Trump says he expects the Israel-Iran ceasefire will last 'forever'
President Donald Trump said Monday night that he expects the ceasefire that he announced between Israel and Iran will end all military hostilities between the two countries.
'I think the ceasefire is unlimited. It's going to go forever," Trump said in a phone interview.
Asked whether the war was completely over, Trump said: 'Yes. I don't believe they will ever be shooting at each other again.'
Trump said on Truth Social that the two countries had agreed to enter into a ceasefire, which would be rolled out in stages over the next 24 hours.
A diplomat briefed on the negotiations told NBC News that Trump and Vice President JD Vance brokered the deal with the help of top Qatari leaders who delivered a ceasefire proposal to Iran.
According to a senior White House official, Trump called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and bluntly told him, 'No more war, no more fighting. The Iranians have been significantly weakened."
As Trump was speaking with the Israelis from the Oval Office, his national security team was sending messages to the Iranians through intermediaries, the senior White House official said.
The senior White House official said Trump got Netanyahu to agree to the ceasefire and then Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff signaled to the Iranians — 'both directly and indirectly' — that the United States wanted a ceasefire and that the Iranians should agree to it.
The phased-in ceasefire — in which Iran would stop firing for 12 hours before Israel would do the same for another 12 hours — was Trump's idea to appease Israeli concerns that Iran would not hold up its end of the deal, the official said.
Another source familiar with the outreach to foreign officials told NBC News that Trump called the emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, earlier Monday to say he could get Israel to agree to a ceasefire if Qatar could get Iran on board. The source said that Qatar's prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani, then coordinated with Vance and that the prime minister spoke with the Iranians.
Israel has agreed to a bilateral ceasefire, Netanyahu's office said in a statement early Tuesday, hours after Iran said it "imposed a ceasefire" on the country, according to Iranian state-aligned media.
Iran has launched its last round of missiles at Israel as a ceasefire takes effect, according to Iranian state media.
'Ceasefire begins following four waves of Iranian attacks on Israeli-occupied territories,' English-language state media Press TV said on X.
Iranian health officials recently said Israel's strikes have killed at least 400 people in Iran and injured 3,000. Iran's retaliatory strikes have killed at least 24 people in Israel.
"A lot of people were dying, and it was only going to get worse," Trump told NBC News on Monday night.
The United States attacked Iran over the weekend, hitting three nuclear facilities in a strike that involved more than 125 U.S. military aircraft.
Defying a warning from Trump that retaliation against U.S. assets 'will be met with even greater force," Iran attacked a base in Qatar where thousands of U.S. troops are stationed. Qatar said there were no casualties.
Trump called Iran's retaliatory strike a 'weak response' Monday afternoon on Truth Social, adding that Tehran could 'proceed to Peace' and that he would 'enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same.'
When Trump later announced that a ceasefire agreement had been reached, he suggested the conflict between Israel and Iran should be called 'THE 12 DAY WAR.'
The senior White House official said the name was Trump's idea.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
28 minutes ago
- Sky News
Do Israel and Iran know ‘what the f***' they're doing now?
👉Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on your podcast app👈 In this episode, Richard and Yalda react to US President Donald Trump's "they don't know what the f**k they're doing'' comment on the White House lawn as the shaky Israel-Iran ceasefire comes into effect. Yalda gives Richard her inside scoop on the phone call Trump had with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop him from bombing Iran and further violating the ceasefire. They also ask each other what could come next and answer a question on what regime change would entail in Iran. This episode contains language some will find offensive.
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination withdrawn
Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination has been withdrawn by a senior Ukraine politician who accused the US president of appeasing Vladimir Putin. Oleksandr Merezhko, chairman of Ukraine's foreign affairs committee, said he had lost 'any kind of faith' in Mr Trump's ability to end the war. He nominated Mr Trump in late 2024, revealing to The Telegraph that he believed it would encourage the president-elect to follow through on a pledge to end the war. Since then, Mr Trump has largely abandoned peace talks after repeated rounds of failed negotiations and a very public falling out in the Oval Office with Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president. 'This appeasement of aggression encourages Putin to continue the attack. Trump just turns a blind eye to all of it,' Mr Merezhko said in a letter to the Nobel committee. 'I lost any kind of faith that Trump will deliver in any of his promises.' Despite failings in Ukraine, Mr Trump's push this week to broker a ceasefire between Iran and Israel after 12 days of fighting has prompted fresh calls for a Nobel Peace Prize. On Tuesday, Buddy Carter, a US Republican politician, wrote to the Nobel committee to nominate Mr Trump for his 'extraordinary and historic role' in bringing to an end 'the armed conflict between Israel and Iran and preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet'. Addressing Mr Trump's efforts in the Middle East, Mr Merezhko said: 'I understand his position in relation to Israel. It is the right thing to do in order to help Israel to survive because Iran has said they want to destroy Israel. 'I wish he would do the same for Ukraine. Russia also wants to destroy Ukraine. Russia and Iran help each other. Trump should be consistent and help Ukraine.' The US bombed Tehran's nuclear sites on Saturday amid fighting between Israel and Iran. Iran fired ballistic missiles at a US air base in Qatar in retaliation but no one was injured and Washington was warned of the attack in advance. Mr Trump subsequently announced that the two nations had agreed to down weapons but lambasted them both on Tuesday morning as they continued to trade fire. Mr Merezhko said: 'Ukraine did everything Trump wanted. We agreed to all the ceasefire demands, including the mineral deal.' Mr Merezhko nominated Mr Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize to acknowledge his role in the Abraham Accords and to encourage him to bring peace to Ukraine. 'My goal was to give a push in the direction of peace with the nomination. He has failed to deliver on his promises,' he said. 'This seriously undermines US credibility on the world stage. Each day we're being bombarded but Trump doesn't care.' Mr Trump was widely mocked for writing 'Vladimir, stop!' on social media after a bombardment of Kyiv earlier in 2025. Mr Trump rarely rebukes Putin publicly and his envoy, Steve Witkoff, flew to St Petersburg in May for a meeting with the Russian leader. Russia launched a missile attack on Ukraine's south-eastern Dnipropetrovsk region on Tuesday. According to reports, the strikes killed 11 people and injured more than 160 others. Mr Merezhko said the continued strikes were why he had lost faith in Mr Trump. 'My goal with the nomination was to give a push in the direction of peace. My hope was that [Mr Trump] was sincere,' he said. 'He has failed to deliver on his promises. 'I cannot in all good conscience support President Trump's nomination for nor receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize.' Andrii Sybiha, Ukraine's foreign minister, called on Nato leaders meeting in The Hague, including Mr Trump, to put 'pressure on the aggressor'. 'We urge this week's Nato and EU summits to reach decisions that project strength,' he said.
NBC News
33 minutes ago
- NBC News
Senate Republicans scramble to resolve tense divisions as Trump ramps up pressure to pass his big bill
WASHINGTON — The Senate bill's Medicaid cuts are too aggressive for politically vulnerable Republicans. Its clean energy funding cuts are too tame for conservative House Republicans, who are threatening to sink the legislation. And the $10,000 cap on state and local tax deductions is a nonstarter for key blue-state House Republicans. The GOP-led Congress is barreling toward its own deadline for passage of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' and it's getting messy in the final stretch as President Donald Trump ramps up the pressure on lawmakers to put it on his desk by July 4. 'To my friends in the Senate, lock yourself in a room if you must, don't go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK,' Trump wrote Tuesday on Truth Social. 'Work with the House so they can pick it up, and pass it, IMMEDIATELY. NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT'S DONE.' Passing the party-line bill through the House and Senate, where Republicans have three votes to spare in each chamber, will be a daunting task that requires bridging acrimonious divides. The toughest part will be settling on a final product that can unify Senate GOP moderates, like Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, with the far-right House Freedom Caucus. Those two factions have tended to drive the hardest bargain. After a conference lunch meeting, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters his chamber's goal is to get the bill 'across the finish line by the end of the week,' with the goal of crafting a package that can win 51 votes in the Senate. 'Hopefully when push comes to shove and everybody has to say yes or no, we'll get the number of votes we need,' Thune said. A significant source of consternation is the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate bill, which include lowering provider taxes that are used to fund the program, and limiting payments to states. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who faces re-election in a battleground state next year, warned his party during a Tuesday meeting that they will lose the 2026 midterm elections if they push ahead on proposed Medicaid cuts. He compared the situation to the heavy losses Democrats suffered in the 2014 midterms after a rocky Obamacare rollout, according to one source in the room. The meeting came one day after Tillis circulated a document with estimates of how much Medicaid money states would lose if the Senate bill passes, including $38.9 billion in losses for North Carolina, $16 billion for Tennessee and $6.1 billion for Missouri. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said the current version of the bill — which also extends the 2017 Trump tax cuts — doesn't have enough votes and would harm rural hospitals in his state. 'Senate leadership now needs to fix this. They're the ones who have invented this new rural hospital defund scheme that the House says they can't pass, that's going to close rural hospitals,' he said. 'It was a bad idea on their part to fool around with it.' Republicans are looking at creating a new fund to protect rural hospitals from the negative consequences of their bill. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said only a small portion of Medicaid funds go to those institutions, but he argued that 'having a fund specifically for rural hospitals is a targeted way to help ensure their viability.' Senate GOP leaders want to include the Medicaid cuts to limit the bill's red ink. The version the House passed is projected by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office to add $2.4 trillion to the debt over the next 10 years. On Tuesday, 16 House Republicans — almost all representing competitive districts — sent a letter rebelling against the Senate's Medicaid cuts. They fretted that those policies would 'place additional burdens on hospitals,' among other things. 'Protecting Medicaid is essential for the vulnerable constituents we were elected to represent. Therefore, we cannot support a final bill that threatens access to coverage or jeopardizes the stability of our hospitals and providers,' wrote the House Republicans, led by Rep. David Valadao, R-Calif., whose district has one of the highest shares of Medicaid recipients in the country. Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Justin Chermol responded quickly to the letter, questioning the sincerity of the Republicans' opposition to Medicaid cuts. 'Spare us the performative bulls---,' he said in a statement. 'These so-called moderates already voted for the largest cut to Medicaid in American history — and when the time comes, they'll cave to their D.C. party bosses once again to give their billionaire donors a massive tax break.' On the other hand, the Senate bill pares back some of the clean energy cuts, a move that House conservatives say is unacceptable. That's because much of the green tax credits and funding goes to red states, and Republican senators are reluctant to take it away. Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., the chair of the Freedom Caucus, said the Senate bill 'backtracks' on clean energy cuts and threatened to vote against it. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, who voted for the House bill, has also objected to the energy provisions and vowed to oppose the current Senate bill. Roy also warned GOP leaders not to use the July 4 deadline to try and force members to swallow a bill that isn't palatable to them. 'Rumor is Senate plans to jam the House with its weaker, unacceptable [One Big Beautiful Bill] before 7/4. This is not a surprise but it would be a mistake,' Roy said on X. 'The bill in its current Senate form would increase deficits, continue most Green New Scam subsidies, & otherwise fail even a basic smell test... I would not vote for it as it is.' Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., pointed to another reason the process is slow: the bill is still being vetted by the parliamentarian to make sure it complies with Senate rules limiting the bill's provisions to budget matters, a process known as the 'Byrd bath.' 'There's only so much you can pre-negotiate, because the bill is still changing over here as a result of a Byrd bath. I think we're almost done with the Byrd bath. We're making progress in terms of talking through it, but I think we're headed toward the bill hitting the floor sometime toward the end of the week,' Kennedy said. 'And then will everybody be happy? No. But everybody will have a chance to offer an amendment or two.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who attended Tuesday's Senate Republican meeting, said afterward that he expects a solution on the state and local deduction "in the next 24-48 hours." A decisive group of House Republicans from states like New York and California is threatening to sink the entire bill unless the SALT cap is at least $40,000 per tax filer. But Senate Republicans have no interest is raising the cap to that level in because none of them represent blue states where the deduction is a big issue. Bessent added that the U.S. "getting close to the warning track" on the debt limit, which he has urged Congress to raise before August in order to prevent a default by that month's deadline.
