Aldi drops its own price bomb in supermarkets' targeted price attacks
Aldi has joined the Australian supermarket tit-for-tat price contest begun by major players Coles and Woolworths to ensure its discount gap stays in place.
The German multinational chain has lowered prices by about 1 per cent to ensure its discount bona fides in response to the premium supermarket chains' recent price bombs.
The price drop is Aldi's largest in 18 months, according to JP Morgan's price tracking analysis.
What we are seeing is a precision strike on prices of select and mainly home brands from Coles and Woolworths rather than store-wide discounts.
Sure, supermarkets want to help customers ease cost of living stress, but a series of selective price cuts has more to do with luring those large-trolley shoppers into their stores with, let's say, cheaper nappies, and having them throw in items that are not discounted.
Woolworths fired the first salvo last month in a $100 million land-grab. Coles' response of matching Woolworths was almost immediate, which brings into question the effectiveness of Woolworths' move.
Supermarket shoppers are a promiscuous bunch and are even less loyal because times are tough.
'There is no material-sustained price advantage for Woolworths after investing $100 million into private-label pricing in May, given the quick responses from Aldi and Coles,' JP Morgan analyst Bryan Raymond said.
'It is more about getting value perception back with shoppers, and encouraging branded suppliers of products to invest along with Woolworths to help drive better value for consumers in both home brand and popular branded products.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
37 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Historic Aussie rocket launch just days away
The first Australian-made, Australian-launched rocket is set for takeoff in just a week. Gilmour Space Technologies has confirmed it is targeting a launch window of July 1 to July 3 from launchpad in North Queensland. The launch has been delayed by previous technical issues, with Gilmour Space chief executive, Adam Gilmour, telling 7News: 'I'm kind of almost sick of this rocket'. The protective nose which shields the rocket from the atmospheric pressure was one issue for the engineers to fix at the last launch attempt, along with problems in the data-collecting sensors. 'We have done a full test again of the vehicle just to be safe,' Mr Gilmour said. Gilmour Technologies has announced the Eris launch window is July 1 to July 3. Gilmour Technologies Credit: Supplied Upper-level winds are the biggest environmental challenge now facing the 25-metre, three-stage Eris rocket. A Gilmour satellite was launched aback a SpaceX rocket this week - a launch which was pushed back by similar weather conditions. 'That launch was delayed three days because of upper-level winds, and we're seeing the same high winds here as well,' Mr Gilmour said. 'That was really good … We'd made a few prototypes, but we'd never taken them to space,' he said of his firm's satellite. The satellite will monitor algae in Queensland's rivers and lakes. The Gold Coast company hopes to finally launch its Eris rocket after months of delays. Gilmour Technologies Credit: Supplied Gold Coast-based Gilmour Space plans to launch its rocket from the only certified Australian launch facility, the Bowen Orbital Spaceport, 150km southeast of Townsville. In May, the Australian Space Agency notified Gilmour Space that the company could launch Eris. Technical issues scuppered two launch attempts, the second time the rocket's nose cone accidentally opened, half an hour before takeoff.
AU Financial Review
2 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Queensland refinery slumps to $57m loss in year of pain for processing
One of Australia's two zinc refineries has crashed to a $US37.1 million ($56.8 million) loss in the latest challenge this year to the federal government's hopes of expanding local mineral processing. The loss posted by Korea Zinc's Sun Metals refinery near Townsville adds to the financial pain being felt by Australian manufacturers of aluminium, nickel, manganese, lithium and copper, as a global trend for low smelting and refining fees collides with Australia's rising energy costs.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
NATO bowed to Trump's defence demands. It'll cost them 19,800 fighter jets
Governments around the world agreeing to the change will need to make some tough decisions in the context of other budget pressures, says Euan Graham, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 'How the government cuts the pie of the tax take is going to require hard, hard decisions,' Graham says. The UK, for example, which has agreed to hit the 5 per cent target by 2035, is slashing foreign aid to pay for its additional $155 billion defence spending bill. 'That is not an announcement that I am happy to make,' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said of the change. 'However, the realities of our dangerous new era mean that the defence and national security of our country must always come first.' Other countries lifting their spending to meet the new target include Germany, France and Italy. They will need to boost their annual spending by $220 billion, $153 billion and $135 billion, respectively. Earlier this month, Rutte warned NATO members that if they didn't pledge to up defence spending to 5 per cent, 'you'd better learn to speak Russian'. But Spain, which spent just 1.3 per cent of its GDP on defence last year, refused the increase. The extra spending would force the country to 'drastically raise taxes on the middle class, or severely cut the size of our welfare state,' Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said. The NATO agreement could see Australia dragged further into the debate over defence spending by bolstering the Trump White House's argument that US allies can spend more on defence. US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth has told Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, which the Albanese has pushed back against in favour of its plan to lift expenditure to 2.3 per cent. The Coalition went to the election promising to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2035-36, which the Parliamentary Budget Office said this week would cost $156 billion and add $24 billion in interest costs. If Australia's defence spending was lifted to 5 per cent in the same time frame, the cost to the federal budget would be $261 billion and have an additional $40 billion in interest. Rabobank senior strategist Ben Picton said the debate was about 'guns or butter'. 'The Australian government is faced with choices between increasing the defence budget to expand capability or increasing spending on social programs like the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), aged care, and childcare,' Picton said in a research note this week. 'Clearly, Australia is currently choosing 'butter' but retains substantial headroom in the budget to increase spending by comparison to peer economies.' Loading The Australian government spent about $56 billion on defence in 2024-25 – more than the $44 billion it spent on the NDIS. Eminent economist Saul Eslake believes that no government will cut spending on social services to beef up defence. 'You'd make a lot of people pissed off and it's hard to do, which to me means you've got to look to the revenue side [to raise more money],' Eslake says. But Graham says Australians would understand a cut to services – like the NDIS – if the government was 'honest about the nature of the threat' posed to national security.
