logo
Labour's 'pitiful' soft-justice measures mean criminals will be hauled back to jail for only a few weeks if they breach the terms of their release

Labour's 'pitiful' soft-justice measures mean criminals will be hauled back to jail for only a few weeks if they breach the terms of their release

Daily Mail​14-05-2025

Criminals will be hauled back to jail for just a few weeks if they breach the terms of their release under Labour's latest 'pitiful' soft-justice measures.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood is introducing a standard 28-day ' recall ' period for released prisoners who are locked up again for breaking the rules – even those who commit new offences.
Currently, freed lags can be kept behind bars for the rest of their sentence if they are recalled.
The new policy will free up 1,400 spaces in prisons amid the overcrowding crisis. Officials said if no action was taken, they would run out of space by November.
But Ms Mahmood was accused of presiding over a 'recipe for the breakdown of law and order', while victims' groups voiced alarm at the move.
Ms Mahmood repeated doom-laden warnings she first deployed last summer when she introduced a scheme allowing most inmates to be freed after serving just 40 per cent of their sentences, and which led to lags popping champagne corks outside prison gates.
She said yesterday: 'The consequences of failing to act are unthinkable. If our prisons overflow, courts cancel trials, police halt their arrests, crime goes unpunished and we reach a total breakdown of law and order.'
There were 13,600 recalled prisoners behind bars in March. About a fifth are sent back to jail because they have committed fresh crimes. Ms Mahmood said the 28-day recall period will apply to criminals serving sentences of between one and four years.
Tory justice spokesman Robert Jenrick accused Labour of offering 'an invitation for dangerous criminals to cause carnage'. He added: 'By telling prisoners that they will never serve their full sentence, even if they reoffend, the Justice Secretary has removed an important deterrent.
'Under Labour's new rules, instead of being recalled to serve the rest of their sentence, they'll be given a fixed-term recall of a pitiful 28 days.
'They are then released, with no reassessment of risk or parole board oversight. That is not justice. It's a recipe for the breakdown of law and order.'
Offenders who are recalled for committing a serious further offence – such as terrorism or a murder, sex crime, or serious assault – will be excluded from the scheme, along with any considered dangerous enough to require extra monitoring on release.
But the Ministry of Justice was last night unable to guarantee whether all perpetrators of domestic abuse would be excluded from the recall reforms.
Victims' commissioner Baroness Newlove said: 'Victims will understandably feel unnerved and bewildered by today's announcement.
'I find it difficult to understand why this specific group of offenders has been targeted for early release and I am concerned about the implications for victim safety.
'If the probation service, the Secretary of State and the Parole Board have all judged these individuals to pose a risk of harm to the public, then reducing time served on recall can only place victims and the wider public at an unnecessary risk of harm.'
Domestic abuse commissioner Dame Nicole Jacobs joined the condemnation, warning the measures would put victims at risk and calling for them to be 'scrapped'. She said: 'I cannot stress the lack of consideration for victims' safety and how many lives are being put in danger because of this proposed change.
'You are not sent to prison for four years if you do not pose significant risk to your victim or the wider public. Perpetrators of domestic abuse know everything about their victim – where they live, where they work, where their children go to school.
'They are also extremely willing to breach orders intended to protect victims. Re-releasing them back into the community after 28 days is simply unacceptable.'
At a hastily arranged Downing Street briefing, justice permanent secretary Amy Rees said men's jails were running at 99 per cent capacity in England and Wales.
The MoJ expected jails to 'hit zero capacity – to entirely run out of prison places for adult men – in November of this year', she added.
The mandarin said the current number of recalled inmates in prison was a 'significant contributing factor' to the size of the jail population, which has risen from about 40,000 in the early 1990s to just over 88,000 this week.
Outlining the latest measures, Ms Mahmood said: 'Crucially, it buys us the time we need to introduce the sentencing reforms that – alongside our record prison-building plans – will end the crisis in our prisons for good.'
She confirmed that the Treasury's Spending Review – due next month – will allocate £4.74 billion towards building three new jails.
'A review commissioned by Ms Mahmood and expected to be published next week is likely to recommend freeing most offenders after serving as little as a third of their sentences.
'Offenders should be handed maximum and minimum sentences by the courts, it is expected to propose.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamilton by-election prompts rethink of assumptions about 2026 Holyrood elections
Hamilton by-election prompts rethink of assumptions about 2026 Holyrood elections

Scotsman

time20 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Hamilton by-election prompts rethink of assumptions about 2026 Holyrood elections

John Swinney said it was a two-horse race between the SNP and Reform UK; some commentators claimed Reform might just sneak it; and Labour was tipped to finish third. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... But when the votes were counted in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, it was Labour who emerged as the winners with a majority of 602, overturning the SNP's majority of more than 4,500 in 2021 - a swing of 7.42 per cent from the SNP to Labour. Amid poor poll ratings,and after the party's humiliation in last month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election, where it lost the seat to Reform, this was a major boost for Labour. Labour's Davy Russell celebrates with Anas Sarwar, Jackie Ballie and Monica Lennon after winning the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. Picture: Jeff| Getty Images Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And with the Scottish Parliament elections less than a year away, it prompts a rethink of the assumption that the SNP is on course for a fifth term in power at Holyrood. Labour's landslide general election victory last July encouraged hopes that Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar could oust John Swinney as First Minister and end nearly two decades of SNP rule next May. But a series of unpopular decisions by the new Labour government at Westminster, including means-testing winter fuel payments, led to plummeting poll figures and seemed to put paid to the party's chances in Scotland. Reacting to the Hamitlon result, Mr Sarwar claimed it showed a rejection of the SNP because of its record in Government, as well as a rejection of Nigel Farage and Reform. But he also acknowledged people wanted the UK Labour government to 'go further and faster in making a difference to people's lives'. The SNP's continuing poll lead after18 years in government cannot be easily dismissed and Reform's 26 per cent of the vote shows it is a serious threat, but Labour nevertheless has good reason to be heartened by the Hamilton victory. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Commentators have warned against reading too much into the win and rightly point out the parties' performances in Hamilton were roughly in line with Scotland-wide polling which shows SNP support 15 points down on the 2021 Holyrood election and Labour support two points down. But the fact remains that Labour has won a fiercely-fought by-election which they were widely expected to lose badly and have taken a seat from the SNP who were seen as more or less certain victors next year. And that gives Labour a new momentum in their drive to win power at Holyrood.

Chancellor's U-turn restoring winter fuel payments to millions of pensioners is the correct decision
Chancellor's U-turn restoring winter fuel payments to millions of pensioners is the correct decision

Daily Record

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Chancellor's U-turn restoring winter fuel payments to millions of pensioners is the correct decision

Setting the new cut-off point at £35,000 seems reasonable and allows the UK Government to claw black cash given to the wealthiest. But the original policy last year to slash the WFP to all but the poorest pensioners should never have happened. Labour should always be the party that looks out for people on low and modest incomes. They should never be taking money from people who need it and linking the WFP to pension credit was appalling. Voters had waited a long time for a Labour government to pursue bold policies. They wanted Keir Starmer to dismantle the Tory legacy on welfare, not undo the policies of Gordon Brown. But this disastrous mis-step overshadowed the early days of the Government and triggered a loss of trust in Starmer. The Starmer administration has steadily improved from its rocky early period and progress is being made on a range of fronts. The package on employment rights is excellent and trade deals with the US and EU should boost growth. Starmer has also proven himself to be a serious politician who thinks carefully before acting. But his Government has to learn lessons from the WFP debacle. It opened the door to Nigel Farage and allowed him to falsely portray himself as a man of the people. This Labour government can be a resounding success but it must close the door on future blunders. Sextortion fight Social media has much to commend it, connecting like-minded people with shared interests across the globe. But there is often a significant downside to the platforms we all use. They can be a tool for bullies and the unscrupulous who seek to exploit vulnerable or impressionable people for their own gain. Sextortion, a form of online blackmail using real or fake images taken from social media, has been used by criminals to terrify young people into parting with cash or be publicly shamed. A campaign to raise awareness of sextortion and how to deal with it has been launched by the youth service Fearless. It urges young people not to panic, not to pay and to seek help. It is sad that in this day and age such a campaign is necessary. And much like our own Our Kids... Our Future campaign, it acknowledges the pressures young people are under in today's Scotland. But while youngsters are becoming more aware of sextortion, perhaps the social media companies could do more to keep them safe online.

Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say
Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say

The UK has one of the "worst statutory leave offers for fathers and other parents in the developed world", the chairwoman of the Women and Equalities Committee has warned. Sarah Owen said the UK's parental leave system was in "urgent need of an overhaul to fit with the reality of working parents' lives". "The UK's parental leave system has fallen far behind most comparable countries," she added. Her comments come as a new report by her House of Commons committee found that a maximum of two weeks' paternity leave is "completely out of step with how most couples want to share their parenting responsibilities" and "entrenches outdated gender stereotypes about caring". The UK's rate of parental pay is "completely out of kilter with the cost of living, has not kept pace with inflation and is far below rates in most comparable countries", the report states. The Women and Equalities Committee has urged the government to consider raising paternity pay to the level of maternity pay during the first six weeks, which equals 90% of someone's average earnings. It also called on the government to either amend the Employment Rights Bill to legislate for a day one right to paid leave or commit to "considering this vital change within its review" in consultation with employers. The report stated that working parents "will be let down by a review that leads only to tinkering around the edges of the system". In its report, the committee also recommended a phased introduction of increases to statutory pay across the system to improve the rates for all working parents up to 80% or more of average earnings or the real living wage. Additionally, it urged the government to consider options for providing statutory paid leave for all self-employed working fathers as part of its review of the parental leave system, as the lack of provision for self-employed fathers was "deeply unfair". The report suggests considering the introduction of a paternity allowance for self-employed fathers and other parents, similar to the maternity allowance. The upcoming review into the parental leave system must examine the function and necessity of eligibility rules, with a view to "simplifying or removing the employment status, time in service and earnings criteria", the committee added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store