UK military to get £5 billion investment for drones and lasers
The funding, announced by Defence Secretary John Healey, includes £4 billion for drones and autonomous systems, and an extra £1 billion for lasers to protect British ships and soldiers
The Government is set to invest £5 billion in military drones and lasers, aiming to equip frontline troops with "the kit of the future into the hands of frontline troops".
Defence Secretary John Healey announced the funding, which includes £4 billion for drones and autonomous systems, plus an additional £1 billion for lasers to safeguard British vessels and soldiers.
This follows Monday's Strategic Defence Review, which advocated a heightened emphasis on emerging technology, such as artificial intelligence and drones, as an "immediate priority".
Mr Healey stated that this investment would represent "the most significant advance in UK defence technology in decades" and "ensure our armed forces have the cutting-edge capabilities they need to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing world".
He further commented: "We are delivering the Strategic Defence Review's vision to put the UK at the leading edge of innovation in Nato, by backing British industry and fast-tracking the kit of the future into the hands of frontline troops."
A portion of the funds will be used to establish a new "drone centre", aimed at speeding up the deployment of this technology across all three branches of the military.
The focus on drone technology comes as it has demonstrated increasing lethality on the Ukrainian battlefield, where it now claims more lives than conventional artillery.
During an April conference with defence ministers from allied nations, Mr Healey reported that the UK estimates drones to be responsible for 70-80% of battlefield casualties. Sunday witnessed Ukraine conduct a significant strike on Russian airfields situated well beyond the front line, utilising an array of small drones.
The Government is not only investing in drones and artificial intelligence but has also declared an extra £1 billion funding towards "directed energy weapons" (DEWs) development within the current parliamentary period.
This ambitious plan includes equipping the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers with the DragonFire laser by 2027 and provisioning the Army with a comparable system by the close of the decade.
Designed to provide a more economical option for air defence, the use of DragonFire and other DEWs aim to counter aerial threats including drones at a mere £10 per discharge, a stark contrast to the thousands of pounds required for firing traditional weaponry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Alternative Transbalkan gas route excludes Russian supply to Ukraine, source says
KYIV, June 4 (Reuters) - An alternative Transbalkan gas import route for Ukraine has been developed that allows for cheaper imports to Ukraine that avoid Russian-origin gas, an Ukrainian industry source familiar with the matter said on Wednesday. The route will be operational from June, the source said, adding it could allow Ukraine to import up to 1 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas in the more lucrative June-October period, including 100 million cubic meters (mcm) in June. Ukraine currently imports gas via Poland, Slovakia and Hungary. Formerly one of the largest importers of Russian gas, Ukraine has not been buying it since 2015 and in January, stopped the transit of Russian gas through its territory to Europe. Ukrainian officials have previously said that Kyiv would not allow gas purchases from a country that is at war with Ukraine. Ukraine said last month its energy regulator had approved a gas import mechanism that will avoid the high transit fees of gas supplied through the Transbalkan pipeline from Greece to Ukraine. "The planning (of gas shipping via Transbalkan pipeline) took into account the condition that natural gas can be supplied to the entry point in Greece from Greek LNG terminals or the TAP pipeline with Azerbaijani gas or reverse flow from Italy," the source said. "This minimises the possibility of transporting gas of Russian origin," he added. "All parties to the project agreed with this (the absence of Russian gas)." The daily import capacity is expected at 7 mcm of gas. "The cost of the route can compete with alternative routes for gas imports to Ukraine," he added. The Kyiv government has said Ukraine needs to import at least 4 bcm of gas for the new 2025/26 heating season while analysts and former officials estimated the imports at about 6.3 bcm.
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour forced to cancel Chancellor's £5,000-a-head conference
Labour has cancelled a summit for business leaders charging £5,000 a head amid reports of low demand. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, was expected to address executives and lobbyists at the conference in central London in three weeks. It was supposed to be the first in a series of special events offering a 'unique opportunity' for businesses to 'engage with Labour's plan to kick-start economic growth '. But it has now been postponed after several firms decided to skip it, according to the Financial Times, with leaders put off partly by the cost. It comes after Labour cancelled another audience with the Chancellor in March, two weeks before it was set to take place, with tickets said to cost £1,500. On Wednesday, Ms Reeves was grilled on whether Labour was treating companies like a 'cash point', with firms reportedly becoming 'jaded' about 'constant requests' for money. It points to an increasingly strained relationship with the sector in the wake of the Chancellor's tax raid on businesses last year. Taking questions after a speech in Greater Manchester, Ms Reeves was told that companies were getting 'increasingly jaded by constant requests for cash from the party in the name of business engagement'. Asked if Labour was treating businesses like a 'cash point', she said: 'I think that it's well known that I regularly meet British businesses in my capacity as Chancellor, also as a local MP, and when I'm on visits right around the country, and I am doing right now at this great bus company in Rochdale. 'So I don't think that it's a valid criticism of me as Chancellor, that I don't spend enough time with business.' The decision to pull the June event was seized upon by the Tories, who joked that charging firms for access while hiking their taxes did not amount to a 'great sales pitch'. The Financial Times said that several lobbyists had decided not to attend in part because of the cost. In March, Labour reportedly raised the price per head from £3,000 to £5,000. One senior figure at a FTSE 100 firm told the newspaper that 'none of our team is going', while another lobbyist said they had 'no clients planning to attend' and a third said businesses were 'getting stricter about what they spend on'. A Labour Party spokesman said: 'The Labour Party regularly engages with a wide range of stakeholders and events are frequently scheduled throughout the year, which receive a high level of interest.'
New Statesman
14 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Letter of the week: The politics of poverty
Photo byI wholeheartedly support Gordon Brown's urgent call to action on child poverty in your recent special edition. The sad but undeniable truth is that child poverty is not just a statistic, but a defining fault line in British society today. It is the greatest driver of social division, a scar on our national conscience, and, if left unchecked, a threat to the future prospects of millions of children. As Brown rightly notes, this is not simply a moral emergency; it is an economic and educational crisis. We cannot talk about fixing Britain without talking about child poverty. Nor can we talk about restoring fairness or social mobility without tackling the structural barriers that trap children in disadvantage. Unless we address the deep-rooted educational inequalities that mirror and reinforce child poverty, from postcode lotteries in provision to the hollowing out of early years and special-needs support, we will fail to give every child a fair start. Millions believe that we are all better off when we care for the worst off. That compassion must now be matched by policy. Because child poverty is not inevitable. It is the result of political choices. And with the right choices, we can lift the next generation out of poverty and into promise. Mike Ion, Shrewsbury Food for thought One of my earliest memories is visiting the clinic with my mum to collect my orange juice and cod-liver oil, provided free by the government to keep me healthy. At my primary school there was free milk for everyone every day. This was about 1946, when the country was virtually bankrupt after fighting the war. Later, at secondary school we all had a midday meal of meat and two veg and pudding, again free. This was not just socialist ideology – nothing was withdrawn by Churchill or Macmillan. It was taken for granted by both parties that children must be properly nourished. Compared to those days the country is now enormously wealthy, but children go hungry. What has happened? John Lowell, Cheadle Hulme Brown's bairns I find it more than curious that in Gordon Brown's guest-edited child poverty issue there is no reflection on the fact that the one part of the UK where levels of child poverty are dropping is where he lives – in Scotland. Why has he not mentioned this? Child poverty in the UK has risen to 31 per cent while that in Scotland has dropped to 22 per cent. Surely there is a story worth looking at here. Ernie Watt, London Relative riches In 1950 my parents had to give up our modern house in Birmingham because they couldn't make ends meet, and we moved to an old terrace house with an outside toilet and no hot water. The present houses in Ladywood would have seemed lovely. We of course had no phone and no car, and our clothes were hand-me-downs (so was my bike) or were made by my mother. But we had a radio and a cat, I played cricket and football in the street, I could go to the park and to the library, a government scheme enabled us to build a bathroom, I had two parents who loved me and loved each other, and through Mr Tunnicliffe and Miss Swift at Rookery Road Junior School and through the eleven-plus, things changed for my sister and me. I guess we were poor, though we were typical of our street. After reading the New Statesman issue, I still don't have a very clear picture of what poverty means in 2025. I need stories, and also an impression of how typical they are. And maybe we need to set the problem and the desired actions about poverty alongside the questions Rowan Williams raised about how democracy recovers a grounding in solidarity. John Goldingay, Oxford Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Lineker's red card Although Gary Lineker is on the right side in the Gaza debate, it was only proper that he left the BBC for his mistake (Media Notebook, 23 May). Though I do feel he has become a victim of one of the pitfalls of social media. It's so easy to hit share within seconds of seeing content only to notice something sinister moments later when the damage has already been done. So what will happen to the social media outlet that allowed the post in the first place? I'm guessing nothing. Maybe this is another reason we still need the old media Alison Phillips talks about. Some research first, then the story. Rob Grew, Birmingham Trump's ties 'Superhuman narcissism' (Neil Kinnock, 23 May) is one but not the only explanation for Trump's behaviour. For example, his failure in months to bring the peace in Ukraine he boasted he'd achieve within hours can be explained, as FBI and congressional investigations have shown, by his loyalty to Vladimir Putin. Former allies of Russia's president have admitted to interfering in US elections. Trump may, therefore, owe a lot to Putin. Similarly his failure to safeguard the planet boils down to another favour returned. For this election campaign, while he didn't quite receive the $1bn in contributions he reportedly pushed for from oil executives, it was close. So again, he owes them. He's a narcissist, but he won't bite the hands that feed him. David Murray, Wallington Rivers of life Thank you for the interview with Robert Macfarlane (Encounter, 23 May). I hope there will be more articles about the environment in the front pages because, as with the water issue, the environment is political. Flood risks can be reduced at next to no cost by introducing beavers. Carbon can be sequestered without spending billions on carbon capture and storage simply by preserving peatland. You can't chop down old orchards and woodlands and expect the same ecological benefits from compensation planting elsewhere. Children in poverty can benefit from, among other things, access to nature. Here in Cambridge, there are children from poor households who have never seen the River Cam, even though they live just a mile away. Ecological literacy is important and as long as this Labour government bats away people who care about, well, bats and other wildlife, voters will desert them. Tim Tam, Cambridge Write to letters@ We reserve the right to edit letters [See also: Gary Lineker and the impartiality trap] Related
