When clash erupted between T.N. government and Governor on appointing a Vice-Chancellor 40 years ago
Around a dozen State universities in Tamil Nadu currently do not have Vice-Chancellors, as Tamil Nadu remains embroiled in a legal tussle over shifting the authority to appoint them, from the Governor (in his capacity as Chancellor) to the State government. Interestingly, it is not the first time Tamil Nadu has witnessed a disagreement between the government and the Governor on this issue. A conflict took place four decades ago over the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of Madurai Kamaraj University.
In 1985, during M.G. Ramachandran's tenure as Chief Minister, tensions simmered over Governor S.L. Khurana's use of his authority to appoint Vice-Chancellors. That March, Education Minister C. Aranganayagam remarked that difficulties in appointing Vice-Chancellors 'seemed peculiar to States where non-Congress (I) governments were in office.' His comment came just months after the AIADMK-Congress (I) alliance swept to power in Tamil Nadu in the aftermath of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination.
Referring to similar controversies in Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal, Aranganayagam observed, according to The Hindu, that Governors in Congress (I)-ruled states appeared to have no issue accepting recommendations from the State government. 'This problem arose only in non-Congress (I) governed States,' he said.
In the Assembly, Aranganayagam argued it would be better to vest the power to oversee universities in State governments rather than with the Governor or the Central government.
Against this backdrop, in October 1985, Governor Khurana appointed S. Krishnaswamy, a well-regarded biologist, as Vice-Chancellor of Madurai Kamaraj University. The appointment caught the State government by surprise. Aranganayagam said the government had recommended C.A. Perumal, Head of the Political Science Department at University of Madras, for the post. He stated: 'The practice so far has been that the Governor consults the Chief Minister before making the appointment; in this case, the Chief Minister was not consulted. Therefore, with the Chief Minister's consent, the advice to the Governor is being forwarded. We have nothing against Dr. Krishnaswamy personally.'
When asked whether the government had officially conveyed its preference to the Governor, Aranganayagam admitted that he had only informally suggested Perumal's name, but insisted the Governor ought to have consulted the Chief Minister before finalising the appointment.
Later that evening, the Raj Bhavan issued a statement expressing surprise at the Minister's remarks. It emphasised that this was not the first time the Governor had appointed a Vice-Chancellor without direct consultation, noting that he had made similar decisions at least six times in the previous three years. The Governor's office stated that the process had been consistent and that in some instances — such as appointments to Madras and Bharathidasan Universities — he had disagreed with the Education Minister's recommendations and independently made the final call. The Governor's position, it said, was to choose the best candidate from the panel submitted.
The Raj Bhavan also cited Section 11 of the Madurai Kamaraj University Act to support the legality of Krishnaswamy's appointment.
Aranganayagam countered this by invoking Article 163(1) of the Constitution, which mandates that the Governor act on the advice of the Council of Ministers. He argued that since the Governor holds the post of Chancellor by virtue of being Governor, he cannot wield more power in the Chancellor's role than he does as Governor.
He also denied that the appointment followed past practice. 'In all previous cases, the Governor appointed Vice-Chancellors only after consulting the Chief Minister and obtaining his concurrence; in this case, he has not done so,' he said. Aranganayagam added that the issue was not about the individual selected, but about the principle of who holds the appointing authority. Aranganayam felt persons belonging to the state were better equipped than 'others coming from outside' to select the appropriate person for a post.
However, just a few hours later, the State government issued an official release, stating: 'It is most unfortunate that an unnecessary controversy has arisen over the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of Madurai Kamaraj University. The Government, after careful consideration, holds that the appointment of Dr. S. Krishnaswamy by the Governor-Chancellor is valid and on merit. The Governor's decision is being implemented by the Government.'
The Hindu reported: 'What happened between the Education Minister's assertion in the morning and the issue of the press release in the evening (putting an end to the controversy) is not quite clear. It is, however, learnt that, on behalf of the Chief Minister, an emissary (one of his Cabinet colleagues) called on the Governor at the Raj Bhavan in the afternoon and sorted out the matter.'
Krishnaswamy later assumed charge as Vice-Chancellor. He told journalists he was pleased that the Education Minister had clarified, 'We have nothing against Prof. Krishnaswamy personally.'
Incidentally, then Finance Minister V.R. Nedunchezhiyan welcomed the appointment, saying, 'I am happy that an internationally-known scientist has been chosen for the position.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Do we need to lionise BJP for criticising us on stampede: DKS
Bengaluru: Hitting out at the BJP for taking a moral high ground and criticising the government on the Bengaluru stampede, Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar on Tuesday asked who would take responsibility for stampedes in BJP-ruled states. 'Do we need to carry the BJP on our shoulders for taking a high ground and criticising the government on the stampede? Who is responsible for the stampedes in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and many railway stations across the country? More than hundred people died in a stampede at a UP temple alone. I went to visit plane crash site in Ahmedabad, did I say a word about the union government?' Shivakumar was speaking to reporters after flagging off a marathon organised by the Karnataka Pollution Control Board on the occasion of World Environment Day. Asked if the BJP was targeting DK Shivakumar, he said, 'It is natural that powerful people have a lot of enemies. The lesser the strength, the lesser the enemies. There won't obviously be any enemies if one doesn't have any power. If the media is with us, we will take oath once again in 2028.' Asked if he would swear in as the CM, he said the Congress government would take oath. Asked about High Court's stay on re-tendering for waste disposal, he said, 'How will it work if we don't' clean the city? I will study the judgement. There were 89 tenders earlier and they have all ganged up. It is a mafia. They think they can refuge under the Court's order, we will persuade the Court about this.' 'Some people are engaged in obstructing works by getting stays through PILs. This won't work with us. We will throw away the garbage mafia and will give opportunities to newcomers,' he said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Is Iran set for Shah regime 2.0? Exiled crown prince Reza Pahlavi has a message for Iranians: ‘The future is bright'
Amidst escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi asserts the Islamic Republic's collapse is imminent. He urges Iranians to rise up and reclaim their nation, envisioning a secular, democratic future. Pahlavi's statement arrives as speculation increases regarding potential international support for regime change in Tehran. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As war rages between Iran and Israel, exiled Iranian crown prince Reza Pahlavi has issued a dramatic message to his compatriots, declaring the Islamic Republic's collapse 'irreversible' and urging Iranians to rise up and 'reclaim Iran.'In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Pahlavi declared: 'The Islamic Republic has come to its end and is collapsing. What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together we will turn the page of history. Now is the time to stand up; the time to reclaim Iran. May I be with you soon.'The eldest son of Iran's last monarch, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, Reza was named Crown Prince in 1967 during his father's reign. He fled Iran in 1978 at age 17, shortly before the Shah's downfall and the 1979 Islamic Revolution that swept in a new era of clerical based in the United States, Pahlavi leads the National Council of Iran, an exiled opposition group. A longstanding critic of the Islamic Republic, he has previously advocated for a peaceful transition to a secular, democratic government—one that would protect civil liberties, reintegrate Iran with the international community, and modernize its latest statement comes amid a spiraling conflict. Last Friday, Israel launched its largest airstrike campaign against Iran, citing imminent threats linked to Iran's nuclear ambitions. Iran, a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, denies pursuing nuclear weapons and maintains that its program is for peaceful timing of Pahlavi's message is striking. With speculation swirling around U.S. and Israeli support for possible regime change in Tehran, the exiled prince's hopes for a return may seem more plausible than at any point in the past four monarchy's fall in 1979 followed growing unrest over corruption, westernization, and the sale of Iran's resources to foreign interests. The revolution led to the end of the Pahlavi dynasty and the rise of the Islamic with Iran facing deep internal and external pressure, Reza Pahlavi is once again positioning himself as a potential figurehead for a post-Islamic Republic Iran.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Iran–Israel war: Crude oil prices rise to near 5-month high as Brent tops $76. More upside ahead?
Crude oil prices continue to remain elevated as tensions between Iran and Israel persist for the sixth consecutive day, pushing prices close to a five-month high. Traders are particularly worried about potential disruptions to Iran's crude oil exports of 1.5–2.0 million barrels per day (mmbpd), out of its total output of 3.4 mmbpd. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude climbed as much as 0.64% on Wednesday, after surging over 4.3% on Tuesday to reach its highest level since January. Brent crude futures gained 0.5% after rising 4.4% in the previous trading session to touch $76.70 per barrel, the highest level since February. As hostilities between the two nations deepen, with both sides escalating attacks since Friday, concerns are mounting over potential U.S. military involvement and the risk of a broader regional conflict. On Tuesday, U.S. President Donald Trump demanded Iran's "unconditional surrender" and warned of a possible strike against the country's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a social media post ahead of his meeting with the national security team. While the Trump administration has maintained that the U.S. is not directly involved, the president's latest comments indicate a shift toward a more aggressive posture, signaling possible direct intervention in support of Israel's efforts to pressure Tehran. U.S. weapons are seen as critical to executing a more comprehensive strike against Iran's nuclear infrastructure than what Israel could achieve alone. Meanwhile, Israel's military confirmed it had launched strikes near Tehran and detected missile launches from Iran, with interception efforts reportedly underway. The conflict between the two countries began on Friday after Israel struck at Iranian nuclear and military facilities with the objective of preventing Iran from building a nuclear weapon. Meanwhile, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) said on Monday it expects the global economy to remain resilient in the second half of 2025, despite growing concerns over trade conflicts. However, it trimmed its forecast for oil supply growth from non-OPEC+ producers in 2026, signaling potential tightening in global energy markets. OPEC now expects U.S. output of tight oil, another term for shale, to hold steady next year at 9.05 million bpd/day. Last month, it expected small growth year on year and in January had forecast output in 2026 would reach 9.28 million bpd. In late May, OPEC+ agreed to increase oil production by 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) for July 2025. Meanwhile, another emerging concern driving crude prices higher is the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz—a key chokepoint for global oil trade. While this scenario has moved into focus amid rising tensions, experts believe the probability of such a closure remains low. A sustained disruption of Iran's crude oil exports by 0.5–1 million barrels per day (mmbpd) could add $5–10 per barrel to crude prices in the near to medium term, potentially pushing Brent crude to stabilise in the $75–80 per barrel range. However, domestic brokerage firm JM Financial believes that Brent is unlikely to rise significantly above $80 per barrel, citing a likely surplus of 1–2 mmbpd in CY25. This surplus, as per the brokerage, could stem from excess output growth by non-OPEC+ countries, the reversal of OPEC+'s 2.2 mmbpd voluntary cuts, and the availability of around 2 mmbpd of spare capacity with Saudi Arabia (plus an additional 1 mmbpd with the UAE), which could be deployed to offset any supply shock, especially given the strong relationship between U.S. President Trump and Saudi Arabia. (With inputs from agencies) Disclaimer: The views and recommendations given in this article are those of individual analysts. These do not represent the views of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.
