SM Teo Chee Hean's contributions left indelible mark on S'pore, says PM Wong
Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean, 70, is stepping down from Cabinet and politics. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO
SINGAPORE - Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean's contributions in defence, climate action, diplomacy and security have left an indelible mark and helped Singapore to stand tall in the world, said Prime Minister Lawrence Wong.
In a valedictory letter to SM Teo on May 6, PM Wong thanked SM Teo for his lifetime of service for Singapore, and expressed his appreciation for his unwavering service and dedication to the nation and its people.
SM Teo, 70, who is also Coordinating Minister for National Security, is stepping down from Cabinet and politics. PM Wong had paid tribute to him and Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat, who is also retiring, on Nomination Day on April 23.
'You dedicated your entire 53-year career to safeguarding and advancing the interests of Singapore and Singaporeans,' PM Wong said in the letter .
Thanking PM Wong for his kind thoughts and words, SM Teo said in a social media post on the same day that all he tried to do was to serve Singapore and Singaporeans as well as he could.
'I thank each and every one of the many colleagues, partners and volunteers who were on this journey together; without you we would not have travelled so far on this fruitful and fulfilling journey,' he said. 'Many thanks for the honour and privilege to have served.'
In his letter, PM Wong said SM Teo led work on important and difficult issues with rigour and thoughtfulness.
This included implementing the recommendations of the Constitutional Commission to review specific aspects of the Elected Presidency in 2016 , and taking the related Constitutional amendments through in Parliament.
Most recently, he conducted the review of the use of NRIC numbers in the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority's Bizfile service, delivering a 'thorough and definitive account in Parliament on what went wrong and how we could do better'.
'You approached each of these demanding assignments with thoroughness and clarity, never hesitating to hold individuals accountable when necessary, and making sure that the Government will always have the moral courage and conviction to do the right thing, and to do right by Singapore,' he wrote.
SM Teo's leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic was invaluable and exemplary, PM Wong added.
At the national level, SM Teo led efforts to manage the outbreak in migrant worker dormitories – responding swiftly and steadily to an urgent and potentially dangerous crisis.
'You were calm and composed under pressure, and you inspired the civil servants and SAF officers who worked with you during those difficult days,' he said. 'In the community, you ensured residents remained connected through online town halls and community forums, despite the restrictions on physical gatherings.'
SM Teo's efforts to preserve a sense of community during those challenging times were deeply felt and appreciated by residents, he said.
SM Teo started out as a navy officer in 1972 and rose through the ranks, eventually leaving the armed forces as Chief of Navy in 1992 to enter politics.
His dedication to the nation continued throughout his political career, 16 years of which were spent at the Ministry of Defence in various capacities.
As Defence Minister from 2003 to 2011, his visionary leadership was pivotal to the Third Generation transformation of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), PM Wong said.
The acquisition of advanced equipment for land, sea and air combat, and his foresight in creating an integrated and networked force, enabled servicemen and servicewomen to fight more effectively.
Because of these efforts, the SAF is now equipped with the cutting-edge capabilities it needs to meet evolving security challenges, PM Wong added.
SM Teo also led the SAF to make operational deployments for Singapore's security. In the aftermath of the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami, the SAF mounted Operation Flying Eagle to provide aid to Indonesia and Thailand. This remains the largest humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operation undertaken by SAF, said PM Wong.
Under SM Teo's watch, the SAF also contributed to peace operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Gulf of Aden to support peace and security in regions of the world which have an impact on Singapore.
Beyond strengthening military capabilities, SM Teo has fostered strong ties with the Republic's defence partners.
He worked with his counterparts to establish the Asean Defence Ministers Meeting (ADMM)-Plus in 2010, which has become a major platform for security cooperation and dialogue between Asean member states and the eight partner countries.
He also played a key role in developing the Shangri-La Dialogue into the premier defence forum for the Asia-Pacific.
When SM Teo went to the Ministry of Home Affairs in 2011, he began transforming the Home Team, accelerating the integration of technology to speed up and strengthen police and civil defence responses.
He also enhanced the capacity of Singapore's Home Team through community partnerships, tapping on Singaporeans as ears and eyes on the ground to help fight crime, counter radicalisation and terrorism, and be first responders in fire and medical emergencies.
He kept abreast of the scourge of cyberattacks and cybercrimes by setting up the Singapore Police Force's Cybercrime Command.
In 2011, he was appointed Coordinating Minister for National Security, taking on the critical task of ensuring that Singapore's external and domestic security strategies are well-integrated and forward-looking.
He led the work to establish the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA) to deal with cyber threats.
He also set the direction for the Home Affairs and Defence ministries to work in closer collaboration.
'Beyond defence and security, you made a lasting impact on generations of young Singaporeans,' PM Wong said.
As Minister for Education, SM Teo drove bold and necessary reforms to prepare Singapore for a knowledge-based economy. One major shift was to update the primary, secondary and junior college curricula to better develop thinking, communication and process skills.
He steered reviews of the Mother Tongue Languages curriculum, leading to the introduction of new syllabuses to better suit the needs of students.
He also initiated single-session primary schools and freed up space and time for students to participate in a wider range of co-curricular and enrichment activities – enhancing not just academic outcomes, but also students' affective, social and physical development.
As Deputy Prime Minister and later as Senior Minister, SM Teo brought his wealth of experience and sharp strategic mind to bear on critical national issues.
'You never hesitated to speak your mind and voice different views in Cabinet, making our discussions more robust,' said PM Wong
He chaired multiple committees on complex and cross-cutting matters, including on the existential issue of climate change. In this role, he coordinated Singapore's climate action efforts, balancing tough trade-offs to formulate practical net-zero goals.
'You represented Singapore with distinction on the global stage, furthering Singapore's relations with key partners,' said PM Wong.
As Singapore's Co-Chair of the Joint Council for Bilateral Cooperation with China, he oversaw the establishment of its third Government-to-Government project, the Chongqing Connectivity Initiative.
He was also instrumental in establishing the Singapore-China Forum on Leadership and the Singapore-China Social Governance Forum, which have broadened bilateral cooperation and provided platforms for the younger generation of leaders on both sides to build strong ties.
With Indonesia, SM Teo guided sensitive negotiations that successfully concluded three landmark agreements – the Flight Information Region Agreement, the Extradition Treaty, and the Defence Cooperation Agreement – resolving three complex, long-standing bilateral issues.
'You helped Singapore to stand tall in the world, and created space and opportunities for our country internationally,' he said.
On the ground, SM Teo has served his residents for over three decades.
He was first elected in the 1992 Marine Parade GRC by-election as a member of then-Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong's team, before moving to contest in Pasir Ris GRC during the 1997 general election. He has been re-elected there five times since, a clear testament to his residents' trust in him, said PM Wong.
'As the steadfast anchor for the Pasir Ris-Punggol team, you provided unwavering stability and leadership,' he said. 'Your residents appreciate your proactive, practical and thoughtful approach to ground issues – addressing their concerns, improving their lives, and creating a strong sense of community.'
They saw the benefits of impactful developments, such as the opening of facilities like Pasir Ris Mall and Pasir Ris Polyclinic, as well as social schemes such as the Pasir Ris-Punggol Career Marketplace done in partnership with the NTUC, he added.
SM Teo was also a trusted mentor to new PAP MPs, instilling in them his deep sense of duty and service, PM Wong said.
'Your dedication to nurturing future leaders, both within your GRC team and the wider Party, speaks to your belief in long-term leadership renewal,' said PM Wong. 'As First Assistant Secretary General of the PAP in 2015, you played a key role in the Party's leadership transition and charting its future direction.'
PM Wong said that when he entered politics in 2011, SM Teo was already a seasoned leader.
'I have benefitted greatly from your generous guidance and wise counsel. If I can take Singapore forward from here, it is only because earlier generations of leaders like you have worked hard to safeguard our future.'
He added: 'My team and I will do our utmost to continue your ethos – protecting what we have built, and bringing Singapore onward and upward.'
Chin Soo Fang is senior correspondent at The Straits Times covering topics such as community, politics, social issues, consumer, culture and heritage.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
8 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: America First, China Next? Why Trump's new travel ban harms US interests
SINGAPORE: United States President Donald Trump has rebooted his travel ban, hitting Southeast Asia for the first time. He banned – partially or fully – citizens of 19 countries, including Myanmar and Laos, from entering the US with effect from Monday (Jun 9). He clearly learned lessons from the ban he instituted initially during his first term. Mr Trump' playbook started with an executive order on the first day of his second term ordering the State Department to launch a global review of foreign governments' vetting and screening capabilities and to identify which were 'so deficient as to warrant' a travel ban. This time, instead of calling it a 'Muslim ban' like he did eight years ago with no study, he justified the ban for national security reasons after a review of several months, claiming also that people from those countries had high rates of overstaying their visas. This policy, preordained but dressed in process, will likely be upheld by the courts. 'A CONVENIENT DISTRACTION' FROM BAD NEWS The travel ban comes amid reports of the lowest US job growth in two years, strong public criticism of Mr Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' from Elon Musk as they feud, and an antisemitic attack a week ago. 'This noxious reboot comes as a convenient distraction from so many bad news items in the form of setbacks for the Trump agenda,' Thurgood Marshall Jr, a senior Clinton official, told me. And while Mr Trump said last week's Colorado 'terror attack' for which an Egyptian national has been charged with injuring several with gasoline bombs spurred the timing of the travel ban, Egypt not being on the list undercuts his premise this ban would have prevented it from happening. This ban both appeals to his core MAGA anti-immigration base and advances his governing philosophy. Mr Trump made the real message plain as he announced the travel ban: 'We don't want them.' The 'America First' agenda includes a sweeping crackdown on immigration: So far, he has barred international students from Harvard University, halted student visa interviews for those accepted to US schools and ordered immigration raids across the country. Of course, every country can and should aim to ensure only legal and lawful immigration to their territory. Citizens from certain countries should receive higher scrutiny for any number of reasons, including whether their government sponsors terrorism. Individuals who have a high chance of overstaying their visa can also be denied one. A blanket ban on all citizens from a given country provides the easy way out administratively and a political win from his base; however, it brings upon the US geopolitical harm. SOUTHEAST ASIA NOT SPARED This time, Laos and Myanmar were included in Mr Trump's travel ban – countries that accounted for barely 11,000 of the 72 million foreign visitors in 2024 per the Department of Commerce. Rick Reece, Executive Director of non-governmental organisation Village Focus International, an American who has lived and worked in Laos since 1998, told me: 'There are so many family connections [with the US] here. Now, uncertainty with the US comes out in anger and cynicism.' 'I hope Lao people don't lose their respect and admiration for the US. My own son and wife, both Lao passport holders, would love to visit the US to see friends and family, but I can't see that happening for the foreseeable future,' he added. Tatum Albertine, a former State Department and USAID official with years of experience in Myanmar, told me it was surprising to see Myanmar included in the travel ban. 'I don't think the Trump Administration even knows what it wants out of its relationship with them,' she said. The US had already taken a reputational hit in the country in the wake of the deadly earthquake in March. 'Trump 2.0 massively failed in sending a USAID humanitarian intervention team,' she added. '[Secretary of State Marco] Rubio said they were deployed, but people on the ground tell me that was not true – those people who were ready had been fired.' The rest of Southeast Asia, including Singapore, are also caught in Mr Trump's continuing assault on immigration, with the halt to student visa interviews pending the expansion of 'social media screening and vetting'. No one knows how long this will last. Some students who have been accepted to US schools have no idea when, or if, they'll be allowed to enter the country. Those already enrolled aren't sure if they will be let back in if they head home during the summer break. In a region where the US competes with China for influence, a ban on two ASEAN member states and collateral damage from the change to student visas could strengthen China's hand. AMERICA FIRST LEADS TO CHINA NEXT While there will be no immediate fallout by banning travel from these countries given their lack of geopolitical and geoeconomic standing, there will still be consequences. Mr Trump's broader immigration policies create anxiety about US travel, amid unhappiness about his sweeping tariffs. A head of global public affairs at an American multinational told me she can't have her team meet in the US this summer because many of her international staff fear travelling there. New York City, the top US destination for internation travel, estimated 2.5 million (or 17 per cent) fewer foreign travellers in 2025. Travel from Canada, the US' top source of visitors, is expected to go down more than 20 per cent. The World Travel & Tourism Council projects a US$12.5 billion loss in international visitor spending this year. Nelson Cunningham, who served in the Biden administration as a Senior Advisor at the State Department, told me: 'If we cut off contact with the best and brightest around the world, America First cannot help but become America Alone'. 'America First inevitably leads to China Next,' he concluded. With the new travel ban, governments will continue to seek alternate markets and partners for trade and security. Businesses will see diminish their advantages with access to foreign government officials, customers and employees. The erosion of Brand America continues.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far?
An art installation at the Padang. Vocal naysayers recently accused the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. PHOTO: ST FILE Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far? SINGAPORE – At a time when most people understand that the personal is political, individual views have become a battleground of virtue – equality, good; hierarchy, bad. Elitism? The worst possible kind of social evil. Yet, take a step back from this instinctive repulsion and there might be benefits to muddying the waters. Elitism, the belief that an elite group, however defined, should be entitled to the reins of power has been the norm throughout much of history. Whether it is the clergy, kings with their divine right, the Confucian scholar or today's fintech bros, there have been groups in each time period that societies tend to value and reward. It was only with increasing democratisation, and a growing disenfranchisement at the chasm between the top and the rest, that elitism has become a byword for undeserved privilege and gross injustice. This brief trip back in time is not to rehabilitate elitism, but to show that the current period against it – or at least one that pays lip service to not believing in an elite class – may be an aberrant one. In the West, this has been taken to extremes, manifesting in a debilitating disregard fo r e xperts and fatal results during the Covid-19 pandemic against the advice of doctors to vaccinate. In Singapore, it is the elite schools that are targeted, in the idealistic slogan that every school is a good school. Though, for perplexing reasons, this scepticism has not yet been extended to the natural reverence the majority of Singaporeans harbour for lawyers and doctors. Their expertise is assumed to be universally applicable – a mentality that has narrowed parents and students' conception of what success looks like. In any case, the ills of elitism have been thoroughly aired, including the type of entitled, discompassionate divas that it ends up producing. The very consensus of who deserves to be elite has also fractured. I wonder, though, if this enmity has led to some unexpected side effects. This is a train of thought sparked by recent reactions to the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative set out during the Budget statement in 2025. Self-sabotage Under the scheme, $100 would be given t o Si ngaporeans aged 18 and above for the consumption of the local arts, redeemable from September. One would expect rejoicing, but there was uproar from a group of vocal naysayers. They accused the credits of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. Why? Because the money could be better spent on support for groceries. This, I thought, was a case of anti-elitism as self-sabotage. Central to this worldview was that the arts is an elitist activity patronised only by the rich and the hyper-educated aesthete, when one type of activity for the elite and one for the others is exactly the sort of segregation and self-limiting mentality that perpetuates divides. There was no sense that this $100 in credits was a way of making the perceived barrier more permeable. To put it in context, the Government also announced $800 in CDC vouchers. This was bread for all, and roses too. Yet another potentially problematic by-product is that the word 'elite' has since been tainted by association. No one dares lay claim to the word 'elite', or acknowledge that someone else may be elite in his or her field. The rare exemption is perhaps in sports, where athletes accept the cut-throat nature of their competition, and where non-athletes are so tangibly outside their league that there is no point in pretending otherwise. This is not in itself a problem – elite is after all just a word – though I find no easy replacement term that can immediately convey excellence to the same degree. But it incidentally comes at a time when there is a general reluctance to impose any kind of objective standard, supplemented by that compassionate but useless invention: the consolation prize. This applies to things: Is no one taste now better than another? As well as people, where so many takes on social media are considered equally valid, measured just by virality. It is the kind of ChatGPT mentality where how often something is repeated or the number of clicks on a website can influence results, with no regard to its truth value. The war against elitism may have come at the expense of standards and good sense. Reclaiming elite This impulse to drag discourse to the same level – usually downwards – has the right intentions, timely given that, for so long, highly selective elitist standards have been imposed as objective metrics. To right the ship so discourse is levelled upwards though, perhaps elite can be thought of as separate from elitism, rehabilitated without the corresponding concentration of resources and power. This should be expanded so that who is elite becomes not just about education but also because of other qualities – role models people can aspire to in different contexts. What constitutes an elite has always been reliant on man-made barometers, negotiated by the community. There should be no shame in aspiring to be elite. Anti-elitism should not mean an absence of the elite, but that all who put their heart and minds to it should have a fair shot at claiming its pedigree, or getting closer to it. It is a lifelong dusting off of mediocrity, and it begins with first recognising what is good. Hear Me Out is a new series where young journalists (over)share on topics ranging from navigating friendships to self-loathing, and the occasional intrusive thought. Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.
CNA
2 days ago
- CNA
Iran says US travel ban reflects 'racist mentality'
TEHRAN: Tehran denounced on Saturday (Jun 7) the US travel ban on Iranians and citizens of 11 other mostly Middle Eastern and African countries, saying Washington's decision was a sign of a "racist mentality". US President Donald Trump signed on Wednesday an executive order reviving sweeping restrictions that echo his first-term travel ban, justified on national security grounds following a firebomb attack at a pro-Israel rally in Colorado. Alireza Hashemi-Raja, the foreign ministry's director general for the affairs of Iranians abroad, called the measure, which takes effect on Jun 9, "a clear sign of the dominance of a supremacist and racist mentality among American policymakers". The decision "indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian and Muslim people", he added in a statement released by the ministry. Apart from Iran, the US ban targets nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. A partial ban was also imposed on travellers from seven other countries, including Laos. Hashemi-Raja said the policy "violates fundamental principles of international law" and deprives "hundreds of millions of people of the right to travel based solely on their nationality or religion". The foreign ministry official said that the ban was discriminatory and would "entail international responsibility for the US government", without elaborating. Iran and the US severed diplomatic ties shortly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and relations have remained deeply strained since. The US is home to the largest Iranian community outside Iran. According to figures from Tehran's foreign ministry, in 2020 there were some 1.5 million Iranians in the US. Trump's executive order came days after Sunday's attack at the Colorado rally, in which authorities said more than a dozen people were hurt. The suspect is an Egyptian man who had overstayed a tourist visa.
