
If You Want To Avoid Getting Sick Before Your Flight, Experts Say You Should Stay Away From These 5 Airport Foods
Many hungry travelers turn to airport grab-and-go food before flights, but if you want to avoid getting sick before hopping on a plane, you may want to think twice about your choices.
For example, food and beverage items can become contaminated with harmful bacteria if they're not kept at appropriate temperatures or handled in clean conditions — and you may not know how well-regulated airport food is. Even if these items don't necessarily taste or smell bad, you can still get sick from them, according to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. And that's the last thing you want happening before you board a flight.
'Once consumables arrive at [airport] service areas, they must be properly stored, thawed, and prepared, with strict adherence to food safety protocols,' explained Francine Shaw, founder of Savvy Food Safety Inc. and a food safety consultant who spent years inspecting airport facilities. 'Otherwise, the risk of foodborne illness increases with every step.'
We talked to food safety experts about which food and drink items they tend to skip when at the airport — and safer options they opt for instead.
Because fountain drink machines and iced tea dispensers are particularly difficult to clean, they can be 'breeding grounds for dangerous bacteria,' said Darin Detwiler, a food safety expert and professor at Northeastern University.
'In high-traffic areas like airports, where machines dispense drinks constantly, the risk is even greater,' he explained. 'While stainless steel urns and soda dispensers may appear spotless … a sticky layer of bacteria and mold often accumulates inside, especially in spigots, nozzles and syrup lines.'
Tea dispensers have a sugary, damp environment that can feed the growth of E. coli, salmonella and even Legionella, which can lead to a severe pneumonia called Legionnaires' disease, he said. Also due to the 'enclosed, damp interiors' of fountain machines, it can be hard to get rid of bacteria like listeria and pseudomonas. These can be particularly dangerous for people with compromised immune systems, pregnant women, and older adults.
What's a safer alternative? He recommends bottled, sealed drinks. Hot coffee or tea is also generally a good option because boiling water minimizes the risk of bacteria.
'[But] be careful with the milk [or] cream if it is open and sitting at room temperature,' Shaw added. Perishable items, like milk, should not be left out at room temperature for more than two hours, according to the FDA.
'These often sit at unsafe temperatures for extended periods, increasing the risk of bacterial growth,' Detwiler said. 'I have seen this too many times at the convenience stores inside airports.'
Especially be aware if these grab-and-go items are kept in a refrigeration unit without a door because the temperatures may not be cold enough, Shaw added.
Ellen Shumaker, director of outreach for the Safe Plates program at North Carolina State University, doesn't buy a prepared salad if she's not going to eat it right away.
'Cut leafy greens, cut tomatoes, and cut melons can have potentially harmful bacteria grow and cause illness if kept at room temperature for longer than four hours,' she said.
She also avoids salads and sandwiches if they contain any raw sprouts. Because they are grown in warm, humid conditions, they are likely to contain bacteria, like E. coli, salmonella and listeria, according to the FDA.
So what prepackaged foods travel well? Shaw recommends snacks that are sealed and have a longer shelf life, like nuts, granola bars, and dried fruit. If you want to have more control over your snack options and spend less money, you can always bring your own, Detwiler suggested.
Fruit Cups
Pre-cut fruit from a grab-and-go counter or in the airport lounge may seem like a healthy option, but it can be risky if not handled properly.
'Once fruit is sliced, its protective skin is removed, exposing it to bacteria from handling, processing, and storage,' Detwiler explained. 'If not kept at proper refrigeration temperatures, cut fruit can become a breeding ground for listeria … as well as E. coli and salmonella from improper handling.'
As a substitute, try fresh fruit that still has the peel on it.
'Wrapped uncut apples, unpeeled oranges, or bananas are naturally sealed and less likely to be contaminated,' Shaw said.
Similar to fruit cups, bacteria from produce can end up in fresh-squeezed juices if they're not pasteurized, according to the FDA. (Pasteurized means they've gone through a heating process that kills harmful bacteria.)
'Juices labeled as 'unpasteurized' or 'cold-pressed' may seem appealing for their freshness, but they pose a higher risk of contamination with E. coli, salmonella, and listeria, especially if they've been sitting at improper temperatures,' Detwiler said.
The same goes for unpasteurized dairy products, like raw milk or cheese, and yogurt made from raw milk.
'I also avoid fresh smoothies … since I can never be sure about the cleanliness of the vendor or of the ingredients, so I prefer to play it safe while traveling,' added Bryan Quoc Le, a food scientist and food science consultant.
Alternatively, look for juices and milk products that are sealed, refrigerated and labeled as 'pasteurized,' Detwiler advised.
'Maintaining safe temperatures for raw fish in an airport setting can be challenging,' Detwiler said. 'Unlike dedicated sushi restaurants that maintain strict handling procedures, airport sushi may have been sitting for hours, increasing the risk of parasites, vibrio, and listeria.'
If you're looking for a protein option, he recommends fully cooked seafood dishes (like grilled shrimp or salmon), cooked meats (like grilled chicken), or a plant-based protein.
Le also prefers hot, cooked options at the airport, like pizza and hot sandwiches, or anything that can be kept at room temperature, like breads or pastries.
'When in doubt, opt for hot, cooked foods rather than cold or raw options,' Detwiler said. 'Higher temperatures help reduce the presence of harmful bacteria.'
'I would recommend avoiding any places that don't appear to be kept clean because this could be an indicator of other issues,' Shumaker said.
Red flags that Shaw watches out for include poor personal hygiene (like when workers don't wash their hands or wear gloves), sticky floors and tables, low-quality ingredients, pests (like insects or rodents), and negative reviews on social media.
Detwiler also avoids eating food from the airport food court that are not usually a part of the restaurant's menu, such as breakfast.
'This is their opportunity to increase revenue and most likely comes with foods or procedures that are not a part of their normal operating procedures [or] standards,' he said.
'One factor that many people likely overlook when eating while traveling is the cleanliness of their own hands,' Le said.
Thousands of people touch the same airport surfaces each day, from handles to elevator buttons to doorknobs, Shumaker added. When traveling, she washes her hands as frequently as possible, especially before she eats. It's also important to know that hand sanitizer doesn't work against norovirus, so hand-washing is really most effective.
'[Hand-washing] can greatly reduce the chances of ingesting any microorganisms that can make you sick, and is just as important as the type of food that you eat at the airport,' Le said.
This article originally appeared on HuffPost.
Hungry for more? Download our free Tasty app to browse and save 7,500+ free recipes — no subscription required.
Tasty
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vox
8 hours ago
- Vox
One thing we can count on to keep ruining our summers
is a correspondent at Vox writing about climate change, energy policy, and science. He is also a regular contributor to the radio program Science Friday. Prior to Vox, he was a reporter for ClimateWire at E&E News. Smoke from wildfires in Canada is once again shrouding parts of the United States — cities like Chicago and Milwaukee — with unhealthy air, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency. Parts of the plume have reached as far as Europe. The bulk of the smoke is forecasted to drift eastward across North America and thin out. As of Thursday afternoon, Canada was battling more than 200 blazes, the majority in western provinces like British Columbia and Alberta, according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre. In Canada, the fires forced more than 27,000 people to evacuate, but the smoke is 'impacting aerial operations for both suppression and evacuation flights.' This is all too familiar. Canada faced a massive spate of wildfires in 2023 and in 2024 that similarly sent clouds of ash and dust across North America, reaching places like New York City. The burned area this year is a fraction of the size of the regions scorched in 2023, a record-breaking year for wildfires in Canada, but it's still early in the fire season. Canadian fire officials warn that the 'potential for emerging significant wildland fires is high to extreme' and lightning may lead to more ignitions in the next few days. These blazes remind us that the dangers of wildfires reach far beyond their flames, and the threat is growing. Wildfire smoke contains a melange of gases like carbon monoxide, particles of soot, and hazardous chemicals like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons that can cause cancer. The tiniest particles in smoke can penetrate deep into the lungs, and even reach the bloodstream, leading to a variety of health problems. When it drifts over a community, it often causes a surge in emergency room visits as people who breathe the smoke suffer strokes, heart attacks, and asthma attacks. There's also evidence that long-term exposure to smoke can lead to a higher likelihood of death from heart, lung, kidney, and digestive diseases. And experts believe the true health burden from wildfires is likely much more extensive than we realize. The harms to health will increase as wildfires become more destructive. Though wildfires are a natural, regular, and vital phenomenon across many landscapes, more people are now living in fire-prone areas, increasing the risk to lives and homes. That increases the odds of starting a fire and means more people and property are in harm's way when one ignites. Decades of fire suppression have allowed fuels like trees and grasses to build up to dangerous levels. And as humanity continues to burn fossil fuels, emitting greenhouse gases and heating up the planet, the climate is changing in ways that enhance fire conditions. So smoke isn't the only pollutant to worry about, and as average temperatures continue to rise, these factors are undoing hard-fought progress in improving air quality across much of the world. However, there are ways to clear the air and avoid some of the worst harms. One tactic is to pay attention to the Air Quality Index in your area and avoid being outdoors when pollution reaches high levels. Wearing a high-quality KN95 or N95 mask can help reduce the damage from polluted air. Blocking air from getting indoors and filtering the air in living areas reduces smoke exposure as well.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Government promises quicker A&E times under plan to help end corridor care
Hundreds of thousands fewer patients will face long A&E waits, the Government has pledged, as it also set out plans to try and end 'corridor care'. Almost £450 million will be put into creating better care and more facilities, with an emphasis on caring for people closer to their homes, according to the Department of Health and NHS England. The new Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for England says more needs to be done to drive down long waits, cut delayed discharges and improve care for patients. An earlier version of the document said NHS trusts would need to show how, by this winter, systems will 'improve flow through hospitals, with a particular focus on patients waiting over 12 hours, and eliminate corridor care'. But the later version does not commit to a timescale for ending corridor care, instead saying systems must 'improve flow through hospitals, with a particular focus on reducing patients waiting over 12 hours and making progress on eliminating corridor care'. Ministers have also set an ambition for a minimum of 78% of patients who attend A&E (up from the current 75%) to be admitted, transferred or discharged within four hours, meaning 'over 800,000 people a month will receive more timely care'. There will also be a focus on seeing more children. The Government wants to slash the number of patients waiting more than 12 hours for a hospital bed – or to be discharged from A&E – so this occurs 'less than 10% of the time', according to the new document. Around 1.7 million attendances at A&E every year currently exceed this time frame. Further measures in the plan are intended to drive down delayed discharges from hospital, which occur when people are medically fit to leave but care in their homes or community has not yet been put in place. Local performance targets will be set to improve patient discharge times, and 'eliminate internal discharge delays of more than 48 hours in all settings', the plan said. Experts said A&E 'league tables' will be published to drive up performance. Those patients who need an overnight emergency admission will also have their overall stay reduced where appropriate – the average is 'currently nearly a day longer than in 2019'. The plan further sets out how ambulance waiting times for category 2 patients – such as those suffering stroke, heart attack, sepsis or major trauma – will be cut by more than 14%, from 35 to 30 minutes. A previous target of 18 minutes has been repeatedly missed. In the document, there is an aim to 'eradicate' last winter's lengthy ambulance handover delays by meeting a maximum 45-minute target for patients to be handed over to A&E. This should help 'get 550,000 more ambulances back on the road for patients', it says. According to the document, around 40 new same day emergency care and urgent treatment centres will also be established to treat and discharge patients the same day, avoiding unnecessary admissions to hospital. Almost 500 new ambulances will also be rolled out across the country by March 2026. The plan details 15 mental health crisis assessment centres, which are designed to ensure mentally ill people do not have to wait in A&E for hours for care. It comes after the NHS experienced a crisis over winter, with patients waiting hours for beds and regularly being treated in corridors – so-called corridor care. A&E waiting time targets have not been met for more than a decade, while the 18-minute target for category 2 ambulance calls has never been hit outside the pandemic. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'No patient should ever be left waiting for hours in hospital corridors or for an ambulance which ought to arrive in minutes. 'We can't fix more than a decade of underinvestment and neglect overnight. 'But through the measures we're setting out today, we will deliver faster and more convenient care for patients in emergencies. 'Far too many patients are ending up in A&E who don't need or want to be there, because there isn't anywhere else available. 'Because patients can't get a GP appointment, which costs the NHS £40, they end up in A&E, which costs around £400 – worse for patients and more expensive for the taxpayer. 'The package of investment and reforms we are announcing today will help the NHS treat more patients in the community, so they don't end up stuck on trolleys in A&E.' Under the plans, paramedics will play a bigger role in the community, with patients given 'more effective treatment at the scene of an accident or in their own homes from ambulance crews'. More patients will also be seen by urgent community response teams in their own homes to try to avoid hospital admission. The NHS is also pledging better use of virtual wards, where patients are monitored by hospital staff from their home, and there are plans to drive up vaccination rates among NHS staff to help protect patients. Royal College of Emergency Medicine president Dr Adrian Boyle said: 'There is some good and some bad – but we wholeheartedly welcome the commitment to publish A&E performance data for each and every hospital and we thank NHS England and the Department of Health for heeding our recommendation. 'In this plan, for possibly the first time, NHS England acknowledges the shameful situation being experienced by patients and clinicians across the country's emergency departments – and that must be commended. 'However, some parts lack ambition – for example accepting that 10% of people will face A&E waits of more than 12 hours, when no patient should. 'Also maintaining the four-hour standard at 78% when the stated aim is that 95% of patients should move through the emergency department within this time – something which hasn't happened for a decade.' He said there were also concerns about how the maximum 45-minute ambulance handover will be achieved 'without exposing patients to risk and increasing overcrowding in our departments'. Association of Ambulance Chief Executives managing director Anna Parry said: 'We are particularly heartened to see the plan's emphasis on the reduction and improved management of hospital handover delays. 'Handover delays have the greatest detrimental impact on ambulance resources and create unnecessary delays and additional harm for thousands of patients each year. 'The elimination of corridor care and the focus on reducing 12-hour waits at emergency departments is also welcomed.' The Liberal Democrats claimed the Government had listened to their calls to end corridor care, but called on ministers to follow through on their promises. Lib Dem health spokesperson Helen Morgan MP said: 'Patients have heard these kinds of promises before only to be led up the garden path. 'We can't bear any more of the shameful neglect and failed delivery that we saw for a decade under the Conservatives. 'It's good to see ministers finally listen to Liberal Democrat demands to end corridor care but the misery in our A&Es will only be prolonged if they continue to move at a snail's pace on social care. 'Until they grasp this nettle, millions are at risk of dangerously long waits in A&E. 'They must see sense and conclude their review into social care by the end of this year.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Sea Salt Crackers sold in Pennsylvania recalled
(WHTM) — The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) announced the recall of Sea Salt Crackers sold at retail stores in 11 states, including Pennsylvania. According to the FDA, Firehook of Virginia is recalling one lot of its Firehook brand Classic Sea Salt Organic Crackers (UPC8 99055 00063 5) because they may contain undeclared sesame, which could cause a life-threatening reaction for people with an allergy or severe sensitivity. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now The recall was initiated back on May 30, 2025, after it was discovered that the sesame-containing product was distributed in packaging that did not reveal the presence of sesame. The problem was caused by a temporary breakdown in the company's production and packaging process. It is important to note that no illnesses have yet been reported in relation to this recall. The FDA says that the Firehook artisan baked Classic Sea Salt Crackers came in an 8oz clear package with a Best By Date of September 29, 2025. These recalled Firehook artisan baked Classic Sea Salt Crackers were sold at retail stores in CT, MA, MD, ME, NC, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, and VA. Moving forward, consumers who purchased the recalled crackers are urged to return them to the place of purchase for a full refund. If you have any questions, you can contact the company at 1-888-580-0745. abc27 news will keep you updated as more information becomes available. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.