
GE2025: Scrutinise WP's plans, as there is 'no silver bullet' to challenges that Singapore faces, says PAP's Edwin Tong
SINGAPORE: The People's Action Party (PAP) knows there is 'no silver bullet' to the challenges lying ahead for Singapore, and voters should not be persuaded by "rhetoric" that promise a solution, said Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong at Bedok Stadium on Saturday evening (Apr 26).
'Don't listen to people saying, 'We have got a solution. It will solve everything. Vote us, not the PAP, we will solve everything for you.' There is no silver bullet and this is a multifaceted, complex economic situation,' said Mr Tong at the PAP's East Coast rally – one of three happening at the time.
"In this election, we have to go beyond mere rhetoric and soundbites," he added.
In his speech, Mr Tong, who is helming the People's Action Party (PAP) team contesting East Coast GRC in the 2025 General Election, acknowledged that his challenger from the Workers' Party (WP) Yee Jenn Jong had said he wants to improve Singapore.
'I agree with him. We must all be in politics for the service of Singapore and Singaporeans. But at the same time, this also needs to be done in a practical way that makes sense,' said Mr Tong.
The PAP's five-member slate contesting East Coast GRC includes Senior Minister of State for National Development and Digital Development and Information Tan Kiat How, Ms Jessica Tan, as well as new faces Hazlina Abdul Halim and Dinesh Vasu Dash.
All five candidates spoke on Saturday evening, in the team's first rally of the election.
Of the five, only Mr Tan and Ms Tan have been retained from the party's previous East Coast GRC slate in 2020.
Among those who spoke at the PAP East Coast team's first rally was Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat, who announced his retirement from politics ahead of the upcoming elections. He was the former anchor minister in East Coast GRC.
Other former PAP MPs who spoke at Saturday's rally include ex-Minister for Manpower Lim Swee Say, who represented the Bedok ward from 2011 to 2020, and Mr Sitoh Yih Pin, the former MP for Potong Pasir SMC.
STANDING UP TO SCRUTINY
During his speech, Mr Tong struck out against some of the WP's suggestions for addressing cost of living concerns through alternative revenue channels to the goods and services tax (GST).
'Let me ask you, who amongst us would like to pay more tax, pay more GST? But there's also a growing need to look after Singaporeans,' said Mr Tong.
On the WP's suggestion to increase the tax for multinational corporations (MNCs) to raise revenue, Mr Tong said that MNCs provide 'the bulk of good paying jobs' for Singaporeans.
'What if they leave Singapore, and with that the good jobs they provide to Singaporeans? Will Singapore be better off or worse off?' said Mr Tong.
As for the suggestion that the government could raise the current 50 per cent Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC) to 60 per cent, Mr Tong said this would mean the reserves grow at a slower rate and give less resources to subsequent generations.
Mr Tong said: 'It's not a bad idea from a politician's perspective, but from the perspective of safeguarding Singapore's long term interests for our children and their children and our children's children's children, would that be prudent? Would that be safe? Would that be wise?'
He added that policy ideas had to be tested against practical execution and its impact on future generations, lest it start a path down a 'slippery slope'.
'We invite our residents to look at our plans, scrutinise our plans, but don't just look at our plans before you vote. Look at the Workers' Party's plans,' said Mr Tong.
'Ask them: What are those plans? Do they stand up to scrutiny? Do they benefit us long term? Do they help a subsequent generation of Singaporeans?'
THE PAP IS NOT 'FEARMONGERING'
Pointing to evolving global circumstances, Mr Tong on Saturday noted that some opposition parties have said the PAP was using 'scare tactics' and 'fearmongering' by addressing these circumstances that 'deeply impact' Singapore.
'We all know that we'll be going into this General Election at very difficult times,' he said.
'Between international armed conflicts and serious trade wars to culture wars – which divide our society, fracture our societies and have fault lines based on identity – global stability and world order have come under very serious threat.
'Society is being polarised, focusing more and more on having to choose one side over the other, which leaves us less and less common space and less and less moderate viewpoints in the middle ground.'
These changes are felt by everyone in the world, not just Singapore, Mr Tong added.
'But at the same time, the PAP will always be upfront with Singaporeans. We will say it as it is and what our concerns are. We will give Singaporeans the truth, and we will share with you what steps we will take to help you navigate these difficulties.'
Referring to the 'fearmongering' that some opposition parties had accused the PAP of doing, PAP newcomer Mr Dinesh said the threat to Singapore is real in his speech that followed Mr Tong's.
'But do you think that our growth forecast next year would have been revised downwards if the threat to our economy isn't real?' said the former CEO of the Agency for Integrated Care.
'Locally, there is talk of being a first world parliament, but there have been more opposition MPs in the previous five years," he said.
"What have they been doing? And they have been talking and talking and talking since 1981. Singaporeans are tired of their talking. We want action."
Fellow PAP newcomer Mdm Hazlina also acknowledged the concerns of many Singaporeans that she had heard from walking the ground in the past few days.
'Our young seniors are worried about turbulent waters ahead. I'm sorry, but you are right. Your concerns are not unfounded. We are a small nation, but a mighty one. So be prepared, but be brave and be united,' she said.
Ms Jessica Tan, who represented the ward's Changi-Simei division for 19 years, said in her speech: 'There is great uncertainty and increased cost of living pressures. There are no shortcuts.
'Don't let anyone fool you. There are no shortcuts to addressing these concerns. It will require both near-term support and longer-term structural and innovative solutions.'
The ruling party's slate is like a 'sturdy tree' that has grown over generations, said Mr Tan Kiat How, who represented the ward's Kembangan Chai Chee division in the previous term.
Mr Tan was the first of the candidates to speak.
'Much like a sturdy tree, the leaves might change. The seasons come and go. But the PAP roots are deep here in East Coast… So I urge you to not cut down this tree in exchange of sweet promises made to you about good profits from cutting down the tree to sell it as timber,' he said.
'Every time election comes around, there may be sweet promises that may look good and sound good in the short term, but in the long term, you are destroying the roots of a sturdy tree.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far?
An art installation at the Padang. Vocal naysayers recently accused the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. PHOTO: ST FILE Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far? SINGAPORE – At a time when most people understand that the personal is political, individual views have become a battleground of virtue – equality, good; hierarchy, bad. Elitism? The worst possible kind of social evil. Yet, take a step back from this instinctive repulsion and there might be benefits to muddying the waters. Elitism, the belief that an elite group, however defined, should be entitled to the reins of power has been the norm throughout much of history. Whether it is the clergy, kings with their divine right, the Confucian scholar or today's fintech bros, there have been groups in each time period that societies tend to value and reward. It was only with increasing democratisation, and a growing disenfranchisement at the chasm between the top and the rest, that elitism has become a byword for undeserved privilege and gross injustice. This brief trip back in time is not to rehabilitate elitism, but to show that the current period against it – or at least one that pays lip service to not believing in an elite class – may be an aberrant one. In the West, this has been taken to extremes, manifesting in a debilitating disregard fo r e xperts and fatal results during the Covid-19 pandemic against the advice of doctors to vaccinate. In Singapore, it is the elite schools that are targeted, in the idealistic slogan that every school is a good school. Though, for perplexing reasons, this scepticism has not yet been extended to the natural reverence the majority of Singaporeans harbour for lawyers and doctors. Their expertise is assumed to be universally applicable – a mentality that has narrowed parents and students' conception of what success looks like. In any case, the ills of elitism have been thoroughly aired, including the type of entitled, discompassionate divas that it ends up producing. The very consensus of who deserves to be elite has also fractured. I wonder, though, if this enmity has led to some unexpected side effects. This is a train of thought sparked by recent reactions to the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative set out during the Budget statement in 2025. Self-sabotage Under the scheme, $100 would be given t o Si ngaporeans aged 18 and above for the consumption of the local arts, redeemable from September. One would expect rejoicing, but there was uproar from a group of vocal naysayers. They accused the credits of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. Why? Because the money could be better spent on support for groceries. This, I thought, was a case of anti-elitism as self-sabotage. Central to this worldview was that the arts is an elitist activity patronised only by the rich and the hyper-educated aesthete, when one type of activity for the elite and one for the others is exactly the sort of segregation and self-limiting mentality that perpetuates divides. There was no sense that this $100 in credits was a way of making the perceived barrier more permeable. To put it in context, the Government also announced $800 in CDC vouchers. This was bread for all, and roses too. Yet another potentially problematic by-product is that the word 'elite' has since been tainted by association. No one dares lay claim to the word 'elite', or acknowledge that someone else may be elite in his or her field. The rare exemption is perhaps in sports, where athletes accept the cut-throat nature of their competition, and where non-athletes are so tangibly outside their league that there is no point in pretending otherwise. This is not in itself a problem – elite is after all just a word – though I find no easy replacement term that can immediately convey excellence to the same degree. But it incidentally comes at a time when there is a general reluctance to impose any kind of objective standard, supplemented by that compassionate but useless invention: the consolation prize. This applies to things: Is no one taste now better than another? As well as people, where so many takes on social media are considered equally valid, measured just by virality. It is the kind of ChatGPT mentality where how often something is repeated or the number of clicks on a website can influence results, with no regard to its truth value. The war against elitism may have come at the expense of standards and good sense. Reclaiming elite This impulse to drag discourse to the same level – usually downwards – has the right intentions, timely given that, for so long, highly selective elitist standards have been imposed as objective metrics. To right the ship so discourse is levelled upwards though, perhaps elite can be thought of as separate from elitism, rehabilitated without the corresponding concentration of resources and power. This should be expanded so that who is elite becomes not just about education but also because of other qualities – role models people can aspire to in different contexts. What constitutes an elite has always been reliant on man-made barometers, negotiated by the community. There should be no shame in aspiring to be elite. Anti-elitism should not mean an absence of the elite, but that all who put their heart and minds to it should have a fair shot at claiming its pedigree, or getting closer to it. It is a lifelong dusting off of mediocrity, and it begins with first recognising what is good. Hear Me Out is a new series where young journalists (over)share on topics ranging from navigating friendships to self-loathing, and the occasional intrusive thought. Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.

Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
S'pore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban
SINGAPORE - Singapore's embassy in Washington has been seeking clarification from the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security on President Donald Trump's directive prohibiting foreigners from entering the country to study at Harvard University. The embassy is hoping for clarity from US authorities in the next few days, including on whether there will be any delay in the processing of visas for Singaporeans hoping to study in the US, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said on June 7. In a zoom call with Singapore media to wrap up his five-day visit to Washington, he noted that many current and prospective students looking to study in the United States had expressed their concern to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs over potential visa delays. Asked to elaborate on contingencies being planned should Singaporean students find themselves unable to proceeds with their plans to study in the US, he said the Government is trying to find solutions to deal with the worst case scenario where students are not able to physically study in Boston. 'We've got some ideas for how we can help them to, in a sense, deal with that eventuality without impairing their academic and professional progress,' said Dr Balakrishnan. 'For others who are not yet here, who have not yet secured visas, you may also need to have backup plans, but my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed.' Dr Balakrishnan noted that Singapore's ambassador to the US Lui Tuck Yew has also held a virtual town hall with students currently studying in Harvard. In the virtual town hall on May 30, Mr Lui told Singaporean students at Harvard that the Republic's autonomous universities can offer them placements if they wish to discontinue their studies in the US and return home. A Ministry of Education spokesperson said this message was shared with affected students so they could consider returning to Singapore as a possible option to continue their studies. There are six autonomous universities here: National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design and Singapore Institute of Technology. University statistics show that there are currently 151 Singaporean students in Harvard. Among them are 12 Public Service Commission scholarship holders. Foreign students at Harvard were thrown into limbo after Mr Trump's administration announced on May 22 that it had revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification with immediate effect. The nearly 6,800 international students in the Ivy League college were given an ultimatum to either transfer to another institution, or face deportation. A federal judge later blocked the move, with the Trump administration rolling back its stance on May 29 and giving Harvard 30 days to submit evidence contesting the administration's plan to revoke the school's right to enrol international students. International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body, but Mr Trump said the university should cap its international intake at 15 per cent. Dr Balakrishnan said the situation confronting international students stems from domestic political issues within the US. But students, including from Singapore, can become affected as collateral damage, and there will be a period of uncertainty of at least a few days or weeks. 'Nevertheless, we will continue to pursue this with the American authorities, and I hope we'll be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States.' At a macro level, it remains in both Singapore and the US' interests to keep opportunities open for Singaporeans who want to study and work in the US to expand their domain experience and their networks, he added. 'So this is an issue that we will continue to pursue with the State Department.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.


Online Citizen
3 days ago
- Online Citizen
Teo Chee Hean to succeed Lim Boon Heng as Temasek chairman from October
Temasek Holdings announced on 6 June that former Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean will assume the role of chairman on 9 October 2025, following the conclusion of its third-quarter board meeting. He will first join Temasek's board of directors as deputy chairman on 1 July, according to a press release issued by the state investment firm. Teo will be Temasek's fifth chairman. His appointment follows his retirement from politics in April this year. He did not stand for re-election during the most recent General Election. Temasek highlighted Teo's experience over 53 years in public service, including military and ministerial appointments, and noted his involvement in policymaking on issues such as national security, digital governance, and climate change. Teo, 70, began his public service career in the Republic of Singapore Navy, rising to become Chief of Navy before entering politics in 1992. He first contested in Marine Parade GRC and later represented Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC in Parliament until his retirement. In Cabinet, he held portfolios in defence, education, home affairs, and the environment. Between 2009 and 2019, he served as Deputy Prime Minister and subsequently as Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security until stepping down. Temasek described Teo's strategic understanding of global and domestic issues as a valuable asset in a time of evolving global challenges. Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, who is also Minister for Finance, acknowledged Lim Boon Heng's tenure, thanking him for his service. He credited Lim with expanding Temasek's international presence, reinforcing governance standards, and promoting sustainability. The Prime Minister also expressed support for Teo's appointment, citing his familiarity with Singapore's strategic priorities and public service record. Lim, who has served as Temasek chairman since 2013, will retire after over a decade in the role. He joined the board in 2012, following his own retirement from politics in 2011. His earlier public service included positions such as Minister in the Prime Minister's Office and Secretary-General of the National Trades Union Congress. During Lim's chairmanship, Temasek's net portfolio value rose from S$223 billion (US$174 billion) in 2014 to S$389 billion (US$303 billion) in the latest financial year. The company also expanded its global presence, with close to half of its 13 offices now located in Europe and the United States. Exposure to developed markets doubled over this period. Temasek credited Lim with placing emphasis on leadership renewal and internationalisation, and for guiding the firm through a significant leadership change in 2021 when Dilhan Pillay succeeded Ho Ching as CEO. Under Lim's leadership, Temasek also launched initiatives such as the Ecosperity conference and Tripartite Conversations, which aim to advance sustainability and collaboration across its investment ecosystem. Temasek further acknowledged his role in shaping its T2030 strategy in 2019, a 10-year roadmap to build a resilient portfolio. Reflecting on his term, Lim said he was privileged to work with a team focused on long-term value and purpose. He welcomed Teo's appointment, noting the value of his experience in guiding Temasek through evolving global conditions. Lim remains the chairman of NTUC Enterprise Co-operative Limited. In response, Teo expressed appreciation for Lim's contributions and said that the global climate today requires clarity on strategic priorities such as security, international relations, and sustainability. He stated that he looked forward to supporting Temasek's leadership team in building on the company's achievements while adapting to the future. CEO Dilhan Pillay described Lim as a steward leader whose principles helped define Temasek's identity. He also welcomed Teo, noting that his experience would be instrumental as the firm navigates global shifts. Temasek also announced board retirements taking effect in the coming months. Deputy chairman Cheng Wai Keung and director Stephen Lee will retire on 30 June after nearly 14 and 8 years of service respectively. Director Bobby Chin will step down on 31 July after 11 years. Temasek said their contributions supported investment and portfolio decision-making and strengthened its global outlook on governance and risk.