logo
Ex-Canada PM calls on political parties to ‘sever relations' with separatist forces targeting India

Ex-Canada PM calls on political parties to ‘sever relations' with separatist forces targeting India

Hindustan Times2 days ago

Toronto: Former Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper has called on the country's political parties to 'sever relations' with separatist forces targeting India.
Harper made these remarks while speaking at 5th Canada India Charity Gala organised by the organisation Impact Media and Events Coordination (IMEC) in Brampton over the weekend, where the former PM was honoured with the Global Impact Award.
'Canada cannot have that strong relationship unless the governing party, and frankly, any political party that aspires to government, unless they sever relations with those who seek to bring the battles of India's past to Canada,' he told the audience at the event, according to local media reports.
He also called upon political parties to 'sever relations with those who seek to divide the great country that is modern India'.
'The Khalistani movement is a fringe movement in Canada. It is a fringe movement among Indo-Canadians and it is even a fringe movement among Sikh Canadians,' he said.
He said he didn't know why various politicians spent so much time on that and added that during his tenure his caucus 'understood' they were to have 'no contact whatsoever with the Khalistani movement'.
He said he hoped 'all political parties will return to that kind of a policy'.
'There is no reason why countries like Canada and India cannot be those enlightened voices working together, which we can do and should do by putting our recent disputes behind us,' he said.
Relations between Canada and India cratered on September 18, 2023, when then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated in the House of Commons that there were 'credible allegations' of a potential link between Indian agents and the killing of pro-Khalistan figure Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Surrey, British Columbia, three months earlier. India described those accusations as 'absurd' and 'motivated'.
This is not the first time that Harper has spoken out against Canadian politicians indulging pro-Khalistan elements in Canada.
In November last year, he said the country should stop cultivating such divisive groups.
This isn't the first time Harper has condemned the pro-Khalistan movement in Canada. In July 2019, while speaking at an event organised by the Canada India Foundation in Brampton, he said that during his tenure as PM his government had 'denounced and refused all relationships with those Khalistanis and others who seek to bring the battles of the past to Canada and seek to divide the great country of India'.
Speaking at an event organised by the Abraham Global Peace Initiative (AGP)I in Toronto, he said, 'We must stop cultivating Jihadists, antisemites, Khalistanis, Tamil Tigers, and other divisive groups. When it comes to our immigration system, we are going to have to ask ourselves some hard questions about how we screen people.'
'We cannot start importing age-old hatreds onto our streets,' the former PM stated, adding, 'We need to do something about this — we cannot let it continue.'
Harper was Prime Minister from 2006 to 2015, before the Conservative Party he led was defeated by his successor and Liberal Party leader Justin Trudeau.
As PM, Harper had established a Commission of Inquiry into the bombing of Air India flight 182, the Kanishka, by Khalistani terrorists on June 23, 1985, which claimed 329 lives. That Commission, headed by retired Justice John Major, submitted its report on July 16, 2010
Harper said then, 'The destruction of Air India Flight 182 remains the worst terrorist attack in Canadian history. It was a cowardly, despicable and senseless act.'
On the 25th anniversary of the tragedy, Harper issued an apology on behalf of the government for the failures that led to the terror attack.
The Harper government devised the 'one, united India' policy which remains Canada's official position.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alternative to choke points, IMEC strategic necessity for India in changing world order—MEA
Alternative to choke points, IMEC strategic necessity for India in changing world order—MEA

The Print

time35 minutes ago

  • The Print

Alternative to choke points, IMEC strategic necessity for India in changing world order—MEA

'Historical choke points like Gibraltar, the Malacca Strait, Panama Canal, and the Red Sea have shown us that disruption is inevitable when access is concentrated [at specific points],' he said, adding that the IMEC offered a necessary alternative in an increasingly uncertain global landscape. Speaking at the Chintan Research Foundation-hosted IMEC conference in New Delhi on Wednesday, Ravi highlighted how global crises, such as the Russia-Ukraine war, had exposed critical vulnerabilities in existing supply chains. New Delhi: The government sees the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) as a strategic imperative for its future economic and geopolitical ambitions, said Dammu Ravi, Secretary (Economic Relations), Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). 'IMEC is the starting point for India. On the western front, it starts from India, [then] UAE, Saudi, Jordan, Israel, Greece [France and Italy]—there are seven important countries here,' he said. 'On the eastern front is the trilateral island, so you have India, Myanmar, Thailand, and connecting to ASEAN. These are very important. Actually, from a strategic point of view, IMEC is very critical for India.' Strategic necessity in a changing world India's economic aspirations, a projected $30 trillion GDP by 2047, require robust external connectivity, said Ravi. The economic secretary also argued that corridors such as IMEC, as well as the Trilateral Highway, would be vital to support India's industrial ambitions. 'We are at just three percent of global manufacturing compared to China's 30 percent. As we scale up, these corridors will become essential platforms for trade and supply chains,' he added. Also Read: IMEC a 'channel of peace' says Greek minister, plays up growing ties with 'inviolable partner' India India's digital & infrastructure advantage Ravi laid his emphasis on India's competitive edge in building low-cost infrastructure, including ports, highways, railways, and airports, alongside its pioneering Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI). 'Digitally connecting IMEC is a first-mover opportunity for India,' he said. 'These are low-cost, scaleable solutions we can lead.' He argued that IMEC would not be just a trade route but a multimodal economic corridor, integrating energy grids, digital systems, and transport infrastructure. 'It is a chance to bring in investment and boost manufacturing along the corridor and expand markets into the hinterland.' While countries such as China have advanced the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) through centralised control and $1 trillion investment in deep funds, democracies must navigate a slower, consensus-driven process, Ravi said, noting under-development models like EU's Global Gateway Forum and the US-led Global Partnership for Infrastructure Investment. 'Democracies debate, deliberate, and move slower, but collaboration is our strength,' Ravi said, calling for a multilateral approach to IMEC. He floated the idea of an IMEC Fund to support execution over time and proposed the creation of an IMEC Secretariat to ensure coordination, timelines, and project continuity. Geopolitical hurdles & role of diplomacy Ravi acknowledged the geopolitical headwind facing the project—from sanctioned Russia and Iran to politically unstable Myanmar. 'These are challenges we must engage with diplomatically. Every participating country's foreign office needs to be actively involved,' he said. He also warned against internal economic resistance, urging Indian industries to see the corridor as an opportunity, not a threat. 'We will need to build narratives that reassure domestic players while keeping the long-term benefits in view. Also, you need a Secretariat for the IMEC. You need to have a coordinating mechanism, without which you will not be able to have timelines, and you will not be able to fulfil your objectives with clarity, ' he added. In conclusion, Ravi positioned IMEC not as a competitor to existing trade routes such as the Suez Canal but as a complementary system. 'Multiple routes mean greater resilience. IMEC is not about replacing but expanding global trade possibilities,' he said, adding that one should not see IMEC 'as a competitor to the Suez Canal; rather, it is a complementary trade route'. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: Global trade needs IMEC. Not just India-Europe, it'll boost markets in Middle East too

Columbia University's accreditation under threat says Trump Admin amid allegations of ignoring Jewish students
Columbia University's accreditation under threat says Trump Admin amid allegations of ignoring Jewish students

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Columbia University's accreditation under threat says Trump Admin amid allegations of ignoring Jewish students

The US Department of Education announced on June 4 that Columbia University violated federal anti-discrimination laws, failing to protect Jewish students amid pro-Palestinian protests on campus. The department said this breach places Columbia in violation of the standards required by its accrediting agency, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon issued a strong statement, saying, 'The school's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus' following the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel. The Department formally notified the Middle States Commission, stressing that Columbia's actions violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Federal law requires accreditors to notify member institutions of such violations and implement a plan to restore compliance. 'If a university fails to come into compliance within a specified period, an accreditor must take appropriate action against its member institution,' the department stated. 'Accreditors have an enormous public responsibility as gatekeepers of federal student aid. They determine which institutions are eligible for federal student loans and Pell Grants. Just as the Department of Education has an obligation to uphold federal antidiscrimination law, university accreditors have an obligation to ensure member institutions abide by their standards,' she said. Columbia already lost $400 million in federal grants and contracts earlier this year, prompting layoffs of nearly 180 staff. The potential loss of accreditation could have far-reaching impacts, particularly for students who rely on federal aid. According to Columbia's website, 21% of undergraduates at Columbia College and Columbia Engineering receive Pell Grants. Trump escalating his confrontation with Harvard University on May 29 accused the institution of disrespecting the country and singling it out as a hotbed of antisemitism linked to anti-Israel protests. But, Trump praised Columbia University for being cooperative, despite also calling it 'very, very bad.' 'Harvard has to understand the last thing I want to do is hurt them. They're hurting themselves. They're fighting,' Trump said. 'Columbia has been very, very bad — what they've done, they're very antisemitic and lots of other things — but they're working with us on finding a solution.'

Canadian bill seeks to deny hearings to some asylum-seekers
Canadian bill seeks to deny hearings to some asylum-seekers

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Canadian bill seeks to deny hearings to some asylum-seekers

TORONTO, - A Canadian border-security bill introduced by the Liberal government earlier this week may deny some asylum-seekers a refugee hearing and make it easier for the government to revoke migrants' status. The bill comes as the government seeks to address U.S. concerns about its border security and reduce the number of migrants in the country. In addition to denying some refugee hearings and allowing the suspension, cancellation or variance of immigration documents, the bill facilitates sharing people's information and makes it easier to read people's mail, among other measures. President Donald Trump has said Canada had failed to do enough to stem the flow of illicit fentanyl into the U.S., using that as justification for some of his tariffs. This week Trump doubled the tariffs in place on steel and aluminum, prompting calls for Canada to boost retaliatory measures of its own. Late last year Canada pledged C$1.3 billion to beef up its border. As Canada reduces the number of new permanent and temporary residents, its refugee system faces a historic backlog of more than 280,000 cases. This week's bill follows through on some of those border promises as well as on suggestions from some top ministers that Canada would fast-track refusals for some refugee claims. If the bill passes, asylum-seekers who have been in Canada more than one year would not be eligible for refugee hearings. Instead, they would have access to a pre-removal risk assessment, meant to determine whether they would be in danger in their country of origin. According to data published by Canada's Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Department, 30% of pre-removal risk assessments in 2019 for people deemed ineligible for refugee hearings were approved; by contrast, according to Immigration and Refugee Board data, that year 60% of finalized refugee hearings were approved. Asylum-seekers who wait two weeks to file claims after crossing from the U.S. to avoid being turned back under a bilateral agreement would also not get hearings. The bill, which needs to go through multiple readings before the House of Commons votes on it and sends it to the Senate, would also allow the government to "cancel, suspend or vary" immigration documents if deemed in the public interest. Migrant and refugee advocates worry the changes could leave vulnerable people deported to dangerous situations in their home countries without adequate due process. A spokesperson for Canada's Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab said on Wednesday that the government recognizes the conditions in people's home countries may change, but the pre-removal risk assessment will prevent them from being returned to persecution or torture. "The asylum ineligibilities introduced yesterday seek to maintain protection for those fleeing danger while discouraging misuse that bypasses the asylum system's function – which is to protect the vulnerable," the spokesperson wrote in an email. "Canada is reneging on its basic human rights obligations to do individual arbitration," said Migrant Rights Network spokesperson Syed Hussan. "This is teeing up a deportation machine."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store