logo
High school football: Centerville coach resigns

High school football: Centerville coach resigns

Yahoo06-12-2024

Dec. 5—Centerville High School football head coach Brent Ullery has resigned his position.
Ullery, who also teaches at CHS, confirmed his decision to the Dayton Daily News on Thursday afternoon.
He declined further comment but shared a letter sent to the CHS community.
"It is time for me to step away from varsity football," Ullery wrote. "I look forward to spending great time with my wife, my kids, and the rest of my family. I look forward to trying to be the best husband, father, son, and brother that I can be."
Ullery played at Centerville for his father, Ron, from 1999-2002 then made the Ohio State football team as a walk-on receiver. He played for Jim Tressel's Buckeyes from 2003-07, earning a varsity letter as a senior when the Buckeyes won the Big Ten and beat Michigan for the third year in a row and and went to the BCS National Championship game for the second year in a row.
The younger Ullery taught math at Dublin Coffman High School near Columbus for five years before returning to his alma mater as an assistant in 2014.
He took over the Centerville program in 2017 and led the Elks to a 10-2 record and the GWOC National East division championship in his first season.
They went 58-34 in his eight seasons and also won the GWOC the last two years.
He is stepping away after leading Centerville to their first regional championship since 1991.
The Elks' season came to an end last week with a 49-10 loss to Cincinnati Moeller in the state semifinals.
"While it is not easy to step away from a great program with great people, in a great place, I look forward to what is ahead for my family. I will assist, if needed, in the transition of the program and also in the recruitment of our players while the next coach is found."
Centerville director of athletics Rob Dement, who is set to retire at the end of December, told the Dayton Daily News in an email he will not be part of the search to find Ullery's replacement but will coordinate with his replacement, Brandon Hon, and other school officials to carry out the process.
"I am so appreciative of all Brent did for our kids, the program and for me as an athletic director," Dement said. "He has left this program in a great position, and I am proud of the decision he has made. Coach Ullery does not do anything without thinking it through, and I know this decision was a very difficult decision but one that was made for all the right reasons."
The Elks have had only four full-time head coaches since 1973: Bob Gregg (1973-99), Ron Ullery (2000-13), Rodney Roberts (2014-16) and Brent Ullery.
Historically one of the area's most successful programs, Centerville should return many of its top players from this season in 2025, and CHS will be one of at least three programs in the GWOC under new leadership.
Miamisburg hired Matt Muncy, who was previously the head coach at Franklin, to replace Lance Schneider, and Northmont is open after Tony Broering retired in November.
Carroll, Chaminade Julienne, Springfield Catholic Central, Greenville, Franklin, West Carrollton and Dixie have all also posted openings for head football coaches since the end of the season.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2025 College football odds: Which teams are most likely to go undefeated?
2025 College football odds: Which teams are most likely to go undefeated?

Fox Sports

time4 hours ago

  • Fox Sports

2025 College football odds: Which teams are most likely to go undefeated?

It's not easy to run the table in college football— but it's proven far from unlikely in recent decades. Six teams have gone undefeated over the last 10 seasons, and going back even further, 30 teams have completed an undefeated season since 1994. Can any squad pull off the feat next season? Let's take a look ahead at which teams have the shortest odds to go undefeated during the 2025 college football season at DraftKings Sportsbook as of June 6. Ohio State undefeated regular season No: −600 (bet $10 to win $11.67 total) Yes: +400 (bet $10 to win $50 total) History: Ohio State has gone undefeated twice since 2002. It last went undefeated in 2012, finishing with a 12–0 record. While Ohio State didn't go on to win the championship that year, the Buckeyes did claim the title in 2002 over the Miami Hurricanes, completing a 14–0 season. They made history that year as the first team to achieve a 14-0 record and win a national championship. The Buckeyes won the CFP last year, but finished the regular season with a 14-2 record. Notre Dame undefeated regular season No: −600 (bet $10 to win $11.67 total) Yes: +400 (bet $10 to win $50 total) History: Notre Dame has not finished a college football season undefeated since 1988, when it posted a 12-0 record. However, the Associated Press has been crowning NCAA national champions since 1936, and Notre Dame holds the record for the most undefeated, championship-winning campaigns with six. In addition to 1988, the Fighting Irish went undefeated in 1973 (11-0), 1966 (9-0-1), 1949 (10-0), 1947 (9-0) and 1946 (8-0-1). Notre Dame finished last year's regular season with a 14-2 record, falling to OSU in the CFP title game. Oregon undefeated regular season No: −650 (bet $10 to win $11.54 total) Yes: +425 (bet $10 to win $52.50 total) History: In the modern era of college football, Oregon has never finished a season unbeaten. It wasn't until 2000 that the team achieved a double-digit win total (10–2 record). Including that season, the Ducks have had 15 seasons of at least 10 wins. In last year's campaign, Oregon came very close, winning 13 of its 14 games and finishing with a 9-0 record in the Big Ten. Penn State undefeated regular season No: −700 (bet $10 to win $11.43 total) Yes: +450 (bet $10 to win $55 total) History: The Nittany Lions have multiple undefeated seasons in their history. However, 1994 was the last time they finished undefeated (12–0), culminating with a victory over Oregon in the Rose Bowl. Penn State has earned just two outright national championships in its history, and went 13-3 in last year's campaign. Texas undefeated regular season No: −800 (bet $10 to win $11.25 total) Yes: +500 (bet $10 to win $60 total) History: Texas last completed an undefeated season in 2005, finishing at 13–0 and defeating USC in the Rose Bowl. The Longhorns also went undefeated and won the title in 1969 (11-0) and 1963 (11-0). Texas finished last season with a 13-3 record. ​​Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! recommended Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

Ranking Oregon Ducks' 2025 opponents from easiest to toughest, per ESPN FPI
Ranking Oregon Ducks' 2025 opponents from easiest to toughest, per ESPN FPI

USA Today

time6 hours ago

  • USA Today

Ranking Oregon Ducks' 2025 opponents from easiest to toughest, per ESPN FPI

Ranking Oregon Ducks' 2025 opponents from easiest to toughest, per ESPN FPI The Oregon Ducks have a lot to prove entering the 2025 college football season, looking to show that their Big Ten Championship a year ago was far from a fluke while also establishing themselves as national championship contenders once again under Dan Lanning in his fourth year at the helm. It won't be easy to do, with a new-look roster taking over in Eugene and a lot of young and talented players stepping into bigger roles. Fortunately, the Ducks won't have a grueling schedule to deal with. In our most recent ranking of the toughest schedules in the conference, Oregon finds itself in the middle of the pack at No. 11 out of 18 teams. Trips to Penn State, Iowa, and Washington could prove tough, but the Ducks do get the benefit of hosting the likes of Indiana, USC, and Wisconsin. Which of those games will prove to be the toughest, though? While we may have an idea, a tool that was released this week — ESPN's Football Power Index — can help us. For those unfamiliar with ESPN's FPI, it is an index that 'relies on past performance on offense and defense, returning and transfer production and past recruiting data for players on the roster to form a rating.' In essence, it's ESPN's way of declaring the top teams in the nation, looking at their roster, their schedule, their percentage to win each game, and where that ultimately lands them after the season comes to an end. Here's how the FPI see's Oregon's schedule broken down, from the easiest game on the docket to the toughest: No. 12 — Week 1 vs. Montana State Bobcats National FPI Rank: None As an FCS team, Montana State doesn't get an FPI score from ESPN, but don't let that allow you to look past the Bobcats. Last season, they lost to the North Dakota State Bison in the FCS National Championship Game, which was their second loss in the title game since 2021. This is a talented and well-coached team that could surprise someone in Week 1. No. 11 — Week 4 vs. Oregon State Beavers National FPI Rank: No. 80 (-4.5) This may be a great rivalry, but it likely won't be a very great product on the field for quite a while. The two programs appear to be going in different directions thanks to conference realignment. As long as this game continues, we will have traditions staying alive, but as for interesting football, we may be out of luck for a while. No. 10 — Week 3 at Northwestern Wildcats National FPI Rank: No. 74 (-3.6) Northwestern might be a bit better this year than they were in 2024 thanks to a new QB in Preston Stone, but it's hard to imagine that they're going to be giving Oregon a major test this early in the season. No. 9 — Week 2 vs. Oklahoma State Cowboys National FPI Rank: No. 67 (0.3) As far as name brands go, this matchup between Oregon and Oklahoma State is a pretty solid non-conference clash, but based on where the Cowboys stand going into this year and their recent history, it likely won't be too interesting of a game when all is said and done. No. 8 — Week 8 at Rutgers Scarlet Knights National FPI Rank: No. 55 (3.5) Greg Schiano may be able to win some games in the Big Ten this year with a decent roster, but I don't think Rutgers is going to be good enough to give the Ducks any trouble, even across the country on a long road trip. No. 7 — Week 12 vs. Minnesota Golden Gophers National FPI Rank: No. 43 (5.2) I'm interested to see what PJ Fleck can do with the Minnesota roster this year, but with Drake Lindsey under center, they probably won't be among the top teams in the conference, and should be a big underdog on the road at Autzen. No. 6 — Week 11 at Iowa Hawkeyes National FPI Rank: No. 39 (6.3) Iowa will go as far as transfer QB Mark Gronowski can take them this year. He has the talent to be really good for Iowa, coming over from South Dakota State as a high-level FCS QB, but whether or not that's good enough to make the Hawkeyes dangerous in the Big Ten is a different question. Fortunately for Oregon, this game comes later in the season, so there shouldn't be any surprises. For more Iowa news and analysis, check out Hawkeyes Wire! No. 5 — Week 9 vs. Wisconsin Badgers National FPI Rank: No. 38 (6.3) Will Wisconsin be the home that Billy Edwards Jr. needs to reach his ceiling? That's the central question for the Badgers this year. If the answer is yes, then this game late in the season in Eugene might be interesting. If not, I don't think the Ducks will have any trouble with getting a win here. For more Wisconsin news and analysis, check out Badgers Wire! No. 4 — Week 7 vs. Indiana Hoosiers National FPI Rank: No. 31 (8.3) Indiana was the story of the year in the Big Ten last year, and if they can find the same magic in Fernando Mendoza as they did in Kurtis Rourke, then they could once again be a formidable foe. I wouldn't bet against them at this point, but I still think Oregon's talent wins out in this game. It also helps that the Ducks get Curt Cignetti and his squad at home in Eugene. No. 3 — Week 14 at Washington Huskies National FPI Rank: No. 27 (8.8) The Huskies had a down year in 2024 with Jedd Fisch taking over, but don't be surprised to see them bounce back in 2025, with Demond Williams under center and a solid roster around him. I think this game against Washington could be tougher than many Oregon fans want to admit, especially since it will take place up in Seattle, a tough place to play. It should be a fun year in the rivalry, regardless of the outcome. For more Washington news and analysis, check out Huskies Wire! No. 2 — Week 13 vs. USC Trojans National FPI Rank: No. 19 (13.0) Can USC live up to the hype and put together a solid season, or will they once again hover around .500 and have Lincoln Riley's name in hot-seat conversations? That's something that we have to wait and see, but regardless of how good they are, the rivalry with Oregon will be fun to watch late in the year with likely College Football Playoff spots on the line. For more USC news and analysis, check out Trojans Wire! No. 1 — Week 5 at Penn State Nittany Lions National FPI Rank: No. 5 (21.5) This is the game of the year for Oregon and undoubtedly the hardest one on the schedule. A neutral-site game against Penn State would be difficult, but having to travel to Happy Valley and be part of a whiteout game is going to be difficult. The winner of this early-season matchup will be in a great spot to get to the playoff and have an inside track on a spot in the Big Ten Championship. For more Penn State news and analysis, check out Nittany Lions Wire! Contact/Follow @Ducks_Wire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oregon Ducks news, notes, and opinions.

Notre Dame mailbag: Is it over with USC? Fun watching film with Marcus Freeman?
Notre Dame mailbag: Is it over with USC? Fun watching film with Marcus Freeman?

New York Times

time7 hours ago

  • New York Times

Notre Dame mailbag: Is it over with USC? Fun watching film with Marcus Freeman?

SOUTH BEND, Ind. — Welcome back to the Notre Dame mailbag. You've got questions, so let's get started. Note: Submitted questions have been edited for clarity and length. As the USC series appears to be approaching its end, how much of the blame falls on the Big Ten essentially holding USC hostage? Do you think this could be a sign of things to come as the wheel of college football 'progress' churns toward a Big Ten/SEC super league, and is there a world in which Notre Dame is blackballed from scheduling games against foes from those conferences? — Jack Z. For starters, the Big Ten didn't force USC to join, destroying the Pac-12 in the process. That was USC's decision, which all but dragged UCLA, Washington and Oregon to follow the Trojans' lead, toppling a conference and scattering it across the Big 12 and ACC. Advertisement As for the 'sign of things to come' aspect of scheduling, it's worth monitoring. It's also worth acknowledging Notre Dame has home-and-home agreements with Alabama, Florida, Texas, Texas A&M, Purdue, Michigan State, Arkansas, Indiana and Michigan on future schedules. Ohio State just came off as a home-and-home. The Shamrock Series created a neutral-and-neutral against Wisconsin. Our 2025 home game times are SET ☘️👀 📆 Mark your calendars 📆 🎟️ #GoIrish☘️ — Notre Dame Football (@NDFootball) May 12, 2025 As much as both leagues feel like they're taking their scheduling ball and going home, it's hard to imagine those conferences shunning Notre Dame (and the money associated with the Irish) to prove some high-minded point. The 'join a conference!' crowd is primarily fans and a few coaches. It never seems to be from the administrators running the sport. The adults in the room know Notre Dame is good for business. None of that means the USC series is on solid ground, however. But there's a difference between playing a home-and-home with Notre Dame and being locked into a perpetual series with the Irish. I'd doubt the teams cycling through Notre Dame's schedule would jump at the chance to play Notre Dame every year on top of their SEC or Big Ten slates. As much as USC is to blame for the current stalemate in the series, Lincoln Riley's willingness to walk away from one of the great rivalries in the sport makes sense for College Football Playoff contention purposes. (Yes, this assumes Riley can build a CFP-contending roster.) USC traveled to Michigan, Maryland and Minnesota last year. This year, it's got trips to Illinois, Purdue, Nebraska and that October date at Notre Dame. The Trojans don't think they need that additional travel to South Bend. USC probably doesn't want the extra competition, either, considering it just went 7-5 and finished ninth in the conference. Advertisement Notre Dame probably needs the series more than USC does. But the Trojans need a win over the Irish to validate Riley's project, which feels tenuous at best. Too many cautious programs and coaches worry about the schedule being too hard. They should spend more time on the upside of winning signature games. Marcus Freeman has already proved himself that way, not just by beating USC but by making the CFP run. Riley is much less defined, but a potential win over Notre Dame may change the perceptions around USC. He just needs to have the constitution to take on that challenge. It's not clear that he does. What's one thing you learned breaking down film with Freeman that maybe felt different from the previous versions of the series with players? — Terence M. Thanks for checking out that story. It was a lot of fun. The biggest difference between sitting down with the head coach instead of a player was understanding all the moving parts of the play opposed to just diving deep with one player on one assignment. But what struck me most going over the plays was how much there was to critique and how Freeman jumped all over it. Like, he was still bothered by receivers missing blocks in games that happened seven months ago. Games Notre Dame won! He even told me a couple of plays to go watch on my own, plays that had stuck with him that much. Freeman talks a lot in news conferences about not being outcome-driven and chasing perfection, but after watching just eight plays with him, I wonder if there are more than a dozen 'perfect plays' in a 150-play game. Maybe this shouldn't be a surprise, but getting 11 college kids to do the exact right thing at the exact right time seems really, really difficult. Is the lack of a 2027 quarterback offer a sign of maturity and incorporating lessons learned after being burned by longtime QB decommits, or a sign of the downside of having a season that stretches so deep into January? — Andrew B. It's the downside of having a season stretch until Jan. 20. Notre Dame couldn't use the winter contact period to evaluate quarterbacks in person, which is how the staff would have played it under normal circumstances. Whether it was offensive coordinator Mike Denbrock or quarterbacks coach Gino Guidugli, they'd have crisscrossed the country to see quarterbacks throw in person. Instead, they were preparing for the national championship game. And yeah, that's a trade Notre Dame would be willing to make every year, even if it means being behind in quarterback recruiting. Advertisement For the sake of context, it's worth remembering that Notre Dame landed four-star quarterback Noah Grubbs about this time last summer, just before Irish Invasion. But he'd camped at Notre Dame a year earlier and the Irish staff had been targeting him for months. The Deuce Knight situation was similar, with the Mississippi product targeted during the summer and committing before the Ohio State game two years ago. CJ Carr committed the summer before his junior year, same with Tyler Buchner and Steve Angeli. It's not like Notre Dame can't pivot late when forced to adjust, landing Kenny Minchey in November of his senior year or grabbing Blake Hebert in October of his senior year. The Minchey/Hebert timelines are not ideal because they delay putting a face on your recruiting class while also making it harder to pursue wideouts. Minchey was a late flip from Pitt after the Irish struggled to attract quarterbacks after landing Carr and missing on Dante Moore. Hebert was a reaction to Knight flipping to Auburn. I'm not entirely sure there's a 'lessons learned' element to quarterback recruiting this cycle as Notre Dame would chase Knight just the same this cycle as last. Would that be a smart move considering the 'fit' that's so important at Notre Dame? Debatable. Bottom line, quarterback recruiting is a crapshoot of the highest order. And that's true for everybody, not just Notre Dame. The most successful quarterback of the modern era was a three-star flip from Washington State, Ian Book. The highest-rated quarterbacks the Irish did sign haven't panned out: Brandon Wimbush, Tyler Buchner and Phil Jurkovec. And with the transfer portal available to Notre Dame, the penalty for missing at the position is simply a matter of money. There's always a Riley Leonard, Sam Hartman or Jack Coan available. So yes, Notre Dame needs to make a decision at quarterback for the Class of 2027 soon. I'd expect that to happen in the coming weeks. But with the uncertainty of the position combined with ability to get out of jail free (even if 'free' means a seven-figure investment), the Irish don't need to panic in making that quarterback call. Brian Kelly and Marcus Freeman capped their third years at Notre Dame with a run to the national title game. Which coach had the more impressive first three seasons — Kelly with his ground-up reinvention or Freeman's seemingly sustainable build (plus his overwhelming buy-in from the fan base)? — Ryan M. There aren't many places where Kelly should get the nod over Freeman with Notre Dame's fan base. This remains one. Kelly took a broken program and put it in the national championship game in three years. Freeman took a College Football Playoff regular and did the same. Notre Dame lost to Navy and UConn in the season before Kelly took over. Notre Dame went 11-1 and won its final six games by an average of 27.3 points in the season before Freeman took over as head coach. Advertisement As much as Year 3 under Freeman had a soul that Kelly's third season did not, thanks to the wins over Georgia and Penn State, it's hard to overstate the magic of 2012 when Notre Dame was the story of college football. Put another way, there was never a question last season if Notre Dame was relevant or capable of climbing the sport's mountain. Before Kelly's third season, it was an existential question if Notre Dame had been relegated to the has-been era of the sport. If Freeman proved people right about Notre Dame, Kelly had to first prove people wrong. Now the question is about sustaining success, which Freeman seems much more capable of doing. The university is more invested in football's success. The depth of recruiting is better. And as Ryan noted, the fan base is behind the head coach more now than then. I remember walking into the first practice before the 2013 season and telling another reporter it felt like we were going to cover three months of air coming out of the balloon. And that's what happened. Very little about Notre Dame football felt sturdy after Kelly's flirtation with the Eagles and the Manti Te'o nonsense. That's not the case today. Who ends up with more passing yards: CJ Carr/Kenny Minchey in 12 games in 2025 or Riley Leonard in 16 games in 2024? — Tommy R. To put Leonard's 178.8 passing yards per game in perspective, that ranked No. 89 nationally last season. If Carr/Minchey produce the same total of 2,861 yards during the regular season, it would amount to 238.4 yards per game, which would have ranked No. 36 nationally, between quarterbacks from Western Kentucky and Hawaii. Point being, we're not talking about some transcendental passing performance if Carr or Minchey do in the regular season what Leonard did in the entire season. So, give me Carr and/or Minchey to better Leonard's passing statistics. They both have more arm talent and a better receiver room, plus a better offensive line in front of them. Advertisement As for Leonard's 184 carries for 906 yards and 17 rushing touchdowns … that might be harder to replicate. Is there a new rivalry for Notre Dame that would interest you? — Peter B. This sounds like a great question for next week's fan survey. Not that I'm chasing USC off the schedule, but the Clemson series somewhat fills this slot if it comes to that. Creating new rivalries rarely seems to work … yet Irish versus Tigers somehow does. If USC dropped off the schedule as an every-season opponent, I'd run the slot into a higher-end Power 2 rotating series. Step back from rivalry and lean into novelty. Yes, I'd rather see USC every season, but what if Notre Dame swapped that over 10 years of home-and-homes with Oregon, LSU, Iowa, Auburn and Washington? (Top photo of Kenny Minchey: Justin Casterline / Getty Images)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store