
Irish Examiner view: AI becoming an own goal for humanity
Between the US eating itself alive like a snake feasting on its own tail, Russia continuing to assault Ukraine, and the devastation in Gaza, climate change almost seems like a hoary old chestnut. A relic of another time, perhaps.
And yet that doesn't stop us feeling it. We've just been through the driest spring for European farmers in a century; last week brought an 'unprecedented' heatwave to the waters around Ireland, Devon, and Cornwall; and Europe's supplies of cocoa, wheat, and maize are now threatened by biodiversity collapse in exporting countries.
Meanwhile, in a spectacular own goal for humanity, the scale of AI data centre water and energy usage was made clear in different reports. One analysis argued that AI could be responsible for half the electricity use by data centres by the end of this year — and as much as the whole country of Japan by the end of the decade.
All for what — copyright theft of literature, news publications, and art? While AI technology as a whole has plenty of productivity and other potential benefits — for instance, in science, health, or technology — the environmental impact is stark. It's been estimated that asking ChatGPT to write a 100-word email uses 500ml of water for cooling.
That's fresh water that then evaporates and rejoins the water cycle, though that doesn't mean that its source river or lake is being replenished. That's not even factoring in the electricity.
Why we are not using AI to, frankly, develop climate sustainable AI tech seems another own goal, even if the Chinese AI models do seem to be more energy efficient.
Yet that doesn't save the planet, or the areas near AI data centres where locals frequently have no water in their taps because of them. And that's not even factoring in the amount of carbon dioxide used from powering the plants, carbon which then goes on heating the atmosphere. The US, where much of the AI infrastructure is based, is rolling back environmental regulations as it is, so it's unlikely these data centres will be powered exclusively by renewables.
All of this has a steadily more catastrophic impact on the world around us. One might argue to pull carbon from the atmosphere, we should plant more trees. Trees are wonderful things, providing life to many non-human creatures, but even then they have to be planted in the right way.
George R Stewart's seminal 1949 apocalyptic novel, Earth Abides (from the biblical verse 'men go and come, but Earth abides'), argued that humans have no particular right to survival, and indeed that if their numbers become too small civilisation itself will cease to exist.
As environmentalists say, there is no Planet B. Only time will tell if we can curb our excesses enough to mitigate some climate catastrophes. But time, alas, is not on our side.
Tesla has lost its sparkle
It's a psychological milestone, but seeing Tesla overtaken by its Chinese rival BYD in terms of European sales seems momentous. Tesla CEO Elon Musk's dabbling in government cutbacks (yet the US government spent more in the first quarter than it did in the same period last year), far-right politics, and peddling conspiracy theories has taken a toll on the company's standing, and with it, sales generally.
That doesn't mean people don't want Teslas overall, because it still sells thousands, only that they're more discerning about whether it's a brand that they want to be associated with. And its general lack of innovation in its fleet over recent years — amid forays into automonous driving, robotaxis, walking robots — has seen competitors eat at its market share.
BYD — that's Build Your Dream — had targeted Europe for EV sales, but in the face of European tariffs is now selling plug-in hybrids as well. And clearly, the market is listening.
Volkswagen is still the top of the EVs in Europe, amid plenty of competition even if some manufacturers have cooled their enthusiasm for the segment.
Still, as prices and technology improve across the industry, one may be excused for wondering if Tesla is steadily becoming dull and obsolete — everything it seemed it would never be when it launched.
Healing bonds
In a week of carnage in the Middle East, fine weather at home, and climate change threatening European supplies of chocolate, you would be forgiven for not spotting another milestone: Germany's first permanent military posting abroad since, well, you know when.
A combat unit that will eventually have 4,800 soldiers has begun deploying to Lithuania as part of a wider response to Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine. It's designed to bolster the defence of the Baltic states; Lithuania is bordered by Russia's Kaliningrad to the west (home of the Russian Baltic fleet) and Moscow's unfailing ally Belarus to the east.
There was a time, not so long ago, when the very idea of the German military being anywhere in numbers other than Germany might still make a great many people nervous, purely for historical reasons.
But it says much that, when the German military came to the aid of Poland during dire flooding last September, Polish prime minister Donald Tusk managed to make light of it: 'If you see German soldiers, please do not panic. They are here to help.'
If there were ever an indication that the European Union could bridge old divides, that was probably it.
The deployment in Lithuania is a sign of the times for Nato countries — Finland is also watching over the border as Russia builds and expands bases — but it's also a sign of newfound European strength and confidence in a world when the US has increasingly become an unreliable partner.
Read More
Irish Examiner view: Everyone can be an enemy in a warzone

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Kraken becomes first crypto giant to get Mica license from Central Bank
The move means that Kraken can now trade across the 30-member European Economic Area as a fully-regulated entity. Andrew Mulvenny, the Dublin-based general manager of trading platform for Kraken, described the move as a 'huge milestone and a massive achievement'. It comes after a run of bad news for Ireland in the crypto space, with Coinbase following Gemini out of Ireland as its main regulatory hub in recent months. Coinbase chose to switch its EU regulatory base to Luxembourg, saying it preferred the regulation climate there to Dublin. Gemini said the same thing, favouring Malta. Both of the crypto giants had originally established their European regulatory hubs in Dublin in 2023, before Central Bank governor Gabrioel Makhlouf described cryptocurrencies as a 'Ponzi scheme'. The IDA's CEO, Michael Logan, said that Kraken's Mica licence from the Central Bank here was important. 'This landmark moment strengthens Ireland's standing as a leading fintech hub in Europe,' he said. 'We value Kraken's ongoing investment and engagement and we look forward to further collaboration as the digital finance sector continues to grow in Ireland and across the EU.' The chair of Blockchain Ireland, Lory Kehoe, also put a positive light on the Kraken news against the background of regulatory uncertainty in recent months. 'This is a win for the Irish ecosystem,' he said. 'It strengthens Ireland's position in the EU's digital finance landscape, creates pathways for high-quality jobs and gives clarity to start-ups, institutions, and investors building in Ireland.' Mr Kehoe also predicted that more Mica licences would be issued by the Central Bank. A spokesperson for Kraken said that the Mica licence represented a 'pivotal milestone' for the San Francisco firm. 'Being the first major global crypto platform to receive authorisation from the Central Bank of Ireland affirms Kraken's commitment to building for the long term,' said Kraken co-CEO, Arjun Sethi. 'Over the past several years, our team has worked tirelessly to meet the CBI's gold standard regulatory expectations. This license reflects that effort and places us in a strong position to expand our product offering, grow our institutional and retail client base and deliver secure, accessible and fully regulated crypto services to millions more people across the EU.'


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Meta wins AI copyright case in blow to authors
Meta's use of millions of books to train its artificial intelligence models has been judged 'fair' by a US federal court on Wednesday, in a win for tech companies that use copyrighted materials to develop AI. The case, brought by about a dozen authors, including Ta-Nehisi Coates and Richard Kadrey, challenged how the $1.4 trillion (€1.2 trillion) social media giant used a library of millions of online books, academic articles and comics to train its Llama AI models. Meta's use of these titles is protected under copyright law's fair use provision, San Francisco district judge Vince Chhabria ruled. The Big Tech firm had argued that the works had been used to develop a transformative technology, which was fair 'irrespective' of how it acquired the works. This case is among dozens of legal battles working their way through the courts, as creators seek greater financial rights when their works are used to train AI models that may disrupt their livelihoods – while companies profit from the technology. READ MORE However, Mr Chhabria warned that his decision reflected the authors' failure to properly make their case. 'This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta's use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful,' he said. 'It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one.' IATA Director General Willie Walsh on airline profits, air fares and why the Dublin Airport passenger cap makes Ireland a laughing stock Listen | 35:56 It is the second victory in a week for tech groups that develop AI, after a federal judge on Monday ruled in favour of San Francisco start-up Anthropic in a similar case. Anthropic had trained its Claude models on legally purchased physical books that were cut up and manually scanned, which the ruling said constituted 'fair use'. However, the judge added that there would need to be a separate trial for claims that it pirated millions of books digitally for training. The Meta case dealt with LibGen, a so-called online shadow library that hosts much of its content without permission from the rights holders. Mr Chhabria suggested a 'potentially winning argument' in the Meta case would be market dilution, referring to the damage caused to copyright holders by AI products that could 'flood the market with endless amounts of images, songs, articles, books, and more'. 'People can prompt generative AI models to produce these outputs using a tiny fraction of the time and creativity that would otherwise be required,' Chhabria added. He warned AI could 'dramatically undermine the incentive for human beings to create things the old-fashioned way'. Meta and legal representatives for the authors did not immediately reply to requests for comment. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025


Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Tesla's robotaxis had multiple driving mistakes in first test, videos show
A first public test of robotaxis by Tesla in Texas led to multiple traffic problems and driving issues, videos from company-selected riders showed over the first few days. Chief executive Elon Musk has tied Tesla's financial future to self-driving technology, and with Tesla sales down, the stakes are high. He said Tesla would roll out the service to other US cities later this year and predicted "millions of Teslas" operating "fully autonomously" by the second half of next year. The Tesla fans invited to the trial were strongly supportive and posted videos of hours of trouble-free driving, but issues drew questions from federal road safety regulators and auto safety experts. Issues included Tesla robotaxis entering the wrong lane, dropping passengers off in the middle of multiple-lane roads or at intersections, sudden braking, speeding and driving over a curb. In one instance, a robotaxi drove into a lane meant for oncoming traffic for about six seconds. It had pulled into an intersection in its left-turn lane with its indicator on. Then the steering wheel wobbled momentarily, and instead of turning, it proceeded straight into the lane meant for oncoming traffic, prompting a honk from a car behind it. In another incident, the car suddenly braked with no obstruction apparent in the video. The passenger jerked forward and their belongings were thrown to the floor. In a third video, taken from another vehicle, a robotaxi abruptly stopped twice in the middle of the road while passing police vehicles with flashing lights. "This is awfully early to have a bunch of videos of erratic and poor driving," said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University computer-engineering professor and autonomous-technology expert. I was not expecting as many videos of problematic driving on the very first day. Tesla is testing about 10 to 20 robotaxis, which are standard Model Ys with advanced software, and has been operating since Sunday afternoon. Reuters was able to independently verify the locations of at least 11 videos showing issues. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. The incidents caught on camera did not involve accidents, and one expert said some reflected a decision to focus on safety. "So far so good. It handled the situations very well and likely better than even good drivers," Alain Kornhauser, Princeton University professor of operations research and financial engineering, said by email. He added it would be more dangerous to drive at less than the speed of prevailing traffic, for instance. Read More Tesla shares soar after first robotaxi rides hit the road