Gérard Depardieu: The rise and fall of a French film icon
PARIS, May 13 — Gérard Depardieu was a titan of French cinema for more than 50 years but a sexual assault conviction, a string of other allegations and several instances of lewd behaviour now cast a long, dark shadow over what was once a glittering career.
The 76-year-old has been accused of sexual assault or rape by around 20 women.
Today, in the first of these cases to go to trial, Depardieu was convicted of sexually assaulting two women during a 2021 film shoot in Paris for French director Jean Becker.
One of the two victims said Depardieu grabbed her, groped her breasts and made 'obscene remarks' about wanting to penetrate her.
His lawyer said he will appeal.
In 2020, he was also charged with raping actor Charlotte Arnould when she was in her 20s.
He denies the allegations.
Depardieu's prolific career spans more than 200 films, making him one of the best-known French faces on the silver screen.
French audiences long appreciated his brash, unfiltered and frequently offensive character.
But this is now often seen in a strikingly different light in the #MeToo era.
'Fall of the Ogre'
A 2023 television investigation entitled 'The Fall of the Ogre' revealed images shot five years earlier in North Korea, in which Depardieu can be heard making obscene sexual remarks about an under-age girl.
When then–culture minister Rima Abdul-Malak called the recording of Depardieu in North Korea a 'shame for France', President Emmanuel Macron jumped to his defence.
He remained a 'towering actor' who 'makes France proud', Macron said.
Around 60 film and art figures signed a petition to support the 'cinema giant' in 2023, entitled 'Don't Cancel Gerard Depardieu'.
Ahead of the sexual assault verdict, fellow film icon Brigitte Bardot also leapt to his defence, saying: 'Those who have talent and put their hands on a girl's bottom are thrown in the gutter.'
While he attended the start of the trial, Depardieu was not in court for the verdict.
He had in April been working on a new film directed by another of his supporters, actor Fanny Ardant, in the Portuguese archipelago of the Azores.
'Hero with a thousand faces'
Depardieu was born December 27, 1948, in Châteauroux, central France.
Although his teenage years were marked by delinquency, he went on to discover the theatre in Paris and appeared in his first film in 1965.
One of Depardieu's breakthrough roles came as a violent small-time crook in 1974's Les Valseuses (Going Places) directed by Bertrand Blier — a film that drew criticism for its on-screen depictions of sex.
The controversy did nothing to harm Depardieu's career.
He went on to be crowned with France's version of an Oscar, the César award, for Le Dernier Métro (The Last Metro) by New Wave icon François Truffaut.
US magazine Newsweek called Depardieu a 'hero with a thousand faces' in 1987, when he was on a successful run that peaked with 1990's Cyrano de Bergerac by Jean-Paul Rappeneau.
He began dipping into Hollywood in the years after, with movies such as Green Card and 1492 which won him new audiences.
But his reputation took a blow in 1991 — just before the Oscars ceremony where Depardieu was nominated for Best Actor for Cyrano de Bergerac — when Time magazine printed an interview where he admitted to rapes during childhood.
There was anger in the French government about an alleged conspiracy to deprive him of the Oscar and Depardieu denied having made the remarks, although Time stood by the interview.
'Provocative, excessive'
While Depardieu's other antics — such as urinating on board a plane in 2011 — had once drawn laughs, he now became a liability for film studios.
Pleading before the court of public opinion in an open letter in 2023, he swore that he was 'neither a rapist nor a predator'.
'I've been provocative, excessive, sometimes crude throughout my life... If when I thought I was living intensely in the present moment, I have hurt or shocked anyone at all, I never meant to do harm and I apologise,' Depardieu wrote.
The father-of-three, whose son Guillaume died in 2008, has undergone a quadruple heart bypass and suffers from diabetes that has been aggravated by the stress of the trial, according to his lawyer.
In 2013, he received a Russian passport personally from President Vladimir Putin.
But he has criticised Moscow's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
40 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Woodkid bends sound like origami for Hideo Kojima's ‘Death Stranding 2'
PARIS, June 11 — French singer and director Woodkid has composed the music for the hotly awaited Death Stranding 2 video game, with the 42-year-old telling AFP that the songs unfold 'almost like origami.' The author of hit 2013 debut album The Golden Age, who has previously worked with Taylor Swift and Lana Del Rey, has produced dozens of hours of music for the Japanese-made action-adventure title. 'The main challenge is creating procedural music — music that evolves with the player, depending on their actions. And yet, still writing pop songs with vocals,' Woodkid, whose real name is Yoann Lemoine, told AFP. 'You have to unfold the songs almost like origami, turn them into versions that last several hours, which are then condensed and reprogrammed by developers,' he explained. A longtime video game enthusiast, Lemoine calls it a 'completely different approach' from scoring a film or writing a conventional album. An album of 16 tracks taken from the game is set to be released on Friday, titled Woodkid for Death Stranding 2. They include a collaboration with American actress Elle Fanning, who appears in the game, and another with Bryce Dessner, guitarist of indie rock band The National. Impressionistic Woodkid — who said playing video games was 'an escape' during his youth — said he jumped at the chance of working with legendary Death Stranding creator Hideo Kojima. Kojima's work in the 1990s, particularly the original Metal Gear Solid, left a mark on Woodkid. The pair met in 2020 through a mutual friend. Kojima had already used one of Woodkid's tracks in the first Death Stranding, a celebrity-packed adventure game that sees players act as couriers in a post-apocalyptic world. The first one was set in the United States, while the second takes place in disaster-struck Mexico and Australia. As well as a debut from Fanning, the sequel again includes actors Norman Reedus (The Walking Dead) and Lea Seydoux (No Time to Die) who play the main characters. 'We connected quickly, I think because we share common fantasies,' Woodkid said of his collaboration with Kojima, which involved several months of immersion in Tokyo. 'There's a darkness in us — dreamlike, fanciful, sometimes deeply melancholic — that bonds us.' Man in demand Their work was 'very impressionistic,' Woodkid explained. 'We start with fragments: percussion, beats, textures, vocal sketches I might try. He brings scenes and characters he describes to me, and we build everything together like a ping-pong exchange,' he added. 'Unlike a film, I didn't actually compose much to picture — it's more like thematic background music.' His skills as a composer and director have seen him called on by Taylor Swift for her video for 'Back to December', Lana Del Rey for 'Blue Jeans' and 'Born to Die', and Katy Perry for 'Teenage Dream'. Woodkid also directed French classical musician Mylene Farmer's most recent album, L'Emprise (2022), co-writing seven tracks. For Death Stranding 2, he worked with pianist Yvan Cassar, a long-time collaborator of the singer. 'I like staying in the shadows. I'm not a star. I believe in the works more than the artists, so I prefer focusing on the things I create,' he said. Asked whether he appears in Kojima's game himself, he lets the question hang, but can't help smiling. Death Stranding 2 will be available from June 26. — AFP
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
When the powerful fear justice — Che Ran
JUNE 11 — It's always the same playbook. When justice starts sniffing too close to the men with blood under their fingernails, they don't argue facts. They don't invite transparency. They threaten. They bully. They pick up the phone and speak slowly, like they're doing you a favour by not tearing the whole thing down. And that's exactly what David Cameron did. The former Prime Minister—Britain's once-chosen steward of democracy and human rights—called the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and told him that holding Israeli leaders accountable for alleged war crimes would be like 'dropping a hydrogen bomb.' Let that sink in. Not a court ruling. Not a verdict. A bomb. This wasn't diplomacy. This was a warning shot dressed up in a suit and tie. What Cameron said wasn't just inappropriate—it was an act of sabotage. A deliberate attempt to undermine the last scraps of credibility that international law still clings to. Because if the ICC can't investigate crimes when the accused are politically powerful or deemed 'friends' of the West, then what's the point of any of it? Why have a court at all if the people who need to be judged the most are immune? There is a deeper sickness here. A double standard so naked, it burns. When the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, the Western world applauded. Justice, finally. Accountability, finally. But when the same court looked toward Tel Aviv, everything changed. Suddenly, the court became 'unhelpful,' 'biased,' 'a threat to peace.' The same nations that trumpet the rule of law from their podiums at the UN started hurling stones at the very institution they once helped build. You cannot cherry-pick justice. You cannot hold it high when it suits you, and gut it when it challenges your allies. That isn't justice—it's empire in drag. It's colonialism wrapped in legalese. And it's killing any hope that the law can protect the weak from the strong. The story doesn't end with Cameron. He was just the loudest voice on the line. Across the Atlantic, American lawmakers have been snarling too. Threats of sanctions, visa bans, financial strangulation—all aimed at shutting down an investigation into Israeli actions in Gaza. And behind the scenes, there are reports of intimidation, surveillance, even smear campaigns against court officials. A full-scale assault, not just on the investigation, but on the very idea that no one is above the law. The International Criminal Court building is seen in The Hague, Netherlands, January 16, 2019. — Reuters pic It should chill us to the bone. Because once justice becomes conditional—once we allow politics to decide who gets prosecuted and who doesn't—we are no longer in a world of law. We are back in the jungle, clawing and snarling, where might is right and innocence is irrelevant. And still, amid this storm, one man stood his ground. Karim Khan, the British prosecutor at the ICC, didn't back down. He didn't cave. He didn't roll over for the threats of former prime ministers or the pressure of global superpowers. He just said, calmly: 'I don't like being threatened.' In that moment, something rare happened. A flicker of integrity, flickering stubbornly in the dark. But flickers don't last forever. They need fuel. They need public outrage. They need people to care. Because if we let this go—if we let the Camerons of the world silence investigations with threats and handshakes—then we are saying, loud and clear, that war crimes only matter when poor men commit them. That starving civilians, bombing hospitals, or reducing entire neighbourhoods to ash is forgivable, so long as the pilot's accent is Western and the missiles are paid for in dollars or sterling. We cannot let this stand. If international law means anything, it must mean something when it's hard. It must mean something when the accused are rich, powerful, and uncomfortably close. Otherwise, it's just theatre. And we've all seen enough performances. What Cameron did was not a slip. It was not a moment of poor judgment. It was a deliberate act to protect power from accountability. And we must call it what it is: an assault on justice. Because the moment we start excusing the inexcusable, the moment we let politics decide who gets to face the scales and who walks free—we lose something essential. Not just as nations. Not just as institutions. But as human beings. We lose our claim to conscience. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
Weinstein retrial jury sees ‘good progress' after tense standoff threatens mistrial
NEW YORK, June 10 — Jurors reported getting closer to a verdict Monday in the sex crimes retrial of disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, despite tensions raising the risk of a deadlocked jury and a mistrial. 'We're making good progress,' Judge Curtis Farber read in a final note from jurors wrapping up the third day of closed-door deliberations in the New York courtroom. Farber had previously read aloud two notes sent to him by the 12-member jury. In the first note, a juror expressed a desire to talk to Farber 'about the situation that isn't very good.' In the second, jurors wrote they 'request the entire definition of reasonable doubt and rules of the jury especially to avoid a hung jury.' A hung jury occurs when a judge acknowledges that jurors have been unable to reach a unanimous decision after several days of deliberations. In that case, a mistrial would be declared and a new trial may be held. On Monday morning, Weinstein, whose downfall in 2017 sparked the global #MeToo movement, looked on impassively from his wheelchair, as the judge, prosecutors and his lawyers engaged in tense discussions. The jury must decide whether Weinstein — accused by dozens of women of being a sexual predator — is guilty of sexual assaults in 2006 on Miriam Haley and former model Kaja Sokola, and of rape in 2013 of then-aspiring actress Jessica Mann. Weinstein is on trial again after a New York state appeals court threw out his 2020 convictions, citing irregularities in the original proceedings. The former movie industry titan's 23-year prison sentence for the initial conviction was thrown out, but he remains imprisoned for separate offenses. 'Playground stuff' On Friday, one juror came forward to report tensions between his fellow panelists, alleging 'people are being shunned. It's playground stuff.' He asked to resign as a juror, but Farber denied his request. Responding to the situation, Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala called for a mistrial, but the judge refused his request. At midday Monday, another juror sought to deliver a message of reassurance that matters had calmed down. 'Things are going well, the tone is very different today, we are finding headways,' she told the judge, who appeared to breathe a sigh of relief. During the trial, the three alleged victims testified for several days, recounting how the powerful movie producer had forced them into sexual relations after luring them to his apartment or a hotel room in New York. On Wednesday, prosecutor Nicole Blumberg summarized the evidence of the three alleged victims by saying simply: 'He raped three women, they all said no.' The Hollywood figure had 'all the power' and 'all the control' over the alleged victims, which is why jurors should find him guilty, she said. 'The defendant thought the rules did not apply to him, now it is the time to let him know that the rules apply to him.' Weinstein did not take the stand but conceded in an interview with FOX5 television on Friday that he had acted 'immorally.' He insisted he did nothing criminal, however. Weinstein's defence team has suggested the women accused him to score a payday from a legal settlement or criminal damages. — AFP
