logo
Riefenstahl proves that the best documentary subjects are monsters

Riefenstahl proves that the best documentary subjects are monsters

Independent14-04-2025

I don't want to talk about it,' Leni Riefenstahl used to say when she was asked about her past. The German director was happy to discuss her pioneering cinematic techniques, her trailblazing credentials and her redemptive later work with the Nuba people of Sudan. But there was one pesky subject that she preferred to give a wide berth: her role as the ultimate Nazi propagandist. Riefenstahl would go on to survive the Third Reich by nearly 60 years, dying in 2003 at the age of 101. That's six decades of deflection, distortion and avoidance. 'I don't want to talk about it' practically became the woman's catchphrase.
If you thrill to the sight of animals being cornered and criminals run to ground, there is much to relish in Riefenstahl, Andres Veiel's new documentary on the original cancelled artist. It's an exhaustive and surely definitive portrait, combing Riefenstahl's personal archive, filling in the blanks, and presenting its subject warts and all. Veiel isn't remotely interested in hosting a hatchet job here. He acknowledges Riefenstahl's intuitive artistry and technical prowess and shows how Olympia – her 1938 film on the Berlin Olympics – advanced the medium in leaps and bounds. But he also dismantles the great director's defence. Time and again Riefenstahl would protest that she was an artist and not a politician, that her films were pure and peace-loving affairs and that she never had much interest in Nazism anyway. The one thing she was guilty of was her complete and utter innocence.
The evidence, no surprise, tells a rather different story. History records that Riefenstahl was dazzled by Hitler and overjoyed to work as the Reich's official myth-maker. Moreover, although she claimed to have no knowledge of the Holocaust, investigators later found that she may have indirectly caused a massacre by ordering Jewish workers to be removed from a street scene she was filming. At one point in Veiel's documentary, a TV interviewer asks whether it's true that she used to visit the cinema with Joseph Goebbels (an estimated 10 times, according to Goebbels' diary). Riefenstahl is incandescent and promptly explodes with rage. She doesn't want to talk about it.
In the best possible way, Riefenstahl is a monstrous subject. She's unsympathetic and drags dark history behind her. She's a fake and a liar, constantly batting up against the hard glass of reality and prone to fly off the handle whenever she's held to account. All of which is to say that she's a documentary-maker's dream. Every film is a collaboration between the director and their subject. The latter provides the raw meat and draws the basic story arc. But they also leave gaps to be filled and falsehoods to unpick. They're telling one story and the director is telling another, and it is this tension – this friction – that's a recipe for good drama. It almost doesn't matter that Riefenstahl is long dead and can't be questioned in person by Veiel. She's left incriminating letters, false statements and a trove of car-crash TV interviews for us all to peruse.
On balance, I prefer documentaries in which the subject doesn't want to talk than the ones in which they do. I like it when they have to be chivvied into facing inconvenient truths, or where their chatter is a distraction, or a puzzle to solve. Andrew Jarecki's true-crime investigation The Jinx famously ended with its chief suspect – accused killer Robert Durst – caught on a hot mic and apparently confessing his crimes. But in films, as in life, smoking guns are a rarity. The truth is elusive; friction is a given. Most good documentaries are an ongoing squabble between two or more points of view.
It's the director's decision how much of this squabble they show. Filmmakers such as Nick Broomfield or Louis Theroux lift the bonnet and expose the engine, effectively casting themselves as co-stars in the drama. Others maintain a lower profile and like to keep the ugly negotiations backstage. The cartoonist Robert Crumb hated the idea of appearing in a documentary, but his good friend Terry Zwigoff begged and pleaded for his permission (legend has it that Zwigoff intimated that he might shoot himself if the film didn't happen). The director then whipped up a gloriously dark and twisted picture – Crumb (1994) – which painted the Crumbs as the most dysfunctional American family this side of the Mansons. The cartoonist, on seeing the finished work, was horrified.
The Oscar-winning director Errol Morris is known for his down-the-barrel interrogations of controversial US figures (Steve Bannon, Donald Rumsfeld, Holocaust-denier Fred A Leuchter). But his finest achievement remains The Thin Blue Line (1988), a forensic examination of a policeman's murder in Dallas. Morris's documentary gives us not just one unsympathetic subject, but scores of them; an unstable rogues' gallery of false witnesses and outright liars, casual incompetents and wall-eyed crazies. The Thin Blue Line brilliantly navigated this minefield of untruths. It identified the real killer and freed an innocent man from death row. But the dust had barely settled when the film's hero – the wrongly convicted Randall Adams – promptly sued the director for the sole rights to his story. Adams wanted to tell it his way and earn some money on the side. He didn't want to be the subject of someone else's masterpiece.
Towards the end of Veiel's documentary, we see Riefenstahl steeling herself for a final TV grilling. She studies her face in the mirror, checks the camera angles and prepares yet again to duck and block her way out of trouble; to present herself and her work in the most flattering light. This is about the only time in the film that I felt some sympathy for the woman, if only because it's a grander, grimmer version of what we all do every day. We frame our lives as a story and cast ourselves as the hero, even when the evidence suggests otherwise. Good documentaries tell outlandish tales about unusual subjects. But the great ones, I think, spotlight a commonplace human frailty. They show us that everyone in the end behaves in much the same way, whether they're successes or failures, Nazi sympathisers or not. We tell the truth as we see it and pray that our listeners won't interrupt. We love to talk about certain subjects. Other ones, not so much.
'Riefenstahl' is in cinemas from 9 May

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The fragility of the modern city reflects humanity's vulnerability
The fragility of the modern city reflects humanity's vulnerability

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

The fragility of the modern city reflects humanity's vulnerability

As I reached the final pages of the German writer Gregor Hens's essayistic travelogue The City and the World, news of the blackout across Spain and Portugal snatched my attention. Madrid and Lisbon were at a standstill. Images of gridlocked round-abouts and commuters rushing out of pitch-dark subway tunnels plunged me into a fatalistic mood. When will it happen here? Hens, I realised, had nailed an important point: the 'stunning complexity' of modern cities makes them fragile. The metropolis, he writes, has become so intricate, its limits so stretched, that in it, 'we are always living on the verge of catastrophe'. A seasoned globetrotter who spent his formative years 'guzzling jet fuel with abandon', Hens has lived in cities around the world, from Berlin (his current home) to Los Angeles. He has visited a host of other far-flung locations, from Shanghai and Shenzhen to Las Vegas. Each place a person visits, Hens suggests, becomes plotted in the 'galactic city' of their mind, a network 'whose intricately folded map actually offers the most surprising connections'. This is urban wandering on a rather different scale to that of Charles Baudelaire, whose 1863 essay 'The Artist, Man of the World' paved the way for a host of successive writers, most notably Walter Benjamin, to delight in roaming a single city on foot. Hens takes stock of our modern technologically dictated movements within and across cities, investigating how these places have come to sprawl far beyond the possible step-count of even the most determined walker. His understanding of the word 'city' encompasses entities that aren't cities in the obvious sense: libraries, viruses, cemeteries and the brain. These each have 'cityness', apparently, because they are networks. Hens is careful to acknowledge that this insight owes something to the work of writers like Rebecca Solnit ('a city is built to resemble a conscious mind… a network') and Michel Foucault ('our experience of the world is… that of a network'). His critique is bricolage-style: he makes incisive links between ideas, even if not quite delivering a decisive overriding argument of his own. This suits his subject. Cities are, he argues, constituted of 'the rubble of history', so are 'no longer spatially and temporally comprehensible' as a whole. Messiness is, for Hens, what makes cities interesting. He sees Los Angeles, in its orderly layout, as an outlier, envying 'anyone who manages to get lost' in it. The greatest cities, it seems, allow room for the inhabitant or visitor to forge their own geography, one which overlaps with but doesn't quite match what's on Google Maps. Our encounters, Hens suggests, are many-layered and varied. Some cities, like New York, are so ingrained in the public imagination that 'we first know [them] from our dreams'. Others, like Chongqing or Wuhan, are 'generic cities' that 'arouse no longings' for Hens. Mostly, though, we can know a city only 'in an excerpted form': outside of the webs we weave between bars and offices, homes and parks, much remains terra incognita. This is Hens's second book to be published in English and in it he has doubled down on a tested formula. In his 2015 memoir Nicotine (also elegantly translated by Jen Calleja), he surveyed his life as a smoker, using stories of memorable cigarettes like signposts in the mazy network of his experience. In The City and the World, the mechanism is essentially the same, but this time cities are the cigarettes. It works and it doesn't. On one level, the book satisfyingly blends memoir with literary criticism, travelogue and social commentary to create an experimental text reminiscent of other Fitzcarraldo Editions favourites such as Brian Dillon's Essayism. At the same time this fragmentary approach, which jumps back and forth between different cities and does away with chapters, doesn't feel quite as fresh as it did in Nicotine. That book's central subject was precise and sexy enough to carry the reader through its more meandering passages. The concept of the city isn't as tight – especially not once houses and children's playgrounds are included in Hens's definition. Yet his tentacular style makes sense as a response to the overstimulating, frenetic character of modern cities. How we think and live is mapped on to the metropolis. If the city is fragile, then we are too.

Simone Biles' husband Jonathan Owens breaks cover amid Riley Gaines trans feud
Simone Biles' husband Jonathan Owens breaks cover amid Riley Gaines trans feud

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Simone Biles' husband Jonathan Owens breaks cover amid Riley Gaines trans feud

Simone Biles ' husband Jonathan Owens has thrown his support behind his wife amid her feud with Riley Gaines over transgender athletes in women's sports. Biles and Gaines have been in a bitter feud over the topic since Friday, when the latter remarked about a photo containing a transgender high school softball player. The legendary Olympic gymnast's response was long and harsh, comparing Riley's appearance to that of a male, forcing her to pull back on those comments in a subsequent apology. Owens' first public comments since the feud began was not an additional statement. The Chicago Bears player opted for a subtle route to support his wife. On Tuesday, he posted a screenshot of Biles' apology to his Instagram story with three silver hearts to show his support for her. The defender staying in line with his wife amid controversy is consistent with her actions when roles were reversed. The defender's first public comments since the feud began was not an additional statement Fans attacked Owens after he admitted to not knowing who Biles was before they met on celebrity dating app Raya in 2020. Criticism continued last summer after he was seen wearing his partner's gold medal from the 2024 Summer Olympics. In a post celebrating his wife, the NFL player posed next to her with the gold around his neck and wrote: 'Witnessing history every time you step on the mat - Congrats baby on becoming the most decorated American gymnast in Olympic history!!!! Just wow!!!! 8 of them!!!!! So thankful I was there to see it'. Several users blasted Owens for his 'odd' behavior on the night, while content creator Kiera Breaugh even told him to 'take it off' in a video which racked up 2.5 million views on TikTok. However, Biles took to the comments section to hit out at Breaugh and other users for criticizing her husband, branding them 'so f****ng miserable'. 'Crazy thing is, I put my medal on every single one of my family members and took pictures,' she wrote. 'So don't ever make assumptions. Like y'all are so f****ng miserable. leave us alone'. It is yet to be seen whether Biles feud with Gaines is over, as it has contained a few twists and turns. The OIympian broke her four-day silence after her first attack on Gaines by writing on X: 'I wanted to follow up from my last tweets. I've always believed competitive equity & inclusivity are both essential in sport. 'The current system doesn't adequately balance these important principles, which often leads to frustration and heated exchanges, and it didn't help for me to get personal with Riley, which I apologize for.' Gaines replied: 'I accept Simone's apology for the personal attacks including the ones where she body-shamed me. I know she knows what this feels like. She's still the greatest female gymnast of all time. A couple of things. Sports ARE inclusive by nature. Anyone can and everyone SHOULD play…' In a lengthy apology, Biles also admitted she didn't have the answers on how to include trans athletes in sports in a way that keeps everyone happy - seemingly acknowledging how polarizing her criticism of Gaines had been.

Cruz Beckham post heartbreaking family snap after brother Brooklyn tells them he ‘wants no contact'
Cruz Beckham post heartbreaking family snap after brother Brooklyn tells them he ‘wants no contact'

Scottish Sun

time4 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Cruz Beckham post heartbreaking family snap after brother Brooklyn tells them he ‘wants no contact'

Brooklyn was understood to be unhappy at discovering his father's knighthood in the press cruz control Cruz Beckham post heartbreaking family snap after brother Brooklyn tells them he 'wants no contact' CRUZ Beckham has shared a throwback family snap amid the ongoing family feud between the Beckhams. The youngest son of David and Victoria appeared to be looking back at happier times in the family as he shared an old snap of the three brothers with their mum after she had just given birth to daughter, Harper Seven. 5 Cruz has shared a throwback snap of his family amid the ongoing feud Credit: Instagram 5 The family are locked in a feud Credit: Instagram/victoriabeckham The snap, believed to be taken in 2011, showed the three boys beaming down the lens of the camera as they snuggled up to their mum. Victoria tenderly held her daughter in the heartwarming picture. Cruz's decision to upload the image is very telling amid ongoing tension in the family after Brooklyn decided he no longer wanted contact with his famous family. Cruz did not add any captions nor did he tag his family members in the snap. Earlier today, it was revealed that Brooklyn is refusing to reply to messages amid the bitter feud, according to reports. The 26-year-old, who lives in LA with wife Nicola Peltz, 30, has no desire to speak to his parents or siblings after only learning about his dad's knighthood in the press, an insider has told Page Six. The sourced said: "Brooklyn told his family he wants no contact and he's not responding to those that try to connect.' However, a source close to Brooklyn denied this and said, "this seems to be another deliberate attempt to misrepresent the truth, and it only serves to distract from this honor being bestowed on Brooklyn's father." The Sun has contacted representatives for Brooklyn and the Beckhams for comment. England legend David will be knighted as part of King Charles' birthday honours. Peltz-Beckham's respond to reports of family feud It's a title he has coveted for some time and it means Victoria will be come Lady Beckham. David was first put forward for a knighthood in 2011 after helping to secure the London 2012 Olympics. But he was blocked from getting the title by the Honours Committee after becoming caught up in a tax avoidance scheme, along with many other stars. His finances were cleared by the taxman at least four years ago - paving the way for him to finally get the coveted honour. Just weeks ago we revealed how David and Victoria feel there might be no way to reconcile with their eldest child. Brooklyn, who was a no-show at David's star-studded 50th birthday celebrations last month, shared a video of himself and Nicola riding on his motorbike and wrote: 'My whole world. I will love you forever. I always choose you baby.' Those close to the Beckhams said the message seemed 'very pointed'. A source added: 'It shows how much this situation with his family has escalated. 5 Brooklyn has cut all contact with his family Credit: Getty 5 Brooklyn has been going through a difficult time Credit: Getty "It's very sad for everyone involved, especially David and Victoria who love him very much. This isn't the Brooklyn his family knows and loves. 'This post was like a dagger to their hearts but they will always be there for Brooklyn.' Tensions became public when Brooklyn did not publicly acknowledge fashion designer Victoria, 51, on Mother's Day. He then failed to show at any of David's 50th birthday parties. His mum and dad have continued to acknowledge him on social media, but pals of Brooklyn and Nicola suggested that was for show. The Sun revealed that the couple recently had dinner in California with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who were 'very empathetic'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store