
USDA preps for farm aid rollout
Presented by Bayer
With help from Jordan Wolman and Samuel Benson
QUICK FIX
— The Agriculture Department is gearing up to roll out $10 billion in economic assistance for farmers by the deadline this week.
— Hill Democrats are urging USDA to explain and reverse the axing of two local food purchasing programs.
— Ag groups are making louder pleas for exemptions as President Donald Trump continues his tariff battles.
IT'S MONDAY, MARCH 17. Welcome to Morning Agriculture. I'm your host Grace Yarrow. Happy St. Patrick's Day — and, perhaps more importantly for readers of this newsletter, happy National Agriculture Week! Send tips, scoops and how you're planning to celebrate to gyarrow@politico.com. As always, don't forget to follow us at @Morning_Ag for more.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
Driving the day
CLOCK IS TICKING: The Agriculture Department is expected to open applications for economic aid to farmers by the deadline of Friday.
USDA chief Brooke Rollins promised farmers at the Commodity Classic at the beginning of March that the funds would be ready by that deadline. Senate Ag Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) told MA on Friday he's spoken with Rollins and expects the funds to start flowing on time.
Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) confirmed USDA is 'very close' and said last week that farmers can expect an announcement of open applications soon.
Next on the to-do list: Lawmakers haven't gotten clarity on timing for another $21 billion in disaster aid to help farmers recover from last year's hurricanes, floods, droughts and more. A group of representatives from the Southeast urged Rollins in a letter last week to expedite the process.
AROUND THE AGENCIES
REVERSING BIDEN'S FORMULA MOVES: In a series of executive orders Friday, Trump revoked former President Joe Biden's use of the Defense Production Act to speed up manufacturing of U.S.-made infant formula after a major recall and shortage of formula in 2022.
Biden's order directed USDA and HHS to use the Defense Department's commercial aircraft to pick up products from overseas 'so it can get to store shelves faster.'
More background: The Biden administration faced aggressive calls to take more action as parents struggled to find the critical products after a monthslong shutdown of the Abbott Nutrition plant in Sturgis, Michigan.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment about any predicted changes in availability or cost of baby formula as a result of Trump's revocation.
On The Hill
FIRST IN MA: Dozens of Democratic lawmakers are expressing their 'deep dismay' over USDA's halting of more than $1 billion for programs that gave schools and food banks money to buy food from local farms and ranchers.
Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) led 81 other Democrats in a letter asking Rollins for answers on why the programs were cut and how USDA will help farmers and organizations that relied on those initiatives for markets and local foods.
The lawmakers called the cancellations 'reckless and cruel' as farmers face harsh economic conditions and uncertainty, and consumers continue to experience high grocery store prices for local or nutritious food.
FROM THE UPPER CHAMBER: Thirty-two Senate Democrats, led by California Sen. Adam Schiff, also wrote to Rollins asking for more clarity on the decision to stop funding for the local food purchasing programs.
'At a time when food insecurity remains high, providing affordable, fresh food to food banks and families while supporting American farmers is critical,' they wrote.
TARIFFS, TARIFFS AND TARIFFS
CHANGING THEIR TUNE? Some agriculture groups are growing tired of feeling like their private requests for exemptions or support for farmers during Trump's tariff wars are failing to result in any tangible change.
Trump deployed a lower tariff on potash from Canada, a key fertilizer ingredient that powerful ag lobbying groups and GOP lawmakers urged the president to prioritize. That declaration opened the floodgates of industry lobbyists asking for more exemptions or lower tariffs for their industries behind the scenes.
'Everyone I've talked to is still largely taking the tack of making kind of dry public statements when they have to make them, and making stronger private appeals,' said one ag advocate, granted anonymity to candidly discuss thinking around how to respond to Trump's policies.
Another ag industry representative added that the tone of groups' approaches has started to change.
'Everyone was trying to play nicely, meaning we were just saying, 'We understand what you're doing Mr. President,'' they said. 'I think everyone's saying now, 'Wow, we're disappointed.''
More background: Ag groups pressed for Trump to exempt potash and other ag inputs from his tariffs, as farmers face already-high input costs. Groups like the American Farm Bureau Federation counted that change as a win, and a sign that Trump was listening to farmers' needs.
Now, they're asking the administration to provide more certainty on what comes next, as Trump has delayed tariffs on Canada and Mexico and as worldwide 'reciprocal' tariffs are on the horizon next month.
One 'perfect' example: Alcohol importers and producers are warning that they'll be hit hard by tariffs on imports from other countries impacting popular products, including European sparkling wines like champagne and prosecco and Mexican spirits like tequila and mezcal.
Chris Swonger, president and CEO of the Distilled Spirits Council of the U.S. recently told MA he's pushing harder to receive a spirits exemption from Trump after seeing other carveouts for the auto industry and potash.
'We are going to work hard to make sure these tariffs are removed. We are the perfect model of a category where there should be an exemption,' Swonger said.
TRUDEAU'S ORANGE A-PEEL: When former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced retaliatory tariffs on 1,256 items — from household appliances to coffee — he encouraged Canadians to 'do your part' by picking domestic products at the grocery store, 'foregoing Florida orange juice altogether,' our colleagues write.
The economic benefits between Canada and Florida go far beyond tourism. Canadians get 40 percent of their seafood from Florida and import loads of produce such as citrus, watermelon, strawberries and tomatoes.
Florida citrus producers are already grappling with disease and hurricanes, and U.S. consumers are drinking less orange juice. Developers are also increasingly building homes in orange-producing areas, shrinking land that was once used for orange groves, per The Associated Press.
Row Crops
— Eggs are so expensive that people are smuggling them in from Mexico. (The Wall Street Journal)
— As world leaders grasp for a response to Trump's tariffs, they have two models to study — and both have plenty of pitfalls, our colleagues write.
— The Forest Service has informed California's Department of Fish and Wildlife that it will not be able to proceed with a nearly $1 million grant awarded by the state for the purpose of removing waste left by illegal cannabis cultivation sites on federal lands, our Natalie Fertig writes.
— A major climate lawsuit is heading to trial next week, and experts say the case brought by a Peruvian farmer against German energy giant RWE could set a crucial precedent in holding polluters accountable for climate change. (The Associated Press)
— House Ag Chair G.T. Thompson (R-Pa.) told the Pennsylvania Capital-Star that 'at this point in time' he's planning to stay in Congress and not run for Pennsylvania governor.
THAT'S ALL FOR MA! Drop us a line and send us your agriculture job announcements or events: gyarrow@politico.com, marciabrown@politico.com, jwolman@politico.com, sbenson@politico.com, rdugyala@politico.com and gmott@politico.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
15 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.
The Trump administration announced Saturday that National Guard troops were being sent to Los Angeles — an action Gov. Gavin Newsom said he opposed. President Trump is activating the Guard by using powers that have been invoked only rarely. Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision called Title 10 to 'temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.' Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard members in the United States or abroad. Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation's leading constitutional law scholars, said 'for the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling.' 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent,' said Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. 'It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done.' Tom Homan, the Trump administration's 'border czar,' announced the plan to send the National Guard in an interview on Fox News on Saturday as protesters continued confronting immigration agents during raids. 'This is about enforcing the law,' Homan said. 'We're not going to apologize for doing it. We're stepping up.' 'We're already ahead of the game. We were already mobilizing,' he added. 'We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight. We're gonna continue doing our job. We're gonna push back on these people.' Newsom criticized the federal action, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was 'purposefully inflammatory' and would 'only escalate tensions.' The governor called the president and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor's office. Critics have raised concerns that Trump also might try to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to activate troops as part of his campaign to deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants. The president has the authority under the Insurrection Act to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws' that any portion of the state's inhabitants are deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right. The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that Trump's use of the military domestically would be misguided and dangerous. According to the ACLU, Title 10 activation of National Guard troops has historically been rare and Congress has prohibited troops deployed under the law from providing 'direct assistance' to civilian law enforcement — under both a separate provision of Title 10 as well as the Posse Comitatus Act. The Insurrection Act, however, is viewed as an exception to the prohibitions under the Posse Comitatus Act. In 1958, President Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court's decision ending racial segregation in schools, and to defend Black students against a violent mob. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, wrote in a recent article that if Trump were to invoke the Insurrection Act 'to activate federalized troops for mass deportation — whether at the border or somewhere else in the country — it would be unprecedented, unnecessary, and wrong.' Chemerinsky said invoking the Insurrection Act and nationalizing a state's National Guard has been reserved for extreme circumstances where there are no other alternatives to maintain the peace. Chemerinsky said he feared that in this case the Trump administration was seeking 'to send a message to protesters of the willingness of the federal government to use federal troops to quell protests.' In 1992, California Gov. Pete Wilson requested that President George H.W. Bush use the National Guard to quell the unrest in Los Angeles after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That was under a different provision of federal law that allows the president to use military force in the United States. That provision applies if a state governor or legislature requests it. California politics editor Phil Willon contributed to this report.

19 minutes ago
Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud
NEWARK, N.J. -- President Donald Trump walked out to a thunderous standing ovation just ahead of the start of the UFC pay-per-view card at the Prudential Center on Saturday night, putting his public feud with tech billionaire Elon Musk on hold to instead watch the fierce battles inside the cage. Trump was accompanied by UFC President Dana White and the pair headed to their cageside seats to Kid Rock's 'American Bad Ass.' Trump and White did the same for UFC's card last November at Madison Square Garden, only then they were joined by Musk. Trump shook hands with fans and supporters — a heavyweight lineup that included retired boxing champion Mike Tyson — on his way to the cage. Trump was joined by his daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, along with son Eric Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Trump shook hands with the UFC broadcast team that included Joe Rogan. Rogan hosted Trump on his podcast for hours in the final stages of the campaign last year. UFC fans went wild for Trump and held mobile devices in their outstretched arms to snap pictures of him. Trump arrived in time for the start of a card set to include two championship fights. Julianna Peña and Merab Dvalishvili were scheduled to each defend their 135-pound championships. UFC fighter Kevin Holland won the first fight with Trump in the building, scaled the cage and briefly chatted with the President before his post-fight interview.


New York Times
19 minutes ago
- New York Times
Gina Ortiz Jones, a Progressive, Is Elected San Antonio's Mayor
Gina Ortiz Jones, a Filipino American who served as under secretary of the Air Force during the Biden administration, won a runoff election on Saturday to become the mayor of San Antonio, making her the first openly gay leader of the seventh-largest city in the country. Ms. Jones, 44, defeated Rolando Pablos, 57, a Mexican immigrant and former Texas secretary of state known for his close ties to Gov. Greg Abbott, a conservative Republican. 'San Antonio showed up and showed out,' Ms. Jones told a group of supporters Saturday night, and then referring to voters she added. 'We reminded them that our city is about compassion and it's about leading with everybody in mind.' 'So I look forward to being a mayor for all.' The election was a test of Latino sentiment after the dramatic shift of Hispanic voters toward Donald J. Trump in 2024. Kamala Harris handily won San Antonio, a Latino-majority city and Democratic stronghold, but Mr. Trump made significant gains in the city on his way to a 14-percentage-point victory in Texas. On Saturday night, Mr. Pablos conceded. 'We tried. It was a very tough race.' Though technically nonpartisan, Mr. Pablos did not downplay his ties to Republican leaders in Texas, nor did Ms. Jones shy from her longstanding Democratic connections. Heading into Saturday, she was seen as the front-runner, having earned the largest portion of the voting bloc in a crowded, 27-candidate election in May. Then, she won 27 percent of the vote to Mr. Pablos's 17 percent. She was also closely aligned with the politics of the outgoing mayor, Ron Nirenberg, who was first elected in 2017 and is term limited after four consecutive wins. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.