Old Fitzgerald Keeps It Classy With New ‘7-Year Bottled in Bond' Bourbon
By Jacob Osborn - News
Published: 12 June 2025 |Last Updated: 11 June 2025
Share Copy Link
Readtime: 3 min
Every product is carefully selected by our editors and experts. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more. For more information on how we test products, click here.
Old Fitzgerald bourbon is a history lesson unto itself, and one can sense as much just by scoping the timeless bottle design. The label stayed the course through Prohibition and eventually took their operation to the famous Stitzel-Weller Distillery, which shuttered in 1992. Production migrated over to Bernheim Distillery and then again to the current owner, Heaven Hill. Limited supply and skyrocketing price points have kept the majority of these expressions out of reach, but that all changes with a new signature statement. Introducing Old Fitzgerald's 7-Year-Old Bottled-in-Bond Straight Kentucky Bourbon Whiskey.
Over the last decade, Heaven Hill have been keeping Old Fitz alive with a certain degree of temperance (pun intended). However, don't take that to mean the core distillate isn't readily accessible to whiskey lovers. In addition to the affordable Old Fitzgerald Prime, we have the Larceny bourbon range, which likewise uses the same core mashbill of 68% corn, 20% wheat, and 12% malted barley. At the higher end of the spectrum is the acclaimed Decanter Series, a limited edition release that tends to sell out quickly and fetch meteoric prices on the secondhand market.
With 7-Year-Old Bottled-in-Bond, an exciting new chapter unfolds in the long and storied history of Old Fitz. Offered at a suggested retail price of US$59.99 (though prices have already increased due to limited supply), the wheated bourbon walks the line between bottom-shelf Prime and the tippy-top-shelf Decanter Series. The liquid delivers a bright copper colour and a welcoming nose of graham cracker and honey. Tasting notes include fresh bread, brown sugar, cinnamon, apricot, and baking spice, which give way to oak at the finish. It's bottled at 100 proof and that's just enough to dial up the flavour without burning your throat on the way down. The use of wheat means one can expect a relatively smooth ride, in general.
Old Fitzgerald's 7-Year-Old Bottled-In-Bond | Image: Supplied
The launch of 7-Year-Old Bottled-in-Bond doubles as a soft reboot for Old Fitz, complete with their first dedicated website. Between that and various social media campaigns, it's clear that Heaven Hill is committed to preserving the legacy of this historic label. Driving home the heritage vibe is an iconic bottle design that holds the past closely to its heart.
'Seven years proved to be a sweet spot for a Whiskey that already transcends expectations for a wheated Bourbon,' said Master Distiller Conor O'Driscoll of the latest release.
While more readily available than the Decanter Series, the new expression appears to be selling out fast. If you can find a bottle for around US$80 or less, don't hesitate to pull the trigger.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
State government grant supported firm with criminal links
The AWU went on to say 'key partners' would bring their specialised expertise to the program, singling out 24-7 Personnel, one of the business names used by the company linked to Hennig and the Elsayed brothers. 'Recruitment company 24-7 Personnel has embraced the program with remarkable enthusiasm, branding their involvement as 'Empower 24-7',' the newsletter says. 'Their dedication has yielded impressive results, with over 2000 applications from women eager to participate in the initiative. 'What sets this program apart from other initiatives using traditional labor [sic] hire companies is the leadership and commitment of 24-7 Personnel's two female directors, who will personally participate in the mentoring initiative post-training. This creates a unique environment where participants can connect with women who have successfully navigated the industry.' The company's two female directors, Kristina Kuzmanovska and Rebecca Reed, are the partners of Bassem Elsayed and Jarrod Hennig. The firm's registered address is the office of a gangland accountant being probed by federal police over unrelated allegations. The business is owned by two family trusts linked to each woman. Reed responded to this masthead's initial story by saying the business had 'no knowledge of or involvement with organised crime at all and is in all respects a well-run small family business'. On Friday, this masthead revealed that Hennig, who was jailed for eight years on multiple counts of drug trafficking, had signed AWU enterprise-bargaining agreements secured by 24-7 using his middle name, Morgan. He has also been photographed with Bassem Elsayed and AWU delegates at a lunch at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. The involvement of 24-7 in the AWU's taxpayer-funded program has raised questions about whether a portion of this money came into the hands of the organised criminal figures or their associates. In a brochure produced by the company, Empower Women 24-7 is referred to as a collaboration with the union 'designed to actively support and prepare women for meaningful employment in traditionally male-dominated industries'. 'Our initial focus [is] on the manufacturing sector, with plans to expand across construction and other industries,' it says. The brochure includes the AWU logo and features a picture of Kuzmanovska and Reed. In June 2024, the Allan government officially announced the $191,400 payment to the AWU for a project in a broader media release, after the agreement was signed on May 20. The AWU and 24-7 did not respond to questions about how much of this funding went to Empower Women 24-7 and how much in total grant funding has been provided to the company through their arrangements with the AWU. Minister Natalie Hutchins, a member of the AWU, who is the responsible minister for women's equality grants, recused herself from the grant-funding decisions involving the union because it represented a conflict of interest. In another newsletter to members, AWU Victoria secretary Ronnie Hayden on Friday responded to The Age 's reporting, saying there were 'no allegations of corruption against the Australian Workers' Union or its members'. 'The reporting attempts to link companies and individuals to historic criminal associations without providing evidence of any wrongdoing in relation to the projects or the union. 'While the story references certain AWU delegates and labour-hire companies, it is important to note that no one — neither the union nor the companies involved — has been accused of any criminal offence. 'Like you, I care deeply about the integrity of our union and the projects we help deliver.' However, Hayden said the story again highlighted a 'broader issue' with the use of labour-hire companies on taxpayer-funded projects. 'That's why I'm calling for reform — specifically, a ban or significant reduction in the use of labour-hire firms on government projects,' he said. 'Instead, we should prioritise direct employment models that protect workers' rights and improve accountability. 'We will continue to review our processes to ensure we uphold the standards our members expect and deserve.' MPC Kinetic is one of the companies delivering the Golden Plains Wind Farm. When contacted by The Age, chief executive and managing director Adam Machon said: 'We are not aware of any criminal allegations against MPC employees on the project.' The Victorian government would not say whether it could seek to claw back the money that went to 24-7. 'We have zero tolerance for any sort of illegal behaviour – there is no place for it on any worksite,' a spokesperson said. 'Unions are meant to keep people safe – we are making sure that people coming forward with information about conduct on worksites have the complaints processes and protections they deserve.'
Perth Now
19 hours ago
- Perth Now
ASX slips on geopolitical tensions
The Australian sharemarket fell slightly during Friday's trading as fears of the fallout between Israel and Iran resulted in a broad sell-off on the market and investors rush to safe havens including gold. The benchmark ASX200 index closed down 17.70 points or 0.21 per cent to finish the week at 8,547.40. The broader All Ordinaries also traded lower falling 25.40 points or 0.29 per cent to 8,770.60. The Australian dollar slipped 0.85 per cent and is now buying 64.72 US cents. On a day dominated by geopolitical tensions, the market had a spike in volatility with strong gains in the energy, utilities and gold miners offset by falls in information technology, healthcare and consumer discretionary stocks. The ASX fell on Iran-Israel tensions. NewsWire / Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia Overall, just three of the 11 sectors gained during Friday's trading. One of the bright spots was the energy sector as the price of crude oil jumped to nearly $US75 a barrel on the back of political tensions between Israel and Iran which helped drive Australia's energy stocks higher. Israel has said the pre‑emptive attacks were aimed at eliminating Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missile capabilities, but the fears in the market are based on what Iran will do as a retaliation to these strikes. If it hits neighbouring oilfields or blocks the Strait of Hormuz, which controls 20 per cent of the world's oil consumption, the price of the commodity could skyrocket. Woodside Energy shares soared 7.4 per cent to $25.21, Santos traded higher gaining 3.73 per cent to $6.96 and Beach Energy gained 2.77 per cent to $1.30. There was also a flight to safety, with the price of gold jumping back to $US3,400 an ounce. This helped drive Northern Star up 5.1 per cent to $22.53 as well as Evolution Mining, which rose 5.5 per cent to $9.20. It was also a mixed day for the major banks. Commonwealth Bank slipped 0.65 per cent to $179.35, NAB fell 0.31 per cent to $38.87 and ANZ dropped 0.54 per cent to $29.63. Westpac was the outlier eking out a tiny gain of 0.03 per cent to $33.36. Just three of the 11 sectors gained during Friday's trading. NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers Credit: News Corp Australia Despite the strong moves on the market, AMP chief economist Shane Oliver urged a sense of caution. 'Just bear in mind that tensions regularly flare up in the Middle East, escalate for a while and then settle back down again so there is a danger in getting too negative on it and the key for investors is to look for the opportunities that the latest conflict may throw up,' he wrote in an economic note. Even with the falls, Dr Oliver said the Australia market still finished in the green. 'Despite falling on Friday after Israel's attack, Australian shares bucked the global trend and are on track for a gain of around 0.3 per cent for the week after having hit a record high midweek with the gains led by energy, utility property and consumer stocks,' he said. In corporate news, shares in Cettire continued its falls, dropping another 20.3 per cent to $0.26 a share, after slumping 31 per cent during Thursday's trading. The fall in the online luxury retailer comes after it issued a second profit downgrade in the last few months. Accent group also had a day to forget, with shares dropping 21 per cent to a year low of $1.43 after annoying a disappointing post Christmas trading period. The Platypus and HypeDC owner said sales for the 23 weeks until June 8 are down 1 per cent and is now expecting an EBIT of between $108m to $11m for the financial year.
The Advertiser
19 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Crossbenchers pressure Labor to launch 'urgent' AUKUS inquiry
ACT senator David Pocock and an alliance of parliamentary crossbenchers are calling on the Albanese government to urgently establish a formal inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal. It comes after revelations the Trump administration will review the terms of the trilateral pact to ensure it meets "American First criteria", which has sparked doubts about the future of the landmark deal. Eight crossbench MPs wrote to Defence Minister Richard Marles on Friday, raising concerns about the $368 billion deal that could see Australia buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-attack submarines from the US by the 2030s. The MPs said there has been insufficient parliamentary oversight of the pact and said Australians wanted to know more about its strategic and financial implications. "With the UK and now the US reviewing AUKUS, Australia is now the only country not actively considering whether the agreement in its current form best serves our national interest," Senator Pocok said in a statement. "Given the scale and cost of this deal, a transparent review is not just sensible; it's overdue." Australia is investing billions of dollars to support the US's submarine production base under AUKUS, which is estimated to be 20 years behind schedule. Independent MP Allegra Spender said there needed to be an open discussion about the "very clear risk" that the US will not be able to guarantee the transfer of the boats without diminishing its naval capabilities. "AUKUS is the centrepiece of our defence and foreign policy strategy, but it's been adopted by the major parties with very poor public engagement," Ms Spender said. "AUKUS will shape Australia's future for decades with enormous implications both financially, economically, and strategically, but in discussions at the community level, there are consistent questions and concerns that have not been addressed." Defence Minister Richard Marles has said he remains confident the deal will go ahead and that the US review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. "We've always known that increasing the production and sustainment rate in the United States is a challenge, but we're confident that we can meet that challenge," Mr Marles said on Friday. The Canberra Times has contacted a spokesperson for comment. A parliamentary inquiry into the ratification of the AUKUS treaty last year heard that a provision allowing the US and the UK to withdraw with a year's notice could have "significant implications" for Australia. The inquiry heard there were no specified terms in the treaty or in agreement documents to suggest Australia would have full ownership of the second-hand US-built boats, which are due to be sold and delivered by 2032. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was concerned about the future of AUKUS and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump to secure its terms. "We'll continue to make the case for AUKUS, and we must. It is a good arrangement and the right arrangement to ensure we get peace in our region through deterrence," Mr Taylor said on Friday. Mr Albanese is expected to hold his first in-person meeting with the US president on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, which has yet to be confirmed. The potential meeting comes after Labor rebuffed US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent. ACT senator David Pocock and an alliance of parliamentary crossbenchers are calling on the Albanese government to urgently establish a formal inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal. It comes after revelations the Trump administration will review the terms of the trilateral pact to ensure it meets "American First criteria", which has sparked doubts about the future of the landmark deal. Eight crossbench MPs wrote to Defence Minister Richard Marles on Friday, raising concerns about the $368 billion deal that could see Australia buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-attack submarines from the US by the 2030s. The MPs said there has been insufficient parliamentary oversight of the pact and said Australians wanted to know more about its strategic and financial implications. "With the UK and now the US reviewing AUKUS, Australia is now the only country not actively considering whether the agreement in its current form best serves our national interest," Senator Pocok said in a statement. "Given the scale and cost of this deal, a transparent review is not just sensible; it's overdue." Australia is investing billions of dollars to support the US's submarine production base under AUKUS, which is estimated to be 20 years behind schedule. Independent MP Allegra Spender said there needed to be an open discussion about the "very clear risk" that the US will not be able to guarantee the transfer of the boats without diminishing its naval capabilities. "AUKUS is the centrepiece of our defence and foreign policy strategy, but it's been adopted by the major parties with very poor public engagement," Ms Spender said. "AUKUS will shape Australia's future for decades with enormous implications both financially, economically, and strategically, but in discussions at the community level, there are consistent questions and concerns that have not been addressed." Defence Minister Richard Marles has said he remains confident the deal will go ahead and that the US review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. "We've always known that increasing the production and sustainment rate in the United States is a challenge, but we're confident that we can meet that challenge," Mr Marles said on Friday. The Canberra Times has contacted a spokesperson for comment. A parliamentary inquiry into the ratification of the AUKUS treaty last year heard that a provision allowing the US and the UK to withdraw with a year's notice could have "significant implications" for Australia. The inquiry heard there were no specified terms in the treaty or in agreement documents to suggest Australia would have full ownership of the second-hand US-built boats, which are due to be sold and delivered by 2032. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was concerned about the future of AUKUS and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump to secure its terms. "We'll continue to make the case for AUKUS, and we must. It is a good arrangement and the right arrangement to ensure we get peace in our region through deterrence," Mr Taylor said on Friday. Mr Albanese is expected to hold his first in-person meeting with the US president on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, which has yet to be confirmed. The potential meeting comes after Labor rebuffed US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent. ACT senator David Pocock and an alliance of parliamentary crossbenchers are calling on the Albanese government to urgently establish a formal inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal. It comes after revelations the Trump administration will review the terms of the trilateral pact to ensure it meets "American First criteria", which has sparked doubts about the future of the landmark deal. Eight crossbench MPs wrote to Defence Minister Richard Marles on Friday, raising concerns about the $368 billion deal that could see Australia buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-attack submarines from the US by the 2030s. The MPs said there has been insufficient parliamentary oversight of the pact and said Australians wanted to know more about its strategic and financial implications. "With the UK and now the US reviewing AUKUS, Australia is now the only country not actively considering whether the agreement in its current form best serves our national interest," Senator Pocok said in a statement. "Given the scale and cost of this deal, a transparent review is not just sensible; it's overdue." Australia is investing billions of dollars to support the US's submarine production base under AUKUS, which is estimated to be 20 years behind schedule. Independent MP Allegra Spender said there needed to be an open discussion about the "very clear risk" that the US will not be able to guarantee the transfer of the boats without diminishing its naval capabilities. "AUKUS is the centrepiece of our defence and foreign policy strategy, but it's been adopted by the major parties with very poor public engagement," Ms Spender said. "AUKUS will shape Australia's future for decades with enormous implications both financially, economically, and strategically, but in discussions at the community level, there are consistent questions and concerns that have not been addressed." Defence Minister Richard Marles has said he remains confident the deal will go ahead and that the US review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. "We've always known that increasing the production and sustainment rate in the United States is a challenge, but we're confident that we can meet that challenge," Mr Marles said on Friday. The Canberra Times has contacted a spokesperson for comment. A parliamentary inquiry into the ratification of the AUKUS treaty last year heard that a provision allowing the US and the UK to withdraw with a year's notice could have "significant implications" for Australia. The inquiry heard there were no specified terms in the treaty or in agreement documents to suggest Australia would have full ownership of the second-hand US-built boats, which are due to be sold and delivered by 2032. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was concerned about the future of AUKUS and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump to secure its terms. "We'll continue to make the case for AUKUS, and we must. It is a good arrangement and the right arrangement to ensure we get peace in our region through deterrence," Mr Taylor said on Friday. Mr Albanese is expected to hold his first in-person meeting with the US president on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, which has yet to be confirmed. The potential meeting comes after Labor rebuffed US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent. ACT senator David Pocock and an alliance of parliamentary crossbenchers are calling on the Albanese government to urgently establish a formal inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal. It comes after revelations the Trump administration will review the terms of the trilateral pact to ensure it meets "American First criteria", which has sparked doubts about the future of the landmark deal. Eight crossbench MPs wrote to Defence Minister Richard Marles on Friday, raising concerns about the $368 billion deal that could see Australia buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-attack submarines from the US by the 2030s. The MPs said there has been insufficient parliamentary oversight of the pact and said Australians wanted to know more about its strategic and financial implications. "With the UK and now the US reviewing AUKUS, Australia is now the only country not actively considering whether the agreement in its current form best serves our national interest," Senator Pocok said in a statement. "Given the scale and cost of this deal, a transparent review is not just sensible; it's overdue." Australia is investing billions of dollars to support the US's submarine production base under AUKUS, which is estimated to be 20 years behind schedule. Independent MP Allegra Spender said there needed to be an open discussion about the "very clear risk" that the US will not be able to guarantee the transfer of the boats without diminishing its naval capabilities. "AUKUS is the centrepiece of our defence and foreign policy strategy, but it's been adopted by the major parties with very poor public engagement," Ms Spender said. "AUKUS will shape Australia's future for decades with enormous implications both financially, economically, and strategically, but in discussions at the community level, there are consistent questions and concerns that have not been addressed." Defence Minister Richard Marles has said he remains confident the deal will go ahead and that the US review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. "We've always known that increasing the production and sustainment rate in the United States is a challenge, but we're confident that we can meet that challenge," Mr Marles said on Friday. The Canberra Times has contacted a spokesperson for comment. A parliamentary inquiry into the ratification of the AUKUS treaty last year heard that a provision allowing the US and the UK to withdraw with a year's notice could have "significant implications" for Australia. The inquiry heard there were no specified terms in the treaty or in agreement documents to suggest Australia would have full ownership of the second-hand US-built boats, which are due to be sold and delivered by 2032. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was concerned about the future of AUKUS and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump to secure its terms. "We'll continue to make the case for AUKUS, and we must. It is a good arrangement and the right arrangement to ensure we get peace in our region through deterrence," Mr Taylor said on Friday. Mr Albanese is expected to hold his first in-person meeting with the US president on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, which has yet to be confirmed. The potential meeting comes after Labor rebuffed US Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent.
