Trump can keep National Guard deployed to Los Angeles for now, appeals court rules
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court's ruling blocking the mobilization.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Trump, but it means he will maintain command of the guard for now.
On Thursday, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer found that Trump's deployment of the Guard was unlawful. Breyer had ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump and Japan PM discuss tariffs, Israel's attacks against Iran
WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and U.S. President Donald Trump held a phone call on Friday in which they discussed tariffs and Israel's attacks against Iran, the Japanese foreign ministry said. Trump has sought to leverage his tariff threats to strike bilateral trade deals with many countries, including U.S. ally Japan. Japan will remain steadfast in its request for a review of U.S. tariffs and would not accept a partial agreement, Tokyo's chief tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Friday. On the diplomatic front, the two leaders agreed remain in close communication on Israel's strikes against Iran that began late on Thursday U.S. time and on Friday Middle East and Asia time. Japan has condemned Israel's strikes by calling them escalatory while the U.S. has called those a form of "unilateral action" and said Washington was not involved. "Prime Minister Ishiba reiterated Japan's views on the U.S. tariff measures, taking into account the results of the Japan-U.S. Consultations on the U.S. Tariff Measures to date," the Japanese foreign ministry said. It added that the two leaders "concurred to accelerate the consultations between the ministers in charge in order to achieve a mutually beneficial agreement." A White House official confirmed from the U.S. side the call had taken place on Friday. The Japanese foreign ministry added that the two leaders agreed on the importance of peace and stability in the Middle East. Trump and Ishiba are expected to meet in Canada on the sidelines of the Group of Seven meeting next week.
NBC News
24 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump's balancing act on the Israel-Iran conflict: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, we examine how the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran are splitting President Donald Trump's base. Plus, Kristen Welker writes that Trump's showdown with California is testing his political strength on a core issue. And Gordon Lubold answers a reader question on Trump's military parade this weekend. — Adam Wollner Israel-Iran conflict splits Trump's MAGA backers By Jonathan Allen and Henry J. Gomez As the percussion of Israeli munitions rattled Tehran on Thursday night, President Donald Trump's MAGA movement observed a rare silence — a sign, influential Republicans say, of the divide within their own party when it comes to the prospect of a war between Israel and Iran. It took Trump, who comments publicly more often than any president in recent memory, about 10 hours to put out a statement on his Truth Social platform, in which he urged Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program. The first official U.S. assessment had been issued by the White House under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's name, and it emphasized that America was 'not involved' in the strikes. In the meantime, Charlie Kirk, the co-founder of Turning Point USA, polled his 5 million X followers on the question of whether America should 'get involved in Israel's war against Iran.' By Friday afternoon, the poll showed more than 350,000 votes, with an overwhelming proportion in the 'No' column. When Kirk read Rubio's statement on the strikes during a podcast Thursday night, Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist popular with the MAGA audience, interjected that it was 'not a supportive statement at all.' Earlier Thursday, before the strikes, Posobiec had warned on X that a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' And Steve Bannon, host of the 'War Room' podcast, which is influential with MAGA adherents within the administration and outside of it, steered clear of public commentary Thursday night. It all adds up to a demonstration of the quandary facing Trump as he and other elected Republicans seek safe political turf. Trump's electoral success owes in no small part to his isolationist-leaning 'America First' platform and his fierce criticism of drawn-out U.S. engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan. But Israel's latest action pits traditional Republican support for the Jewish state — and antipathy toward Iran — against the MAGA base's fear that the U.S. will be drawn into a new foreign war. And even within Trump's MAGA wing, there's a long-running split over American backing of Israel. Trump has always been on the pro-Israel side of the divide. California standoffs provide pressure test for one of Trump's top issues By Kristen Welker The ongoing protests in Los Angeles and legal standoff over President Donald Trump's decision to federalize California National Guard troops dominated the headlines this week, providing a pressure test for the president on one of his signature issues. Immigration has consistently been one of the bright spots for Trump when it comes to his poll numbers. Even as Americans soured on his handling of the economy and inflation throughout the course of his first 100 days in office, they tended to be split over his handling of immigration. It may still be too soon to gauge how Americans feel about the ramped-up immigration raids and the decision to deploy National Guard troops over Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections, since events are still unfolding. But a new Reuters-Ipsos poll released suggests some cracks may be emerging. Half of Americans surveyed said they do not approve of the president's response to protests in Los Angeles, with 35% approving and 15% saying they were unsure or did not answer. A similar share of Americans (49%) said Trump has gone too far with arrests of immigrants, while 40% did not believe he has gone too far, and 11% unsure or not answering. (The poll was conducted from June 11-12 and has a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points.) Around half of Americans (48%) said that the president should deploy the military 'to bring order to violent protests,' while 41% say he should not do so, and 11% were unsure or did not answer. California leaders have disputed Trump's claims that the L.A. protests were violent, saying the 'majority' have been peaceful. Surveys conducted as the Los Angeles protests were unfolding had mixed more results. A Quinnipiac University poll, which was in the field June 5-9, found majorities of registered voters disapproving of Trump's handling of deportations (56% disapprove and 40% approve) and immigration broadly (43% approve and 54% disapprove), though immigration was still one of Trump's better-testing issues. (The poll had a margin of error of +/- 2.8 points). An Economist/YouGov survey conducted June 6-9 found Americans gave Trump a net-positive rating on his handling of immigration, with 49% approving and 45% disapproving. That survey, which had a margin of error of +/- 3.5 points, also found varying levels of support for deportations, with less support for deporting those who have not committed violent crimes. And on Sunday, we'll have our own set of numbers. Steve Kornacki will join 'Meet the Press' to unpack our latest NBC News Decision Desk poll, powered by SurveyMonkey, which will look at Americans' views of the Trump presidency, including his handling of immigration and other issues. We'll also discuss the latest in Los Angeles and the future of Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill with Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. ✉️ Mailbag: How much will Trump's parade cost? Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's reader question is about this weekend's military parade in Washington, D.C. 'How much is it going to cost? Who approved spending it?' To answer that, we turned to national security reporter Gordon Lubold. Here's his response: The estimated cost for the parade was put at about $45 million by the U.S. Army, which pays for the range of things required to put it on, like transporting the slew of tanks, helicopters and vehicles as well as the roughly 7,000 soldiers brought from around the country to participate and provide support for the big event. The parade is celebrating the Army's 250th birthday, which happens to fall on President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. While the parade is the centerpiece event, the Army is planning several other events, including static stations for Americans to see its many vehicles, drones and other things, areas for group workouts, a flyover and even a jump by the Army's Golden Knights demonstration parachute team, weather permitting. The estimated cost includes the $3 million it cost to install large metal plates onto some of the streets in the nation's capital to mitigate damage that the tracks of the tanks was expected to cause. The $45 million also includes a $16 million estimate to repair the streets and other damage to the city following the event, which is expected to draw as many as 200,000 or more people. In an interview with NBC News' 'Meet the Press' last month, Trump said the cost of the parade was 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.'
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
ICE preparing $45bn expansion of immigration detention facilities to meet arrest quota
Immigration and Customs Enforcement is preparing for a $45 billion expansion of detention facilities to meet high arrest quotas, according to a new report. The Trump administration recently ramped up ICE quotas to 3,000 arrests per day, from 1,000. The increase in ICE raids across the country and the new places agents are targeting to find and detain immigrants in the country illegally have sparked mass protests in Los Angeles and other major cities. With the increase in arrests comes the issue of housing immigrants and, according to a Bloomberg report published Friday, Trump officials are looking to tent companies, private prison operators and disaster-relief providers for a 'massive expansion' of immigration detention facilities. Last month, ICE found 41 firms to bid for business under its planned expansion, Bloomberg reports. Of those firms, at least nine have advertised 'soft-sided' facilities, which are temporary structures previously used to help ICE process immigrants along the southern border. The $45 billion ICE would use to fund the facilities is included in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which has passed the House but still needs to be approved by the Senate and signed by the president. It's been a week since anti-ICE protests erupted in LA following immigration raids at multiple locations. At the heart of the raids is White House aide and anti-immigration hardliner Stephen Miller, according to multiple reports. In late May, Bloomberg reported, citing a person familiar with the matter, that the ICE arrest quota increase was delivered at a meeting led by Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Miller reportedly told federal agents to 'just go out there and arrest illegal aliens,' according to people familiar with the meeting who spoke to The Wall Street Journal. Instead of creating a list of immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally, Miller said agents would target Home Depots and 7-Eleven convenience stores, the Journal reported in an article published Monday. LA has been a flashpoint in the fight between the Trump administration and Americans against his mass deportation efforts. In response to the growing protests, which have mostly been peaceful, the president deployed thousands of National Guard troops and 700 Marines in the city. The move was unprecedented and sparked backlash from California officials. California Governor Gavin Newsom sued the Trump administration to stop the military deployment, and a judge ordered Trump to return control of the National Guard to Newsom. But Trump officials appealed, leading an appeals court to pause the order and set a hearing on the matter for Tuesday.
