Columbus jury renders verdict in $2.5 billion lawsuit against Ford Motor Company
A Columbus jury rendered a 'phase 2' verdict Friday of $2.5 billion in punitive damages in a case against the Ford Motor Company, according to a news release from Butler Prather LLP, a Columbus-based law firm.
The case, Brogdon (Mills) v. Ford Motor Company, involved the deaths of Herman and Debra Mills, who died as a result of their injuries after their 2015 Ford F250 'Super Duty' truck rolled over and the roof crushed down on them in August 2022 in Decatur County, according to the news release.
The Mills were founders of Mills Welding & Fabrication Services and retired in 2019, according to the release.
The release says the Mills truck left the road, hit a culvert covered by tall grass, vaulted into the air, struck on its front and then flopped over. The roof collapsed into the passenger compartment, the release says.
The release says Debra Mills died at the scene and Herman Mills died nine days later in a Tallahassee, Florida, hospital.
The release says, 'The roofs on all 1999-2016 'Super Duty' trucks are indisputably weak.' The release claims those trucks have a strength-to-weight rating (SWR) of 1.1 when the minimum SWR rating to get a 'good' roof strength rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is 4.0.
'Ford contended that the roofs on the 1999-2016 'Super Duty' trucks are 'absolutely safe' and there was nothing wrong with them,' the release says. The release says, 'Ford also contended, as it has for decades, that roof strength doesn't matter — that there is no 'causal relationship' between roof strength and injuries in rollover wrecks.'
The release also states, 'That argument has been rejected by the federal government agency charged with automotive safety, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ('NHTSA'), and by the IIHS.'
The lawsuit was filed May 23, 2023, by James E. 'Dusty' Brogdon and his brothers Ronald B. 'Rusty' Brogdon and Jason Mills, according to the release. The release says the case was filed in the Columbus Division of the Middle District of Georgia because James E. Brogdon lives in Harris County.
The case was tried in the United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia, Columbus Division, before U.S. District Judge Clay Land.
This phase 2 verdict comes after the the jury rendered its phase 1 compensatory damages verdict Thursday for $30.5 million, according to the release.
'Ford has known for 26 years that people were getting killed and hurt by these weak roofs,' James 'Jim' Butler Jr., lead counsel for the Mills family, said in the news release. 'Ford has constantly refused to admit the danger or warn of the risk.'
'We were very pleased to be able to help the Mills family,' Ramsey Prather, co-counsel for the Mills family, said in the news release. 'Perhaps this verdict will serve to do what Ford refuses to do — warn American citizens of the danger.'
The Ledger-Enquirer didn't reach a Ford Motor Company official for comment before publication.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
23 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Minda Corporation forms joint venture with Toyodenso to manufacture advanced automotive switches in India
Minda Corporation has entered into a strategic joint venture with Japan-based Toyodenso to provide end-to-end solutions for the Indian automotive switch market. The partnership will cover design, development, manufacturing, and marketing of advanced automotive switches for two-wheelers, passenger vehicles, and other automotive segments. Minda Corporation will hold a 60% majority stake in the joint venture, while Toyodenso will hold the remaining 40%. The venture has already secured orders from Indian customers and plans to set up a greenfield manufacturing facility in Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Operations at the plant are expected to begin in the second half of FY 2026–27. This collaboration aligns with Minda Corporation's strategy to localize new technologies and expand its synergistic product portfolio. Toyodenso will contribute cutting-edge engineering and technology, while Minda Corporation will leverage its strength in localized manufacturing and supply chain management. The partnership is poised to meet the growing demand for technologically advanced switches in the Indian automotive sector. Ashok Minda, Chairman & Group CEO, Minda Corporation Limited, commented, 'We are very excited and privileged to partner with Toyodenso, a Global Japanese company with rich legacy of technological innovation. This partnership marks a pivotal milestone in our journey to drive smart mobility solutions while fostering indigenous manufacturing by integrating globally recognized technologies into India's automotive ecosystem.' Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Austin-based business says it will offer Tesla robotaxi rentals in 2026
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Just days from now, Tesla reportedly plans to deploy its first commercial robotaxi service on Austin's public streets. Tesla CEO Elon Musk unveiled plans to launch them in June as part of its new autonomous vehicle ride hailing service. On Tuesday, social media posts circulated online of one of those vehicles driving on South Congress Avenue. Tesla robotaxi service reportedly launching next week in Austin Austin-based RV rental agency, The Outdoorsy Group, said it plans to incorporate this new technology in the future. 'We see outdoorsy as a platform for all forms of mobility,' said Co-Founder and CEO Jeff Cavins. 'Motorcycles, trucks, cars, camper vans, airstreams. Of course, the autonomous vehicle is important to us because it enables a whole level of autonomy.' Cavins said he jumped at the idea when it was first announced. 'We called the fleet team, whom we knew really well at Tesla, and we placed an order for 100 Teslas.' Jeff Cavins, Outdoorsy Group Co-Founder & CEO Cavins said along with Outdoorsy, they built their own insurance company called Roamly Insurance Group. 'I think the insurance component is very important,' Cavins said. 'You want to make sure, if you're a city or a municipality or city council or a mayor's office, that the insurance company that's backing these fleets of robotaxis is an insurance company you can rely on.' Still, some questions remain unanswered. In a letter sent to Tesla in May, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration asked the company to explain how it plans to operate safely. Questions focused on things like: Crash reporting Complying with traffic safey laws Automated responses to emergencies NHTSA asked how the robotaxis will safely operate in low-visibility, like sun glare, fog, rain or snow. Those conditions are tied to previous accidents involving the company's driver-assistance software. KXAN reached out to see if NHTSA heard back. The agency told us on Friday that its investigation remains open and that Tesla's response must be submitted by June 19. NHTSA said any updates will be posted in the investigation file online. Attorney Donald Slavik represents people across the country who were injured or killed by Tesla autopilot and full self-driving. He shared multiple stories with KXAN about some of the cases he's taken. 'A family in Texas where a gentleman, father and husband was putting trash cans out on the street in the neighborhood,' Slavik said. 'Vehicle coming by with the driver using autopilot so that he could talk on his phone or work on his phone. Hit the man and very, very seriously injured [him]. He survived for a year and a half and died.' Slavik said unlike states with established autonomous vehicle oversight, cities in Texas cannot regulate AV's. The Texas Legislature passed a bill back in 2017 that prohibited that. 'There's nothing that prevents someone from putting these vehicles out in Texas. There's no regulation that says you have to have a human person behind the wheel with responsibility for operating the vehicle.' Attorney Donald Slavik, Slavik Law Firm Slavik worries about how a robotaxi would respond in severe weather conditions as well. 'Is it going to pull over safely and stop, or is it going to try to drive through it?' Slavik wondered. KXAN has repeatedly reached out to Tesla about its robotaxi plans. We'll update this story if we get a response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped
There's little left for us to say that can further embarrass the Tesla Cybertruck, a vehicle that was supposed to be the culmination of Elon Musk's genius. And maybe this is what Musk's genius looks like. The luckless EV has faced eight recalls so far, and its trademark stainless steel panels, when they aren't flying off, have demonstrated that they're better at serving as a shiny canvas for spray paint than as the armor of an "apocalypse-proof" tank. But somehow, its already dire sales are now even worse than expected. In the entire first quarter of 2025, Tesla has managed to sell just 7,100 Cybertrucks in the US, according to registration data from S&P Global Mobility cited by the Wall Street Journal. It's an astounding and rapid plummet, when in the fourth quarter of 2024, Tesla sold close to double that amount, with roughly 13,000 Cybertrucks. A lot changed between those two quarters — like Musk embarking on a spectacular speedrun to destroy his and Tesla's image, mainly by leading the Trump administration's charge to gut the federal government. These actions, and Musk's personal espousing of far-right politics, sparked worldwide protests against him and his automaker. It has yet to recover, with Tesla's total sales in the US dropping nine percent in the first three months of this year. There are other factors at play, too, like the success of its Chinese competitors and its aging vehicle lineup, but the imploded brand reputation looms largest. And more than any other of its vehicles, the Cybertruck for one reason or another has embodied the public's souring sentiment on Musk, becoming prime targets for vandalism. They're also notoriously unreliable, sold for nothing less than $100,000 before cheaper $70,000 versions were desperately rolled out, and launched with a range over 150 miles shorter than what Musk promised. In all of 2024, the company sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks. The most recent quarter's tally makes Musk previous boast that the automaker would sell up to half a million Cybertrucks per year even more ridiculous. Is it any wonder that buyers are staying away? So few people want to buy these things that in May Electrek reported that Tesla was sitting on an inventory worth $800 million of 10,000 unsold Cybertrucks — an embarrassment as much as it is a logistical headache. Dealerships have resorted to dumping their glut of the unorthodox pickup trucks in deserted parking lots. The pain isn't likely to stop anytime soon. Trump's tariffs, which factored into Musk's fallout with the president, will drive up the costs of car parts. The administration also plans to axe tax credits for purchasing EVs, demolishing a huge incentive for American consumers to buy from automakers like Tesla. More on Tesla: Terrifying Footage Shows Self-Driving Tesla Get Confused by the Sun, Mow Down Innocent Grandmother Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data