1968 Mercury Cougar Features A Unique Fastback Design
Read the full story on Backfire News
This custom 1968 Mercury Cougar as a fastback gives a glimpse of what could have been but wasn't. Perhaps back in the day it was understood that only the Mustang could have such a design, but one has to wonder had Mercury created such a thing, how would it have fared on the market. We'll never know for sure.What we do know is this creation from JF Kustoms out of Canada sure looks amazing. The designer said he wanted to build such a car for a long time, he just needed a client who wanted it. When that finally happened, the guy unleased his creative energies and pure magic ensued.
He tells Autotopia LA that he wanted to build the car as a believable concept from the late 60s, from the engine to the paint and interior, but with a bit of modern flair. We think he nailed that vibe.
Under the hood is a Boss 9 big block V8, which pushes about 770-horsepower naturally aspirated. Backing it is a Tremec 5-speed, which is great to see since even a lot of custom classic muscle cars feature automatics these days. There's also a Ford 9-inch, the same thing Chevy guys use.
Interestingly enough, the Cougar has been kept as a unibody. But there chassis has a lot of reinforcing elements, adding torsional rigidity to improve handling. The suspension and subframe were fabricated by the shop, as was the stainless steel, polished exhaust system.
The interior's design shows surprising restraint, considering this build could've been opulent. There are nice details, but it does look like something Mercury might have done in that era, including using wood trim and the same green as on the body. They even added small details like an ashtray.
You really need to watch the video review to fully appreciate this car. Plus you get to see it rip some burnouts and donuts.
Images via Autotopia LA/YouTube
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
10 Classic Muscle Cars for the Middle Class To Buy for Hobby and Investment
Classic muscle cars are getting painfully expensive. The golden-era icons, Chevelle SS 454s, anything with a 426 Hemi, early GTOs, have skyrocketed into collector territory, commanding prices most of us will never touch. Inflation's up, wages aren't, and middle-class buyers are getting squeezed out of the market. But that doesn't mean the dream is dead. There's still a sweet spot for gearheads who want real V8 muscle without a six-figure price tag — if you know where to look. Now, before anyone grabs their pitchforks, yes, we know not all of these are 'true' muscle cars by the strict textbook definition. Some are pony cars, some are Malaise-era holdouts, and a few even have four doors. But they all deliver what matters: classic looks, V8 power (or the potential for it), rear-wheel drive, and serious street presence. According to Investopedia, roughly 50% of the American population belongs to the middle class, with an income spanning two-thirds to double the national median household income, which was $80,610 in 2023. That means we're working with a realistic classic car budget — typically somewhere between $5,000 and $30,000. We also want to clarify how we defined 'muscle cars' here. We cast a wide net, including pony cars, Malaise-era survivors, and even a few later-model performance sedans with the same spirit, rear-wheel drive, burly engines, mod potential, and attitude. If it looks the part, sounds the part, and drives like fun, we'll give it a shot. We hear you, some of these might make your eyebrow twitch. But collector tastes are evolving, and so are the prices. Today's 'not-quite muscle' cars are tomorrow's garage queens. And these are the ones you can still afford. Let's just get the Mustang out of the way. Sure, some will argue that it's a pony car, not a real muscle car, but barely anyone cares about that distinction anymore. The Mustang is pure Americana; it's a car that brought affordable style, power, and freedom to a generation. According to Hagerty's Valuation Tool, you can get a 1966 2-door coupe with the 289 V8 for around $22,000 and that's for a car in good condition. It's possible to pay a lot less up front and buy a project instead. Mustangs enjoy an absolutely mahoosive selection of aftermarket parts, so you can essentially turn it into the car of your dreams. Gearheads tend to focus on the third-gen Plymouth Hemi 'Cuda, so the second-generation Barracuda is kind of overlooked. That's a shame, because this really is a cool muscle car in its own right. On the plus side, being overlooked also makes it relatively affordable, so it's feasible for regular people to get their hands on one. Hagerty reckons a '68 Barracuda 2-door hardtop coupe in good condition and fitted with the 318 V8 should cost just under $16,000. That's a bargain! Those looking for a restoration object can probably get that price closer to $10,000. Many muscle car enthusiasts used to turn their noses up at the Chevrolet Nova, but I think it has aged well. It offers classic styling and a cool design, and with the right engine, it makes all the right noises and goes fast enough to get us in trouble. Oh, and it's also affordable! Our friends over at Hagerty say we can buy a '71 Nova SS with the 270-hp 350 V8 for less than $30,000. If that's too much, or you want a project, I suggest the 1975 Nova SS instead. It may only have a 110-hp 262, but it can be yours for roughly $11,000. Then, you can spend the money you saved on an LS swap and force sports cars to dine on your dust as the light turns green. Much like the Nova, the Plymouth Duster has traditionally been viewed as a second-tier classic muscle car, and that's reflected in the prices. Hagerty's Valuation Tool shows that it's possible to get a 2-door coupe in good condition for less than $28,000. That's for a car with the 340 V8 pushing out 275 American workhorses. You'd better hurry up, though, as prices have increased nearly 5% in the last year. Bargain hunters should check out the 1976 Duster instead, as it'll only set you back roughly $14,000. Being a Malaise Era car, its 360 V8 only churns out 220 hp, but that's easily fixed with an engine swap or some aftermarket performance parts. We mentioned the Ford Mustang earlier, but what if you're looking for something that offers all the same things, but with added exclusivity... and for less money? What you want is the Mercury Cougar! It's built on the same platform as the 'Stang, and it's just as cool as its Ford cousin, but it looks different — which means you'll have more people staring and asking about your car. According to Hagerty, it's possible to pick up a 1968 Mercury Cougar in good condition for as little as $15,800. In 1970, Chevrolet released the most iconic Chevelle ever in the form of the SS 454 LS6, a rare beast with an astonishing 450 hp. As you may have already guessed, there's no way we'll get that one on our budget — unless it's a wreck and total basket case. However, if we opt for the far less iconic 1971 Chevrolet Chevelle Heavy Chevy, Hagerty informs us we can get away with paying just $17,200. Granted, it doesn't have the same design or engine as the SS454, but it still looks cool, and the 307 V8 spits out 200 hp along with a glorious soundtrack. So far, we've covered some really cool old-school muscle cars, and while they're affordable compared to the more collectible models, they're not dirt cheap! If your budget is tighter than Mick Jagger's pants, those cars may be out of reach. However, there's still hope. The 1980s had a lot to offer, but in terms of muscle cars, that era definitely wasn't the best. The Malaise Era had wreaked havoc on the industry, and the muscle segment was still reeling from the effects, but by the late 1980s, things were starting to pick up. Hagerty claims it's possible to get a 1988 Camaro with a 5.0-liter V8 for just $5,400. If you're willing to put in some time, money, and elbow grease, you can easily make that money back, as immaculate base models are listed for as much as $21,000 on Before the Impala SS arrived in the mid-1990s, muscle car purists would never have accepted a 4-door sedan, but after being starved of proper high-performance models for a couple of decades, they welcomed it with open arms. The 7th-gen was the first car to wear the Impala badge since 1985. It was based on the Chevy Caprice, and under the hood, it had a Corvette-derived 5.7-liter LT1 V8, sending a respectable 260 hp to the rear wheels. Prices went up for a few years but have now dropped around 6% in the last 12 months, and Hagerty informs us that an Impala SS in good condition costs around $17,000. The second-gen Dodge Charger has appeared in movies and TV shows such as Bullitt, The Dukes of Hazzard, and the Fast & Furious franchise. It's become such an icon that finding one for reasonable money is nigh on impossible — especially if you want the R/T model with the 440 or 426 Hemi engine. However, all is not lost. Those willing to give the third-gen Charger a chance can get their hands on a bargain. Hagerty's Valuation Tool tells us a 1971 base model with the 318 engine can be had for $19,300. That's a $10,000+ saving compared to a base model from the year before. In 1993, Ford introduced the first SVT Cobra Mustang, built on the Fox body and with the "5.0" 4.9-liter engine under the hood. Three years later, they replaced the aging powerplant with the new aluminum 4.6-liter DOHC modular unit. Checking out Hagerty's Valuation Tool tells us this car can be had for a song these days. Its value has dropped over 15%, and prices for cars in good condition now sit around the $ 11,500 mark. That's not bad for a car that can even be used as a daily driver! Pontiac introduced the Firebird Trans Am WS6 in 1996, and it only had a short 6-year run, which has made it somewhat sought-after by collectors. According to Hagerty, it had a Corvette-derived LT1 small-block V8 with 305 hp, although the following year, it received an LS1 with 310 horses. With giant nostrils on the hood and generally aggressive styling, it certainly looked the part. Hagerty also says prices have dropped 5%, so you can get behind the wheel of this monster if you're willing to part with $15,100. It is possible for us mere mortals to get behind the wheel of a real classic muscle car without breaking the bank or having to settle for the quasi-muscle cars of the Malaise Era. If you're looking for a hobby or a project, you can get away with spending very little money upfront, and seeing as many of these classics are becoming more collectible, it can even be called an investment.
Motor Trend
a day ago
- Motor Trend
Rad! 2026 Ford Mustang FX Package Remasters 1980s-Era Fox Body
The so-called "Fox body" Ford Mustangs, the third-generation cars built from 1979 through 1993, are enjoying a sort of nostalgia-driven renaissance in interest these days. Unsurprisingly, this is because those who were young when the Fox bodies were on sale are now older, maybe with some extra cash and spare garage space to start collecting these Mustangs off-lawn, so to speak. How "in" are Fox bodies these days? Ford is even getting in on the action with a new FX package that celebrates the Mustang defined by the 1980s. This isn't the first time Ford has dipped into Fox-body lore lately, either—when the current Mustang arrived for 2024, its digital gauge cluster even included a setting that recreates the Fox body's old-school analog gauge pack. The FX package takes the nostalgia a lot further, of course, with white badges, white wheels, retro "Mustang" lettering, and more. It's available only on the Mustang GT Premium trim level, on both the coupe and convertible, and with or without the Performance package. It Ain't Real If It Ain't Teal Ford doesn't choose just any white paint for the FX package; since all things Mustang must treat time like a flat circle, everything you see painted white is, specifically, painted Oxford White, a hue that was available on the original Mustang. It's used for the "GT" badges, wheels, retro "Mustang" sticker on the rear glass (coupe only), and the "nostrils" in the grille on Performance package variants. There are two wheel designs and both evoke classic Fox body designs, with the version you see here adopting a slick turbofan style. The other version—for non-Performance-pack cars—is a classic five-spoke. Both wear color-matched center caps bearing "Mustang GT" lettering in what Ford says is a new font (that happens to look like an old, Fox-body font, but who's keeping close track?). Oh, and speaking of paint, the FX package introduces a new-for-2026 paint color (which also will be available on other '26 Mustangs): Adriatic Blue Metallic. Put simply, it's a rad teal color (pictured here)—what could be more Fox-body-era than that? Another new paint color this year is Orange Fury Metallic. It has no specific history linked to the Fox body, it's just worth mentioning since it hasn't been offered on the Mustang since 2019. Pivotal Digital Setting aside how blown peoples' minds would have been if, in the 1980s, their Fox body Mustangs came with the sort of digitized dashboard that today's Mustang gets (FX package included), Ford has put some effort into backdating the FX's interior. Plaid-like seat inserts do a lot of the heavy lifting here, but remember, there's always that Fox body gauge cluster option. Less obvious is the Dark Alley interior trim borrowed from the Mustang Dark Horse model, as well as subtle blue stitching and a "Mustang GT" badge on the passenger-side dash. Ford hasn't outlined the FX package's price yet, but mentions that order books for the 2026 Mustang lineup overall open in later in June 2025. We'll surely find out then how much this retro FX package (and the Mustang overall) costs. But if you want to rock out with your 1980s out in a new-generation Mustang, you should definitely peep this one.
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Chris Buescher Devastated After Falling Short With 'Fastest Car on Track'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Despite a second-place finish at the Michigan International Speedway, Chris Buescher seemed upset about the "missed opportunity" that cost him the NASCAR Cup Series race win. RFK Racing had a great race weekend at Michigan, considering all three cars it fielded finished within the top ten. Buescher finished behind race winner Denny Hamlin, while Ryan Preece and Brad Keselowski finished in ninth and tenth. Despite the remarkable team effort, Buescher took it on himself after the race, especially considering that he had one of the fastest cars. One factor that likely set him back was that his car took longer to refuel, which then followed undesired race restarts. Speaking to FOX Sports' Bob Pockrass, he said: Chris Buescher, driver of the #17 Kroger/OIKOS Ford, walks the grid during practice for the NASCAR Cup Series Cracker Barrel 400 at Nashville Superspeedway on May 31, 2025 in Lebanon, Tennessee. Chris Buescher, driver of the #17 Kroger/OIKOS Ford, walks the grid during practice for the NASCAR Cup Series Cracker Barrel 400 at Nashville Superspeedway on May 31, 2025 in Lebanon, Tennessee."I got by the 38 and I just had a big big over. And that's what let the 11, 54, then the 38 by. That moment was my error, and realistically cost us to win today, because we were better than the 11 car. "Proud of the team for giving me that car, and that opportunity. I'd love to have it back, but that's not an option. A lot of speed, fantastic race for us. Big solid day but just feels like a missed opportunity." Chris Buescher laments the missed opportunity with arguably the fastest car in the field as he finished second to Denny Hamlin. @NASCARONFOX — Bob Pockrass (@bobpockrass) June 8, 2025 Speaking to NBC Sports, Buescher stated that the team needs some luck on their side to win. He said: "We certainly need a little bit of good luck or fortune on our side. This is a day where we kind of made our own. We were really fast and worked hard to be there and just didn't have any bad luck, so that put us with a shot to win. "After the last handful of weeks with having speed in the first stage and qualifying and not being able to get the race finish that was certainly big, but it's frustrating to be that close and to know that we had a car that was capable of winning. I just needed to do a better job." He added: "That was such a fast Mustang. I really appreciate everybody on this team working so hard to put us in this situation and to have a chance to win. I'm disappointed I didn't get it done. It's on me. I had a couple different decisions I would love to go back and make and ultimately should have had us ahead of the 11. We were faster on the day and I didn't do a good enough job."
