TikTok-famous mum breaks down in court as she reveals what really funded her luxurious lifestyle
A TikTok mum broke down as a court heard she used stolen money to fund her lavish lifestyle.
Raven Bianca Buck, 26, will spend no time behind bars, despite pleading guilty to one count of money laundering in Queensland's Beenleigh District Court on Thursday.
The court heard the young mother's then-boyfriend stole $151,000 from the Australian Taxation Office by claiming GST on false business activity statements.
Their scheme was stopped after more than $700,000 worth of false refunds were denied by the ATO.
Buck, who has 16,500 TikTok followers, received more than $48,000 from the scheme in 13 bank transfers over a five month period in 2022.
She withdrew at least $25,000 of the stolen funds in cash - and spent much of the money on a flashy car and expensive jewellery in just one day.
'It's known that she purchased over $6,000 worth of jewellery, as well as placed about $10,000 towards a Mercedes-Benz, which was her primary vehicle,' Crown prosecutor Lauren Hall told the court the Courier Mail reported.
'Conversations revealed that, in her words, that he was doing dodgy sh*t and she didn't ask him to be a criminal, but he was.
Raven Bianca Buck (pictured) used money scammed from the ATO to buy a Mercedes-Benz and $6,000 worth of jewellery in one day
Buck pleaded guilty to one count of money laundering in Beenleigh District Court (pictured)
'She was away overseas at the time of a search warrant and had primary knowledge about the investigation, and her mobile phone was wiped.'
The court also heard Buck had struggled with mental health issues and was in an abusive relationship with her ex.
She has spent the last three years in a steady job to provide as a single mother.
Buck was seen weeping as her circumstances were aired to the courtroom.
At one point, Judge Amanda McDonnell paused the proceedings to offer her a tissue.
Judge McDonnell ultimately reduced Buck's sentence as she was a young offender with limited criminal history.
She also noted that Buck pleaded guilty to her crimes early in the legal process.
'You're to be sentenced on the basis that you were aware that there was a substantial risk,' Judge McDonnell said.
Buck (pictured) was handed an 18-month suspended sentence with the judge noting her limited criminal history and early admission of guilt
'It was therefore unjustifiable for you to spend the money knowing there was a risk it was tainted property that you recklessly engaged in money laundering.'
Buck received a 18 month suspended .
She refused to comment on the verdict as she left the court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Grim update on underworld figure's bodyguard following broad daylight shooting in busy Sydney kebab shop
One of the victims of a brazen shooting in a kebab shop may 'never walk again'. Two masked and hooded gunmen, dressed head to toe in black, sprinted into M Brothers in Auburn, in Sydney 's west, just after 1pm on Monday. Samimjan Azari, 26, was hit in the arm and shoulder, 25-year-old Kali Taiseni was shot in the face and an innocent female shop employee, Yurdagul Aydogu, suffered two gunshot wounds to the torso. Mr Taiseni, an aspiring footballer, was travelling with Azari when the shooting unfolded. While he was hit in the face with a bullet, it has been revealed that shrapnel travelled through to his head to spine. His loved ones were told he may never walk again, reported The Daily Telegraph. Ms Aydogu, 47, remains in a medically induced coma but is expected to make a full recovery. She underwent two round of surgery to remove the bullets from her body. Azari also remains hospitalised for his arm and shoulder injuries. The would-be assassins on Monday unleashed a volley of eight handgun shots as their victims tried to flee out the back, while another man attempted to fend them off with a chair. Police believe Azari was the target of the attack due to his underworld links. Azari has survived three prior attempts on his life - including being shot while he was riding in the back of a ute at Brighton Le Sands - and he was allegedly behind a heist at Condell Park in January. In that incident, he allegedly sent two men to steal illegal tobacco valued at roughly $4.5million from a black market syndicate, but it turned into a violent kidnapping. Three men were allegedly threatened with weapons, tied up, bashed and one of the men had his toe 'partially severed' in the attack which lasted up to half an hour. Officers are believed to have seized the cigarettes, Nine News reported. Police believe this incident is why Azari is wanted dead and Detective Superintendent Jason Box believed he also escaped a planned attack last Friday. 'On this occasion, witnesses sighted a white ute with several occupants with their faces covered, and one occupant was believed to be holding a firearm,' he said. Azari and his associates reportedly provided 'limited information'. CCTV showed the aftermath of the kebab shop shooting, with NSW Ambulance paramedics treating the injured at the scene. Diner owner Mohammed Rahimi revealed on Tuesday how he fought to save the life of staff cook Gul Yildiz, 47, as she lay bleeding from her wounds. 'There was a lot of blood,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'I was basically putting pressure [on them].' He said he did not recognise the men who were shot in the hit, saying he sees a lot of customers each day. But he said the gunmen knew their targets and told staff to get on the ground. 'After second gunshot, the power cut off, so the shop was dark,' he added. 'One of the staff, as soon as she hear a gunshot, she fell down. She was there behind the counter with another staff, and basically [the gunman] told [us] to get down. The innocent victim caught in the crossfire is known in the community as a 'very good lady', locals told Daily Mail Australia. She is currently in a coma at Westmead Hospital with her daughter by her side and is believed to be in a stable condition. 'It is beyond comprehension that three people were shot in a crowded Sydney street in broad daylight, and the resources of the NSW police have already been deployed,' Acting NSW Police Commissioner Peter Thurtell said. Police recently warned that Azari was at the 'epicentre' of gangland tensions in the city. During a press conference on Monday, police minister Yasmin Catley said the gunmen will be held accountable as she shared her anger at an innocent woman getting shot. 'All she did was go to work and she has been caught up in this shocking event,' she said. 'It's one thing for criminals to be shooting each other but when innocent people get caught up in this, it is absolutely abhorrent and we will not tolerate it. 'It's completely unacceptable that this sort of behaviour should happen in Sydney.' 'We will do everything we can to bring these gunmen to justice. It's as simple as that. We will make sure that we go and go until we bring these people to justice.' Witnesses said two men with their faces covered entered the South Parade kebab shop and fired eight bullets. At the time of the shooting, the area was bustling with people on their lunch break and heading to the nearby Auburn train station.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Explosive defence argument revealed about why Erin Patterson got sick before any of her lunch guests - as the prosecution case is picked apart
Erin Patterson 's early onset of illness after serving deadly beef Wellingtons to her lunch guests was brought on by her preparation of the meal, a jury has heard. On Wednesday, Patterson's barrister Colin Mandy, SC continued to outline his client's defence against claims she deliberately served poisoned pastry meals to the relatives of her estranged husband Simon Patterson. Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to the murders of Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson. They died after consuming death cap mushrooms served in beef Wellingtons during lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Only Pastor Ian Wilkinson survived the lunch, in what Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers, SC on Monday suggested had been a big mistake. The jury has previously heard Ms Patterson claimed to have become ill shortly after the fateful lunch while her guests became sick much later, around midnight. 'There's a sensible reason for that, because in the morning, several hours before the guests arrived, she was stirring and tasting the duxelle,' Mr Mandy told the jury. 'She was preparing that part of the meal. She was tasting it and that's why she added the dried mushrooms to it. So at least a few hours before anyone else ate any, she had had some.' The jury has heard prosecutors claim that Patterson was never sick from what she ate at the lunch and had simply pretended to be, so as to cover-up her alleged crime. Dr Rogers told the jury medical tests revealed Patterson had no signs of death cap poisoning, unlike her guests who suffered severe symptoms, including organ failure. She argued that Patterson fabricated symptoms, such as vomiting after eating cake, to appear sick like her guests. 'We suggest that if the accused had truly vomited ... that is a detail she would have shared with medical staff,' Dr Rogers said. 'The fact that she never made any mention of it should cause you to seriously doubt this claim and we suggest, reject ... [this claim] as a lie.' Mr Mandy said Patterson's claim that she vomited after the lunch ought be treated as truthful. The court heard Patterson claimed she had vomited shortly after the lunch ended, around 2.45pm. 'Now if that was a lie, members of the jury, to encourage you to think that the poison had all left her body, she surely would've said to you that it happened as soon as the guests left,' Mr Mandy said. Mr Mandy also suggested Patterson's evidence that she couldn't remember what was in her vomit ought also be treated as the truth. 'She can't be more precise about the contents of her stomach. If she was lying, if she was lying to you, she would say, ''oh look, when I threw up, I could clearly recognise pastry and meat and mushrooms in there. Absolutely categorically it all came up'',' Mr Mandy said. 'If she was lying, that's what she'd say. But instead she says, 'I don't know, it's vomit'. If she was lying, she would've said, ''I threw up immediately and I could clearly see everything''. She didn't say that to you.' Mr Mandy further suggested Patterson did not become as sick as her lunch guests due to a number of significant factors. He said expert evidence suggested people who consumed the same amount of toxin could react in different ways. 'People can eat the same meal, some develop a higher grade, some develop a lower grade of the severity of the illness,' Mr Mandy said. He told the jury there could have been a variation in toxicity from one person's portion to another. And some people have different reactions upon consuming toxins, he said. 'So some people have a better toxic response than others. Yes. So depending on an individual's tolerance to that particular toxin or their physiological response that may be different,' Mr Mandy said. Expert evidence further suggested the age of the individual could also play a factor as could the weight of the person. 'Obviously weight is a factor,' Mr Mandy said. 'As you know, Erin weighed over a hundred kilos. Age is a factor. She's significantly younger than the other guests.' Mr Mandy accused the prosecution of providing 'misleading impressions' to jurors during Dr Rogers' closing address. 'So Dr Rogers yesterday in her closing argument, invited you to think about what you would do in this situation if this was really just a horrible accident,' he said. 'And what the Crown was asking you to do is to engage in an exercise which might be dangerous and seductive, but it's not appropriate because it involves hindsight reasons. 'And hindsight reasoning is dangerous because it distorts how we evaluate decisions and actions that occurred in the past.' Mr Mandy further accused lone lunch guest survivor Ian Wilkinson of providing the jury incorrect evidence when he described Patterson eating her meal off a different coloured plate. 'It has to be the case that Ian Wilkinson is wrong about what he said. It makes no sense logically that you would use that method to deliver up an unpoisoned parcel, but otherwise, on all of the evidence, he's wrong; honestly mistaken,' Mr Mandy said. He also said Mr Wilkinson was wrong about the colour of Patterson's other plates, which he had described as being grey. 'Erin and Simon were far more familiar with the crockery in the house than Ian was, and so we submit to you that you would have to find, on a proper and analytical examination of that evidence, that he wasn't right about those plates. Honestly mistaken,' Mr Mandy said. Mr Mandy also claimed it would have made more sense for Patterson to simply mark the 'safe Wellington' on the pastry rather than serve it on a different coloured plate. We submit to you there is only one logical way of getting around that problem if this was your plan, and that would be to mark the unpoisoned one, it's wrapped in pastry, in some way, so that you can recognise it and differentiate it from the others,' Mr Mandy said. 'Easy to do, pastry, in which case you would not need different coloured plates.' He urged the jury to consider why his client would have 'lured' her lunch guests to lunch with a tale about a false cancer diagnosis if they did not discuss the issue until after they had all eaten the Wellingtons. 'On the Crown case, her object had already been achieved,' he said. 'The only rational conclusion … is the lie about cancer has absolutely nothing to do with the intention to kill, if there was one.'
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The vile reason a convicted rapist whose brutal torture of a 22-year-old woman left her permanently disfigured is appealing his SEVEN life sentences
A man who raped and tortured a woman for weeks has appealed his multiple life sentences, claiming he was not credited for his efforts to stop the victim from dying. Nicholas John Crilley was handed seven life sentences by a Queensland judge in 2020 after pleading guilty to 62 offences including grievous bodily harm, deprivation of liberty, torture and 18 counts of rape. Crilley's treatment of the woman, aged 22 at the time, in Brisbane in June 2017 left her permanently disfigured. He was arrested eight days after his offences following a dramatic pursuit through the city, during which he rammed police vehicles and carjacked an elderly woman. All three justices of the Court of Appeal on Wednesday said they had concerns about whether Crilley had genuine remorse. 'Even when he rings the ambulance, he does not say this is someone who for 23 days has been burned and abused and starved ... and she is likely to die,' Justice Thomas Bradley said. 'He said she had taken a turn for the worse and he did not know what was wrong ... to call that saving her life is a big stretch.' Justice David Boddice said there were arguments for Crilley wanting his victim to survive so she could suffer more. 'There are actual statements made by him in the course of it that he wanted to disfigure her so she was not attractive to other men,' he said. 'This was about maiming her for later in life.' Justice Bradley said Crilley's letter to the sentencing judge expressing remorse was 'disturbing' and referred to himself 28 times. Court of Appeal President Debra Mullins said the letter suggested Crilley had a personality disorder. 'A fair reading of the letter is that it is self-centred,' Justice Mullins said. Defence barrister Craig Eberhardt told the justices that his client's offences were 'horrendous' and showed 'incredible cruelty'. 'Our submissions do not change the character of the offending. We accept entirely that this remains in the worst category of this type,' he said. 'If (Crilley) had not called an ambulance, therefore saving her life, if he had not pleaded guilty and had cross-examined (the victim) at trial, if he was not remorseful, there would not be a complaint about the sentence imposed.' The justices heard Crilley acted against his own interests by not letting the victim die, which would have made it difficult to later convict him on multiple counts. Crown prosecutor Michael Lehane said there was evidence that Crilley thought the victim was so injured she would never be able to testify against him. 'She had not been conscious for three days. His thought was she could not speak,' he said. 'There was no consideration that she would be a critical prosecution witness.' Mr Lehane said the sentencing judge had considered Crilley's guilty plea. 'The nature of the offending simply overwhelmed these particular mitigating features and warranted life imprisonment,' he said. The justices reserved their judgment, which will be handed down at an undetermined date. Justice Mullins thanked Mr Eberhardt and Crilley's legal team. 'It's important that counsel take briefs that are very difficult matters, as this one was,' she said. Lifeline 13 11 14
