
The defense industry has SXSW surrounded
With help from Alfred Ng
South by Southwest is underway in Austin this week, the 37th edition of the tech, music and film festival. This year, however, is the first since SXSW ended sponsorships from the U.S. Army and weapons makers.
The defense industry had been attending the conference since it became a linchpin of the global tech-conference circuit — a relationship that abruptly ended last year, after attendees protested the U.S. Army sponsoring last year's events while America backed Israel in its war in Gaza.
That doesn't mean the defense sector has disappeared from Austin. On the contrary: Austin has become a near-split screen, as multiple defense tech confabs have sprung up to make the increasingly lucrative connection between innovation and the armed forces.
Tectonic Defense, a publication focused on defense tech, hosted a new two-day conference on March 10 and 11. Austin4America launched for the first time late last week. They joined more established meetings including Space and Defense Innovation and 'Disruptive Defense' powered by the Pentagon's Defense Innovation Unit, AFWERX and NAVALX.
It's a physical manifestation of a rift over the role of the American tech industry: Should Silicon Valley, with a long history of counterculture West Coast politics, keep its innovation separate from the military? Or does the industry have a patriotic or even profit imperative to contribute to the armed forces?
The question is gaining new energy as tech leaders ally themselves with the Trump administration, and as veterans of defense startups like Palantir and Anduril join the administration.
For years, with progressive values ascendant in Silicon Valley, military connections to the mainstream tech industry became increasingly fraught. In 2018, employee protests at Google drove the company to withdraw from Project Maven, which was intended to use AI to analyze drone footage at the Pentagon. This year — as tech companies tack to the political right, that dustup seems like ancient history. In February, Google dropped its commitment not to use AI for weapons.
Before the policy change, SXSW had long served as a place where the two worlds met. South by Southwest started in 1987 as a music gathering, and tech was added to the offerings almost a decade later. Nick Barbaro, one of the founders of SXSW, said the military was involved early; 'they had Army bands coming here from our second and third year,' he said.
But last year, sponsorship by the Army drew a backlash. Dozens of artists withdrew from the festival to protest U.S. support for Israel's assault on Gaza, which was sparked by a deadly Hamas attack on Oct. 7, 2023. In response, the festival announced it was 'revising our sponsorship model' and said 'the US Army, and companies who engage in weapons manufacturing, will not be sponsors of SXSW 2025.'
Barbaro said, 'there were a lot of mixed feelings about how we ought to deal with that. I don't personally think there's anything wrong with the Army being here as a sponsor, but the timing was very poor. It was right as Gaza was happening.'
The decision was 'disappointing,' said Lt. Col. Jamie Dobson, spokesperson of the Austin-based Army Futures Command that focuses on ensuring that soldiers 'remain at the forefront of technological innovation and warfighting ability.'
Her organization sent reps to three of the four alternate conferences: Tectonic, Austin4America, and Space and Defense.
'The relationship for us is critically important. It's not just that we want to do business. We want the relationship with them because tech is evolving so quickly that we can't just buy what they're selling today. We want to know what they're planning three generations down the line, she said.
Now, as the defense tech ecosystem is forced out of SXSW, it is growing. One roundup by Distinctive Edge Partners, which organizes Space and Defense Innovation, found more than 100 panels spread across 18 venues handling defense and space, with the vast majority having nothing to do with SXSW except timing.
Newly founded Tectonic Defense held its event over March 10 and 11. Industry speakers included reps from Palantir, Anduril, General Catalyst and Skydio; the military sent speakers from an alphabet soup of agencies and offices, including DARPA and the Defense Innovation Unit.
Disruptive Defense, convened by the Defense Innovation Unit at the Pentagon along with NAVALX and AFWERX, drew more than 3,000 people to its sixth annual meeting, a spokesperson said.
A third defense tech summit called Austin4America started this year as well— specifically because SXSW had kicked out the military, founder Luke Fischer told DFD. He said about 1700 people signed up 'with a large number' attending.
Barbaro, the SXSW co-founder, said the bifurcation was not total. 'Our relationship with the Army has not gone away,' he said. 'We're not banning them.'
There's cross-pollination; several South by attendees planned to attend outside defense events as well, he said. Still, Barbaro said the status quo, where his festival can focus on tech and culture while defense and weapons take the stage elsewhere is 'probably the best result for us.'
As the two threads spin out separately in Austin, some tech figures are actively trying to tie them back together. Bryce Mitchell, an Air Force veteran and an MBA student at Stanford University, said he co-founded the university's DEFCON Student Network last year to bridge between tech and defense, and he said the war in Ukraine had proven that Silicon Valley must serve U.S. security interests.
He told DFD he wasn't attending SXSW, but he saw its stepping away from the military as out of date.
'In some ways Silicon Valley has passed its Project Maven moment,' Bryce said. 'Those days are behind us.'
TIKTOK'S JOBS REPORT FOR TRUMP
In a not-so-subtle appeal to President Trump, TikTok released an economics report Tuesday highlighting the platform's benefits for American businesses.
The report, which POLITICO's Gabby Miller first covered in Morning Tech, found TikTok has helped about 75% of small businesses grow and benefited 4.7 million U.S. workers. It also noted that about two-thirds of survey respondents felt that a TikTok ban would hurt businesses.
TikTok commissioned the study from Oxford Economics, and sought to provide context on the app's role in the American economy. The report comes as the company attempts to ward off a ban in the United States by touting its security measures meant to ensure U.S. data doesn't end up in China, and that it boosts the economy. TikTok has also invested in ad campaign that included a Super Bowl commercial.
Trump gave TikTok a reprieve from the ban in January, but has not indicated whether he will extend the deadline again as he's encouraged an American buyer for the popular social media platform.
UKRAINE DID IT? REALLY?
Cybersecurity experts aren't buying Elon Musk's claims that a cyberattack against his social media platform X came from Ukraine.
Musk claimed without providing evidence that IP addresses linked to the attack originated in Ukraine. Cybersecurity experts from the United Kingdom and Ukraine pushed back on Musk's claims, POLITICO EU's Sam Clark reported on Tuesday.
The rebuttals noted that if the attempts were a distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS), it would leverage large networks of computers from around the world, making IP address origins irrelevant. Clark also reported that a pro-Palestinian group claimed responsibility for the cyberattack.
POST OF THE DAY
THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS
Stay in touch with the whole team: Derek Robertson (drobertson@politico.com); Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@politico.com); Steve Heuser (sheuser@politico.com); Nate Robson (nrobson@politico.com); Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@politico.com); and Christine Mui (cmui@politico.com).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal
BANGKOK (AP) — Australia's defense minister dismissed concerns Thursday that a deal between the U.S., Australia and Britain to provide his country with nuclear-powered submarines could be in jeopardy, following a report that the Pentagon had ordered a review. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News Australia that he had known about the review of the deal 'for some time,' saying that it was a 'very natural step for the incoming administration to take.' He noted that the UK's government also reviewed the deal, the centerpiece of a three-way alliance known as AUKUS after it was elected, and that his own government had looked at it as part of its own review of Australia's entire defense posture. 'I think an incoming government having a look at this is something that they have a perfect right to do and we welcome it and we'll work with it,' he said. The deal, worth more than $200 billion, was signed between the three countries in 2021 under then President Joe Biden, designed to provide Australia, one of Washington's staunchest allies in the region, with greater maritime capabilities to counter China's increasingly strong navy . The deal also involves the U.S. selling several of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia to bridge the gap as the new submarines are being jointly built. In January, Australia made the first of six $500 million payments to the U.S. under the AUKUS deal, meant to bolster American submarine manufacturing. Marles met with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the sidelines of a defense conference in Singapore less than two weeks ago, and told reporters afterward that he had come away with 'a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is proceeding.' 'AUKUS is on track and we are meeting all the timelines that are associated with it,' he said. 'We are very optimistic.' Hegseth's address to the defense forum made multiple mentions of cooperation with Australia but no reference to AUKUS, however, though he did later mention the deal when he was taking questions. Hegseth did urge allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defense spending, and underscored the need for a 'strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners' as the U.S. seeks to counter China. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Three ways the Trump-Musk feud revealed the GOP's twisted hypocrisy
Aside from being globally cathartic, the all-too-predictable breakup of President Donald Trump's unquenchable ego and Elon Musk's immense sense of self-importance pulled the dressing-room curtain back on the Republican Party. And what we saw was both cringeworthy and indecent. Or as I like to call it, the Republican Party. Here are three things this episode of 'Real Annoying Billionaires of Washington, DC' taught us about the conservatives who excitedly welcomed Musk – and his money – into politics: As the president and the weirdo billionaire hurled insults at each other on June 5, Trump posted this threat: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Gee, I wonder who, up until June 5, was helping Musk grease the wheels to line up 'Billions and Billions of Dollars' in additional government contracts? As The New York Times reported in March: 'Within the Trump administration's Defense Department, Elon Musk's SpaceX rocketry is being trumpeted as the nifty new way the Pentagon could move military cargo rapidly around the globe. In the Commerce Department, SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service will now be fully eligible for the federal government's $42 billion rural broadband push, after being largely shut out during the Biden era. … And at the Federal Aviation Administration and the White House itself, Starlink satellite dishes have recently been installed, to expand federal government internet access.' Opinion: Musk erupts, claims Trump is in the Epstein files. Who could've seen this coming? How quickly Trump went from filling Musk's coffers to repay him for his support and campaign contributions to suggesting Musk's contracts were, in fact, a form of government waste and fraud. (I mean … they are a form of government waste and fraud, but not in the way Trump was suggesting.) There's no other takeaway from this other than: We were happy to pay Musk whatever he wanted as long as he loved Trump, but the minute he stopped loving Trump, we can easily stop paying him. I think there's a word for that. Musk's swift about-face on Trump shows what many of us have long suspected: Republicans or Republicans-of-convenience like Musk don't actually like or respect Trump. On Feb. 7, Musk posted on social media: 'I love @realDonaldTrump as much as a straight man can love another man.' On June 5, Musk posted: '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Going from 'I love you, man' to 'I'm alleging you're connected to a notorious sex offender who was facing child sex trafficking charges before he died of suicide in jail' is quite a journey. And it implies that Musk saw Trump for what he is: a useful, loathsome fool. Opinion: Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me. The minute Trump became not useful to Musk, he sang his truth, something I'd bet most Republicans would do if they had untold wealth and didn't have to worry much about repercussions. That tells you all you need to know about the modern-day GOP – liars boosting a lout in their own self-interest. For all its fanfare, the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency that Musk oversaw accomplished precious little cost-cutting while inflicting massive harm on America's global reputation, the lives of people reliant on U.S. aid, and the overall functioning of the federal government. Republicans knew this yet still tripped over themselves to toss roses at Musk's feet, hailing him as some kind of genius/savior. They wanted his money, and they wanted the disinformation cannon that comes with his right-wing social media platform. But when Musk grew wise to what Republican lawmakers were doing with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act – a deficit-ballooning monstrosity – he turned on his handmaidens and his former love, President Trump. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So Trump, of course, called him crazy. Which begs the question: Why were you letting a crazy person access Americans' most private data and demolish the federal workforce? And are you now going to … you know … make sure the guy you think is crazy didn't do something catastrophically bad? Congressional Republicans had to pick a side, and they've largely stepped into Trump's arms, knowing Musk may well be disliked even more than the sitting president. The Washington Post reported June 6: 'Across the government, the Trump administration is scrambling to rehire many federal employees dismissed under DOGE's staff-slashing initiatives after wiping out entire offices, in some cases imperiling key services such as weather forecasting and the drug approval process.' Translation: Musk's DOGE nonsense was for naught, an attempt to fluff a billionaire's ego while cloaking the high-spending, deficit-raising moves Republicans were going to make all along. There's a sucker born every minute, and two Republicans to take 'em. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump vs. Musk shows us depths of the GOP's moral rot | Opinion

Wall Street Journal
20 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Iran Says It Will Scale Up Nuclear Work After U.N. Atomic Agency Vote
Iran said it would open a new uranium enrichment facility and increase its production of highly enriched fissile material after the U.N. atomic agency member states declared Tehran had failed to comply with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations, casting a fresh shadow over struggling U.S.-Iran nuclear talks. Iran's announcement comes ahead of a sixth round of nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran expected on Sunday. President Trump said on Monday he had grown less confident about striking a deal with Tehran.