Angel: Michigan needs greater transparency in how it conducts its business
Sunshine is an antidote for many things: mood swings, stress, depression.
It also can be an antidote to government corruption or malfeasance. As taxpayers and citizens, we deserve transparency — including access to public records and governmental meetings at which the people's business is conducted.
Without access and transparency, there is an absence of accountability.
Public records are the backbone of watchdog and public service reporting. But it's not just reporters who want access to public records.
Parents want to know how money is spent in their school districts.
Developers want to know how municipalities work with business partners.
Voters want to know who is donating money to various campaigns.
Taxpayers want to know the details behind the deals their elected officials are making.
And the list goes on.
Michigan's Freedom of Information Act and Open Meetings Act provide the framework for access. Yet Michigan has a long way to go to meet the spirit of transparency and accountability.
As we observe Sunshine Week, March 16-22, it's worth noting Michigan is one of two states that exempts the governor's office from FOIA. The overwhelming majority of state legislatures are subject to FOIA. Michigan's is not.
The big question is: Why? What is it our elected state officials don't want us to know? Citizens should demand their state representatives and governor hold themselves to the same public records standards as all other public bodies in the state.
Legislators and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer can and should fix this issue in the current legislative session. In a climate where there is rising distrust in government, transparently conducting business is the best way to show taxpayers you're doing the work you've been hired to do.
Another sticking point for people, including news agencies, seeking public records is exorbitant fees. There are rules in place to limit fees, but some municipalities ignore them and others stretch their limits.
High fees naturally prevent some information-seekers from following through on their FOIA requests. Everyday citizens likely aren't going cough up hundreds or thousands of dollars for public records. And fees are haphazard. One municipality might give a requestor information for free without a FOIA request; another might charge a fee for the exact same information.
The same blueprint applies for how quickly records are delivered. Some entities will deliver them upon request; others file for time extensions and then estimate it will takes weeks or months to procure the requested information.
To be clear, high fees and lengthy delays are distinct strategies some public bodies use to stymie requests for public records. Again, what are these entities hiding? Why do they have such disdain for those seeking access to how government works.
Sunshine is a disinfectant. And Michigan is desperately in need of more sunshine.
Stephanie Angel is executive editor of the Lansing State Journal. Contact her at sangel@lsj.com.
This article originally appeared on Lansing State Journal: Sunshine Week: Michigan's public bodies lack transparency
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Former Dem 'super mayor' pleads the Fifth after failing to produce public records in court
A Chicago suburb's former Democratic "super mayor" is facing yet another legal hurdle after failing to produce public records from her time in office after being held in contempt of court earlier this month. In a hearing on Friday, Tiffany Henyard's attorney Beau Bridley pleaded the Fifth on his client's behalf after she was ordered to hand over public records from her time in office. "The smear campaign against Tiffany Henyard, which began while she was in office, continues even now that she is out of office," Bridley said in a statement to Fox News Digital. Bridley conceded that the former mayor does not have the requested document, with an Illinois judge allowing Henyard's legal team to submit an affidavit in its place. "The mayor has no document that the plaintiff seeks," Bridley said. "This matter is going to be resolved with a simple affidavit. The whole hearing was much ado about nothing." The hearing stems from a lawsuit filed by the Edgar County Watchdogs Inc., after the organization sued Henyard and the Village of Dolton for failing to produce financial records after the documents were requested under the Freedom of Information Act. "We had little doubt Ms. Henyard would use losing the election as an excuse not to produce the documents," Edward "Coach" Weinhaus, attorney for Edgar County Watchdogs, said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "Invoking the Fifth Amendment for a criminal investigation was an added wrinkle. The Watchdogs will keep looking for the documents even if the voters might have inadvertently thrown out the documents with the mayor." The embattled former mayor was unseated after losing her re-election bid to Jason House, who was sworn in last month. Henyard was also defeated by Illinois state Sen. Napoleon Harris in her attempt to keep her seat as Thornton Township supervisor. Henyard was thrust into the national spotlight in April 2024 after officials at Dolton Village Hall were served subpoenas from the FBI following a corruption investigation, FOX 32 Chicago reported. Henyard, however, was not charged with a crime. In response to the FBI looking into Henyard's administration, village trustees voted to hire former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot to investigate the former mayor's spending. At the initial vote, supporters of Henyard clashed with her opponents as the meeting spiraled into a screaming match between groups. Lightfoot's investigation reportedly revealed the village's fund fell from its initial $5.6 million balance to a $3.6 million deficit, with the local government's credit card bills accumulating a whopping $779,000 balance in 2023. On the day Henyard lost the mayoral primary, the Village of Dolton was reportedly slapped with a federal subpoena as officials demanded records tied to a land development allegedly tied to Henyard's boyfriend. Henyard is required to return for a hearing on June 11, with a judge set to decide if she is to remain in contempt of court while being fined $1,000 per day.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-SEC plan says existing staff cuts help meet DOGE targets
By Douglas Gillison and Chris Prentice (Reuters) -Wall Street's top regulator told the White House in March it had already made substantial progress toward meeting President Trump and Elon Musk's demands for leaner government via voluntary workforce reductions, according to a planning document obtained by Reuters. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission also told the Office of Management and Budget that it is legally required to seek input from Congress before any "significant reorganization" and that changes beyond certain budget thresholds need lawmakers' approval, according to the March 13 document provided in response to a Reuters' public records request. The SEC submission for "reduction in force" and reorganizations, which Reuters is the first to report, responded to February's call from Trump and erstwhile ally Musk for federal agencies to develop plans for "large scale" cuts as part of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency initiative. Though much of the text, released under the Freedom of Information Act, is redacted, the visible portions suggest agency leadership at least in part believed voluntary reductions already in progress could weigh against the need for further cuts. An SEC spokesperson declined to comment beyond recently installed SEC Chair Paul Atkins's public statements and the agency's recent budget request. The Office of Management and Budget did not respond to a request for comment. Since he took office in January, Trump's government-slashing efforts have stirred unease and concern among some SEC staff uncertain about the future of the agency's workforce and its political independence. Critics have said the workforce reductions could hinder the SEC's performance in times of crisis but Atkins has brushed off such concerns. Officials affiliated with the so-called Department of Government Efficiency continue to work on restructuring and cost cutting at the SEC. The March plan was compiled by then-Acting Director Mark Uyeda, who while serving as interim agency chief also rewired top agency positions in Enforcement and Examinations to have them report to new deputy directors. Uyeda declined to comment on the document. The plan predates Atkins' arrival in office in April. In response to an OMB query about how the agency planned to achieve staffing cuts and costs savings in the next three fiscal years, the document highlighted workforce reductions already underway. The "SEC has already used a variety of tools to achieve efficiencies," the memo said, referring to early retirement and resignation programs. It also said that, in addition to voluntary departures, the SEC had "eliminated over 550 authorized positions," leaving agency headcount at that point at 4,300 and falling. "This is below the lowest headcount level during the president's first term in office," it added. Agency data previously released to Reuters shows that by April 600 people had taken the administration's various buyout offers. The SEC last month asked Congress to approve funding for the coming fiscal year that would roughly preserve staffing at around 4,100 full-time positions. In response to a query about working with Congress on agency restructuring, the Uyeda plan pointed out that legally any "significant" restructuring required consultation with the House and Senate appropriations committees and that major funding shifts required those committees' approval. Sign in to access your portfolio
USA Today
2 days ago
- USA Today
Whitmer says she won't run for president. Democrats better hope she's joking.
For nearly as long as she's been governor, Gretchen Whitmer has been considered a presidential hopeful. And for nearly as long as she's been considered a presidential hopeful, Michigan's governor has been telling anybody who'd listen that she's actually not. When an interviewer at a Detroit Economic Club forum in April asked Whitmer what she's looking forward to in 2026, when she's term-limited out of office, the governor didn't miss a beat: "Retiring." Democrats better hope Whitmer was joking, because she may be the party's best hope of reclaiming the White House in 2028. Why Whitmer and not Buttigieg, Shapiro or Beshear? We could talk here about the other guys likely to seek the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, a list that includes, at minimum: Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle. Former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg California Gov. Gavin Newsom Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro Colorado Gov. Jared Polis Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear And it will surely grow over the next three years. But I think it's a better idea to talk about Whitmer. She's a successful purple-state governor (a recent Impact Research poll puts her approval rating at a whopping 63%) with decades of legislative, policymaking and executive experience. She speaks with intelligence and sensitivity on subjects from manufacturing to motherhood. She's got a knack for focusing on substantive issues that offer common ground, like funding our schools and fixing our roads. At 53, she's youthful and energetic ‒ but seasoned and experienced ‒ in a party with a surfeit of octogenarians, and she's a woman in a party whose voters, at times, seem disinclined toward white male candidates, at least at the state and congressional levels. Whitmer is an effective advocate for the causes she champions, and, as a mom who seemed to effortlessly balance raising two daughters, now grown, and leading the 10th most populous state in the nation, she's an aspirational figure for thousands of Michigan women who can't remember if they put money in their kid's school lunch account. (OK, it's me. I'm Michigan women.) Whitmer was elected and reelected by wide margins, and her approval rating has never dipped below 50%, which is, in these sorry times, a real achievement. "She is a superb retail politician, and a really unique one," said pollster Richard Czuba of the Glengariff Group. "You watch her work a rope line, and she makes everyone feel seen. And she comes from a state that's a must-win for a Democrat." American voters like centrists – and Whitmer does what voters expect There's no denying that her willingness to work with President Donald Trump has disappointed some Democrats who would prefer blanket opposition to hopeful collaboration. That centrist thing, Czuba said, is really only a problem for the far flanks of both parties ‒ and they're not the swing voters who decide elections, in Michigan or in the United States. "We did this question last year: Should an elected official cross party lines and negotiate with the other party to get something done, or should elected officials stick to the party's position and stand up for it?" said Czuba, of a survey of likely voters for the Detroit Regional Chamber ahead of the 2024 Mackinac Policy Conference. "It was 70% to 19%." The 19%, he said, were on the far right and the far left. "She's doing exactly what most voters expect of their leaders," Czuba said. "The governor understands the middle in a way that few people understand independent, centrist voters. That's one of her strengths. She pays attention to the center. In a purple state like Michigan, if you don't, you lose. That's how Democrats can win nationally. "They need to pay attention to the center, because if you don't, you lose." Gretchen Whitmer doesn't start fights, but she can finish them This is who Whitmer has always been. Her political sensibility is best described as "cheerfully determined,' and if there were an Olympic event in keeping your cool, this lady would hold the gold medal. As late as January 2018, powerful Democratic men – including Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan – were working to replace Whitmer on the Democratic gubernatorial ballot. Her response? "I'm staying focused on running a campaign that can win, so we can get Michigan back to being a state our kids will stay in when they graduate," Whitmer told me that year. "I'm eager to build the coalition. … I'm eager to work with anyone who wants to solve problems." In 2019, when then-Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, a Republican, called her "batshit crazy" to a crowd of supporters, or said in 2021 that he and the GOP legislature had "spanked" Whitmer "hard" on the budget and appointments, the governor wasn't mad, just disappointed: "I think that we deserve better, frankly, but I'm not going to spend my energy there because I've got a lot of important things that I'm working on that the people of our state need us to be all-successful on." In her most recent State of the State address, with Republicans back at the helm of the House of Representatives, Whitmer stayed on collaborative message: 'I took an oath to serve the people of Michigan ‒ all the people. That's my commitment to you no matter who is in the White House or on the other side of the table in Lansing. Yes, I do hope to find common ground with President Trump and work with the Democratic Senate and Republican House on our shared priorities.' Whitmer doesn't start fights, but she's not a pushover. During the COVID-19 pandemic, she went toe-to-toe with Trump, who dubbed her "that woman from Michigan," and in 2022 she led the charge to enshrine reproductive rights in the state constitution after Roe v. Wade was overturned. She's a staunch supporter of civil rights, women's rights and LBGTQ+ rights, and she has made it clear that won't change. What does Whitmer's 'folder incident' at the White House mean? The Econ Club interview last month came on the heels of a rough week for Michigan's governor. A meeting with Trump, set to discuss a new fighter mission for Selfridge Air Force Base and invasive Asian carp in the Great Lakes, had taken a turn: After exchanging pleasant remarks with Whitmer and Michigan's Republican House Speaker Matt Hall, a wave of cameras poured into the Oval Office as Trump signed two executive orders authorizing politically motivated investigations of staffers who served in his first term. An uncomfortable Whitmer edged away from the action, at one point holding a folder in front of her face as a photographer snapped a picture. The image, published on April 12 by The New York Times, reverberated through the political world. ("What was going through my mind at that moment?" she said to the Econ Club interviewer. "'I don't want my picture taken.'") I got dozens of texts the day the picture published, mostly from political insiders who saw The Folder Incident as Whitmer's Howard Dean scream. (Which, of course, is not actually what ended 2004 candidate Dean's presidential ambitions ... but we're still talking about it, 21 years later.) As the story unfolded, some of the Democratic insiders and national pundits who had been enamored with the notion of Whitmer as a presidential contender soured on the governor. The honeymoon, it seemed, was over. I didn't feel so great about The Folder Incident myself. It was unpleasant to watch a strong female governor treated that way, and the image, I thought, would reverberate. But outside the political bubble, it was a different story. When I floated the suggestion that this might tank Whitmer's presidential future past a friend who's not knee-deep in politics, my friend was skeptical. "Hmm. I guess we'll see. The 2028 election is a long way away," she said. "Some people will just see it as, 'I have nothing to do with this.'" My friend isn't alone. In an Epic-MRA poll conducted between April 28 through May 3 – after the Oval Office meeting – 52% of Michiganders said they approved of Whitmer's performance as governor, consistent with previous polls. In the same survey, just 41% said the same of Trump. A few weeks later, that new fighter mission at Selfridge Whitmer went to the White House to discuss – it happened. Democrats need to reconnect with voters Most folks in jobs like mine have responded to Whitmer's repeated assertions that she's into the job she has, not the one everyone thinks she wants, with mild eye-rolling to outright scoffing. But I believe her. When Whitmer says she's not running in 2028, it doesn't sound coy. It's been a punishing seven years, complete with a pandemic and a murder/kidnapping plot that an astounding number of people somehow see as a punchline or a put-up, and it's easy to imagine that she's ready for a break. Still, if I were a Democratic strategist, I'd be wondering whether I could persuade Whitmer to change her mind. Democrats want to win, but winning elections isn't just about numbers on the board. Voters are people, people whose lives are affected by who sits in the governor's mansion, or in the Oval Office. What Democrats need is to reconnect with voters, and Whitmer is among the few Democrats willing – or able – to give the party what it needs. Nancy Kaffer is the editorial page editor of the Detroit Free Press, where this column originally appeared. Contact her atnkaffer@
