logo
Urbana Dems, the county board has a spot for you

Urbana Dems, the county board has a spot for you

Yahoo6 hours ago

Jun. 16—Ds want you
The Champaign County Board has a vacancy to fill, prompting the local Democratic Party to solicit applications from individuals interested in serving from District 10 in Urbana.
The vacancy was created by board Democrat Chris Stohr's decision to resign after he was appointed to serve on the board of the local sanitary district.
Local party officials have set a July 6 deadline for submission of an application. A link to the application can be found on the party's website.
District 10 is located in east central Urbana. Specifically, party officials said it is "generally bound by Airport Road to the north, County Road 2000 E to the east, Homer Lake Road and Windsor Road to the south, and Cedar Street, Vine Street, and Anderson Court to the west."
Applications will be reviewed by Democratic precinct committee members, and the name of the preferred applicant will be submitted to Jen Locke, who heads the county board.
She, in turn, is expected to ask the full county board to approve the nomination.
The individual who is nominated and confirmed will be required to run for the post in the November 2026 general election. That individual might, if another Democratic chooses to seek the office, be required to run for the party's nomination in the March 2026 primary election.
Campaign calumny
There may be no cryin' in baseball, but there definitely is lyin' in politics.
That's why a recent Cook County jury award of $1.475 million to a defeated Chicago aldermanic candidate is stunning.
A jury ordered the political organizations of Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle and Alderman Lamont Robinson to pay the punitive damages for making defamatory statements about Ebony Lucas, a real-estate lawyer who ran and lost for Chicago City Council.
Lucas charged the pair made repeated false statements about her in campaign mailers and text messages. The effect was a "coordinated smear campaign alleging Lucas had unpaid liens and fines" for business-related misconduct.
Lucas said the jury decision represents a "stand for truth in our elections," expressing gratitude to jurors for "seeing through the falsehoods and delivering justice."
Robinson vowed to appeal, charging the lawsuit was "politically motivated."
Well, of course it was. The lawsuit was about tawdry tactics in an election campaign.
Preckwinkle also promised to appeal and expressed confidence the jury's verdict will be overturned.
Perhaps. But in the meantime, the jury's decision not only raises questions of law, but also questions of political tactic.
The lie is a politician's best friend.
What exactly are candidates for public office supposed to do in a campaign if lying about their opponents is off limits? Perhaps, as an alternative, they could tell lies about themselves by vastly exaggerating their qualifications and abilities.
Blast from past
Anyone remember a guy named Joe Walsh?
No, not the aging rock star or the British soccer player.
The Joe Walsh in question is the former one-term Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives (2010-12) whose incendiary conservative rhetoric foreshadowed his political doom. He was defeated in his bid for re-election by current Democratic U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth.
The former social worker-turned-politician-turned-radio show host later left the GOP to become an independent. Now he says he's a Democrat.
Walsh recently announced he's moving from Illinois to South Carolina and said he may run for the U.S. Senate against GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham.
Given Walsh's history, the Dems may not want him. But what's done is done, at least for now.
Walsh said he's still a conservative but hates President Trump, whom he called a "tyrant," and the Republican Party.
Capitol Hill showdown
Gov. J.B. Pritzker was loaded for bear when he appeared last week before a hostile GOP congressional committee looking into sanctuary policies for illegal immigrants in various cities and states.
The subject of crimes committed by those in the country illegally came up, one involving the death of Katie Abraham in an Urbana car crash.
She was killed in January by a suspected drunken driver illegally in the United States. He was subsequently arrested and faces trial.
Illinois U.S. Rep. Mary Miller attempted to question Pritzker about "rolling out the red carpet" for the many thousands of illegal immigrants in Illinois. But Pritzker ignored her question and launched an obviously pre-planned rhetorical counter-attack.
"I am not going to be lectured to by someone who extolled the virtues of Adolf Hitler," Pritzker said, alluding to Miller's 2021 comments referencing the German dictator's emphasis on presenting propaganda that was embraced by young people.
The hearing turned into a political game of "gotcha," with Pritzker, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz exchanging insults and observations on a variety of subjects with GOP committee members.
Walz was not as well prepared in the sound-bite game as Pritzker, as indicated by an exchange with Republican U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina.
Another Republican asked Pritzker if he had ever used women's bathrooms.
"Not that I recall," he replied.
On the down low
When Gov. J.B. Pritzker runs for president in 2028, there's one study of Illinois' economic health he'll forget to mention.
The personal finance website WalletHub released its list of best and worst state economies.
Illinois ranked 40th for its state economy but dead last in the economic health category.
A Center Square news account said researcher Chip Lupo established three key categories focusing on "economic activity, economic health and innovation potential."
"Then we applied 28 relevant metrics, and those run everything from GDP growth, start-up activity and share of jobs in high-tech industries," said Lupo.
He said, "Illinois ranked 48th in change in non-farm payrolls, 41st in economic activity, and scored poorly for high foreclosure rates and the state's unemployment rate."
Illinois' unemployment rate is 4.8 percent, one of the highest in the country, and is in the top 10 for states with the biggest increases in unemployment claims.
WalletHub said Massachusetts has the best state economy while Iowa has the worst.
"Illinois will under-perform the region and the U.S. in 2025, with gross state product, employment, and income increasing less than elsewhere," the report's summary said.
Lupo said, "the best state economies encourage growth by being friendly to new businesses and investing in new technology that will help the state deal with future challenges."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FIFA has taken us for fools over its promise to fight racism
FIFA has taken us for fools over its promise to fight racism

New York Times

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Times

FIFA has taken us for fools over its promise to fight racism

Maybe ultimately, we're the fools. Because did we expect anything else from FIFA? Did we really believe world football's governing body was going to make use of the colossal platform available to it? Did we actually think it was going to do even the bare minimum? The news that FIFA has decided not to display any anti-racism or anti-discrimination messaging during games at the ongoing Club World Cup in the United States came with a grim inevitability. Despite rustling up some promotional materials for its 'no racism' and 'no discrimination' initiatives, none have been used so far in the first week of the tournament. There has been nothing in the stadiums, on social media, on captains' armbands. Anywhere at all, in fact. Advertisement When asked by The Athletic, FIFA did not comment on whether there was a link between this decision and the increasingly close relationship between its president Gianni Infantino and the competition's host nation's President Donald Trump, but as soon as it became clear that Infantino was prioritising nurturing that bond over, say, actually running FIFA, it probably should have been obvious that this was going to happen. Trump's attempts to eradicate anything that faintly smells of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) — three words which he has, astonishingly, managed to redefine as bad things — already appear to have spilt over into sport. February's Super Bowl was the first in four years not to have 'End racism' messaging in the stadium. In March, an article on the U.S. Department of Defense's website celebrating Jackie Robinson, the former soldier who became the first man to break the colour barrier in Major League Baseball (MLB), was removed amid a purge of government web content relating to DEI. The article on Robinson was eventually restored, but the direction of travel was clear. So, when it came to FIFA and launching its new, greatly expanded Club World Cup with this first edition in the States, this was probably a case of when, rather than if. From a strictly pragmatic, realpolitik point of view, you could argue that it's sensible for Infantino to cosy up to the president of the country hosting your next two global events, with much of the national-team World Cup next year being played in the U.S. too. But if that means abandoning any moral principles you have, or at least pretend to have, is it worth it? Instead, FIFA's big message for this tournament is its 'Football Unites the World' slogan, which is displayed on captains' armbands, but not in many other places. Advertisement Football unites the world. Sure. But behind what? What is the force for good here? If you're saying that football has a broader social impact beyond just the game, then you have to give us something tangible to prove the point. Otherwise, it's just meaningless. Still, perhaps that's the point. At various intervals, FIFA and Infantino have spoken solemnly about their commitment to anti-racism. In January 2024, he encouraged the idea that teams should forfeit matches in the event of racist incidents. FIFA's 2022 World Cup sustainability report included a promise to carry out 'diversity and anti-discrimination awareness-raising initiatives.' Good idea. If nothing else, football should be used to raise awareness. It's the most popular sport in the world, arguably the biggest cultural force on the planet. When, though, if not at the Club World Cup, the tournament FIFA has been telling us for years is going to be the greatest show on earth? Would this not have been a pretty good opportunity to plaster everything with strong messaging, to make sure that if any viewers took anything from watching these games in America, it was that FIFA was committed to anti-discrimination? It's a particularly Eurocentric point of view to label this tournament a waste of time, another brick placed on top of the Jenga tower that is the international football schedule. But it has much more value and holds much more interest to fans and clubs from other parts of the world. It is far from insignificant. So at the very least, it could have been used as a platform, a method of influencing and drawing attention to the things that FIFA say it is committed to. Football's messaging when it comes to discrimination messaging is generally dishwater-weak as it is. UEFA, the game's European governing body, used to display a video before games in its competitions where famous football figures would stare into the camera and intone, in their native language, 'No to racism'. A noble sentiment, although it's stretching credibility to think that a racist would see, say, Pavel Nedved telling them that this sort of thing is not on, and thus change their ways. Advertisement But at least it was something. FIFA isn't even doing that. Comparisons will be made to the row over the 'One Love' armbands a few teams suggested they were going to wear during matches at the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, an idea that FIFA nixed pretty quickly, and indeed pre-emptively banned from the Women's World Cup in Australia and New Zealand the following year. That was an external initiative, though: from a corporate perspective, it was consistent with its stance that only FIFA-approved messaging could be used. This is different. This is FIFA actively jettisoning something it has previously declared to be a precious part of football's social fabric, apparently because it is politically inconvenient. It all begs the question: if you can't even rely on FIFA to publicise what it claims to stand for, then what's the point? FIFA didn't comment on its plans for the actual World Cup next summer, to be hosted in the United States, Canada and Mexico, but it doesn't bode well. What will the slogan be for that? 'Can everyone just be nice?' 'Please don't be mean to each other'? Could this be watered-down even further, to homeopathic levels? If anyone can, FIFA can. It shouldn't be that hard to present some sort of worthwhile message, even if these are often frustratingly milquetoast. Major League Soccer and MLB recently carried out Pride initiatives, as did the Premier League. Teams in England were still taking the knee before games at the end of the most recent domestic season. But even that seems beyond FIFA. Again, perhaps this is our fault. Expect nothing, and you won't be disappointed. Expect the most basic expression of humanity, and you will. This is FIFA, after all.

In ‘Not My Type,' E. Jean Carroll Gets the Last Gab About the Trump Trials
In ‘Not My Type,' E. Jean Carroll Gets the Last Gab About the Trump Trials

New York Times

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Times

In ‘Not My Type,' E. Jean Carroll Gets the Last Gab About the Trump Trials

NOT MY TYPE: One Woman vs. a President, by E. Jean Carroll We already know that E. Jean Carroll looked smashing when she went to court versus Donald J. Trump. But her irrepressible voice was, necessarily, repressed. For 27 years, with countless exclamation points and emphatic italics, Carroll wrote the 'Ask E. Jean' column for Elle magazine, focusing on the perils of modern dating. Advice columns, a quaint holdover from the heyday of print you'd think ChatGPT would make redundant, remain curiously ubiquitous. Yet even in a crowded field, this adrenalized agony aunt, currently on Substack, stands out, with her giddy feminism (her tuxedo cat is named Vagina T. Fireball); literary references (the Great Pyrenees dog: Miss Havisham); and runaway retro expressions like 'egads!' and 'twitpiffle.' Testifying in depositions and two trials, however, Carroll was instructed by her lawyers to keep her answers short. 'Very, very short,' she writes in 'Not My Type,' a delightful full-gallop account of the experience, and sequel of sorts to 'What Do We Need Men For?' (2019), in which she first accused Trump of assaulting her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room. 'I receive the impression that saying nothing at all would be best,' she adds. Now she is saying pretty much everything, including a few evidentiary morsels not introduced at trial. Like that Jeffrey Epstein, Trump's friend, had heard and gossiped about what had happened. And a 1987 'Spy 100' issue listed Bergdorf dressing rooms in an article about places for 'lunchtime adultery.' The man the magazine called a 'short-fingered vulgarian' was among those on the cover. Trump has plenty of his own insults at hand, of course. Indeed the title 'Not My Type' is taken from one about why he never would have advanced on the unconsenting Carroll: 'No. 1, she's not my type.' (He did, however, mistake her in an old photo for one of his exes, Marla Maples.) 'No. 2, it never happened,' he added. 'It never happened, OK?' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store