
Lawmakers decide which bills worth negotiating and kill the rest
A major reform bill (SB 297) that hit the cutting room floor Thursday was the pitched battle between Secretary of State David Scanlan and HealthTrust, the state's largest risk pool, over whether Scanlan should get enhanced power to regulate these groups that manage insurance plans for units of government.
Last week, the House of Representatives rejected Scanlan's reforms in favor of an amendment that would have let the groups decide whether to come under the regulation of Scanlan's office or the Insurance Department.
Without debate, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Dan Innis, R-Bradford, asked the Senate to 'non-concur' on the House changes and the Senate did on a voice vote which killed the measure.
Scanlan said killing the bill made sense.
"I am pleased the Senate voted to non-concur on the House amended version of SB 297. What began as an attempt to improve the transparency and accountability of pooled risk organizations entrusted with $750 million taxpayer dollars became an attempt by one risk pool to move to a regulatory environment favorable to them without addressing the underlying concerns," Scanlan said in a statement.
Ivermectin bill rejected
The Senate also decided to reject out of hand a controversial House-passed proposal (SB 119) to allow any doctor or pharmacist to provide ivermectin to any patient without a prescription.
Ivermectin was created as a drug to treat parasites for animals but in the past decade it proved to be a prize-winning medication to treat humans for similar conditions.
During COVID-19, the drug became a viral sensation for many Americans who used it to respond to the virus.
House Democratic Floor Leader Lucy Weber of Walpole had argued against giving ivermectin the special status of having a 'standing order' for any patient.
She noted the only medications that have that designation are EpiPens that treat allergic reactions, smoking prevention drugs and some forms of contraception.
This was the main reason that former Gov. Chris Sununu gave when he vetoed a similar bill to this one.
Rep. Yuri Polozov, R-Hooksett, said he pursued the bill because during the pandemic many medical providers were ostracized or even sanctioned for prescribing ivermectin.
Many other bills were also killed because sections that legislators still wanted to survive had been tacked onto another bill.
In this case, the original bill the House amended to favor ivermectin was expected to save the state up to $9 million a year to allow health care providers to prescribe brand name drugs in the Medicaid program if they have discounts or rebates that make these medications cheaper to purchase.
The state Senate tacked that provision onto the trailer bill of its state budget.
In a similar vein, the Senate on Thursday killed a bill (SB 60) dealing with legalized gambling that would have taken from state regulators and given to the Legislature the authority to write rules regarding immunization requirements.
The House had already tacked that section onto the version of its own budget trailer bill.
Another bill (SB 100) that died Thursday was meant to alter a 2021 ban on teaching discrimination in public schools to respond to a federal judge's ruling that struck it down as unconstitutionally too vague.
The House-passed language would require a showing that the educator 'knowingly' was advocating bias in his or her teachings.
Some socially conservative groups that supported the law had warned lawmakers that the House bill only addressed a small part of the legal flaws with the existing law.
The Senate also rejected a House-passed bill that would have created a court docket to resolve disputes over so-called blockchain currencies such as bitcoin (SB 25).
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Indianapolis Star
38 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
'I am outraged at this' - Hundreds protest outside of Indiana Governor's Residence
Hundreds of critics gathered outside the Indiana Governor's Residence on Aug. 7 to show their disapproval with national Republican leadership, who have discussed the idea of holding a special session to redistrict Indiana. Many of those outside of the residence had previously protested Vice President JD Vance's visit to the Statehouse earlier in the day, where he held a meeting with Governor Mike Braun behind closed doors. Braun told reporters as he left the meeting that it went "pretty good" and "covered a wide array of topics." He said redistricting was a topic of conversation, but when asked if any agreement had been reached, he only said, "We listened." But those waving signs outside the Governor's Residence in north Indianapolis felt differently about the meeting. 'The purpose of (Vance's) visit was to make sure that there are no democratic seats in the 2026 election, and that Donald Trump is assured of election because he's rigged it already,' said Lamont Hulse, an organizer with Indivisible Central Indiana. By 5:30 p.m., about 300 people lined Meridian Street, many holding signs like 'save our seats,' 'stop the steal,' and 'no votes for sale.' Close to 100 people have gathered outside of the Indiana Governor's Mansion to protest the state government, who floated the idea of redistricting the state in favor of Republican Republicans already hold 7 of the state's 9 US. House seats.@indystar Hulse believed it was important for Hoosiers to share their voices about this issue. 'I am outraged at this. These are not the Hoosier values I was brought up with," Hulse said. 'The Hoosier values of fairness, of equity, of letting people's voice count, respecting your neighbors, and of not running over people's rights.' More: What Gov. Mike Braun said about redistricting in Indiana following meeting with JD Vance As lifelong Hoosiers, Susan Bettis and Mike Cabat felt embarrassed when they learned intentions of redrawing congressional boundaries had surfaced in Indiana. Traditionally, in Indiana, state leaders don't consider redistricting efforts until the U.S. Census Bureau collects its data at the start of the decade. "It's a blatant power grab that's happening right in the middle of the decade," Bettis said. Bettis and Cabat remembered a time in Indiana when it felt like both state Democrats and Republicans could work together and create legislation that benefited "all Hoosiers and not just the ones that voted for them." While dozens of adults were holding up signs and chanting, Slone Young, 6, and her younger sister were playing hide and seek around the trees at the edge of the governor's residence. An Indiana State Police officer took notice of the two girls playing in the yard and began to walk toward the children, before turning his attention to scold some adults who walked onto the property. When the officer stopped paying attention to them, Young knelt in front of a tree and began to pray. After completing her prayer, she turned to the Governor's Residence and made the sign of the cross toward the building. She then ran to her mother, holding her sister's hands. When asked what she prayed for, Young said, "That's between God and me."


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Redistricting desperation is going viral ahead of 2026
Look anywhere right now, and politicians are joining the calls to rig the 2026 midterms in their party's favor. Why it matters: Republicans started it. But both parties are behaving as if winning the House majority next year is an existential fight. What's at stake: If Dems take the House, they can end President Trump's partisan budget cuts, gain control of the House's oversight powers and ... very likely ... impeach the president. Neither House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) nor House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is in control of redistricting, which is a state-by-state issue. But Jeffries said Thursday that Democrats can't "unilaterally disarm," and Johnson has spoken positively about the push in Texas. In just the last 23 days: July 15: Trump pushed Texas Republicans for a mid-decade redistricting explicitly to add five GOP seats. Just three weeks ago, this was considered an extraordinary gambit. July 16: Gov. Gavin Newsom threatened to retaliate by adding five Democratic seats, despite California's state Constitution forbidding mid-decade redraws. He'll likely try to change the Constitution in November by calling a special election. Sunday: Texas Democrats fled the state to deny quorum for a special session that would include a vote on redistricting. Monday: Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul teased a constitutional amendment to bypass the redistricting commission in New York after the midterms. Tuesday: Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) asked the FBI to help track down the Texas Democrats. Thursday: Trump called for a new census that wouldn't count undocumented immigrants. This seems extremely unlikely. The Supreme Court blocked Trump from not counting undocumented people in the 2020 census. Thursday: Cornyn said the FBI has agreed to help track down the Texas Democrats.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
House Democrats prepare to go scorched earth on redistricting
Democrats in Congress are warming to a strategy of maximum retaliation in response to Republicans' efforts to draw more favorable congressional maps ahead of the 2026 elections. Why it matters: This is a rare moment in which House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and his members are perfectly aligned with the demands of their grassroots base to fight fire with fire. Democrats have been bombarded for months by angry liberal voters demanding they tear up the old political rulebook, cast aside norms and civility, and emulate President Trump's brute force tactics. Now, as they stare down what some see as a struggle for their party's survival, congressional Democrats are just as angry as their voters. "Hakeem is clearly upset and angry and frustrated by this," said Rep. Joe Morelle (D-N.Y.), Jeffries' ranking member on the House Administration Committee. "I think we all are. ... It's existential now." State of play: At Trump's urging, Texas Republicans are trying to redraw their state's congressional maps to turn as many as five Democratic-held districts into seats the GOP would be likely to win. In response, Democratic governors in California, New York and elsewhere have threatened to undertake similar gerrymandering efforts to nullify Republicans' changes in Texas. Republicans are looking at opportunities to gerrymander Democratic districts in Ohio, Indiana, Missouri and Florida — all with an eye to mitigating potential losses in 2026. What we're hearing: Promises to gerrymander Democratic-led states may have begun as threats of mutually assured destruction aimed at getting Texas to back down, but now they have hardened into cold political reality. "Democratic Governors and state legislators can either fight back, or they can let Donald Trump and Republicans steal the midterm elections," House Democratic caucus vice chair Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) said on X. That's in line with the case Democratic leadership has made privately, according to multiple sources. "Every Democratic [governor] with these levers should get a plan together," one senior House Democrat told Axios. Though Jeffries was just in Texas huddling with Democratic legislators, he is "talking to other states," said a second senior House Democrat. Zoom in: Unlike blue-state Republicans, even the Democrats with the most to lose say the party should put aside its commitment to fairer redistricting and get down in the mud with Republicans. Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) said he "100%" agrees with Lieu. Asked about the risk to his own seat, he told Axios, "That train has left the station." Another Texas Democrat told Axios: "I think we should fight back." "This is a game of chess," said a Florida Democrat whose seat is also at risk. "Every move has another move until checkmate." What they're saying: "One cannot unilaterally disarm," Jeffries said in an ABC News interview on Thursday. "The Republicans are counting on that as part of their scheme to try to steal the midterm elections and gerrymander these congressional maps with impunity." Jeffries "is leading the fight ... he is hands-on leading this one," the second senior House Democrat told Axios. Zoom out: In addition to California and New York, lawmakers pointed to Maryland, Illinois, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington as potential targets. The Texas Democrat who spoke anonymously told Axios that, initially, the goal of threats to gerrymander in blue states was "to get Texas to back away," but things are now "moving ahead." "Leadership is on board," the lawmaker added. "Otherwise, we're fighting with our hands tied behind our backs." "I think most Democratic candidates and elected officials agree with the base on this," said Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.). "I don't anticipate a ton of daylight." Yes, but: "Many states cannot" gerrymander, warned the second House Democrat, "Democratic governor or not." Several Democratic governors are constrained by legislatures at least partially controlled by Republicans, and substantial procedural hurdles exist in states like California and New York. The bottom line: "I think there's broad agreement by Democrats that ... we simply can't stand by and let the Republican Party completely ruin the map," said Morelle.