Angel: Michigan needs greater transparency in how it conducts its business
Sunshine is an antidote for many things: mood swings, stress, depression.
It also can be an antidote to government corruption or malfeasance. As taxpayers and citizens, we deserve transparency — including access to public records and governmental meetings at which the people's business is conducted.
Without access and transparency, there is an absence of accountability.
Public records are the backbone of watchdog and public service reporting. But it's not just reporters who want access to public records.
Parents want to know how money is spent in their school districts.
Developers want to know how municipalities work with business partners.
Voters want to know who is donating money to various campaigns.
Taxpayers want to know the details behind the deals their elected officials are making.
And the list goes on.
Michigan's Freedom of Information Act and Open Meetings Act provide the framework for access. Yet Michigan has a long way to go to meet the spirit of transparency and accountability.
As we observe Sunshine Week, March 16-22, it's worth noting Michigan is one of two states that exempts the governor's office from FOIA. The overwhelming majority of state legislatures are subject to FOIA. Michigan's is not.
The big question is: Why? What is it our elected state officials don't want us to know? Citizens should demand their state representatives and governor hold themselves to the same public records standards as all other public bodies in the state.
Legislators and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer can and should fix this issue in the current legislative session. In a climate where there is rising distrust in government, transparently conducting business is the best way to show taxpayers you're doing the work you've been hired to do.
Another sticking point for people, including news agencies, seeking public records is exorbitant fees. There are rules in place to limit fees, but some municipalities ignore them and others stretch their limits.
High fees naturally prevent some information-seekers from following through on their FOIA requests. Everyday citizens likely aren't going cough up hundreds or thousands of dollars for public records. And fees are haphazard. One municipality might give a requestor information for free without a FOIA request; another might charge a fee for the exact same information.
The same blueprint applies for how quickly records are delivered. Some entities will deliver them upon request; others file for time extensions and then estimate it will takes weeks or months to procure the requested information.
To be clear, high fees and lengthy delays are distinct strategies some public bodies use to stymie requests for public records. Again, what are these entities hiding? Why do they have such disdain for those seeking access to how government works.
Sunshine is a disinfectant. And Michigan is desperately in need of more sunshine.
Stephanie Angel is executive editor of the Lansing State Journal. Contact her at sangel@lsj.com.
This article originally appeared on Lansing State Journal: Sunshine Week: Michigan's public bodies lack transparency
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, ‘secret police tactics'
As widespread reports of immigration enforcement officers making arrests wearing masks and refusing to provide information about detainees spread fear in immigrant communities, Boston is trying to get more transparency from the federal government about these operations. In an executive order signed Tuesday morning, Mayor Michelle Wu committed to sending regular Freedom of Information Act requests to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security seeking information on who Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers are arresting, why and where they are being taken. At a news conference Tuesday, Wu accused ICE of using 'secret police tactics,' wearing masks, not identifying themselves and refusing to share information about people who have been detained. Read more: Why do ICE agents wear masks? 'In Boston, our officers wear badges. They do not routinely wear masks. ... It is our responsibility to make sure that communication between our residents and the city of Boston in every manner is designed to boost trust and boost collaboration,' Wu said. 'We expect the same standards from law enforcement operating in the city, no matter what agency they are from.' The mayor said she did not know how many people had been arrested by ICE in Boston since President Donald Trump took office in January. Though the federal government has made claims about how many people have been arrested, Wu said she had no way to verify those numbers, who is included in the count and how many are from Boston versus other communities. The executive order also requires city officials to be in close communication with consular offices of other countries in Boston, which are frequently a source of information for immigrant residents. Community activists who spoke at Tuesday's news conference said the executive order would help families of people who have been arrested by ICE. Lenita Reason, executive director of the Brazilian Worker Center, shared the story of a father who was arrested by ICE and brought to Texas two weeks ago, saying his wife only knew where her husband was being held because the community worked together to help her hire an attorney. While Wu had said the executive order was one small thing the city was doing to help immigrants, Reason said that for her community, it was 'huge.' 'We don't want to be waiting two weeks, three weeks, to find out where our fathers and mothers, members of our community, are,' she said. Because the city does not have power over the federal government, the executive order does not necessarily mean that ICE will cooperate with the city's requests. However, under the Freedom of Information Act, a federal law, government agencies are required to provide public records that are requested. If they ignore or refuse the request, the requester can appeal or sue to potentially have the court force the agency to fulfill the request. There are exemptions to records that must be provided under FOIA, including law enforcement records that could jeopardize an investigation if they are made public. 'The city government cannot overrule what they're doing, but it's still important to tell the truth, and it's still important to be clear about what we expect from our federal government,' Wu said. Last week, the mayor faced blowback from U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Leah Foley, who accused Wu of spreading 'false narratives' when she referred to ICE agents as 'secret police' at another event. Wu also announced Tuesday that Boston had won a victory over the Trump administration in court last week. The city sued the federal government last month after Trump officials cancelled $48 million in previously awarded funding to combat homelessness, and on Friday, Wu said, a judge sided with the city, saying Boston was entitled to the grants. Can Trump deploy the National Guard to stop protests? Here's what the law says What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.
New York Post
13 hours ago
- New York Post
Former Dem ‘super mayor' Tiffany Henyard pleads the Fifth after failing to produce public records in court
A Chicago suburb's former Democratic 'super mayor' is facing yet another legal hurdle after failing to produce public records from her time in office after being held in contempt of court earlier this month. In a hearing on Friday, Tiffany Henyard's attorney Beau Bridley pleaded the Fifth on his client's behalf after she was ordered to hand over public records from her time in office. 'The smear campaign against Tiffany Henyard, which began while she was in office, continues even now that she is out of office,' Bridley said in a statement to Fox News Digital. Bridley conceded that the former mayor does not have the requested document, with an Illinois judge allowing Henyard's legal team to submit an affidavit in its place. 'The mayor has no document that the plaintiff seeks,' Bridley said. 'This matter is going to be resolved with a simple affidavit. The whole hearing was much ado about nothing.' 3 Tiffany Henyard's (pictured) attorney, Beau Bridley, pleaded the Fifth on his client's behalf after she was ordered to hand over public records from her time in office. FOX 32 The hearing stems from a lawsuit filed by the Edgar County Watchdogs Inc., after the organization sued Henyard and the Village of Dolton for failing to produce financial records after the documents were requested under the Freedom of Information Act. 'We had little doubt Ms. Henyard would use losing the election as an excuse not to produce the documents,' Edward 'Coach' Weinhaus, attorney for Edgar County Watchdogs, said in a statement to Fox News Digital. 'Invoking the Fifth Amendment for a criminal investigation was an added wrinkle. The Watchdogs will keep looking for the documents even if the voters might have inadvertently thrown out the documents with the mayor.' 3 Her lawyer conceded that the former mayor does not have the requested document, with an Illinois judge allowing Henyard's legal team to submit an affidavit in its place. @stylemebrandon/Instagram The embattled former mayor was unseated after losing her re-election bid to Jason House, who was sworn in last month. Henyard was also defeated by Illinois state Sen. Napoleon Harris in her attempt to keep her seat as Thornton Township supervisor. Henyard was thrust into the national spotlight in April 2024 after officials at Dolton Village Hall were served subpoenas from the FBI following a corruption investigation, FOX 32 Chicago reported. Henyard, however, was not charged with a crime. 3 The embattled former mayor was unseated after losing her re-election bid to Jason House, who was sworn in last month. Instagram / @tiffanyhenyard In response to the FBI looking into Henyard's administration, village trustees voted to hire former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot to investigate the former mayor's spending. At the initial vote, supporters of Henyard clashed with her opponents as the meeting spiraled into a screaming match between groups. Lightfoot's investigation reportedly revealed the village's fund fell from its initial $5.6 million balance to a $3.6 million deficit, with the local government's credit card bills accumulating a whopping $779,000 balance in 2023. On the day Henyard lost the mayoral primary, the Village of Dolton was reportedly slapped with a federal subpoena as officials demanded records tied to a land development allegedly tied to Henyard's boyfriend. Henyard is required to return for a hearing on June 11, with a judge set to decide if she is to remain in contempt of court while being fined $1,000 per day.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission hosts first meeting ahead of major deadlines
The current membership of the Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission hosts an inaugural meeting. From left, Commissioners Monica Oldenburg, Kim Lowe and Bruce Bailey. At left is the seat for Commissioner Lorelle Mueting of Gretna. June 9, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — The Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission hosted its inaugural meeting Monday ahead of a fast-approaching July 1 deadline to set licensing criteria and an Oct. 1 deadline to begin issuing licenses. Emergency regulations will more than likely need to be adopted to meet the July deadline that voters approved in November, because of public hearing notice requirements for regulatory changes. Next steps remain unclear for the commission, which has a very limited amount of funds for the task. Commissioner Bruce Bailey of Lincoln, who separately chairs the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, said the goal is to come up with something to show the public by July 1 and seek feedback. 'That's where we are at this time,' Bailey told reporters after the meeting. ''Til then, we really don't know anything.' Bailey said his 'gut feeling, realizing what a short window it is,' is that the board will 'most likely' need to consider emergency regulations. Assistant Nebraska Attorney General Ben Swanson, who explained the typical rulemaking process to commissioners on Monday, said he would address the emergency process at the next commission meeting at 10 a.m. on June 26. The commission was still deciding on a location. It was not immediately clear whether the group would hold additional meetings before the July 1 deadline. Under normal rulemaking conditions, an agency or commission drafts guidelines and sets a hearing for public comment. The public must be notified at least 30 days before said hearing. If commissioners approve the proposed rules and regulations later this month, with no significant changes, the guidance will be sent to the Attorney General's Office for constitutional review. The governor has final say on the rules and regulations before they are filed with the Secretary of State's Office. If the commission makes significant changes, there must be another hearing with another 30-day notice. Much of the first meeting focused on administrative hurdles, including the Open Meetings Act for virtual and in-person meetings and support from the Nebraska Department of Administrative Services for budget control and human resources. Bailey and Crista Eggers, executive director of Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, the group that led the new laws through the process to the measures' 2024 wins at the ballot box, described Monday's meeting as a needed 'step.' 'We have to take the wins when we get the wins,' Eggers told reporters. 'Today, having a meeting was a win.' However, Eggers cautioned that major questions remain about how the commission will find funds to work, the timeline for future regulations and how commissioners will respect what the people had in mind when they passed the new laws. 'We have always been committed to sticking in here and advocating and fighting and educating until the day that we see Nebraska patients who need medical cannabis as an option have it, that it's accessible to them, that it's safe for them,' Eggers said. 'That day is not here yet.' State lawmakers in May approved a two-year state budget with a $30,000 increase in the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission's bottom line for staffing related to any of the commission's shared duties with the Nebraska Cannabis Commission, for staff who might take on new duties under the medical cannabis law. Voters placed all three members of the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission on the Medical Cannabis Commission. The governor changed the commission's members in recent weeks by choosing not to reappoint Harry Hoch, Jr., to the 2nd Congressional District seat, leaving just Bailey and Commissioner Kim Lowe of Kearney, as first reported by the Nebraska Examiner. However, lawmakers didn't approve creating a new budget line for the Medical Cannabis Commission the way they did when the Asian American Affairs Commission was created in 2024. Lawmakers also declined to pass a bill clarifying the framework within the Liquor Commission for medical cannabis-related spending and revenue collection. The result is an unclear system that commissioners started grappling with on Monday. Jacob Leaver, deputy state budget administrator, said spending from a Liquor Control Commission cash fund should be used for the 'bare minimum.' He suggested that the cannabis commissioners approve a 'subprogram' in the state budget, which can be done administratively but doesn't equate to new spending. He said commissioners 'theoretically have $0 of appropriation.' 'Essentially, you have to 'borrow' [an] appropriation from the liquor side into that new subprogram for the medical cannabis side,' Leaver said. The Liquor Control Commission has one cash fund, with a maximum annual spending limit of $100,000, which was slightly increased this spring. The fund collects revenue from various liquor-related fees, such as for registration or server training, or from selling copies of governing rules and other documents. The fund is rarely used but tapping into it creates a new juggling act. State law allows those funds to be used for 'any administrative costs' associated with specific liquor statutes. Medical cannabis statutes were placed in a different section of the law, and the budget bills did not expressly authorize additional spending from that fund. Bailey asked whether those funds could be paid back if the Liquor Control Commission authorized diverting funds for the Medical Cannabis Commission. Leaver said 'yes and no,' as the Medical Cannabis Commission collects no general state taxes (income, sales, etc.) but could direct application fees, for instance, back to the cash fund. Liquor commissioners could ask the Legislature for more funds in 2026 or backfill spending, state budget officials have said. Bailey told reporters the commission would look into getting some funds soon in the face of a tight budget but 'a large goal.' 'We'll do our best, as we can,' Bailey said. Bailey and Lowe were sworn into their new roles Monday, as was Dr. Monica Oldenburg of Lincoln. The trio unanimously voted to elect Oldenburg, an anesthesiologist, as chair and approved up to two members to meet with outside consultants or experts and come back with that information. Commissioner Lorelle Mueting of Gretna missed the first meeting. Oldenburg defended Mueting as having had a prior commitment and said commissioners tried to get to work as soon as possible. The AG's Office did not, as it has in the past, threaten the commission Monday with a future lawsuit if licensing moves forward by the Oct. 1 deadline. Attorney General Mike Hilgers and his staff have repeatedly threatened that action, including in court and before the Legislature. Legal action continues in Lancaster County District Court, with a longtime marijuana opponent, former State Sen. John Kuehn of Heartwell, trying to void the new medical cannabis laws. Kuehn's filings argue that the laws are an unlawful delegation of power and run afoul of federal laws against marijuana. Hilgers and his office have argued the AG should be the one to challenge the laws on encroaching on federal constitutional powers and have asked that Kuehn's case be dismissed. Lancaster County District Judge Susan Strong is currently considering whether to dismiss the case. However, a June 5 filing from Kuehn now seeks to add Oldenburg and Mueting to the case while removing Hoch from the lawsuit. Hoch was not reappointed to the commission as Gov. Jim Pillen seeks someone with more 'cannabis experience,' according to Hoch. 'This is a constantly evolving and fast-moving controversy as government actors actively seek new ways to use taxpayer resources to implement the measures at issue,' the latest court filing from Kuehn said. One of Kuehn's attorneys, former State Sen. Andrew La Grone, attended Monday's inaugural meeting of the Cannabis Commission. Kuehn's lawsuit also targets Pillen, Secretary of State Bob Evnen, other state officials and the three sponsors of the 2024 campaign, including Eggers. Eggers said she hopes the commission remembers the lives at the center of the fight, including her son who has a severe form of drug-resistant epilepsy. She said the window of opportunity to work together for safe access remains open. 'I hope they approach this remembering that the decisions and the way they do this does impact real people, and those real people and the patients and the voters of the state are watching,' Eggers said of the commission. 'I believe they have a very, very strong expectation to how this goes.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
