
'Postcode healthcare' persists — new report by government watchdog
Where you live — rather than how sick you are — is still a major factor in how quickly you get elective surgery — or whether you get it at all, according to a new report by the government watchdog.
The report, Providing equitable access to planned care, which has just been tabled in Parliament by the Auditor-General John Ryan, showed elective services in the public system were often "not equitable or timely".
People with the same level of clinical need will qualify for treatment in some districts but not in others.
"As a result, a person's ability to access treatment is, to a significant extent, determined by where they live," the report noted.
"Some clinical staff we spoke with were of the view that a lack of capacity to provide treatment had led to some thresholds that no longer reflect clinical need."
ADVERTISEMENT
The Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act 2022 required Health New Zealand to ensure access to treatment (such as operations to remove cataracts or tonsils, joint replacements and hernia repairs) was based on people's clinical need — not their background, circumstances, or where they live.
However, the audit found Māori, Pacific peoples, people with disabilities, those living in rural areas or in poverty had worse access to planned care.
Health NZ was gradually introducing nationally consistent thresholds for ranking access to planned care.
"It has introduced a national threshold for cataract treatment. Work is under way to align other thresholds for orthopaedics, otorhinolaryngology (ear, nose, and throat conditions), and cardiology," the report said.
RNZ reported on Thursday about the long wait times for ear, nose and throat services in Tairāwhiti, which had less than a quarter of the specialist capacity needed.
Introducing a national threshold for cataract treatment had led to about 1800 people added to the waiting list in the Southern District and about 900 more people put on the waiting list in Counties Manukau, the new report found.
In orthopaedics, threshold "scores" for orthopaedic treatment range from 50 in Auckland and Canterbury to 80 in Wairarapa.
ADVERTISEMENT
"This means that a person's condition needs to be significantly worse in Wairarapa than Canterbury or Auckland to qualify for treatment."
District-specific thresholds still in place were also "obscuring the extent of unmet need for treatment in some districts".
"Significant work will be required to deal with the changes in demand that will result from the introduction of nationally consistent thresholds across all specialities."
A doctor prescribing pharmacy to patient. (Source: Getty)
Faster treatment not same as 'equitable' treatment
The true level of unmet need was unknown, the report continued.
"One possible measure of unmet need is the number of people who are assessed by a specialist but do not meet the threshold for treatment.
ADVERTISEMENT
"However, we also heard some clinicians will not refer a person for specialist assessment if they are considered unlikely to meet the treatment threshold.
"Media reports during our audit suggested that specialities in some districts were not accepting referrals because they did not have the resources and would be unable to meet target time frames for assessing or treating people."
Meeting the government's target for 95% of people receiving planned care treatment within four months by 2030 was going to require "significant improvement" the report said.
"During our audit, the latest available reporting (for October to December 2024) showed that about 59% of planned care patients received treatment within four months of being placed on a waiting list.
"The proportion of people receiving planned care treatment within four months has been in decline since 2017."
However, the focus on improving wait times should go hand-in-hand with a focus on equitable access, the report urged.
"Equity also needs to be a central consideration in Health NZ's work to improve timely provision of treatment. If this does not happen, there is a risk that strategies to improve timeliness could cause further inequities."
ADVERTISEMENT
Health was so interconnected, that too much focus in one area inevitably put pressure on the system elsewhere.
For instance, the number of patients waiting longer than one year for treatment was cut from more than 4000 in October 2023, to 1916 by July 2024, although it rose again to 2630 by December 2024.
However, in the same period, the waiting list for first specialist assessments nearly doubled, from 5000 to 9936, the auditors found.
Outsourcing could 'exacerbate' inequities
Health Minister Simeon Brown's push for more outsourcing to private providers needed to be carefully managed so it did not lead to greater inequities, the Auditor-General said.
"Access to the private hospitals that provide outsourced treatment is not equally distributed across the country. This means that some districts can outsource patients more easily and at shorter notice than others.
"In addition, not all patients can be outsourced for treatment. The people selected for outsourcing to private facilities are generally determined to be non-complex patients."
ADVERTISEMENT
Māori and Pacific peoples and people living in socially deprived areas were also more likely to have complications, which would bar them from treatment in a private hospital.
"Health NZ needs to manage and monitor the outsourcing of treatment so that it does not compromise its focus on the treatment of patients in priority order or otherwise increase inequity in planned care."
Auditor-General's recommendations for Health NZ
Prepare a plan with a clear timeline for introducing nationally consistent thresholds for planned care treatment
Put in place actions to improve equity of access to treatment and that efforts to improve timeliness do not increase inequities
Strengthen its knowledge of equitable access to treatment by looking at unmet need and other information gaps
Enable clear public reporting of how long people waiting for treatment, variations in access and how HNZ will improve equity of access.
rnz.co.nz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Health NZ pay first instalment of Holidays Act shortfall to Waikato staff
More than $39m was paid out to Waikato staff on Friday, Photo: Supplied/ Waikato Hospital More than $39 million in Holidays Act remediation payments were made to Health New Zealand's Waikato staff on Friday - with more payments to come. Identified in 2016, issues relating to the Holidays Act found former district health boards were not paying staff correctly. Health New Zealand Te Manawa Taki regional deputy chief executive Cath Cronin said 5531 current Waikato District staff received a payment. "The remediation payment made today is for the period from 1 May 2010 to 30 June 2022," she said. "The payroll in Waikato is progressively being made compliant and staff in Waikato will receive a second payment later this year from 1 July 2022 up to the date of the second payment." Cronin said the complexities of the payroll in Waikato meant splitting the total amount over two payments was the best way for HNZ to move forward. "We have made significant progress in the remediation project with around two-thirds of our current Health New Zealand employees now having received the money they are owed," she said. The payment today followed similar payments to current HNZ staff in Auckland, Counties Manukau, Waitematā, Taranaki, Wairarapa, Nelson Marlborough], Hutt Valley, Capital Coast , Bay of Plenty, Te Tai Tokerau, Hawke's Bay and South Canterbury. The organisation said more than 75 percent of its payrolls had now been rectified. "Nationally, we have about 90,000 current employees, plus 130,000 former employees, covered by the Holidays Act remediation project, for the period from 1 May 2010 to the present day," Cronin said. The payment to Waikato District staff takes the amount paid so far nationally to more than $530.2 million across 71,093 current employees.


Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
Over $39 Million In Holidays Act Remediation Payments Made To Health NZ's Waikato Staff
Statement attributable to Cath Cronin, Health New Zealand Te Manawa Taki Regional Deputy Chief Executive Today approximately $39.1 million in Holidays Act remediation payments have been processed for 5531 current Waikato District staff. The remediation payment made today is for the period from 1 May 2010 to 30 June 2022. The payroll in Waikato is progressively being made compliant and staff in Waikato will receive a second payment later this year from 1 July 2022 up to the date of the second payment. The complexities of the payroll in Waikato mean that splitting the total amount over two payments is the best way for us to get money into people's pockets sooner. We have made significant progress in the remediation project with around two-thirds of our current Health New Zealand employees now having received the money they are owed. I want to acknowledge the patience of our staff who have been waiting for their payment and also recognise the huge work from our payroll teams, both nationally and in the regions, who have worked tirelessly on this programme. The payment today means over 75% of our payrolls nationally have been rectified. This means those payrolls are now compliant with the Act and staff are being paid correctly for their holidays in a nationally consistent way. Nationally we have about 90,000 current employees plus 130,000 former employees covered by the Holidays Act remediation project, for the period from 1 May 2010 to the present day. Waikato District is the eighteenth payroll nationally to have Holidays Act remediation payments processed to current staff with Auckland, Counties Manukau, Waitematā, Taranaki, Wairarapa, Nelson Marlborough, Hutt Valley, Capital Coast and four former shared services completed, and a partial payments made in Bay of Plenty, Te Tai Tokerau, Hawke's Bay, South Canterbury. The payment to Waikato District staff takes the total amount paid so far nationally to over $530.2 million across 71,093 current employees.

RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
Norfolk Island Council defends waste management amid illegal asbestos dumping fears
The illegal dumping of asbestos-contaminated material is creating health risks for those who dump the material and potentially to others, the Norfolk Island Rregional Council says. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King The Norfolk Island Regional Council says people on the island are illegally dumping construction and demolition waste that potentially contains asbestos. RNZ Pacific has been receiving complaints from members of the island community who believe the council has been hiding asbestos under mulch instead of exporting it to mainland Australia. Norfolk Island Regional Council acting general manager Philip Reid said asbestos is not being buried as part of the council's waste management operations. Reid said construction and demolition waste that had been illegally dumped was temporarily moved and covered with mulch. "This is due to the potential for the material to contain asbestos following unauthorised disposal by waste management centre users," Reid said. According to Health New Zealand , asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral made up of many small fibres which are very strong and are highly resistant to heat, fire, chemicals and wear. It says asbestos can increase the risk of developing cancer and the main way people are exposed to asbestos is by breathing in air that contains asbestos fibres. A statement from the Norfolk Regional Council said the illegal dumping of asbestos-contaminated material is creating health risks for those who dump the material and potentially to others. It said exporting asbestos waste off-island is costly for residents. "One alternative to export could be the development of an engineered disposal pit on Norfolk Island specifically for asbestos waste, which could reduce transport costs but would require careful design to meet planning and environmental legislation. "This option would need to consider the initial cost to develop and construct the pit and also look at the implications of monitoring the pit in the long term." The statement said the council, in the meantime, is developing a community awareness campaign aimed at curbing the illegal and dangerous dumping of asbestos. "The current interim measures of maintaining secure storage during relocation will minimise risks until a permanent solution is implemented."