights were a popular form of entertainment in ancient Rome, and the fighters were most often slaves, prisoners and, on occasion, volunteers. There are murals and mosaics depicting gladiators in combat with various predators. Ancient poets, Bernard says, described "games where people are put to death through beast hunts, or re-enacting mythological scenes or pretty gory things." "These are people who, you know, on a Tuesday afternoon, when they want to go be entertained, they're watching prisoners killed in the amphitheatre, or slaves killed in amphitheatres, by big beasts," Bernard said. There's physical evidence of the creatures too. In 2022, archeologists found the bones of bears and big cats at the Colosseum in Rome. The animals, often starved to make them more aggressive, were also pitted against each other, and often chained together, said study co-author John Pearce, a Roman archaeologist at King's College London. It wasn't always a fight. Animals were were also used in executions, Pearce said, with their victims bound or otherwise defenceless. "This is a reminder of the spectacle culture central to Roman public life," he said. The fact that these remains were unearthed near York paints a picture of just how far and wide the Roman Empire — and, with it, "the darker sides of Roman culture" — had spread, says Bernard. "I mean, there are not many lions in England," he said. "The transport of these animals has got to be pretty remarkable and striking. There are a lot of logistics that I think about." Thompson says the discovery makes him wonder what else archeologists might find among the remnants of far-flung Roman settlements.