
The suspension of Thailand's prime minister over a leaked phone call stirs familiar turmoil
BANGKOK — The Constitutional Court's suspension of Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has raised questions about whether her family's political comeback last year would end with another downfall.
Paetongtarn was the third prime minister in her family, after her father, Thaksin Shinawatra, a telecom billionaire who has been one of Thailand's top political operators, and her aunt, Yingluck Shinawatra, who was the country's first female prime minister. Thaksin was ousted by a military coup in 2006 and Yingluck by a court ruling in 2014.
Thaksin remained beloved after his ouster among voters who saw in him and his allies a government that looked after their interests. While campaigning in 2022, Paetongtarn acknowledged her family ties but insisted she was not her father's proxy. 'It's not the shadow of my dad. I am my dad's daughter, always and forever, but I have my own decisions,' she said.
She also said she hoped her government would be able to 'build opportunity and quality of life' and 'make the country go forward.'
Paetongtarn was suspended Tuesday by the court pending an ethics investigation a leaked phone call with senior Cambodian leader Hun Sen that was perceived as damaging to Thailand's interests and image.
Her critics have said Paetongtarn's government has achieved little. Marriage equality became law but was initiated under her predecessor. Controls on cannabis were retightened after public backlash over decriminalization, but the move and its enforcement were called rushed and confusing.
Her critics also cited unsatisfactory outcomes in other Pheu Thai party policies, like unequal minimum wage increases, constant changes in a cash handout program and the stalled and controversial legalization of casinos . They also noted the lack of progress in tariffs talks with the United States.
But analysts see the leaked call following border tensions with Cambodia to be the most disastrous event by far.
The outrage has centered on Paetongtarn's comments about an outspoken Thai army commander and the perception that she was trying to appease Hun Sen.
Paetongtarn apologized but also denied that she had damaged the country. She ignored calls for her to resign or dissolve Parliament to take responsibility, which critics saw as an attempt by the Pheu Thai party to cling to power.
Napon Jatusripitak, a political science researcher at Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, said her response seemed 'totally disconnected from political reality' and that the scandal has exposed 'her leadership failures and fuels accusations that she prioritizes family interests over national welfare.'
Her father, Thaksin, is believed to be the key decision maker behind Pheu Thai, now led by Paetongtarn. Time and again, Thaksin-backed parties have prevailed in national elections but could not stay in office after legal rulings and destabilizing street protests engineered by Thaksin's die-hard foes.
But in 2023, Thaksin alienated many of his old supporters with what looked like a self-serving deal with his former conservative opponents. It allowed his return from exile and his party to form the new government, while sidelining the progressive Move Forward Party , which finished first in a national election but was seen by the conservative establishment as a greater threat.
Now with the current crisis, things could drastically change for the Shinawatra family.
'In light of the recent controversy, the Shinawatra spell has been broken. The only viable Shinawatra scion is now tainted,' Napon said. 'It would be an understatement to say that the Shinawatra name no longer guarantees electoral success.'
And not everything has been squared away with her family's enemies. Yingluck remains in exile, and legal problems — arguably politically inspired — could send her to prison if she returns to Thailand. Thaksin also still faces some legal challenges .
Thailand's royalist establishment has long been disturbed that Thaksin's populist policies appeared to threaten their status and that of the monarchy at the heart of Thai identity.
Paetongtarn now also faces protests by familiar faces from the same conservative, pro-royalist group that opposed her father.
'History seems to be repeating itself in a way. Thailand seems trapped in a depressingly familiar cycle where Shinawatra-led governments come to power, only to face mounting pressure from traditional power centers, street protests, and extraparliamentary interventions that ultimately force them from office,' Napon said.
Paetongtarn, 38, is the youngest of Thaksin's three children. She was an executive in a hotel business run by her family before making her public entry into politics in 2021 when the Pheu Thai party named her to lead an advisory committee.
She has two children with her husband, Pitaka Suksawat, who was a commercial pilot before he began working in one of the Shinawatras' real estate ventures.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer defends his record in power as biggest revolt of his premiership looms
Sir Keir Starmer has defended his Government's record over its first year in office, all while he faces the largest revolt of his premiership. The Prime Minister insisted at a meeting of senior ministers that his team could look back with a 'real sense of pride and achievement' as the July 5 anniversary of his first year in office nears. The Government's work has focused on giving working people a 'chance to thrive, not just survive', a Downing Street spokesman said, as Labour backbenchers continue to threaten a rebellion over welfare reforms they insist will have a negative impact on disabled people. The welfare reform Bill will have its first airing in the Commons on Tuesday, and some Labour backbenchers continue to say they will vote to halt the legislation, after a much larger rebellion was quelled by ministers last week. Sir Keir opened the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning by telling senior ministers the welfare reforms are 'designed to help those who can work into employment and ensure dignity and security for those who can't work', a No 10 spokesman said. 'He then reflected on the last year in office, saying we could all rightly look back with a real sense of pride and achievement,' the spokesman added. No 10 pointed to the three trade deals struck with India, the US, and the EU, the extra investment in the spending review, and a cut in NHS waiting lists among the Government's achievements one year on. The spokesman added: 'He said the Government's work is all designed and focused on improving the lives of working people and giving them the chance to thrive, not just survive, and the Government should be proud of those achievements as a team.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds had earlier urged Labour MPs to back the reforms package, and warned that retreating entirely from them would mean losing the chance to 'make any changes for the better whatsoever' and undermining 'public support'. 'I'd ask (colleagues) to support the Government on that basis, because clearly what we've got here is something which is better than the existing system,' Mr Reynolds told Sky News on Tuesday morning. Ministers hope a partial U-turn on the benefit cuts, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of universal credit, are enough to win over Labour rebels. Ahead of the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill's second reading in the Commons on Tuesday evening, 39 Labour backbenchers have signed an amendment aimed at halting its progress. Leading rebel Rachael Maskell has warned 'many more' have told her they still plan to vote against the Government's plans than those who have signed up. Asked whether MPs would lose the whip for voting against the Government, Mr Reynolds said he was 'not aware of anything like that' but 'those issues are for the chief whip'. To see off the threat of far greater rebellion, the Government last week softened the impact of its changes to protect some 370,000 existing Pip claimants who had been set to lose out following reassessment. Some 126 Labour MPs had signed that previous 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, which would have stopped the legislation if approved. Ministers also committed to a review of the system, involving disabled people and led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, and unfreezing the higher UC rate for those already claiming the health-related element. But critics have argued the concessions risk creating a 'three-tier' system of disparity between existing and new claimants, as well as any future changes that emerge as a result of the Timms review. Facing questions from broadcasters on Tuesday morning, Mr Reynolds insisted it was 'entirely normal' for existing entitlements to be 'grandfathered' during major changes to the welfare system.


Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
World leader suspended from office over leaked phone call after deadly border dispute
Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended from office on Tuesday amid an ongoing ethics investigation over a leaked phone call with a senior Cambodian leader. "I only thought about what to do to avoid troubles, what to do to avoid armed confrontation, for the soldiers not to suffer any loss. I wouldn't be able to accept it if I said something with the other leader that could lead to negative consequences," Paetongtarn said, according to the Associated Press. Judges on the country's Constitutional Court voted unanimously on a petition accusing her of violating ethics, but voted 7–2 to suspend her, the Associated Press reported. Additionally, they gave Paetongtarn just under two weeks — 12 days — to provide the court with evidence. The suspension comes after a phone call that was allegedly between Paetongtarn and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen. The call, which led to widespread backlash and protests, became a flashpoint after a May 2025 incident in which the two countries engaged in a border dispute that left one Cambodian soldier dead, according to the Associated Press. Cambodian army spokesperson Mao Phalla said the country's troops were conducting a routine patrol when the Thai troops opened fire, the Associated Press reported. However, the Thai army claimed the Cambodian troops had entered a disputed area and that they were responding to gunfire. After the phone call leaked, the streets of Bangkok were filled with protesters calling for Paetongtarn's ouster. "My true intention in the leaked conversation, my true intention 100%, was to work for the country to maintain our sovereignty and save the lives of all our soldiers," Paetongtarn reportedly told the press. Thailand has seen its share of political upheaval in recent years. Paetongtarn's predecessor, Srettha Thavisin, was dismissed by the court last year over an ethics violation.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Indian state proposes seven-year jail term for spreading ‘fake news'
A southern Indian state is working on legislation to tackle the spread of 'fake news' by imposing jail terms of up to seven years, a move that could collide with free speech rights. A draft bill prepared by the government in Karnataka, the country's information technology hub, seeks to punish anyone posting 'fake news', 'anti-feminist' content or 'promoting superstition' with imprisonment and fines. India has long been plagued by the problem of fake news. Indeed, misinformation, particularly online, has been blamed for inciting religious polarisation and even deadly sectarian strife in a country with over a billion internet users. Although the federal government has, contentiously, put in place some measures, backed by legislation, to regulate social media content, Karnataka has become the first state to enact its own measures to tackle the fake news 'menace'. The draft Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News Prohibition Bill doesn't define the misinformation offences it aims to punish but provides for special courts and regulatory committees to implement the legislation. According to state officials defending the draft bill, fake news is a menace plaguing news dissemination, causing conflicts and inflaming an already communally sensitive atmosphere, and so punishing people spreading fake news does not interfere with the rights of those speaking facts. Karnataka registered 259 cases over the sharing and broadcasting of fake news on news or social media between 2023 and March this year, the state home department said. Only six of the cases resulted in conviction and penalties, however. Hello @apar1984,As I mentioned a few days ago, there appears to be some misunderstanding around the proposed misinformation sole objective is to address the growing digital information disorder. Our focus is strictly on tackling misinformation, disinformation,… — Priyank Kharge / ಪ್ರಿಯಾಂಕ್ ಖರ್ಗೆ (@PriyankKharge) June 29, 2025 The Indian government has over the years accused tech giants like Google and Meta of being slow in removing 'fake news' posts. In 2019, it set up a "Fact Check Unit" within the information and broadcasting ministry to refute what it would label misinformation and fake news. It routinely sends legal demands for social media platforms to take down content and block accounts wholesale. In the wake of a military confrontation with Pakistan in May, New Delhi had platforms like X block thousands of accounts in the country. 'There's a clear distinction between what's a fact and what's not a fact. Somewhere in the last 10 years, a huge chunk of the population has lost the ability to discern the difference between an opinion and a news report. An opinion need not be true,' Lavanya Ballal Jain, a spokesperson for the Congress party, which heads the Karnataka government, said, defending the bill. She said Karnataka had witnessed many incidents of community disharmony due to social media posts that weren't factual. 'In coastal Karnataka, where fake news is rampant, we are not seeing just one or two incidents but multiple incidents which have prompted us to take this step,' she told The Independent. The government understood the 'difference between freedom of speech and unbridled freedom to say whatever you want to say', she said when asked whether the proposed law would interfere with freedom of speech. 'The sole objective is to address the growing digital information disorder. Our focus is strictly on tackling misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, and fake news, and nothing beyond that,' the state's minister for information technology, Priyank Kharge, said. But Apar Gupta, founder of the digital advocacy group Internet Freedom Foundation, cautioned that such legislation could have far-reaching impact, including on constitutional rights. "Misinformation is fairly subjective and every person who uses the internet is susceptible to falling within the dragnet of this law," Mr Gupta told Reuters. Assuring the draft bill wasn't a tool to be weaponised, the Congress party spokesperson said the state intended to crack down on fake news and deep fakes like in the rest of the world. 'It is actually a little too late in the day for India to wake up and form or frame laws for this because we have been seeing deepfake AI videos and everything on the spectrum. The world is changing,' she said.