
Beijing's Cyberattack Allegation Against NSA Adds to Signs of US–China Decoupling: Analysts
News Analysis
As tensions escalate between China and the United States, Beijing has accused a U.S. security agency and others of conducting cyberattacks on critical infrastructure. Analysts believe this situation indicates a broader trend of economic decoupling between the two nations.
State media Xinhua reported on April 15 that Chinese authorities accused the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) of launching cyberattacks during the
Asian Winter Games
in Harbin, the capital of Heilongjiang Province, in February.
Chinese cybersecurity experts claim they traced instructions found in Heilongjiang's critical infrastructure back to the U.S. agency, according to the news report, which was republished on the website of China's Ministry of Public Security, the country's top espionage agency.
Beijing's announcement follows a report released by China's National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center on April 3 that highlights allegations of overseas cyberattacks targeting the information systems of the Asian Winter Games. The report claims that these alleged attacks, which it said occurred between Feb. 7 and Feb. 14, came mainly from the United States and its allies.
In response to a request for comment on Beijing's cyberattack accusation, the U.S. State Department said it is aware of the situation.
Related Stories
4/17/2025
3/8/2018
'The reality is that Chinese cyber actors continue to target the United States,' a State Department spokesperson said in an emailed statement to The Epoch Times on April 20.
'We have been clear that China's pervasive and irresponsible cyber activity is unacceptable.'
'Targeting U.S. critical infrastructure networks must stop.'
Chinese police are also pursuing three individuals they allege are NSA agents involved in the alleged cyberattacks, according to Xinhua. They claim that Katheryn A. Wilson, Robert J. Snelling, and Stephen W. Johnson targeted China's infrastructure and companies, including telecom giant Huawei.
The Chinese authorities encouraged the public to come forward with information, promising unspecified rewards for any tips, according to the report. No personal details, including photos or information about the accused individuals' whereabouts, have been released.
In response to an inquiry from The Epoch Times, the NSA on April 20 declined to comment on the matter.
Chinese officials claim to have evidence suggesting that the University of California and Virginia Tech were also involved in these alleged cyber incidents, according to Xinhua, but they did not provide details to support the claim.
The University of California told The Epoch Times on April 21 that it is looking into the matter, while Virginia Tech did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.
Trade War
Although it's not the first time Beijing has publicly pointed fingers at U.S. entities for alleged cyber espionage, analysts suggest that the timing of this accusation is significant, given the backdrop of an ongoing tariff war between the world's two largest economies.
China has vowed not to
Furthermore, China's Ministry of Culture and Tourism issued a notice on April 9 advising its citizens to fully consider the risks when considering traveling to the United States, citing 'deterioration of China–U.S. economic and trade relations.'
Three days later, China's National Film Administration announced
Yeh Yao-Yuan, a tenured professor at the University of St. Thomas in Houston, told The Epoch Times that Beijing's latest cyberattack accusation is a reaction to U.S. tariff hikes and an escalation in the ongoing cyber conflict.
He suggested that this exchange also reflects a broader trend of decoupling between the two nations.
'The U.S.–China relationship is heading toward a trajectory of the first Cold War, and both sides are likely to drift further apart,' Yeh said on April 18. 'Ultimately, countries around the globe will have to make choices about where they stand.'
Sheng Xue, a Chinese writer and human rights activist, believes that Beijing's latest claim of cyberattacks is part of the regime's propaganda efforts.
With U.S. tariffs exceeding 100 percent, China's ailing economy is under mounting pressure, but the leadership in Beijing aims to portray itself as a 'power capable of striking back,' Sheng told The Epoch Times on April 18.
In this context, Beijing is seeking to create 'an external enemy' to divert public attention away from domestic issues and incite anti-American sentiment among the people, Sheng said.
News coverage is shown on a large screen outside a shopping mall during coverage of U.S. tariffs, in Beijing on April 11, 2025.
Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images
Cyberattacks by CCP
The latest development coincides with growing concerns in Washington about Chinese cyber espionage activities under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
In March, the Trump administration
In January, U.S. authorities imposed
The House Select Committee on the CCP convened a
'The CCP has targeted the grids that power our homes, the facilities that treat our water, and the hospitals that care for us as part of their cyber warfare on the American people,' Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), chairman of the House panel, said in his opening remarks.
'We must understand that this isn't just a cyber threat,' Moolenaar said. 'This is part of the CCP's larger strategy to destroy the American way of life.'
Luo Ya contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kissler: Will Tariffs Continue to Drive Energy Markets?
In the past, the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftereffects were a major driver influencing global energy markets. However, this year, the tariffs implemented by the U.S. to try to balance global trade supplanted the post-COVID environment as a major influencer. That said, just how much tariffs will continue to impact energy markets depends on a number of variables, such as the tariffs' eventual size and scope. Moreover, in the case of natural gas, other factors—such as weather, travel and the immense power needs of artificial intelligence (AI)—may prove to be larger influencers. In fact, to some extent, the tariffs' impact on energy markets already seems to be dissipating. While sending energy and equity prices reeling the first month of implementation, the tariffs have had seemingly less of an effect on U.S. demand as we have entered middle of the year. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) reported a record number of travelers in the U.S. going into Memorial Day weekend. However, at the same time, these tariffs have been detrimental to oil demand in Asia, particularly in China, as that region bears most of the tariff burdens. The numbers say it all: Chinese refinery run rates moved well below their five-year averages as crude imports dropped substantially. Crude futures also touched the lowest levels since 2021. Another big factor has been anticipated production increases. OPEC+ has pledged to increase production over the next several months and is estimated to bring back most of the 2 MMbbl/d cuts from the previous years. At the same time, the Trump administration has promised to lower oil prices. Between the Saudi/OPEC production increases and the tariffs' impact on oil markets, that goal may be achieved. On the flip side, the only factors supporting higher oil prices have mostly been geopolitical in nature. These include: the harsh sanctions expected against Iran; the Russia/Ukraine peace talks stalling, which could lead to more sanctions on Russia; and the Israel/Hamas tensions maintaining unrest in the Middle East. Altogether, the real question going forward will be if the seasonal summer travel demand can take up the slack caused by tariffs and OPEC+. The current consensus is that it's not likely, and WTI prices are expected to remain in the $58-$65/bbl area. Of course, many 'what ifs' remain. Partly because of the shift in U.S. presidential administration, green energy is losing its luster. Wind and solar still will be contributing factors, but just not at the subsidized pace seen in the past. That said, there will likely be more solar power sources in the Sunbelt states, and more areas driven by wind-generated power, but now these power sources must be able to stand on their own economically, which should send more demand to the oil and gas sector in the longer term. Shifting focus to natural gas, the expansion of AI and greater demand for LNG will be the major drivers supporting prices. That's as AI expansion is set to double in the next three to five years. It currently pulls 4% of the U.S. power grid, but that figure could move to over 9%. If you add in the expansion of LNG from 11 Bcf/d to 12 Bcf/d of natural gas in the next four to five years, one must wonder where the supply will come from. However, in the near term, weather has been relatively mild so far in 2025, which is pulling less natural gas supplies. That's as current production is in the range of 105.2 to 106 Bcf/d, whereas in 2024, the midyear average production was near the 101 BCF/day. And so, we will need to see some above-average temperatures this summer if we are to see prices comfortably over the $4/MMBtu. While the distant horizon looks bright for natural gas—and likely will be—there is still a lot of time in between. Weather demand will still be a price-driver going forward. As of early June, 2025 has been a bit mild, but weather may change things very quickly.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump approves US Steel, Nippon deal
President Trump approved US Steel's merger with Nippon in a Friday executive order after previously lauding the partnership in late May. The president touted the deal after both companies signed on to a National Security Agreement (NSA) under which they agreed to collectively invest $11 billion nationwide within the next three years, in addition to an initial greenfield project commitment to be completed after 2028. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come,' the companies wrote in a Friday statement. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again,' they added. The deal comes after former President Biden rejected a merger between US steel with the Japanese steelmaker during his last months in office, citing concerns with national interest following a yearlong review. However, the Trump administration said the deal would bring the U.S. a 'golden share' in corporate profits. 'We have a golden stock. We have a golden share, which I control, or the president controls,' Trump said Thursday at the White House. 'That gives you total control.' Last month, Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pa.) said the NSA will require U.S. government approval of a number of the company's board members, which will allow the U.S. to ensure production levels aren't cut. Trump also said in late May that the headquarters would remain in Pittsburgh, stating that the deal would create 70,000 jobs nationally and add $14 billion to the U.S. economy as part of the takeover. U.S. Steel noted it would become a 'wholly owned subsidiary' in April filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Israel's drone strikes in Iran show why US must halt China's land grab here: experts
National security and China experts are warning that Israel's attack on Iran is an example of why Beijing's efforts to purchase land and other assets within the United States need to be stopped immediately. After the initial attacks began on Friday, news reports began surfacing indicating that Israel had secretly built a drone base on Iranian soil that it used to launch its attacks. The operation was years in the making, one Israeli security official told the Jewish Chronicle, adding that weapons systems and soldiers had been smuggled into the country ahead of time. "Look at the ways Israel penetrated Iran for sabotage operations. Now look at the Chinese companies and assets permeating the US power grid (solar converters), local law enforcement (DJI drones), and social media (TikTok)," China policy expert Michael Sobolik wrote in a post on X. "The CCP is preparing to paralyze us in a crisis." The Real Implications Of The Chinese Fungus Smuggling Gabriel Noronha, president of Polaris National Security, also drew parallels between the China land grab in the United States and the recent Ukrainian drone strike that decimated a significant portion of Russia's air fleet. The attack reportedly involved drones smuggled into Russia and released near airfields. "After Ukraine's drone operation in Russia and Israel's operation in Iran, it is obvious that America's enemies will try to replicate that playbook on our soil," Noronha said. "It is increasingly dangerous to allow Chinese companies and individuals to own land - especially near our military bases and critical infrastructure. Left unchecked, we are opening our land to host clandestine Chinese military bases to launch all sorts of attacks and cripple our nation in wartime." Read On The Fox News App After Ukraine's Surprise Drone Assault On Russia, New Attention Drawn To Sensitive Sites Stateside Officials in the United States have been sounding the alarm for years now about China's efforts to purchase land near military bases, and other strategic assets that could help them sabotage the country. Just recently, the Arizona legislature passed a bill meant to block Chinese entities from obtaining more than a 30% stake in Arizona real estate, but it was vetoed by Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs. According to the bill's sponsor, China had recently been trying to lease property near a major Air Force base in the state. Michael Lucci, the CEO and founder of State Armor Action, a conservative group with a mission to develop and enact state-level solutions to global security threats, warned Friday that if the United States does not get serious about interrupting China's asset grab, it risks losing a war with them. He said land grabs are just the "tip of the iceberg." "CCP land ownership is bad but it's tip of the iceberg," Lucci said. "Their industrial property holdings are worse, as is their port access. Perhaps worst of all is their deep penetration of critical infrastructure and govt systems." "I now understand the potential problem of the Chinese government owning land in America," added writer and podcast host Jamie article source: Israel's drone strikes in Iran show why US must halt China's land grab here: experts