
The Familiar Blueprint: Pakistan, Proxies, And Decades Of Terror In India
Last Updated:
The masks may vary, but the machinery hasn't. From LeT to TRF, Pakistan's proxy war on India has thrived on deniability, ISI backing, and decades of impunity
For over three decades, India has endured a relentless campaign of cross-border terrorism, with Pakistan-based terror groups launching some of the deadliest attacks on civilians and security forces alike. The April 22 massacre in Pahalgam, where 26 civilians were gunned down, is the latest in a long line of such assaults — each marked by the same familiar blueprint: jihadist proxies, ISI backing, and safe havens across the border. From the 1993 Mumbai bombings to Pulwama and now Pahalgam, the arc of Pakistan-sponsored terror remains unchanged — brutal, ideological, and calculated.
Below is a detailed timeline of major attacks carried out by Pakistan-based terror outfits — many with proven operational or logistical support from Pakistani intelligence agencies.
March 12, 1993 – Bombay Serial Bomb Blasts
A meticulously planned series of 12 bomb blasts tore through India's financial capital, killing over 250 people and injuring more than 700. The attacks were carried out by the D-Company network led by Dawood Ibrahim. According to reports, this was the first time RDX was used to make bombs in the country.
While the original plan was to conduct serial bomb blasts in April 1993, on the occasion of Shiv Jayanti, later the date of the bombing was revised following the arrest of Gul Mohammad Sheikh alias Gullu on March 9 by Mumbai Police for rioting, as per a News18 report.
India's CBI investigations, testimonies of arrested operatives, and intelligence intercepts pointed to direct assistance from Pakistan's ISI, which allegedly facilitated the training of the bombers in explosives and logistics in Karachi. In 2006, the TADA court convicted Yakub Memon and others, noting clear foreign support.
December 13, 2001 – Indian Parliament Attack
The attackers belonged to Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed — both Pakistan-based. One assailant wore a suicide vest, which detonated after being shot, resulting in his death. The remaining four were also killed during the attack by security forces.
The investigation fell under the jurisdiction of the Delhi Police's anti-terror squad, the Special Cell, established in 1986 to prevent, identify, and investigate terrorist incidents. Mohammad Afzal Guru and his cousin Shaukat Hussain Guru emerged as the prime suspects, along with Hussain's wife Afsan Guru, and S A R Geelani, an Arabic lecturer at Delhi University.
Afzal Guru, a former Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) militant, faced the death penalty and was subsequently hanged in Tihar Jail in 2013.
July 11, 2006 – Mumbai Train Bombings
Seven RDX-laden bombs exploded on Mumbai's suburban railway network within 11 minutes, killing nearly 200 and injuring over 700. The attack targeted India's middle-class commuters during rush hour.
Investigations revealed the involvement of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), with key planners receiving training in Pakistan. Maharashtra ATS and Mumbai Police traced funding and communication links to LeT handlers in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
The bombs were assembled in a flat in Mumbai's Govandi area using RDX smuggled via Gujarat and ammonium nitrate procured locally. They were packed inside pressure cookers and planted in first-class compartments across the Western Railway line. In 2015, after a prolonged trial, a special MCOCA court convicted 12 accused — five were sentenced to death and seven to life imprisonment. The court acknowledged the cross-border dimension of the conspiracy, noting that the planning and training occurred in Pakistan with logistical support from ISI-linked LeT operatives.
November 26–29, 2008 – 26/11 Mumbai Attacks
Perhaps the most defining instance of cross-border terrorism in modern Indian history, ten Pakistani nationals trained by LeT landed on Mumbai's shores via sea and unleashed a 60-hour siege that killed 166 people, including six Americans.
The lone captured terrorist, Ajmal Kasab, confessed during trial to being trained at a LeT camp near Muridke in Pakistan. Investigators uncovered GPS data, intercepts, and financial trails. David Headley, a Pakistani-American involved in the reconnaissance, confirmed ISI's involvement in coordinating the attacks alongside LeT.
The attacks targeted iconic sites including the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, CST railway station, and Nariman House. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the FBI jointly established that the attackers were in real-time contact with handlers in Karachi who monitored the siege through satellite phones and VoIP calls. Despite India handing over multiple dossiers to Islamabad with detailed evidence, Pakistan denied state complicity, further straining diplomatic ties and stalling bilateral talks for years.
January 2, 2016 – Pathankot Airbase Attack
Four heavily armed JeM terrorists breached the Indian Air Force base in Pathankot, Punjab, killing 7 security personnel. The gunmen were traced back to Pakistan through recovered call records and a Pakistani phone number.
The Indian government shared a 90-page dossier with Islamabad. Although Pakistan sent a Joint Investigation Team (JIT), its final report exonerated JeM, calling the attack 'stage-managed," despite overwhelming forensic and telecom evidence.
September 18, 2016 – Uri Army Base Attack
In one of the deadliest attacks on Indian armed forces, terrorists linked to the Jaish-e-Mohammed attacked an Army base, a brigade HQ, in fact, near the town of Uri in Jammu and Kashmir's Baramulla district, killing 19 Indian soldiers and injuring 30 others.
British broadcaster the BBC called it 'the deadliest attack on security forces in Kashmir in two decades'. This was during a time when terrorist activity was extremely high in the Valley. The terror attack led to a six-hour gun battle in which all four terrorists were killed.
The infiltration route, weapons, and food packets bore Pakistani markings. The attack prompted India's first publicly acknowledged surgical strike across the LoC, targeting terror launchpads. Pakistan denied casualties but restricted media access to the region post-strikes.
February 14, 2019 – Pulwama Suicide Bombing
A suicide bomber rammed an explosives-laden vehicle into a CRPF convoy in Pulwama, killing 40 jawans. JeM released a video of the attacker, Adil Ahmad Dar, claiming responsibility.
India traced the vehicle, explosives, and radicalisation back to JeM modules. The Ministry of External Affairs produced dossiers proving Pakistan-based JeM's involvement. In response, India carried out airstrikes in Balakot — targeting JeM's largest known training facility.
April 22, 2025 – Pahalgam Massacre
The most recent attack targeted civilians — a rare and chilling shift. Armed militants opened fire on tourists in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, killing 26, most of them Hindus. Eyewitnesses and survivor accounts reported that the terrorists checked the victims' religion and asked them to recite the kalima before executing them.
The NIA revealed on Wednesday—the same day when India carried out airstrikes on terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in response to the Pahalgam massacre—that a 50-year-old Kashmiri and head of Lashkar-e-Taiba proxy The Resistance Front (TRF) who goes by the name Sheikh Sajjad Gul, was the mastermind of the April 22 killings.
Holed up in the Cantonment town of Rawalpindi, Pakistan, under the patronage of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Gul, who also goes by the alias of Sajjad Ahmed Sheikh, has been a planner of a number of terror attacks, including targeted killings between 2020 and 2024 in Central and South Kashmir, grenade attacks in Central Kashmir in 2023, ambush of J&K police personnel in Bijbehara in Anantnag, Gagangir, Z-Morh Tunnel attack in Ganderbal.
Patterns and Policy Consequences
Across three decades, a consistent pattern emerges:
Terror infrastructure protected inside Pakistan
Operational support and planning by ISI
Use of 'non-state actors" to deny formal culpability
Token or delayed action by Pakistan's civilian leadership
top videos
View all
Each attack has deepened public anger, strained diplomacy, and, in recent years, triggered calibrated military responses from India. In retaliation for the Pahalgam massacre, India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Pakistan responded with missile strikes on Indian military installations, pushing the region to the brink of open conflict.
While tensions have since eased following a ceasefire announced on Saturday evening, the episode underscored how Pakistan-backed terrorism continues to endanger regional stability — and how swiftly proxy violence can spiral into near-conventional warfare.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
26/11 Mumbai attacks cross-border terrorism Pahalgam attack Pakistan ISI
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 10, 2025, 20:34 IST
News india The Familiar Blueprint: Pakistan, Proxies, And Decades Of Terror In India
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
43 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Elusive global unity against terrorism
The 'Operation Sindoor' has shown us how deeply fragmented the fight against terror has become. There is a widely held conviction among all major powers that Pakistan is indeed harbouring terrorists and terror groups on its soil and using them as strategic assets against India, just as it had once used the earlier avatar of Taliban. They do not need more convincing. However, while there was widespread condemnation of the terror attack in Pahalgam, no country has called out Pakistan or even asked it to cooperate with apprehending the perpetrators. This is where facts diverge from reality. Before 'Operation Sindoor' was launched, all that the European Union (EU) did was to call the 'rising tensions between India and Pakistan' 'alarming' and advise India that 'escalation helps no one.' It was obvious that rather than taking a stand of zero tolerance to the menace, the EU continued to see terror attacks through a politically frosted glass – the frost that set in due to India's stand on the Ukraine war. The EU, which was peeved over India's abstentions on the UN votes on Ukraine, saw this as an opportunity to pay back in the same coin. However, what they have conveniently forgotten is that when China aggressed our borders in Galwan, all the European Council President could say in front of Prime Minister Narendra Modi was: 'The relationship between the EU and China is complex. We need to tackle different issues and support all the efforts to maintain a channel of dialogue to find peaceful solutions.' Thank you, EU, for this candid admission.. In fact, when an important member of the EU called India in February 2021 to express its indignation at India's stand in the UN Security Council on the Ukraine vote, India asked them politely to send us a copy of their statement issued when the Galwan clashes happened. There was silence at the other end, since it had issued none. Sometimes it is easy for the EU to forget that international relations did not start with the Ukraine war. The United States have, however, been more forthright on terrorism, though all their actions have to meet the touchstone of domestic acclaim in the US. President Donald Trump's administration has jettisoned the narrow internal focus of Joe Biden's administration on REMVE, or racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism. The recent post of FBI Director Kash Patel on X, calling out a 'Pakistani citizen' being extradited to the US for 'support to ISIS and attempting to commit acts of terrorism', signalled a robust anti-terror policy. The extradition of 26/11 plotter Tahawwur Rana from the US to India is a welcome development. However, the US has also found a sudden bonhomie with Pakistan, calling them 'a phenomenal partner' in combating terror. Consequently, while pursuing zero tolerance to terror, the US does not discriminate between whom it is willing to work with as long as its ends are met. This explains its embrace of former Al-Qaeda leader and current President of Syria, Al Shaara, and a separate deal with the Houthis for stopping attacks on American shipping. The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), on the other hand, are now focusing narrowly on terror since the main ambition of most of its members, especially of the Gulf countries, is to break the shackles of their history of support to Islamic radicalism, spawning terrorists and terror groups around the world. Their desire for regional stability and integration with the 'outside' world has made them lukewarm to the Palestine issue and developments in Gaza, the West Bank and the Middle East. India should not expect much from them vis-a-vis Pakistan's terrorist misadventures either. The Saudi minister's shuttle diplomacy immediately after the Pahalgam attack was similar to the one it undertook after the Pulwama attack, ironically by the same minister, and yielded the same results – nothing. The litmus test will come next month when Pakistan takes over the presidency of the UN Security Council. We will see how the OIC countries in the Council – and there are five of them – treat the issue of terrorism and whether they will use Islamophobia to dilute the fight against terror. How the US and the UK react will be the other litmus test. the fight against terror in Africa has been orphaned. The Global Terrorism Index 2025 points out that the Sahel is now the epicentre of terrorism, accounting for over half of all terrorism deaths in the world. But the outside world has no time since it is not affecting them directly. It is a dismal commentary on our collective fight against terror. The inference is simple and, of course, has been self-evident for a long time. Each state will react as per its own geopolitical and other compulsions, especially when it affects it directly. This was how it was before 9/11 happened – the era of 'your terrorist' and 'my terrorist'. That era is returning. The fragmentation of this fight against terror is worse than ever before. In this scenario, Pakistan is not going to stop with the Pahalgam attack unless it knows that the price it will have to pay for sponsoring terrorism will be unacceptably high. It should be India's endeavour to ensure that this happens, if Pakistan is to be deterred. That is why it is even more necessary now for India to take the lead and sustain the high level of engagement to put forward our narrative and call out those responsible. This engagement should also extend to our neighbours. If sending multi-party delegations to neighbours proves to be sensitive, the foreign secretary can visit our neighbours, who are equally susceptible to being influenced by the Pakistani narrative, with Islamic radicals raising their heads again in some neighbouring countries. This will adversely impact our 'Neighbourhood First' policy. (The writer is a former Ambassador and Permanent Representative of India to the UN in New York. He chaired the UN Security Council's Counter-terrorism Committee.)


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the governments terms
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday. Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
No foreign military leader invited to the June 14 parade: White House
The White House has categorically denied reports that any foreign military leader, including Pakistan's Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, has been invited to the upcoming U.S. Army parade in Washington, marking the 250th anniversary of the American armed forces. 'This is false. No foreign military leaders were invited,' a White House official said, refuting multiple media reports from South Asia. The reports claimed that Mr. Munir would be a guest of honour at the June 14 celebration, which is also U.S. President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. Derek Grossman, a senior defence analyst at RAND Corporation, criticised the rumoured invitation, calling it a 'diplomatic setback' for India. 'For India, the Trump admin's invitation to Pakistani Field Marshal Asim Munir is tantamount to inviting an avowed anti-India terrorist,' he said in post on X. Congress responds India's Opposition Congress Party described it as a diplomatic setback for the Modi Government. 'Failed Marshal Asim Munir, who gave such inflammatory, incendiary and provocative statements, talked about the two-nation theory, Hindus and Muslims, and there is a direct relation between his statement and what happened in Pahalgam on April 22. Same Asim Munir gets a special invitation to go to America on U.S. Army Day on June 14, which is incomprehensible,' the Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said. In anticipation of Mr. Munir's visit, the U.S. chapter of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) had announced a protest rally in front of the Pakistani Embassy in Washington on Saturday. 'PTI USA, alongside 12+ Pakistani diaspora organisations, is holding a massive protest in Washington DC to oppose #UndeclaredMartialLawin Pakistan and to stand against tyranny and raise our voice for a free and fair Pakistan,' it said. (