Flexible Workplaces And Comprehensive Hiring: A Strategic Advantage
In today's evolving work environment, flexibility has become a cornerstone of successful business strategies. Implementing flexible work practices not only supports employees with health needs but also enables companies to tap into a broader pool of skilled candidates. Hiring individuals with disabilities offers substantial business advantages, particularly through programs like the Social Security Administration's Ticket to Work Program (TTW). This Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) initiative supports former workers seeking to re-enter the workforce by providing a structured path that safeguards benefits, allows supported work trials and promotes long-term employment success.
Business and Financial Benefits
Employers who prioritize comprehensive hiring gain access to a largely untapped pool of skilled candidates offering a competitive advantage. Comprehensive hiring is a thorough approach to recruiting that considers all aspects of finding, evaluating and selecting the best candidates to meet an organization's current and future staffing needs. Individuals with disabilities often bring unique perspectives and problem-solving abilities that can enhance innovation and productivity within teams according to the American Foundation for the Blind.
Research indicates that employees with disabilities tend to have higher retention rates, leading to reduced turnover and lower recruitment costs. Their resilience and dedication can positively impact overall team performance.
Companies that lead in disability inclusion report higher revenue and net income compared to their peers. A study by Accenture revealed that such organizations achieved, on average, 28% higher revenue and 30% greater profit margins.
Tax Incentives
Employers may be eligible for federal tax credits when hiring individuals with disabilities, always consult with a tax professional to determine eligibility for these credits and deductions.
Workplace Culture Enhancements
A well-rounded workforce fosters creativity and innovation. Employees with disabilities bring distinct perspectives that can lead to breakthrough solutions and services. Workplaces that offer supportive environments and cultivate mutual respect often experience stronger employee engagement and morale, contributing to a healthier sustainable organizational culture and greater job satisfaction. Additionally, employees with disabilities frequently demonstrate a heightened awareness of workplace safety, which can result in fewer accidents and lower associated costs. Companies that actively reflect the breadth of their customer base through thoughtful hiring practices are better positioned to build trust with consumers, particularly within the disability community—a substantial and often underserved market segment. Organizations recognized for equitable practices are viewed more favorably by customers, job seekers, and investors, helping to attract top talent and drive long-term loyalty.
Considering Returning To Work
For individuals receiving disability benefits, deciding whether to return to work is a highly personal choice that often involves a range of practical and emotional considerations. Taking time to assess stability—both in terms of health and day-to-day functioning—can help inform the decision. Reflecting on questions such as, 'Am I able to manage a consistent routine?' or 'Do I feel ready to take on new responsibilities?' may provide helpful insights. It may also be beneficial to speak with a trusted medical professional, benefits counselor or employment advisor to explore available options, supports and protections. Returning to work is not a one-size-fits-all journey, and understanding one's own readiness is a meaningful part of the process. For those who determine they are ready to explore employment opportunities, several programs exist to support a successful transition back to work.
The Ticket To Work Program
The SSA's Ticket to Work Program offers a pathway for individuals receiving SSDI benefits to re-enter the workforce. For employers, this program provides access to a motivated talent pool and offers several advantages:
In my experience, returning to work while receiving disability benefits is a deeply personal decision that deserves thoughtful consideration. Taking time to assess your readiness, both physically and emotionally can make a meaningful difference. There's no single path forward, but with the right support and guidance, you can make an informed choice that aligns with your well-being and goals.
To begin exploring the Ticket to Work Program, individuals currently receiving SSDI can contact the Ticket to Work Help Line at 1-866-968-7842 or visit the official website at choosework.ssa.gov. The program connects participants with Employment Networks (ENs) or state Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) agencies that provide personalized support, such as resume assistance, interview preparation, benefits counseling and job placement services. There is no cost to participate, and individuals can choose the provider that best aligns with their goals. Taking the first step toward employment through Ticket to Work can help individuals explore opportunities at their own pace, with safeguards in place to support a gradual and informed return to the workforce.
Adopting flexible work practices and broadening hiring approaches can serve as forward-thinking strategies that strengthen workforce performance and organizational resilience. Employers who recognize and act on the benefits of hiring individuals with disabilities position themselves for enhanced innovation, financial performance and a positive workplace culture. Programs like Ticket to Work provide valuable support in this effort, making the path to broader workforce participation both practical and rewarding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Supreme Court allows DOGE to access Social Security data
The Supreme Court on Friday allowed members of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency to access Social Security Administration data. The conservative-majority court, with its three liberal justices objecting, granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration asking the justices to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. The unsigned order said that members of the DOGE team assigned to the Social Security Administration should have "access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work." The lawsuit challenging DOGE's actions was filed by progressive group Democracy Forward on behalf of two unions — the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers — as well as the Alliance for Retired Americans. "This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people," the groups said in a statement. "This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE's affiliates to steal Americans' private and personal data." The White House praised the ruling. "The Supreme Court allowing the Trump Administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law," White House spokesperson Liz Huston said in a statement. Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissenting opinion questioning the need for the court to intervene on an emergency basis. "In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes," she added. DOGE, set up by billionaire Elon Musk before his falling out with President Donald Trump, says it wants to modernize systems and detect waste and fraud at the agency. The data it seeks includes Social Security numbers, medical records, and tax and banking information. "These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in court papers. The lawsuit alleged that allowing broader access to the personal information would violate a federal law called the Privacy Act as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure — and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," the challengers' lawyers wrote in court papers. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander had ruled that DOGE had no need to access the specific data at issue. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, declined to block Hollander's decision, leading to the Trump administration to file its emergency request at the Supreme Court. In a separate order issued at the same time in another case involving DOGE, the Supreme Court granted another request filed by the Trump administration. That decision allows the Trump administration to, for now, shield DOGE from freedom of information requests seeking thousands of pages of material. The move formalizes a decision issued by Chief Justice John Roberts on May 23 that temporarily put lower court decisions on hold while the Supreme Court considered what next steps to take. The court also told lower courts to limit the scope of what material could be disclosed. It means the government will not have to respond to requests for documents and allow for the deposition of the DOGE administrator, Amy Gleason, as a lower court had ruled, while litigation continues. The three liberal justices noted their disagreement with that decision, too. A spokesman for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which filed the lawsuit, said the group was "obviously disappointed" with the decision but "pleased that the court allowed discovery to proceed." A Justice Department spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the order.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered in the Top 1% in 2025
Even if you have money, sometimes it's hard to feel like you're rich with the cost of living skyrocketing or factors linked to lifestyle creep. However, if you make a healthy six figures, you might be in the top 1% of wage earners in the United States. Obviously this is a great money-making group to be a part of, but depending on where you live, you still may just miss the mark and fall into an extremely comfortable category — but not the top 1%. Read Next: For You: Here's how much you need to make in salary alone to be part of the 1% in America, plus how much you need to make to be in the top 5% and top 10% of wage earners. According to data from the Social Security Administration, you need to make $794,129 annually to be in the top 1% of wage earners in the U.S. This is based on an analysis of the most recently available wage data. To break this down further, you'd need to earn about $66,178 per month, or about $15,272 per week, to be in the top 1% of income earners. Check Out: If you're not making over $750,000 per year, you might not be part of the 1%. But if you make six figures, there's a chance you're in the top 10% of wage earners in the U.S. — or even the top 5%. Here's how much you need to make to be in the top 5% and the top 10% in America: Top 5% income threshold: $352,773 Top 10% income threshold: $148,812 As you can see, earning just under $150,000 puts you in the top 10% of all wage earners in the U.S. This doesn't put you in the elite class of top 1% earners, but you make more, on average, than 90% of American households. If you make just more than double that amount, you'll be in the top 5% of American household income. Being a top 1% income earner in the U.S. doesn't necessarily make you part of the top 1% wage earners in your state. In fact, the salary for the top 1% of earners varies quite a bit — depending on where you live. GOBankingRates recently crunched the numbers on location-specific data, showing how much you would need to have earned last year to be part of the 1% in your state. Here's the salary required to be part of the 1% in the top 10 states: Connecticut: $1,192,947 Massachusetts: $1,152,992 California: $1,072,248 Washington: $1,024,599 New Jersey: $1,010,101 New York: $999,747 Colorado: $896,273 Florida: $882,302 Wyoming: $872,896 New Hampshire: $839,742 As you can see, the numbers vary by more than $350,000 from Connecticut to New Hampshire. Here's the data for the 10 lowest-earning states: Ohio: $601,685 Iowa: $591,921 Alabama: $577,017 Indiana: $572,403 Oklahoma: $559,981 Arkansas: $550,469 Kentucky: $532,013 New Mexico: $493,013 Mississippi: $456,309 West Virginia: $435,302 The difference between the top 1% wage earners in Connecticut and West Virginia is over $750,000 per year! Caitlyn Moorhead contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered in the Top 1% in 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court allows DOGE to access Social Security data
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday allowed members of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency to access Social Security Administration data. The conservative-majority court, with its three liberal justices objecting, granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration asking the justices to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. The unsigned order said that members of the DOGE team assigned to the Social Security Administration should have "access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work." The lawsuit challenging DOGE's actions was filed by progressive group Democracy Forward on behalf of two unions — the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers — as well as the Alliance for Retired Americans. "This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people," the groups said in a statement. "This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE's affiliates to steal Americans' private and personal data." The White House praised the ruling. "The Supreme Court allowing the Trump Administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law," White House spokesperson Liz Huston said in a statement. Follow live politics coverage here Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissenting opinion questioning the need for the court to intervene on an emergency basis. "In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes," she added. DOGE, set up by billionaire Elon Musk before his falling out with President Donald Trump, says it wants to modernize systems and detect waste and fraud at the agency. The data it seeks includes Social Security numbers, medical records, and tax and banking information. 'These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny,' Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in court papers. The lawsuit alleged that allowing broader access to the personal information would violate a federal law called the Privacy Act as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure — and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," the challengers' lawyers wrote in court papers. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander had ruled that DOGE had no need to access the specific data at issue. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, declined to block Hollander's decision, leading to the Trump administration to file its emergency request at the Supreme Court. In a separate order issued at the same time in another case involving DOGE, the Supreme Court granted another request filed by the Trump administration. That decision allows the Trump administration to, for now, shield DOGE from freedom of information requests seeking thousands of pages of material. The move formalizes a decision issued by Chief Justice John Roberts on May 23 that temporarily put lower court decisions on hold while the Supreme Court considered what next steps to take. The court also told lower courts to limit the scope of what material could be disclosed. It means the government will not have to respond to requests for documents and allow for the deposition of the DOGE administrator, Amy Gleason, as a lower court had ruled, while litigation continues. The three liberal justices noted their disagreement with that decision, too. A spokesman for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which filed the lawsuit, said the group was "obviously disappointed" with the decision but "pleased that the court allowed discovery to proceed." A Justice Department spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the order. This article was originally published on
