Lawsuit aims to stop enforcement of West Virginia's vaccine exemption order
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (WBOY) — The American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia (ACLU-WV) and Mountain State Justice (MSJ) have filed a lawsuit of behalf of parents to stop Gov. Patrick Morrisey's executive order allowing vaccine exemptions in schools.
The order, which was signed in January, directed health officials to stop enforcing 'compulsory school immunization requirements,' for students who request a religious exemption. A bill to codify religious exemptions failed in the state legislature.
The lawsuit filed in Kanawha County Circuit Court claims that Morrisey does not have the authority to enforce his order since the state legislature did not pass the bill.
'Governors do not rule by decree,' ACLU-WV Legal Director Aubrey Sparks said in a press release. 'At the center of this lawsuit is who gets to make these decisions for our students. On this question, the state Constitution is clear that the authority lies with the Legislature, not the governor.'
Bridge Sports Complex opens all-inclusive playground
The parents behind the lawsuit include those with children who are particularly susceptible to illness. Previously, students had to receive a medical exemption to attend school without being vaccinated for chickenpox, Hepatitis-B, measles, meningitis, mumps, diphtheria, polio, rubella, tetanus and whooping cough.
'Parents should be able to know their child will be safe when they send them off to school,' Sarah Brown, MSJ Executive Director, said in the press release. 'We are seeing the devastating effects of loosening vaccine requirements across the country, and that's why the Legislature wisely declined to loosen the restrictions here in West Virginia. It's vital that their decision not be undermined by the executive branch.'
The lawsuit asks for a judge to block the enforcement of Morrisey's order.
Morrisey said earlier this month that his stance on the order wasn't changed by the bill's failure or the several lawsuits that had been filed against it.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Adults living in the U.S. illegally will be excluded from a state-run health care program under an overall budget deal that the closely divided Minnesota Legislature convened to pass in a special session Monday. Repealing a 2023 state law that made those immigrants eligible for the MinnesotaCare program for the working poor was a priority for Republicans in the negotiations that produced the budget agreement. The Legislature is split 101-100, with the House tied and Democrats holding just a one-seat majority in the Senate, and the health care compromise was a bitter pill for Democrats to accept. The change is expected to affect about 17,000 residents. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, has promised to sign all 14 bills scheduled for action in the special session, to complete a $66 billion, two-year budget that will take effect July 1. After an emotional near four-hour debate, the House voted 68-65 to send the bill to the Senate, where Majority Leader Erin Murphy, of St. Paul, had already said she would supply the necessary Democratic vote to pass it. Under the agreement, the top House Democratic leader, Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, was the only member of her caucus to vote yes. 'This is 100% about the GOP campaign against immigrants,' said House Democratic Floor Leader Jamie Long, of Minneapolis, who voted no. 'From Trump's renewed travel ban announced this week, to his effort to expel those with protected status, to harassing students here to study, to disproportionate military and law enforcement responses that we've seen from Minneapolis to L.A., this all comes back to attacking immigrants and the name of dividing us.' But GOP Rep. Jeff Backer, of Browns Valley, the lead author of the bill, said taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize health care for people who aren't in the country legally. Backer said California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has proposed freezing enrollment for immigrants without legal status in a similar state-funded program and that Illinois' Democratic governor, JB Pritzker, has proposed cutting a similar program . He said residents can still buy health insurance on the private market regardless of their immigration status. 'This is about being fiscally responsible,' Backer said. Enrollment by people who entered the country illegally in MinnesotaCare has run triple the initial projections, which Republicans said could have pushed the costs over $600 million over the next four years. Critics said the change won't save any money because those affected will forego preventive care and need much more expensive care later. 'People don't suddenly stop getting sick when they don't have insurance, but they do put off seeking care until a condition gets bad enough to require a visit to the emergency room, increasing overall health care costs for everyone,' Bernie Burnham, president of the Minnesota AFL-CIO, told reporters at a news conference organized by the critics. Walz and legislative leaders agreed on the broad framework for the budget over four weeks ago, contrasting the bipartisan cooperation that produced it with the deep divisions at the federal level in Washington. But with the tie in the House and the razor-thin Senate Democratic majority, few major policy initiatives got off the ground before the regular session ended May 19. Leaders announced Friday that the details were settled and that they had enough votes to pass everything in the budget package. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Adults living in the U.S. illegally will be excluded from a state-run health care program under an overall budget deal that the closely divided Minnesota Legislature convened to pass in a special session Monday. Repealing a 2023 state law that made those immigrants eligible for the MinnesotaCare program for the working poor was a priority for Republicans in the negotiations that produced the budget agreement. The Legislature is split 101-100, with the House tied and Democrats holding just a one-seat majority in the Senate, and the health care compromise was a bitter pill for Democrats to accept. The change is expected to affect about 17,000 residents. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, has promised to sign all 14 bills scheduled for action in the special session, to complete a $66 billion, two-year budget that will take effect July 1. After an emotional near four-hour debate, the House voted 68-65 to send the bill to the Senate, where Majority Leader Erin Murphy, of St. Paul, had already said she would supply the necessary Democratic vote to pass it. Under the agreement, the top House Democratic leader, Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, was the only member of her caucus to vote yes. 'This is 100% about the GOP campaign against immigrants,' said House Democratic Floor Leader Jamie Long, of Minneapolis, who voted no. 'From Trump's renewed travel ban announced this week, to his effort to expel those with protected status, to harassing students here to study, to disproportionate military and law enforcement responses that we've seen from Minneapolis to L.A., this all comes back to attacking immigrants and the name of dividing us.' But GOP Rep. Jeff Backer, of Browns Valley, the lead author of the bill, said taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize health care for people who aren't in the country legally. Backer said California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has proposed freezing enrollment for immigrants without legal status in a similar state-funded program and that Illinois' Democratic governor, JB Pritzker, has proposed cutting a similar program. He said residents can still buy health insurance on the private market regardless of their immigration status. 'This is about being fiscally responsible,' Backer said. Enrollment by people who entered the country illegally in MinnesotaCare has run triple the initial projections, which Republicans said could have pushed the costs over $600 million over the next four years. Critics said the change won't save any money because those affected will forego preventive care and need much more expensive care later. 'People don't suddenly stop getting sick when they don't have insurance, but they do put off seeking care until a condition gets bad enough to require a visit to the emergency room, increasing overall health care costs for everyone,' Bernie Burnham, president of the Minnesota AFL-CIO, told reporters at a news conference organized by the critics. Walz and legislative leaders agreed on the broad framework for the budget over four weeks ago, contrasting the bipartisan cooperation that produced it with the deep divisions at the federal level in Washington. But with the tie in the House and the razor-thin Senate Democratic majority, few major policy initiatives got off the ground before the regular session ended May 19. Leaders announced Friday that the details were settled and that they had enough votes to pass everything in the budget package.
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
Exclusive: PBM trade group sues Arkansas over pharmacy law
The trade group representing pharmacy benefit managers sued on Monday to overturn a first-in-the-nation state law that prevents them from owning pharmacies in Arkansas. Why it matters: The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association's lawsuit adds to legal challenges to the ownership ban and comes as other states consider similar policies that blame large drug-price middlemen for rising pharmaceutical prices. Navitus Health Solutions, a PBM that's not a member of the trade association, is also a plaintiff in the lawsuit. CVS Health and Cigna, two of the largest PBMs, have filed their own complaints against the law. What they're saying: The law "will disrupt the way patients, especially patients with very complex medical conditions, receive their medication, and it will require consumers in Arkansas to find new pharmacies," said Katie Payne, senior vice president of public affairs and head of advocacy at PCMA. More than 40 retail pharmacies in Arkansas that together fill millions of prescriptions each year will have to cease operation under the law, according to the complaint. Payne said that the law will worsen drug affordability in the state by prohibiting out-of-state companies from running pharmacies that offer lower-cost options. However, PCMA did not have projections on how Arkansas's law will affect drug prices in the state. Zoom in: The lawsuit claims that Arkansas's policy gives preferential treatment to pharmacies based in the state, violating the Constitution's dormant Commerce Clause and Privileges and Immunities Clause. It also says the law improperly declares PBMs guilty of antitrust violations and delivers punishment without a trial. "Rather than innovating and attempting to compete with PBM pharmacies on the merits, many independent pharmacies have turned to state lawmakers to manipulate the market with the heavy hand of government, to artificially tip the scales of competition in their favor," the complaint alleges. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) has said the law is necessary to hold PBMs accountable for anticompetitive actions. Lawmakers at the state and federal level are increasingly questioning large pharmacy benefit managers like CVS Caremark, Express Scripts and Optum Rx's outsize role in the pharmaceutical supply chain and whether they're contributing to high drug prices. Between the lines: PCMA's complaint notes that an earlier version of the bill would have required Walmart — Arkansas's largest company — to close its pharmacies as well, since the company administers its own pharmacy benefits for employees. State legislators amended the policy before it was passed so Walmart would no longer be subject to the law.
