Arrests Of Non Criminal Immigrants Have Risen Eightfold Since Trump Took Office
Washington:
The number of people booked into immigration detention who have been charged only with immigration violations has jumped eight-fold since President Donald Trump took office, government data shows, undercutting his anti-crime message.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention statistics show the number of detainees arrested by ICE with no other criminal charges or convictions rose from about 860 in January to 7,800 this month - a more than 800% increase.
Those arrested and detained with criminal charges or convictions also rose, but at a lower rate of 91%.
Trump took office in January pledging to deport millions of immigrants in the US illegally, framing the push as needed to remove serious criminals. The White House said ICE had arrested more than 100,000 immigrants as of early June, putting the daily average at more than double the pace last year under former President Joe Biden.
Still, it remains far below what Trump would need to remove millions from the US Top White House official Stephen Miller in late May demanded that ICE begin arresting 3,000 migrants per day - three times an earlier quota of 1,000.
Raids in Los Angeles and in other parts of the country swept in non-criminals and have sparked protests calling for ICE to stand down.
"When you have an agenda that sets quotas at 3,000 arrests a day, there are not even enough people that pose a public safety threat to meet that number," said Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council, a pro-immigration think tank.
Under Trump, the US Department of Homeland Security has frequently highlighted arrests of convicted criminals. During recent raids in Los Angeles, DHS put out a press release with mug shots of migrants convicted of murder, a child sex offense and drug trafficking, among other serious crimes.
At the same time, DHS stopped issuing detailed statistical reports on immigration enforcement after Trump took office, which makes it challenging to gauge the scope of the crackdown.
Unpublished ICE statistics reviewed by Reuters show people with criminal convictions of any type - including minor crimes - made up only a third of the 177,000 people arrested and booked into detention from October 2024 through the end of May.
Trump took office on January 20, which means the figures include 3.5 months of Biden's presidency.
Some 62,400 people with criminal convictions were arrested by ICE and placed in detention, the figures show. The top charges were traffic offenses or immigration-related crimes, such as illegal reentry, making up 39% of the total.
DHS did not respond to a request for comment.
No One Exempt
Speaking to MSNBC earlier this week, Trump's border czar Tom Homan said ICE raids in Los Angeles focused on criminals but that non-criminals were picked up, too.
"If ICE is there and arrests that bad guy and other aliens are there, we're going to arrest them," Homan said.
In a letter this week to Todd Lyons, the acting director of ICE, six Hispanic Republican lawmakers led by US Representative Tony Gonzales called on the Trump administration to focus enforcement on criminals.
"Every minute that we spend pursuing an individual with a clean record is a minute less that we dedicate to apprehending terrorists or cartel operatives," they wrote.
US Senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat from California, was forcibly removed from a press conference on Thursday when he tried to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question about immigration arrests.
Padilla was pushed out of the room, shoved to the ground and handcuffed by security.
"You can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day laborers," Padilla told a press conference after the incident.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump condemns ‘terrible shooting' of Minnesota lawmakers, calls it a targeted attack
US President Donald Trump on Saturday condemned what he described as the 'terrible shooting' of two Democratic state lawmakers in Minnesota, calling it a targeted act of violence that must not be tolerated. 'I have been briefed on the terrible shooting that took place in Minnesota, which appears to be a targeted attack against state lawmakers,' Trump said in a statement. 'Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America.' The shooting spree, which took place Saturday morning in two towns near Minneapolis, killed former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, and left state Senator John Hoffman and his wife wounded. Authorities believe the attack was politically motivated. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz confirmed the details during a press conference, calling it 'an assassination' and urging the nation to stand against all forms of political violence. 'Those responsible for this will be held accountable,' he said. The suspect, who fled after exchanging gunfire with officers, was reportedly posing as a law enforcement officer. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Authorities say the individual used a vehicle that looked identical to a police SUV and exploited public trust in uniformed personnel. 'This is a betrayal of what our uniforms represent,' said Public Safety Commissioner Bob Jacobson. A shelter-in-place order was issued Saturday morning as a multi-agency manhunt, including the FBI, continued. US Attorney General Pam Bondi vowed federal support for the investigation, calling the killings 'horrific' and promising prosecution 'to the fullest extent of the law.' Gabrielle Giffords, the former congresswoman and gun violence survivor, said, 'An attack against lawmakers is an attack on American democracy itself.'
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tanks, thunder, and Trump: The military parade that split America
Amid traffic jams, military flyovers, and thousands of troops marching down Constitution Avenue, the United States Army celebrated its 250th anniversary on Saturday. But it wasn't just about history. It was also President Donald Trump's 79th birthday — a detail that has split public opinion and overshadowed the event's original intent. The scale was massive: 6,700 soldiers, 150 vehicles including tanks and howitzers, and more than 50 aircraft. Fighter jets, including the Air Force's Thunderbirds — a last-minute addition at Trump's request — were among the parade's highlights. 'I think it's time for us to celebrate a little bit. You know, we've had a lot of victories,' Trump said earlier in the week. 'It is my birthday, but I'm not celebrating my birthday,' he insisted, pointing instead to Flag Day. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Enlarged Prostate Has Nothing to Do with Age. Just Stop Doing This One Common Thing! Health Benefits Undo It was the first national military parade of this scale since 1991, when troops returned home victorious from the Gulf War. Among the highlights: tanks on urban roads, a White House parachute flag-drop, and a flyover. Trump, stationed at his own reviewing stand, called it 'a celebration of our country' and 'of the Army, actually.' But protests are mounting, weather warnings loomed, and concerns about the parade's cost and purpose deepened — especially as it occurred while the U.S. military engages in controversial operations at home and abroad. Live Events 'This would make great TV' The idea took root last year. At a long-running Army pageant called the 'Twilight Tattoo,' General Randy George and Army spokesperson Col. Dave Butler were hosting media executives when one leaned over and said, 'This would make great television,' according to Butler. From there, things escalated. The Army was already looking for ways to mark its milestone. The suggestion of turning their ceremonial show into a full-blown parade landed without resistance. 'We wanted to reintroduce this nation's Army to the American people,' Butler said. 'To do that, we thought we needed to be in their living rooms and on their phones. We needed something that would catch the national eye.' With Trump's interest piqued — a former media executive who had previously tried and failed to stage a military parade — the door opened. 'It was like knocking on an unlocked door,' said one planning official. Millions in costs, disruptions, and doubts Not everyone is clapping. A poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center shows nearly 60% of Americans think the parade is a poor use of government money. The Army has estimated its own logistics could cost up to $45 million. Security, air traffic closures, and city disruptions will drive the price higher. 'I remain concerned about it, I have to tell you,' said Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. 'These are, for the most part, local streets, and if they're rendered unusable, we have to make them usable and then go seek our money from the feds.' The city is already bracing for road closures, suspended flights, and potential damage to infrastructure. Tanks have been spotted rolling down Rhode Island Avenue, escorted by police. Steel plates and rubber pads have been deployed along the route to mitigate damage, according to Army spokesperson Heather J. Hagan, who said the expected road damage would be 'minimal.' 'A prop for the President' The backlash hasn't been limited to cost. Democrat Senator Tammy Duckworth , a former Army officer, called the parade 'Donald Trump's birthday parade,' accusing the president of exploiting the event for his own image. 'It's to stroke his own ego and make taxpayers foot the bill,' she said. Critics have compared the event to military displays in Russia or North Korea — performative demonstrations of power under authoritarian regimes. Local advisory commissioners have passed resolutions calling for the parade's cancellation, saying it reflects 'authoritarian governments more than democracies.' Samuel Port, a former Army logistics officer and now unemployed contractor, summed up a common sentiment: 'Trump is using this as an excuse to prop himself up. It demeans the soldiers because it's using them as a political prop.' Flashpoints: Immigration raids, Iran aid and public disapproval The parade comes at a sensitive time. Just one day earlier, the United States began assisting Israel's defence against Iranian missile attacks. And earlier in the week, Trump deployed both National Guard and Marine forces to Southern California to suppress protests against immigration raids. The president bypassed state authority in doing so, drawing legal and political scrutiny. 'The President is deploying the American military to police the American people,' Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.), top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee , told Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth during hearings this week. 'Sending the Marines — not after foreign threats, but after American protesters... should stop every one of us cold.' According to a new NBC News/Decision Desk poll released Saturday morning, 64% of Americans disapprove of the parade. Many cite both the financial burden and the optics of military power being used domestically. 'I wouldn't have done it,' said Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), likening the display to Soviet-era demonstrations. 'We were proud not to be that.' Pomp, power, and the President's image The parade also drew comparisons to past authoritarian spectacles. Trump, who has long admired large-scale military demonstrations, first pushed for a parade of this kind after visiting France's Bastille Day celebration in 2017. That effort stalled during his first term, but the 250th Army anniversary provided the perfect excuse. Critics say this was not merely about honouring service. 'It's a stupid order,' said retired Rear Admiral Ken Carodine. 'But it's a legal order. Most of the guys organising or marching in this thing, it's the last thing they want to be doing.' Presidential historian Barbara Perry from the University of Virginia noted the personalisation of the event. 'Usually it's about the personnel,' she said. 'If [Trump] views it as 'his generals' or 'his military,' and ties it to his birthday — that's what's different.' Trump, however, insists the parade is not about him. 'It will be a parade like we haven't had in many, many decades here,' he said this week. 'And it's a celebration of our country.' Weather threatens parade, not public backlash Despite forecasts warning of heavy rain and possible thunderstorms, federal officials opted to proceed with the event as scheduled. The parade was set to begin at 6:30 p.m., following a day of commemorations along the National Mall. For Trump, the parade marks a symbolic high point following his return to the presidency in the 2024 elections. Supporters see it as a reaffirmation of strength and patriotism. But detractors view it as a diversion from failed foreign policy pledges, especially regarding the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. The president had campaigned on promises to end these conflicts. But the parade's timing — against the backdrop of ongoing deployments and incomplete missions — raises questions about whether the event is celebrating victory, or distracting from the lack of it. 'No Kings': Protesters reject militarisation Demonstrations have erupted in Washington and across the country, organised under the slogan 'No Kings.' Activists accuse the president of using military force to bolster his own image. Trump has warned protesters that they 'will be met with very big force,' echoing his broader posture on dissent. That rhetoric has only intensified criticism that the commander-in-chief is merging military spectacle with authoritarian messaging. Local leaders are also frustrated. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser expressed concerns over costs and disruptions. Neighbourhood commissioners passed resolutions calling the parade 'a grotesque spectacle.' And with tanks rolling through streets that recently saw the forced removal of homeless encampments, many see the juxtaposition as deliberate. 'It's appalling that we're spending $45 million on a parade after kicking out the most vulnerable residents of our neighbourhood,' said local commissioner Jim Malec. A parade for whom? Unlike the parades following the Civil War, World Wars I and II, or even Desert Storm — all tied to clear victories — this event lacks a unifying triumph. 'The U.S. is not coming off any war victory,' said Carodine. 'Nobody had a parade for the kids coming back from Afghanistan. That would have made a lot more sense than what we're doing tomorrow.' America's recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have left a mixed legacy. The Afghanistan conflict formally ended in 2021 under a deal negotiated by Trump and executed by President Joe Biden. Many veterans returned home quietly, without recognition or celebration. For some, this parade is a missed opportunity — one that honours political ambition more than military service.
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
As Trump Turns 79, Washington To Host Military Parade Amid National Protests
Washington DC is preparing to host a large-scale military parade on Saturday to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States Army. The event also aligns with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, which he has described as a "parade like no other." Set to begin at 6:00 p.m. local time (23:00 GMT) on June 14, the parade will take place around the National Mall, including the Washington Monument Grounds. While tickets aren't required, the US Army recommends advance registration on its website for better viewing access. More than 7,000 uniformed troops are expected to participate, accompanied by tanks, armoured vehicles, marching bands, flyovers, and a large-scale fireworks display. The Army estimates the cost of the festivities to be between $25 million and $45 million, with a portion earmarked for repairing city streets not built to support heavy military hardware. "Thundering tanks and breath-taking flyovers will roar through our capital city," President Trump said ahead of the parade. This will mark the first major US military parade since 1991, when President George HW Bush presided over celebrations honouring the end of the Gulf War. That event drew approximately 200,000 spectators. Previous parades date back to 1961 under President John F. Kennedy, 1953 during Dwight Eisenhower's first inauguration, and the World War II-era parades of 1942 and 1946. Protests Across the Nation While the capital prepares for military fanfare, demonstrations opposing the Trump administration are set to erupt in over 1,500 locations nationwide. The protests, organised under the banner "No Kings," are being promoted as a "national day of defiance" by the activist group 50501 Movement-short for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement. The group's website criticises the parade as political theatre: "President Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday. A spectacle meant to look like strength. But real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else." Much of the anger has been fuelled by Trump's recent decision to deploy US Marines and National Guard units to Los Angeles, California, against the wishes of the state's governor, in response to ongoing immigration-related protests. Major protest rallies are planned in key cities such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Charlotte, Atlanta, Houston, and Phoenix. Demonstrations will span all 50 states, including dozens in Trump strongholds like Texas and Florida.
