On the 10th anniversary of the U.S. legalizing gay marriage, Jim Obergefell says the fight isn't over
A decade after the Supreme Court's historic Obergefell v. Hodges decision legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, some advocates fear the fight for marriage equality is far from over. Among them is Jim Obergefell, the plaintiff in the case, who became the face of the 2015 decision and has continued to advocate for LGBTQ rights.
'Ten years later, I certainly wasn't expecting to be talking about the threats to marriage equality, the potential for Obergefell to be overturned,' Obergefell told NBC News in an interview.
The 2015 ruling was a turning point for LGBTQ rights. But Obergefell said he fears recent comments from conservative Supreme Court justices may signal a willingness to overturn it, particularly after the court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, ending the constitutional right to abortion.
'For 49 years, people grew up with that right, and then with the proverbial stroke of a pen on that decision, that right was taken away,' Obergefell said. 'We have to learn from that.'
In his concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the case that overturned Roe, Justice Clarence Thomas explicitly mentioned Obergefell as a decision that the high court should reconsider, raising alarms among same-sex marriage advocates. Justice Samuel Alito, in a separate 2024 opinion, also expressed concerns about the Obergefell decision, warning that Americans who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds could be labeled as bigots.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court to issue term's final rulings on Friday
WASHINGTON, June 26 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court will issue its final rulings of its current term on Friday, Chief Justice John Roberts said. It has yet to resolve several important cases, including one involving President Donald Trump's bid to limit birthright citizenship as well as others involving Obamacare, age verification for online pornography and LGBT story books in elementary schools. Due to the unusual procedural nature of the birthright citizenship case, which was brought to the court on an emergency basis but was argued before the justices, a decision in that case could be among the court rulings issued on Friday. Trump signed an executive order to restrict birthright citizenship, a move that would affect thousands of babies born each year in the United States. Federal judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts blocked Trump's order, finding it likely violates the Constitution's 14th Amendment citizenship language. The administration is seeking to broadly enforce the directive. The court also could act at any time in other pending disputes on its emergency docket including Trump's bids to carry out mass job cuts at federal agencies and gut the Department of Education. Other cases awaiting rulings include ones involving preventive care under the Obamacare law, opting children out of certain classes in a Maryland school district when with LGBT characters are read, Louisiana electoral districts and the Federal Communications Commission's mechanism to fund a multi-billion dollar effort to phone and broadband internet access.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Gay state senator zings Republicans over their new ‘Daddy Trump' nickname
Watch as a gay state senator takes a jab at Republicans over their new nickname of 'Daddy Trump' for the US president. Republican Jonathan Lindsey addressed fellow senate members in Michigan on Wednesday (25 June), where he said many Americans see Donald Trump as a 'father figure' and embraced the new moniker. In response, gay Democratic Michigan senator Jeremey Moss fired back: 'You don't want to know what daddy means in my community,' which was met with applause and laughter. The US president's new nickname was bestowed upon him during a Nato summit in The Hague, when the secretary general defended Mr's Trump's foul-mouthed outburst against Iran and Israel on Tuesday (24 June). Mr Rutte excused the rant, saying: 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Supreme Court has 6 cases to decide, including birthright citizenship
The Supreme Court is in the final days of a term that has lately been dominated by the Trump administration's emergency appeals of lower court orders seeking to slow President Donald Trump 's efforts to remake the federal government. But the justices also have six cases to resolve that were argued between January and mid-May. One of the argued cases was an emergency appeal, the administration's bid to be allowed to enforce Trump's executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally. The remaining opinions will be delivered Friday, Chief Justice John Roberts said. On Thursday, a divided court allowed states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood amid a wider Republican-backed push to defund the country's biggest abortion provider. Here are some of the biggest remaining cases: The court rarely hears arguments over emergency appeals, but it took up the administration's plea to narrow orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S. The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. At arguments last month, the court seemed intent on keeping a block on the citizenship restrictions while still looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders. It was not clear what such a decision might look like, but a majority of the court expressed concerns about what would happen if the administration were allowed, even temporarily, to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally. Democratic-led states, immigrants and rights groups who sued over Trump's executive order argued that it would upset the settled understanding of birthright citizenship that has existed for more than 125 years. The court seems likely to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. The school district introduced the storybooks in 2022, with such titles as 'Prince and Knight' and 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding.' The case is one of several religious rights cases at the court this term. The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries. A three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana is making its second trip to the Supreme Court Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are weighing whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. A three-judge court found that the state relied too heavily on race in drawing the district, rejecting Louisiana's arguments that politics predominated, specifically the preservation of the seats of influential members of Congress, including Speaker Mike Johnson. The Supreme Court ordered the challenged map to be used last year while the case went on. Lawmakers only drew that map after civil rights advocates won a court ruling that a map with one Black majority district likely violated the landmark voting rights law. The justices are weighing a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. The justices appeared open to upholding the law, though they also could return it to a lower court for additional work. Some justices worried the lower court hadn't applied a strict enough legal standard in determining whether the Texas law and others like that could run afoul of the First Amendment.
