Controversial pregnancy drug campaigners accused Labour of ignoring parents of "affected" kids
Many women given Primodos blame it and similar drugs for causing abnormalities in babies.
Campaigners calling for justice over a controversial pregnancy test drug have accused Labour of ignoring families who believe their children were affected.
Many women given Primodos blame it and similar drugs for causing abnormalities in babies.
In 2023, campaigners lost a High Court battle for compensation – leaving the claimants potentially liable for costs.
Wilma Ord, 77, of Livingston, took the drug in 1970. Her daughter Kirsteen, 54, is deaf, severely asthmatic and has cerebral palsy.
She said: 'My last MP was SNP Hannah Bardell who went out of her way to listen, to do everything she could but it feels like everything she did has been undone.
'The Labour Government has done nothing for us. They won't look at new evidence, they just won't listen to us.'
Marie Lyon, of the Association for Children Damaged by Hormone Pregnancy Tests, took Primodos in the early stages of her pregnancy with daughter Sarah and has been fighting for justice ever since.
She said: 'I share Wilma's frustration at the apparent lack of support from the Labour Government.' Labour MP for Livingston, Gregor Poynton, has met Wilma and has joined the campaign's All-Party Parliamentary Group of MPs.
Primodos was taken off the market in 1978. By that point 1.5million women had taken it.
Manufacturer Schering, now part of Bayer, has denied a link.
A 2020 independent review found health regulators failed patients and Primodos was responsible for 'avoidable harm'.
Bayer said: 'Bayer maintains that no significant new scientific knowledge has been produced that would call into question the validity of the previous assessment of there being no link between the use of Primodos and the occurrence of such congenital anomalies.'
The Department of Health said: 'The Commission on Human Medicines last year concluded that there was no new evidence to support the claims that the use of hormone tests had adverse outcomes.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
From creating the NHS to investing in people, Labour are innovators – next week we'll do it again… with £86b for hi-tech
IT has been almost a year since Labour came to power – and in that time we have made tough choices to steady our economy. This government will never forget that the decisions we make impact your family's finances. 4 4 You know what it means to work hard and make sacrifices when times are tough. And while that has not been easy, the tide is beginning to turn. Interest rates have been cut four times — a boost for everyone with a mortgage. We raised the pay of millions of working people by up to £1,400 a year by increasing the national minimum wage. In the last week, we have increased the number of children eligible for free school meals by half a million and announced £15billion to upgrade trains and buses outside London. Now is the time to invest in Britain's future, and that means doing things differently. We are building a new economic model that puts working people first. By investing in the industries of tomorrow, we will create good jobs, boost wages and put more money into people's pockets. Too often, governments get caught firefighting today's problems, neglecting the opportunities of tomorrow. But history shows us a different path. Inside robotic surgery that is revolutionising outcomes on the NHS After a post-war election victory in 1945, a Labour government created the NHS. In the 1960s, we backed science and technology in the age of the 'white heat'. In the 1990s, we invested in people and public services, transforming lives. Today, we must do the same, by backing British ideas and innovation. Next week, the Chancellor will set out our plan to renew Britain's economy by investing in your priorities: health, security and good jobs. As part of that, we are announcing an £86billion investment in the UK's fastest-growing sectors — tech, life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence. This money will fund cutting-edge medical research to tackle hard-to-treat diseases to help keep families together for longer. It will support defence innovation to keep Britain safe in an increasingly volatile world. 'Foundations for change' And it will power advances in engineering biology that could revolutionise how we produce food, fuel, materials. These investments will more than pay for themselves and will create thousands of well-paid jobs across the country. And the decisions over where to spend the cash will not be made in Whitehall, but in the communities that will benefit, because we know every corner of Great Britain has a part to play. We want to see Liverpool leveraging its expertise in life sciences to accelerate drug discovery; Northern Ireland harnessing its reputation for cutting-edge defence equipment to shore up our national security; and South Wales making the most of its expertise in designing cutting-edge semiconductors that power the devices like mobile phones and electric cars we rely on every day. 4 4 We know the legacy of the past 14 years can't be reversed overnight. But the tough decisions we have made are laying the foundations for lasting change. Now, we are entering a new phase, focused on long-term renewal and economic strength. The principle is simple: invest through tough times to grow stronger. We see this in the business world constantly. Like the American tech company that, in the 1990s, was 90 days from bankruptcy before doubling down on innovation. That company was Apple, and today many of you are reading this on one of their products. Britain has always led the world when we bet on ourselves. Led the world James Watt's steam engine powered the Industrial Revolution. Work at Bletchley Park laid the foundations for modern computing. Tim Berners-Lee invented the worldwide web. Today, we are global leaders in life sciences and among the top three countries for AI development. These strengths are not just academic — they represent opportunity. Industries that generate billions, improve lives and offer quality jobs for the next generation. We believe Britain's best days are still ahead. That's why we are investing in our people, in innovation, in the future. The road won't always be easy, but we are building a stronger, fairer economy that works for everyone.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's raid on family businesses to cost his constituents 1,000 jobs
Labour's tax raid on family businesses is projected to cost hundreds of jobs in Sir Keir Starmer's constituency alone, new analysis shows. The revenue-raising scheme is also projected to hit the local economies of Labour constituencies harder than their Conservative, Reform and Liberal Democrat-voting counterparts. Analysis by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), which represents nearly 200,000 UK businesses, revealed that the changes to business property relief (BPR) announced in Rachel Reeves's October Budget will stifle growth in Labour seats across the country. The CBI claims that the average gross value added (GVA) losses in seats that elected Labour MPs at the last general election will be over £24 million, compared to £20 million in Conservative seats and £18.5 million in Reform constituencies. The projections span from the October 2024 budget to April 2030, after the next general election. Only seats held by the Green Party fared worse with an average GVA loss of around £40 million, suggesting that cities and urban centres will be worst hit by the raid. The CBI expects the economic hit to result in thousands of job losses in the most-exposed constituencies. Sir Keir's seat of Holborn and St Pancras will be the fourth-worst hit constituency in the country with 1,037 jobs expected to be lost, according to the analysis. Cabinet ministers to feel the pinch in their seats Red Wall seats are also set to suffer. The analysis shows that of £14.9 billion in nationwide GVA losses, some £4.6 billion (31 per cent) of that will hit constituencies that the Tories won in 2019 and Labour won back in 2024. These seats include the 31 Red Wall seats in the North and Midlands along with other key marginal constituencies which Labour will hope to win again at the next election if it wants to stay in power. Senior Cabinet ministers will also feel the pinch in their constituencies. The second-worst hit seat in the country, Manchester Central, is currently represented by Lucy Powell, the Leader of the House of Commons. The third-worst hit seat is Birmingham Ladywood, represented by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary. Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary, represents the ninth-worst-hit seat of Leeds South. In the October Budget, the Chancellor slashed BPR in an attempt to raise money from family businesses. BPR was originally introduced by a Labour government in the 1970s. It allows company shareholders to leave business assets to loved ones without paying inheritance tax on them. But in a sweeping change that will take effect in April 2026, full business relief will only apply to the first £1 million of a business's assets upon a shareholder's death, with everything above this subject to 20 per cent tax.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
KEMI BADENOCH: A simple way to deter migrants? Make them wait for ten years before they can claim any benefits
The issue of immigration is a simple one for the Conservative Party: we need to crack down on it in every form, both legal and illegal. For me, this is about basic fairness. Britain today seems to work more favourably for those who jump the queue, who break the rules, who get into our country illegally but then denigrate our customs and our culture. And those of us who work hard and do the right thing, hoping one day to leave a better life for our children, are left footing the bill. The billions of pounds of taxpayers' money we are spending to put asylum seekers up in hotels, for example, is well known. Less well known, however, is the fact that low-paid immigrants and refugees who stay here for five years qualify for 'indefinite leave to remain'. This allows them to claim the same benefits British citizens are entitled to, such as social housing and Universal Credit. They become automatically entitled to make such claims regardless of whether they've paid taxes or have simply lived off the state throughout those five years. To my mind, that is fundamentally unfair to all the hard-working Brits who have dutifully paid into the system – and I'm determined to stop it. But it's likely to come as no surprise that the Labour Government has no such interest. It voted against our Deportation Bill last month, which would have introduced a strict cap on the number of newcomers to these shores, as well as doubling the time it takes for immigrants to be able to claim benefits from five to ten years. The same ten-year rule would also apply to people seeking the privilege of British citizenship, up from the current five years. And, to make sure those who come here are serious about contributing to our society, rather than just ripping it off, the Bill would have barred anyone who'd claimed benefits from getting indefinite leave to remain. It would also have given the government the power to remove settled status from those who commit any crime – preventing them from claiming that precious British passport. All in all, that Bill was designed to protect our borders and uphold fairness in our benefits system. But thanks to Labour, it was shot down. To be honest, many – if not all – of the measures it contained would probably have ended up going the same way as the former government's abandoned scheme to deport illegal immigrants to Rwanda. That became bogged down in our courts and frustrated by unnamed foreign judges interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Mel Stride (pictured), when he was Work and Pensions Secretary, came up with reforms to the welfare system that would have saved £5billion, but those, too, got stuck in the courts – giving Labour all the excuses they needed to quietly ditch them I have asked distinguished barrister and shadow attorney general Lord Wolfson KC (pictured), and the shadow solicitor general Helen Grant, to lead a commission to establish, once and for all, if the things that we need to do can be done if we remain a member of the European Convention on Human Rights Other potentially transformative policies of ours have floundered in similar ways. Mel Stride, when he was Work and Pensions Secretary, came up with reforms to the welfare system that would have saved £5billion, but those, too, got stuck in the courts – giving Labour all the excuses they needed to quietly ditch them. I call this lawfare – the use of litigation as a political weapon. Even if these legal activists aren't successful, the costs and delays they incur are crippling to democracy. It is turning us into a country afraid of its own shadow. This must change. I have asked distinguished barrister and shadow attorney general Lord Wolfson KC, and the shadow solicitor general Helen Grant, to lead a commission to establish, once and for all, if the things that we need to do – get control of our borders, protect our welfare system and restore fairness – can be done if we remain a member of the European Convention on Human Rights. They will get to the bottom of how we got into this legal quagmire, and the challenges to getting us out. If their conclusions are that we cannot enact reasonable policies to put British citizens first when it comes to social housing and scarce public services, then I will know that we need to leave. The commission's findings will also help me make a workable plan to get us out of the ECHR, while taking into account the need to ensure essential human rights remain protected. The greatest danger we now face is allowing lawfare to make this country less fair, less safe and less democratic. But I'm determined that, under my leadership, the Conservative Party will protect our values, our democracy, our country – and, ultimately, our people.
