Sebi Enhances Investor Charter to Boost Financial Literacy and Inclusion, ET LegalWorld
Markets regulator Sebi on Monday tweaked the investor charter for investment advisers and research analysts to enhance financial inclusion and financial literacy.
This came in view of the recent developments in the securities market, including the introduction of the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platform and SCORES 2.0 -- a web-based centralised grievance redressal system of Sebi.
Advt
Advt
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis.
Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates
Save your favourite articles
The modified charter includes vision, mission, services provided to investors and details of business transacted by investment advisers (IAs) /research analysts with respect to their investors, according to separate circulars.Additionally, it includes rights and responsibilities of investors; details of redressal mechanism available to investors and how to access it, along with formats for investors complaints data to be disclosed monthly by IAs and RAs on their website and mobile applications and trend of annual disposal of complaints.The markets regulator has investment advisers and research analysts to bring the investor charter to the notice of their clients (existing as well as new clients) by disclosing the charter on their respective websites and mobile applications.Also, they have been asked to make the charter available at prominent places in the office and provide a copy of the charter as a part of the client onboarding process, through e-mails or letters etc.To ensure transparency in the Investor Grievance Redressal Mechanism, all IAs and RAs will continue to disclose on their respective websites and mobile applications the data on complaints received against them or against issues dealt by them and redressal thereof, latest by the 7th of the succeeding month in a prescribed format, Sebi said.Sebi, in December 2021, issued an investor charter for IAs and RAs detailing the services provided to investors and, the rights of investors, among others.This was aimed at facilitating investor awareness about various activities which an investor deals with, such as the opening of an account, KYC and in-person verification, complaint resolution, issuance of contract notes and various statements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Sebi clears IPO hurdle for firms with large base of public shareholders
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has softened its position on approving initial public offerings (IPOs) by companies with a large number of public shareholders, resolving a grey area that had stalled several high-profile listings. As a result, five such companies – including HDB Financial Services and Hero FinCorp -- which had filed their draft red herring prospectus last year, have recently received regulatory nod for their IPOs. The delay in Sebi's approval, according to people in the know, stemmed from ambiguity over whether a large number of public shareholders, without any prior public fundraising, violated provisions of the Companies Act. The capital markets regulator has now clarified that a high public shareholder count, by itself, doesn't breach regulations if the company hasn't raised capital through a public offer, the sources said. 'The matter is now settled,' said one of the people. 'If the company hasn't raised public funds through these share issuances, it's not an issue. Many of these cases involve ESOP (employee stock ownership plan) conversions or unlisted market trades.' At the time of their DRHP filing, HDB Financial had more than 41,500 public shareholders, Hero FinCorp had around 7,500, and Vikram Solar about 7,000. All three have received Sebi approval in the past two weeks. Waaree Energies, which has since listed, had about 2,600 public shareholders when it filed IPO papers. Separately, the National Stock Exchange -- also eyeing an IPO -- has seen its shareholder base swell to more than 100,000 due to heightened investor interest. Sebi did not respond to emailed queries until the time of press. The regulator, according to legal experts, now acknowledges that secondary transfers of ESOP-converted shares, where the company is not involved directly and no capital is raised, do not necessarily violate norms. However, the distinction remains fact-dependent. 'The Companies Act permits ESOP grants and their eventual conversion to equity, even if that results in a large number of shareholders, as it doesn't fall under the purview of private placement norms,' said Ankita Singh, managing partner at Sarvaank Associates. 'Where the legal line starts to blur is when these shares, ostensibly meant as employee incentives, become a tool for indirect public participation in a pre-IPO company.' 'Unless the company is found to be raising funds through these transfers, the law doesn't view it as a breach, but it certainly raises regulatory and governance questions around intent and transparency,' Singh added. Apurva Kanvinde, partner at Juris Corp, said Sebi may continue to assess potential securities law violations on a case-by-case basis and may also consult the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). 'Under the Companies Act, 2013, an offer made to more than 200 persons in a financial year is treated as a public issue,' Kanvinde said. 'Securities issued under ESOP schemes are exempt from this threshold. The earlier Companies Act, 1956, had similar exemptions for internal corporate concerns and for NBFCs issuing shares or debentures.' 'In negotiated private sales, the company neither participates nor receives consideration,' said Saumya Ramakrishnan, partner at Bombay Law Chambers. 'Yet even genuine trades have drawn Sebi scrutiny at the DRHP stage due to technicalities.'
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
K-RIDE to get full-time technocrat MD to steer Bengaluru Suburban Railway Project
The Karnataka Rail Infrastructure Development Company (K-RIDE), which is implementing the Bengaluru Suburban Railway Project, invited applications for the post of managing director on deputation on Monday. With this, K-RIDE, a joint venture of the state and Central governments, is set to appoint a full-time technocrat to the agency, which has, until now, had managing directors from the IAS cadre holding multiple charges in the government. According to the vacancy notice issued by K-RIDE, the candidate must be 55 years old or younger as of March 31, 2025. The job description states that the candidate should have a minimum of 25 years of Group A service, of which at least five years must be in a senior administrative grade. The candidate should also have at least fiveyears of experience in planning, design, and execution of railway-related infrastructure projects. The candidate is also expected to have experience in project report preparation, sanction, resource mobilisation and coordination with other ministers/stakeholders. The tenure is for three years with possible extension as per rules. Candidates are given one month to submit their applications. K-RIDE has not had a full-time managing director since Amit Garg's transfer in August 2022. Since then, only in-charge MDs have been appointed, including Gaurav Gupta (August 2022) and Dr N Manjula (November 2023). Manjula, who is now the incumbent MD, also holds an additional charge of secretary to the Infrastructure Development, Ports and Inland Water Transport Departments. In June 2024, Minister of State for Railways V Somanna announced that a technically qualified full-time MDwould be appointed within 15 days; however, no action was taken. Last week, the Karnataka government appointed Dr Vasanthi Amar as special deputy commissioner for K-RIDE. BJP parliamentarians, including Bangalore South MP Tejasvi Surya and Bangalore Central MP P C Mohan, trained their guns on the Congress government for 'failing' to comply with the advertising requirements of the Railway Board to appoint a full-time MD and for allegedly hampering the progress of this key infrastructure project aimed at decongesting Bengaluru. According to government officials, the need for a technocrat as a full-time managing director arises due to the project's construction in close proximity to active railway lines. 'Constructing suburban railway lines alongside active railway lines with trains running at high speed is a complex task. Therefore, K-RIDE needs to be headed by an individual who can take on such technically challenging roles to fast-track the project,' said a government official. The applications will be received by the internal HR division of K-RIDE, which will screen the candidates and shortlist them in line with the job specifications. Shortlisted candidates will be called for an interview by a board comprising representatives from the state and Central governments before the final candidate is selected. The BSRP spans 149.348 km across four corridors: Sampige (KSR Bengaluru to Devanahalli, 41.4 km), Mallige (Benniganahalli to Chikkabanavara, 25.01 km), Parijaata (Kengeri to Whitefield, 35.52 km), and Kanaka (Heelalige to Rajanukunte, 46.24 km). Of all corridors, only Corridor 2 has seen some progress, albeit at a slow pace, with less than 30 per cent of the work completed. Civil work tender was awarded to Larsen & Toubro on August 26, 2022, for Rs 859.97 crore. However, L&T has reportedly hinted at withdrawing from the project due to land acquisition hurdles. L&T has cited the non-availability of land as a primary reason for halting work. Approximately 28.56 acres of private land and 91 acres of railway land are required for Corridor 2, but delays in land handover by South Western Railway and K-RIDE have stalled progress. Private landowners have obtained court stay orders, and some are demanding higher compensation, further complicating the acquisition process. The 7.4-km section between Chikkabanavara and Yeshwantpur as part of Corridor 2 was targeted for completion by end of 2025, with the full corridor expected to be operational by December 2026. However, given the current pace of work, K-RIDE is uncertain about meeting its deadlines. As for the rolling stock, the initial public-private partnership (PPP) model for procuring 306 rail coaches failed due to a lack of bids. A new equity model with 50:50 funding (Rs 2,135 crore from Karnataka, awaiting Railway Ministry approval) has been approved by the Karnataka Cabinet in November 2024. Tenders are ready but await the Central government order and Railway Board approval.
India Today
6 hours ago
- India Today
Why IndusInd Bank is under a cloud of ‘fraud'
(NOTE: This article was originally published in the India Today issue dated June 9, 2025)May 22 was indeed a grim day for 76-year-old Ashok P. Hinduja, chairman of IndusInd International Holdings Ltd (IIHL) and promoter of IndusInd Bank. For the first time in nearly two decades, the bank reported a quarterly net loss—an alarming Rs 2,328 crore. The causes: accounting discrepancies, suspected fraud and mounting stress in its microfinance portfolio. Spooked investors sent the bank's shares tumbling. Both CEO Sumant Kathpalia and deputy CEO Arun Khurana had stepped down in April. On May 28, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) passed an interim order against the duo over alleged insider trading, restraining them from accessing the securities market. Six days before, Sebi chief Tuhin Pandey had said the matter was actually 'RBI's remit'—the central bank was already on the case since March. Sebi would concern itself only 'if there are any egregious violations by anyone', Pandey said. Subsequent events imply something on those lines may have indeed gone all the ash started flying, Hinduja had put on a brave face on the disappointing quarterly results, saying the bank's board has taken 'appropriate, swift' action. But the scale of losses, and more so the suspected fraud behind it, have shaken up what is India's fifth largest lender, with over 41 million customers and deposits of over Rs 4 lakh crore. Though the bank has claimed it is well capitalised, the recent events have threatened to erode its reputation, even as more instances of accounting errors and discrepancies keep surfacing. 'Every line of defence at IndusInd Bank seems to have failed to detect these discrepancies,' says financial consultant Ashvin Parekh. 'A detailed investigation will certainly be conducted, particularly so if it is suggesting intentional non-compliance.'Conceptualised by Srichand P. Hinduja, the eldest of the Hinduja brothers and erstwhile chairman of the Hinduja Group, and established in 1994, IndusInd Bank was the first among the new-generation private banks in the post-economic liberalisation era. Ashok, the youngest of the deceased Srichand's three brothers, chairs the Hinduja Group of companies in India. IIHL holds around 16 per cent stake in the bank, and has the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) consent to raise it to 26 per cent (see chart). Its key customers include large corporates, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) as well as retail clients, with a focus on commercial vehicle financing. The bank had a network of 2,984 branches and 2,956 ATMs as of DISCOVERY OF A 'FRAUD'No one could have predicted such a drastic turn of events at the bank. It came under the RBI's radar in early March, when the central bank denied Kathpalia a three-year extension and granted only a year instead. On March 10, the bank's senior management held a conference call with analysts, stating discrepancies had been found in the derivatives trading portfolio and that the bank expected to take a financial hit of Rs 1,900-2,000 crore as a result. Derivatives are financial contracts whose value is determined by the price of an underlying asset, such as stocks, bonds, commodities or currencies. They are used for various purposes, including hedging risk, speculating on price movements and potentially earning profits. At that stage, Kathpalia said the problem was specifically in the internal deals for foreign currency is standard practice for banks to hedge currency risks to minimise potential losses from exchange rate fluctuations. IndusInd Bank, too, used derivative instruments to manage such risks. However, during a review of its processes to comply with RBI guidelines on investment portfolios—effective April 2024—the bank discovered 'some gaps' in the positioning of its derivatives. It found the anomalies around October-November last year, and hired an external agency to investigate the matter, in addition to an internal enquiry, Kathpalia told the media. Strangely enough, Gobind Jain, the bank's CFO, resigned in January, to 'pursue opportunities outside the bank', following which Khurana stepped into the are complex instruments. Usually, there are multiple underlying assets which are at risk, resulting in complex valuation as well as accounting treatment,' says Parekh. 'The underlying risk may include interest rates, market rates or exchange rates, which are dynamic and volatile. The combination of such underlying risks requires proper assessment of value at risk.' On March 20, the bank announced that it had appointed a new external agency to conduct a root cause analysis and assign accountability. On April 27, it said the agency found that the discrepancies would lead to a financial hit of Rs 1,960 crore. Khurana resigned the next day, and Kathpalia, a day later, taking moral bank has said that a committee of executives will manage operations at present and that it is on the hunt for a new CEO. On May 9, it issued a fresh disclosure, stating it was investigating insider trading allegations against Kathpalia and Khurana. This was followed by disclosures of Rs 674 crore in 'incorrect interest income' recorded in the microfinance division, and Rs 595 crore in unsubstantiated balances under other assets. Both issues, however, were closed as of January, the bank said. J. Sridharan, executive vice chairman of the microfinance arm, Bharat Financial Inclusion, has also tendered his believe the bank failed on several fronts. 'There seems to be a culture and governance breakdown. The bank was trying to grow at any pace,' says Abizer Diwanji, founder, NeoStrat Advisors. 'Whenever cyclical issues hit it, they chose to ignore them.'Mid-sized banks are always vulnerable to market perceptions. Given the high cost of doing business, they often engage in riskier activities than their larger counterparts. In such cases, banks should consistently make provisions in their books for creditors. 'IndusInd tried to grow in the high-yield, unsecured SME segment, and when things hit the roof, they did not have provision cover, and had to do things like derivative accounting,' Diwanji says. 'When you tend to compromise on accounting, you tend to compromise on governance.' As it happens, the Hindujas were also borrowing against IndusInd shares to finance the Reliance Capital acquisition, and may not have wanted the share prices to the bank valued its assets dynamically and regularly, with proper quantification of the value at risk, it could have identified the 'gap' and taken appropriate measures to address the loss in value. 'But here, the underlying valuation itself is a question mark, giving an impression that all the three offices were involved—the front office that does the trade, which holds the instrument or decides to buy the instrument; the mid-office, which is expected to evaluate the risk regularly and dynamically; and the back office, which is supposed to account for it,' says Parekh. 'All the three seem to have either failed or connived.'Many are surprised that such practices went undetected by the senior management for years. The first line of defence is the trader; the second is the senior managers, who may not have asked the necessary questions. The third level comprises the bank's executive directors. It remains unclear whether they implemented proper controls or were prevented from doing so. Beyond these three layers, one would expect the audit committee, along with the internal and external auditors, to examine valuation and accounting practices—followed by oversight from the board of directors and the promoters. IIFL estimates that IndusInd has taken around Rs 4,700 crore hit on its profit and loss statement due to all the 'frauds'. The brokerage has downgraded the IndusInd Bank stock. The bank's shares closed at Rs 804.75 on the BSE on May 28, nearly half of its highest level of Rs 1,550 a year STEADYING THE SHIPAlthough the issues at IndusInd Bank point to serious corporate governance failures, there is no worry yet on its financial health. Hinduja has clarified that the bank is adequately capitalised, with a capital adequacy ratio of 16.24 per cent as of March. The RBI also said on March 15 that the bank was 'well-capitalised and the financial position of the bank remains satisfactory'. Sunil Mehta, the bank's chairman, told analysts on May 21 that they are 'taking further measures to improve internal controls and processes to prevent such lapses from occurring again.'Diwanji says the bank should look at its own business model of high-cost lending. Moreover, the board should oversee internal developments and pay closer attention to whistle-blower complaints. For instance, red flags should have been raised when Jain resigned in January. Last but not the least, the management has to rebuild trust—that begins with a change in work culture. They should allow information to flow and act when necessary, rather than stall the flow of information, he more and more skeletons tumbling out of its closet, IndusInd Bank has to methodically work to resolve its current issues besides building new systems to prevent a recurrence and restore the confidence of its investors and to India Today Magazine
