Iraq probes mass die-off of fish in southern marshlands
Iraqi authorities on Monday launched a probe into a mass die-off of fish in the southern marshlands, the latest in a string of such events in recent years.
One possible cause for the localized die-off could be a shortage of oxygen sparked by low water flow, increased evaporation and rising temperatures fueled by climate change.
Another possible reason could be chemicals used by fishermen to make it easier to catch their prey, local officials and activists told AFP.
AFP images showed large quantities of silver fish floating in the marshlands of Ibn Najm near the southern city of Najaf.
Buffaloes could be seen surrounded by dead fish, trying to cool themselves off in the water.
'We have received several citizens' complaints,' said chief environmental officer in Najaf, Jamal Abd Zeid, adding that a technical inspection team had been set up.
An AFP photographer at the site saw a team of civil servants collecting water from the marshland.
Among the issues the team was tasked with probing, Abd Zeid said, were a shortage of water, electrical fishing and the use by fishermen of 'poisons.'
For at least five years, Iraq has been hit by successive droughts fueled by climate change.
Authorities also blame the construction of dams by neighboring Iran and Turkey for the drastic drop in flow in Iraq's rivers.
The destruction of Iraq's natural environment is only the latest layer of suffering imposed on a country that has endured decades of war and political oppression.
'We need lab tests to determine the exact cause' of the fish die-off, said environmental activist Jassim al-Assadi.
A lack of oxygen caused by low water flow, heat, evaporation and wind were all possible reasons, he said.
He said agricultural pesticides could also have led to the mass die-off.
Probes into other similar events showed the use of poison in fishing led to mass deaths.
'It is dangerous for public health, as well as for the food chain,' Assadi said.
'Using poison today, then again in a month or two... It's going to accumulate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
Believe it or not, the world is getting warmer
If you live in the Middle East, then you have no doubt noticed it has been quite warm recently. That is not a political statement, fake news or a conspiracy. It is hot this year — records have already been broken. And the worrying thing is that it is not going to get any cooler, certainly not for the next five years. According to a report published last week by the UN's World Meteorological Organization: 'Global climate predictions show temperatures are expected to continue at or near record levels in the next five years, increasing climate risks and impacts on societies, economies and sustainable development.' The report states that there is an 80 percent chance at least one year between 2025 and 2029 will be the warmest on record. We should all be concerned by this because many world leaders and, sadly, some prospective future leaders seem intent on increasing the use of fossil fuels. The planet is becoming a dangerous place to live, but we have nowhere else to go. If we mess up this planet, there is no contingency — no Noah's Ark. If the planet overheats, we will suffer with it. And if not us, then our children or their children face a worrying future, and that does not sit easily with me. The biggest producers of greenhouse gases, the rich nations, are doing little to nothing to prevent this Peter Harrison Increased temperatures increase risks for all of us. They cause droughts, which lead to food shortages. Without water, we cannot grow crops to feed people or rear the livestock we so heavily depend on. Although, as a side note, we should consider limiting our meat consumption. Meat farming is heavy on fuel and offers low returns — it takes an average of 3kg of cereals to produce 1kg of meat. Rising temperatures will also lead to an increase in the rate at which the ice caps melt. As melted ice is water, when it enters a body of water — such as the sea — and there is nowhere for it to go, the level rises. So, look forward to more flooding and more frequent, heavier and less manageable rainstorms, like those that occurred last year in the UAE and Oman. For the next five years, there is a high chance of the average annual temperature exceeding the figure of 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels agreed in Paris in 2015. Global average temperatures are likely to be 1.2 C to 1.9 C higher between 2025 and 2029. This might not seem like much, but scientists say the planet's temperature only needs to increase by 2 C and the Marshall Islands will likely disappear under the Pacific Ocean — that means entire communities swept away. And the biggest producers of greenhouse gases, the rich nations, are doing little to nothing to prevent this. It seems amazing that there are still people in the world — people of influence and power — who spread the message of climate change denial. These are usually people who stand to benefit in the short term from the sale of fossil fuels, but they will suffer in the long run just as much as the rest of us, as will their children. Climate change and global warming are facts, they should not be up for discussion. According to a UN report, 'climate change is already affecting every region on Earth.' This 2023 report cited changes in rainfall patterns, rising sea levels and more frequent and intense extreme weather conditions as just some of the impacts. The report made the simple but bold statement: 'The science is clear.' It added that, to avert the worst-case scenario and 'preserve a livable planet, global warming needs to be limited as much as possible and as a matter of urgency.' A particularly effective way to reduce the amount of harmful greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere is through the use of clean energy. Another side note is that gas, while the cleanest of the fossil fuels, still emits harmful gasses when burned. According to UN reports, Costa Rica, Norway, Iceland, Paraguay and Uruguay use 100 percent sustainable energy sources such as hydro, geothermal, wind and solar. Some parts of the world are even producing more power than they need from sustainable sources, meaning they are able to sell on any surplus. Some parts of the world are even producing more power than they need from sustainable sources Peter Harrison It is argued that renewable energy sources are expensive, take up a lot of land and require large and expensive storage systems for when conditions hinder the production of power. But according to a report on the website ScienceDirect, the solar panels now being made need only operate for four to eight months to make up for the emissions produced during their manufacturing process. And, while there is also an impact when they are decommissioned, this only comes about after 25 to 30 years of use. The same report also points to wind turbines, which take about seven months to produce enough clean electricity to make up for the carbon pollution generated during their manufacture, while their life span is 20 to 25 years. The world is getting warmer, there is no debating that. People still do, but highly qualified scientists tell us the planet is getting warmer and this needs to be slowed before the damage done is so bad that life becomes a challenge. There are things we can do, such as turning off lights when they are not being used and setting the air conditioning a few degrees warmer. It is not necessary to have the AC set at 19 C or running all day when you are out. If you are going somewhere that is only a few minutes away by car then, where possible, walk — it is great exercise. And eat less meat. We do not need to eat as much meat as we currently do. The World Cancer Research Fund says we should consume no more than three portions of red meat each week and reduce the amount of processed meat we eat. It is not good for us or the environment. The politicians are dragging their feet on this, but we can all make a difference. If not for you, then surely there must be some level of compassion attached to your hope for the future of your children and their children.
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
Scientists long ago envisioned the end of climate cooperation
PARIS: They warned it could happen: a world of surging nationalism, stalling economic development and the unravelling of decades of international cooperation on climate change and other global challenges. Long before Donald Trump lurched away from diplomatic norms and the international rules-based order, scientists mapped out different potential futures to understand the possible implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Developed a decade ago, five of these "pathways" became crucial to the work of the United Nations' IPCC climate expert panel. These are not predictions for the 21st century. Rather, they envision what could happen with various societal changes including for trade, economic development, technological innovation and global population. The most optimistic narrative foresees sustainable growth and improved equality. A second "middle-of-the-road" scenario is an extension of current trends. The third is a world riven by rivalries, a fourth is blighted by increasing inequality, and the fifth assumes supercharged economic growth grounded in expanding fossil fuel use. Keywan Riahi, of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, who coordinated the development of the so-called Shared Socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), said the world has largely developed in line with the third scenario in recent years. While it is certainly not a perfect fit, what we see now "is a much more fragmented world," Riahi told AFP. "Collaboration is more difficult, economic development is actually also not so optimistic." Scientists' original description of the SSP3 scenario was: "A resurgent nationalism, concerns about competitiveness and security, and regional conflicts push countries to increasingly focus on domestic or, at most, regional issues." This "rocky road" is arguably the worst of all the hypothetical futures. Planet-heating emissions are second only to economic expansion driven by oil, gas and coal. But the fractured SSP3 world ranks first when it comes to damages from climate change, showing the largest population boom, and the weakest economic growth. This scenario "reflects a current strain of populist isolationist politics that is ascendent today", climate scientist Zeke Hausfather noted in a recent newsletter post. In 2021, Hausfather got blowback for calling SSP3 "Trump World". But "the actions in his second term around energy and trade seem to be playing out much more closely to SSP3 than other pathways", he said. The US has ditched the Paris climate treaty, turned its back on global cooperation on science, trade and health, and eviscerating its international development budget. Washington has lambasted UN sustainable development goals, especially related to climate change and women's rights. Domestically, the world's second biggest carbon polluter has undermined progress on low-carbon technology, cancelled climate research, and even stymied weather data collection. World leaders have expressed their disquiet. "The global economy thrived on a foundation of openness and multilateralism underpinned by US leadership... but today it is fracturing," said European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde in late May. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney declared the global trade system in place for 80 years "over", and China's Xi Jinping urged the preservation of "the international order based on international law, and global fairness and justice". There are important ways in which today's reality differs from the hypothetical SSP3 world. World population projections are significantly lower, for instance. And the development of climate tech has been "much more successful", Riahi said. A dramatic drop in the cost of solar and wind power, as well as electric vehicles and batteries, has boosted the growth of low-carbon technologies. Carbon dioxide emissions have also slowed, while predicted warming for the end of the century is lower than a decade ago -- albeit still reaching catastrophic levels. Scientists are currently updating SSP projections and crafting a new set of climate narratives. They have much to unpack. Riahi said that even if there was a "complete collapse of climate policies globally", the previous worst-case emissions projections will likely not materialise because clean energy has become so cheap. At the same time, he said, the world will almost certainly overshoot the Paris deal's aspirational goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels in the coming years. This has forced scientists to consider a new set of questions. What is the new best-case scenario for bending emissions down to zero? If current policies persist, will emissions stay high for a longer period, causing temperatures to keep rising in the coming decades? "What are the implications climatically of this high overshoot, which is unfortunately a more and more likely scenario if you extrapolate what we see at the moment?" said Riahi.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 days ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Smoke From Canadian Fires Reaches Europe, Says EU Climate Monitor
Heavy smoke from intense wildfires in Canada has reached northwestern Europe, the European Union's climate monitoring service said on Tuesday. The huge plumes are at very high altitude and do not pose an immediate health risk, it said in a statement. "Smoke originating from the wildfires in the Canadian provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan has been transported across the Atlantic," the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) said. Satellites tracked the smoke in mid-May, with some plumes reaching as far east as Greece and the eastern Mediterranean. "A second, much larger, smoke plume crossed the Atlantic during the last week of May, reaching northwestern parts of Europe on June 1," CAMS said. Additional plumes are expected to shade the continent in the coming days. Wildfire smoke is comprised of gaseous pollutants such as carbon monoxide, along with water vapor and particle pollution, which can be particularly hazardous to health. A high concentration of carbon monoxide is expected to pass over northwestern France, including the Paris Basin, on Tuesday. The high-altitude smoke headed for Europe is not expected to have a significant impact on surface air quality, but is likely to result in hazy skies and reddish-orange sunsets. Manitoba in central Canada is experiencing its worst start to the fire season in years due to drought, and Saskatchewan to the west declared a state of emergency at the end of May, evacuating thousands of residents. "Central regions of Canada have experienced a very intense few weeks in terms of wildfire emissions," said Mark Parrington, scientific director at CAMS. Canadian authorities have forecast a more intense fire season than usual this summer in central and western Canada, due in particular to severe or extreme drought. Elsewhere, extensive forest fires have been raging in Russia's Far Eastern Federal District since early April, particularly east of Lake Baikal, generating carbon emissions of around 35 million tons, Copernicus reported.
