Vietnam hikes beer, liquor tax by 5pc yearly, set to hit 90pc by 2031
HANOI, June 15 — Vietnam's lawmakers approved raising the tax on beer and strong alcoholic beverages yesterday to 90 per cent by 2031 from the current 65 per cent, state media said.
The tax rate on liquor with more than 20 per cent alcohol content and all beers will rise five percentage points yearly from 2027 before reaching 90 per cent in 2031 under the National Assembly's new legislation.
Levies will also increase by five percentage points annually for other drinks with alcohol content below 20 per cent, which are currently subject to a 35 per cent tax, reaching 60 per cent by 2031.
'The gradual annual tax increase is not intended to change behaviour but rather to help consumers adapt more easily,' Hoang Van Cuong, a member of parliament, told the assembly in March.
Lawmakers also approved a new levy of eight per cent on beverages containing more than five grams of sugar per 100 millilitres, taking effect in 2027 and increasing to 10 per cent in 2028.
Beer sales in Vietnam took a hit following the introduction of a strict zero-alcohol rule for drivers in 2019.
However, Dan Martin, an International Business Advisor at Dezan Shira & Associates, said Vietnam's drinking culture has roots 'that run far too deep to be uprooted by policy alone'.
'Rather than spelling doom for the beer market, these measures represent more of a speed bump than a roadblock,' he told AFP.
Martin said that behavioural shifts were already underway, with more Vietnamese people consuming alcohol at home rather than at traditional venues such as bars.
The trend 'isn't just consumers reacting to new rules', he said.
Vietnam ranked seventh globally in beer consumption in 2022, according to a report by Kirin Holdings, a Japanese beer company.
Nearly 41,000 Vietnamese people die each year due to alcohol consumption, according to the health ministry. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
12 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
PM announces RM250mil in project allocations for navy base in Lumut
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim meeting with navy personnel in Lumut today. (Bernama pic) LUMUT : Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim today announced project allocations totalling over RM250 million for the navy base in Lumut, to improve the well-being and welfare of security personnel, among other things. He said RM65 million has been allocated for the construction of a specialist clinic complex and the upgrading of the armed forces hospital at the base. Also approved were several key infrastructure projects, including the upgrading of the 33kV high-voltage distribution system, with an allocation of RM100 million, the replacement of the Bulk Fuel Installation operational tanks (RM23.3 million), and the upgrading of the operational jetty at the Lumut base (RM66.5 million). 'I urge the state secretary present here to immediately implement the construction of the specialist clinic complex and the upgrading of the Lumut armed forces hospital, for the well-being of navy personnel,' he said at a gathering with navy personnel here today. Present were communications minister Fahmi Fadzil and navy chief Zulhelmy Ithnain. Anwar said the government remains attentive to the need to enhance the country's defence assets, with the defence ministry receiving one of the largest allocations in the annual budget. 'Defence ranks third (in terms of allocation), after education and health. For 2025 alone, RM21.2 billion has been allocated – a significant amount for a developing nation,' he said. He said the move reflected the government's appreciation of the sacrifices made by the security forces and was aimed at ensuring national stability, which is crucial for economic growth. Anwar said he is often moved when learning of the poor condition of certain security assets that are still in use to safeguard the nation. 'That is why after becoming prime minister, I called in all the armed forces chiefs and asked them to outline their priority needs. Based on that, we work to secure sufficient funding to improve our defence machinery and assets,' he said.
Free Malaysia Today
12 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
No SST on residential properties under HDA, says Nga
Only 2% of building material tariff codes are affected by the SST hike, according to the housing and local government ministry. PETALING JAYA : The housing and local government ministry has clarified that residential properties sold under the Housing Development Act (HDA) remain exempt from the expanded sales and service tax (SST). Its minister, Nga Kor Ming, said this covers all residential buildings, including serviced apartments with commercial land titles, provided they are intended for residential use and fall under the scope of the HDA. 'The SST exemption is determined by either the land title or the intended use of the property,' he said in a statement today after consulting with finance minister II Amir Hamzah Azizan. The clarification comes after receiving feedback from industry players about the expanded SST framework that begins from July 1 and its possible impact on housing costs. Groups like the Real Estate and Housing Developers' Association (Rehda) and the Master Builders Association Malaysia had warned of cost pressures and disruptions to ongoing projects and businesses. Under the new tax regime, a 6% service tax will be imposed on construction services for infrastructure, commercial, and industrial buildings, if the taxable value exceeds RM1.5 million annually. Nga also addressed fears over cascading taxes, saying that a business-to-business (B2B) exemption mechanism ensures the service tax is imposed only once along the value chain. He said the sales tax for basic construction materials such as cement, aggregates and sand remains at 0%. Out of 400 tariff codes related to building materials, he said, tax hikes apply to only eight, including items like laminated glass and vats, affecting just 2% of materials. Contractors may also separate material costs from service charges, allowing the SST to be applied solely to construction services. 'The housing and local government ministry remains committed to working with the finance ministry and key stakeholders to ensure fair tax implementation, protect homebuyers' interests, and support a sustainable housing sector,' Nga said. 'The ministry remains committed to preserving housing affordability and protecting homebuyers' interests under the revised SST framework.'
Free Malaysia Today
12 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Claimant loses RM7mil payment after failing to produce original vouchers
The apex court said Pioneer Conglomerate Sdn Bhd had no sustainable claim against Live Capital Sdn Bhd without the two vouchers that formed the pillar of its case. PUTRAJAYA : The Federal Court has ruled that an investment consultancy firm could retain RM7 million for services rendered in acquiring a company, as the plaintiff failed to proof that the payment had been an advance. Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Abdul Rahman Sebli, said the Court of Appeal had erred in how it dealt with disputed documentary evidence, which could lead to confusion and uncertainty. 'The Court of Appeal's written grounds of judgment bind all courts below based on the doctrine of stare decisis,' he said in his 30-page judgment delivered last week. Justices Abu Bakar Jais and Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera also heard the appeal. The facts of the case revealed that Pioneer Conglomerate Sdn Bhd, the plaintiff, had approached Live Capital Sdn Bhd, the defendant, for services relating to the takeover of public-listed company Ta Win Holdings Berhad. Pioneer prepared two vouchers for two cheques — one for RM5 million dated Nov 3, 2017 and another for RM2 million 12 days later. On May 31, 2019, Pioneer filed a civil action in the High Court against Live Capital for RM7 million, claiming that it had been given as an advance. Witness Ngu Tieng Ung who testified for Live Capital admitted that the signature on the first voucher was his but said that the typewritten words 'Being paid as advance to Tenggara Kapital Sdn Bhd' were not there when the voucher was signed. Tenggara Kapital was the former name of Live Capital. Ngu also testified that a handwritten notation 'Advance to Tenggara' was not on the second voucher when he signed it. Pioneer claimed that the two vouchers were proof that the RM7 million was paid to Live Capital as an advance. However, in its defence, Live Capital claimed the sum had been paid as a commission. The High Court dismissed the suit as the original vouchers were not produced in court and the persons who added the notations were not called as witnesses. The Court of Appeal, however, set aside the High Court ruling, holding that the burden of proof had shifted to Live Capital. Delivering the apex court's unanimous decision, Rahman noted that the High Court had accepted Ngu's evidence that the notation and alterations on the two vouchers were not there when he signed them. 'This means they were added or altered by someone unknown to Ngu after he signed them,' he said, adding that the Court of Appeal should not have reversed the decision as an adverse finding of fact had been made against Pioneer. Rahman said it was factually incorrect for the Court of Appeal to say that Pioneer had produced the originals of the two vouchers. He also said the Court of Appeal was wrong to impose the evidential burden of proof on the defendant. 'Before any burden, legal or evidential, is shifted to Live Capital, it must be shown that Pioneer succeeded in establishing a prima facie case against the defendant,' he said. He said Pioneer would have no sustainable claim against Live Capital without the two vouchers that formed the pillar of its case. Rahman also said Live Capital had shown from Pioneer's ledger that the RM7 million was described as an investment in Ta Win, thereby rebutting Pioneer's contention that the money was a loan. The bench awarded RM150,000 in costs to Live Capital, which was represented by Krishna Dallumah, Jasbeer Singh, Nur Hakimah Mohamad, Yong Yoong Hui and Aradhna Kaur. Pioneer was represented by Gurdit Singh and Nashvinder Singh Gill.
