Former Mayor Bill de Blasio to pay $330K over use of NYPD detail during 2020 presidential run
Former Mayor Bill de Blasio will pay $330,000 in restitution and fines for violating city rules by using his NYPD detail during his long-shot 2020 presidential bid — the largest settlement in the history of New York City's Conflicts of Interest Board.
The settlement, the first time the board has brought an enforcement action against a mayor, marks an end to the three-year legal saga centering on de Blasio's move to have his NYPD detail accompany him on 31 out-of-state trips during his failed 2020 presidential campaign.
In Wednesday's agreement, the ex-mayor admitted to taking the security detail along with him despite prior warning from the board.
'In contradiction of the written guidance I received from the Board, I did not reimburse the City for these expenses,' de Blasio wrote in the agreement.
De Blasio has already paid $100,000 of the settlement, and has agreed to cover the rest in quarterly installments over the next four years, according to the settlement agreement. If he defaults a payment, his total amount owed is upped to a whooping $475,000.
'Today I settled an outstanding case with the NYC COIB,' de Blasio said in a social media post. 'I acknowledge that I made a mistake, and I deeply regret it. Now it's time to move forward.'
Reached over the phone, de Blasio declined to elaborate: 'That's all I have to say.'
The historic settlement comes even though de Blasio for years maintained he had done nothing wrong. The ex-mayor also sued the board in 2023, seeking to overturn the the city ethics watchdog's order. That lawsuit was unsuccessful, with a Manhattan Supreme Court judge rejecting it earlier this year and ruling de Blasio was on the hook to repay the full amount.
De Blasio and his attorney, Andrew Celli, argued after the fine was first imposed in 2023 that the board's decision was 'perilous' and set a standard under which the security of sitting mayors could be at risk.
'Every mayor faces threats, and all mayors are entitled to protection,' Celli said at the time.
Queens Councilman Bob Holden, a centrist Democrat and frequent de Blasio critic, lauded the settlement announcement.
'While the city hasn't yet been made whole, this settlement ends years of litigation and requires de Blasio to begin paying back nearly $330,000 in taxpayer funds,' Holden said. 'His arrogance and misuse of public resources caused lasting damage to this city—but at long last, justice is catching up.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats forge strange bedfellows as party flounders in Trump's 2nd term
The Democratic Party has been without a leader since losing the White House in November, and as Democrats navigate President Donald Trump's second administration, they've developed some unlikely alliances. From violent protests erupting in Los Angeles to the defense of controversial deportees and accused extremists, the party's fractured response to Trump's agenda has drawn scrutiny not just from the right, but from within its own ranks. Amid the chaos unfolding in Los Angeles, Trump said those protesting and rioting against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are "not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists." Images emerged this weekend of rioters setting cars on fire and large swaths of protesters shutting down highways as Trump federalized the National Guard for the first time since 1965. He ordered National Guardsmen and Marines to Los Angeles to protect federal immigration agents during the ongoing arrests. Led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, long considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate, Democrats have railed against Trump and rallied behind the anti-ICE protesters. Democrat Accuses Trump Of Unleashing 'Campaign Of Terror' On Illegals As La Riots Rage Read On The Fox News App "This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and the National Guard at risk," Newsom said. Ice Ramps Up Arrests Of Convicted Criminals As Riots Rage In Blue City: 'You Will Not Stop Us' And Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., said on NBC, "A lot of these peaceful protests are being generated because the president of the United States is sowing chaos." "The vast majority of protesters and demonstrators are peaceful," Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., said on MSNBC. "They're passionate." Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national deported from Maryland earlier this year, is set to face federal charges for human smuggling and conspiracy, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Friday. For months, Democrats have ridiculed the Trump administration for deporting Abrego Garcia to a high-security prison in his home country, El Salvador. Returning Abrego Garcia to the U.S. became a major cause for the Democratic Party. Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., was the first of several lawmakers to travel to El Salvador to visit Abrego Garcia this year, sparking social media backlash after being photographed with purported margaritas at a restaurant. "As I have repeatedly said, this is not about the man, it's about his constitutional rights and the rights of all. The administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along," Van Hollen said Friday. Abrego Garcia is accused of being a member of the violent Salvadoran gang MS-13. According to court records filed by his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, he also allegedly physically abused her on multiple occasions. Kilmar Abrego Garcia Indicted On Human Trafficking Charges, Ordered To Appear Before Judge In Nashville Earlier Friday, another Maryland Democrat, Rep. Glenn Ivey, who also made a trip to El Salvador to advocate for Abrego Garcia, used his X account to promote an event to continue the "critical conversation on the fight to return those who are wrongfully imprisoned in El Salvador." And Maryland Gov. Wes Moore celebrated the news of Abrego Garcia's return, telling Fox News Digital, "I want to thank our federal delegation for their efforts to ensure our government adheres to the rule of law." Moore said it was "never about one person, but about the due process that governs all people in our country." Earlier this year, few Democrats were willing to denounce vandalism on Tesla showrooms, charging stations and vehicles, even as Attorney General Pam Bondi labeled the attacks "domestic terrorism," an issue Democrats have railed against for years. What began as protests against Elon Musk and his leadership at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) escalated into violent incidents, including shots fired at a building, destroyed dealership windows and charging stations set on fire. In an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier on "Special Report" in March, Musk blamed Democrat leaders' anti-DOGE rhetoric for the surge in violence against his company. Sen. John Fetterman, a Pennsylvania Democrat who has earned a reputation for bucking his party on key issues like immigration and supporting Israel, dissed Democrats for suddenly backing Musk amid the billionaire's social media spat with Trump. Dems Who Have Spoken Passionately Against Domestic Terrorism Go Silent As Tesla Torchers Are Charged "The Dems, we've been dumping all over Musk and vandalizing Teslas or whatever, and now, suddenly, we might be more back into him," Fetterman said, calling out Democrats' inconsistency. Trump told Fox News' Laura Ingraham that Democrats lost big in November because they're backing "90% negative issues," including support for Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University activist who was arrested and faced deportation for his alleged support of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas. "Backing Khalil is not a great issue, but backing Khalil is better than backing these other hundreds of people that are really serious criminals. It's probably a step better than that," Trump told Ingraham. Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Khalil of participating in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities, which foster a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States." "Condoning antisemitic conduct and disruptive protests in the United States would severely undermine that significant foreign policy objective," Rubio said, defending his move to revoke Khalil's green card over his alleged affiliation with the terrorist group, Hamas. But more than 100 Democrats sent a letter accusing the Trump administration of a "brazen attempt to use the power of the United States government to silence and punish people who do not agree with the sitting President" by arresting Khalil. The Democrats requested documentation of the "reasonable grounds" for his arrest and affirmed his "constitutional right in our democracy to express his political views." Ivy League Anti-israel Ringleader Mahmoud Khalil Withheld Details Of Foreign Ties From Visa Application: Feds The procedural request followed a fiery letter sent by 14 House Democrats, including "Squad" members Reps. Rashida Tlaib, Illhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley, demanding Khalil's release and labeling his detention an "illegal abduction" and violation of the First Amendment. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called the arrest "inhumane" and "unconstitutional." Tlaib, who is the only Palestinian American in Congress and was censured last year for her criticism of U.S. policy on the war in Gaza, said the Trump administration's "illegal actions set a dangerous precedent" and called to "free Mahmoud Khalil." Earlier this year, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced backlash from his own party after voting for the Republican-proposed continuing resolution to avert a government shutdown. Soon after, a Siena College poll found Schumer's favorability was down at 39% among New York state voters questioned in the poll, which was conducted April 14-16. Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez's favorability soared to 47% as rumors swirled about her ambitions for higher office. Texas Democrat Rep. Jasmine Crockett said the Schumer criticism among donors was "reminiscent" of when former President Joe Biden was "taken down" before the 2024 presidential election. Embattled Dnc Vice Chair Decides Not To Run After Diversity Re-vote Called And former DNC Vice Chair David Hogg sparked intraparty conflict this year when he vowed $20 million through his outside political action group, Leaders We Deserve, to primary challenge older House Democrats in safe blue districts he said are "asleep at the wheel." After months of growing tension between DNC officials, Hogg announced he would not compete in the new vice chair election after a majority of members voted for a new contest in the wake of a procedural error in the Feb. 1 elections. But the DNC has a different take on their response to Trump's second term. "The American people think Donald Trump is off the rails — they oppose his deployment of troops to LA, they don't support his budget bill to give handouts to the rich, and they don't trust him to run the economy," DNC spokesperson Aida Ross told Fox News Digital. "That's why Trump has the lowest approval ratings of any modern president at this point in his term. Democrats on the other hand are on a record-breaking streak, winning and overperforming in elections across the map this year, including in red states." Fox News Digital's Andrew Mark Miller, Peter Pinedo and Jasmine Baehr contributed to this report. Original article source: Democrats forge strange bedfellows as party flounders in Trump's 2nd term
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House appropriators OK rebukes to recent DOD scandals in budget bill
House Republican appropriators agreed Thursday to several checks on recent controversial Pentagon moves in their $832 billion defense budget plan for fiscal 2026, including a ban on using any money for military personnel to conduct law enforcement duties on U.S. soil. But the spending plan still drew significant criticism from Democratic lawmakers who objected to restrictions on abortion care for troops, insufficient funds to support Ukraine and missing budget justifications from the administration on how hundreds of billions of dollars will be spent. The funding bill — which heads to the full chamber for consideration later this summer — includes a 3.8% pay raise for troops in 2026 and plans to trim 45,000 civilian employees from the department's workforce in a cost-cutting move. Administration officials have billed it as the first $1 trillion defense budget, pairing the appropriations request with an expected $150 billion funding boost for military programs in the Republican-backed reconciliation package winding through Congress. Without that money, the defense budget would see no increase from fiscal 2025 levels. House panel pushes ahead $453 billion funding plan for VA next year In a statement Thursday, Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif., chairman of the appropriations committee's defense panel, praised the funding plan as 'investing significantly in modernization of the force, maintaining U.S. maritime and air dominance, fostering both innovation and the production capacity it relies upon, air and missile defense, and support for service members and their families.' But he also acknowledged Democratic complaints about incomplete funding requests from the administration, and said he hopes those information gaps will be filled in coming weeks. The committee approved the bill largely along party lines (only one Democrat, Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, voted for it) after more than eight hours of debate and delays, with numerous Democratic amendments rejected by the GOP majority. But Republicans did go along with several provisions touching on recent department controversies. Language offered by Rep. Mike Levin, D-Calif., and approved by the committee would block the use of funds to skirt the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the use of military personnel for civilian law enforcement. The provision came in response to the Trump administration's recent decision to deploy National Guard troops and active-duty Marines to Los Angeles to help with immigration enforcement efforts, over the objections of city and state officials. Calvert and other Republicans backed the measure without offering any direct criticism of President Donald Trump's decision. The committee also approved a Democratic-led amendment to block defense officials from sharing classified information on unsecured networks, a measure aimed at Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of the privately-owned Signal app earlier this year to discuss overseas airstrikes with senior administration leaders. And the legislation calls for a full accounting of money spent on the Army' 250th anniversary celebrations, scheduled for this weekend. The event — which coincides with Trump's 79th birthday — has seen its size and scope balloon by tens of millions of dollars as White House officials have mandated a larger and larger celebration. Other Democratic-led proposals on restricting Trump's use of a Qatari plane as the new Air Force One, blocking the renaming of Navy ships and returning to previous policies allowing travel stipends to help pay for abortion-related care were all rejected. Republicans also included language in the final bill which would block any diversity and inclusion programming at the Defense Department and severely limit health care options for transgender troops or family members, both priorities of the administration. Earlier this week, Senate Republicans expressed stronger concerns about the missing budget information, but said they hope to move soon on their own version of the defense spending package. Both chambers will have to adopt their own drafts of the appropriations measures before negotiating a final budget compromise to be sent to the president to become law.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - More anti-Trump protests? The left just can't help itself.
Brace yourselves, Americans! Tomorrow we will see widespread leftist protests show their 'resistance,' gathering in what they are calling a 'No Kings Nationwide Day of Defiance' in cities across the land. Are they protesting high inflation? No, the rate of inflation is the lowest in four years. Are they objecting to rising unemployment? No, unemployment is holding steady at low levels. Are they squawking about people flooding across our border illegally and driving wages lower? Not at all; President Trump has drastically reduced illegal immigration. Thanks to solid hiring, wages are growing faster than inflation, so real income is up. Are they protesting the failures of so many of our schools to educate our children – and especially minority children? Hardly; Randi Weingarten, head of the American Federation of Teachers, is one of the organizers of the protests. She will not draw attention to schools that are graduating illiterate students. Since those are among the principal concerns of most Americans, what is it they are protesting? First, they are protesting the Trump administration's efforts to deport criminals who are in the U.S. illegally, even though, according to Pew, the vast majority of the country is in favor of booting convicted murderers and child rapists — exactly what Immigration and Customs Enforcement was doing in Los Angeles. It is curious that these groups were mostly mute when Barack Obama, aka the 'Deporter in Chief,' tossed 3 million people out of the country. Second, they are angry that Trump is cutting wasteful and fraudulent federal spending. The country's debt exploded under Joe Biden, but Democrats are objecting to the efforts of the Department of Government Efficiency to root out waste and fraud — even though Biden's own administration estimated the total lost to scams and ineptitude at up to half a trillion dollars every year. They hate DOGE for cutting liberal spending, like the money being squandered on a regular basis at USAID. Sure, there were some worthwhile programs being funded by that department, but there were also too many examples of money being shipped to Democrat-aligned groups that almost certainly ended up in leftist campaign coffers. Elon Musk called such NGOs the 'biggest scam' going, and accused such groups of money-laundering. Third, the protesters are determined to distract from a military parade planned for tomorrow in our nation's capital. They claim the festivities are meant to celebrate Trump — what one of the groups describes as 'Herr Trump's birthday' — but the parade was organized to commemorate the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army. Planning for the celebration has been underway for two years — since before Trump was reelected. The parade portion has only recently been added. Despite this fact, that same group said outright: 'A major goal here is to upstage Trump's self-coronation event by grabbing more of the attention.' Are the furious hordes unhappy with Trump's foreign policy? Many progressives have aligned with Hamas against the administration's support of Israel. In addition, Trump is trying to peacefully force Iran to give up its nuclear arms effort. Biden not only failed to make progress on that front, he gave the mullahs access to tens of billions of dollars, allowing them to beef up terror groups like Hamas and the Houthis. This indirectly helped to fund the heinous attacks on Israel and on commercial shipping in the Red Sea and the U.S. Navy, respectively. Groups putting together this 'No Kings Day' claim they are fighting the Trump administration's 'authoritarianism,' by which they really mean reversal of unpopular policies that have brought the Democratic Party to all-time low favorability ratings. DEI, biological men in women's sports, taxpayer funding of biased news organizations, antisemitism on college campuses, cancel culture, mandates as to what kind of car you can drive or how much water your dishwasher can use — Americans are fed up with what should be called 'progressive authoritarianism.' They elected a president who vowed to change the country's course. He is doing it, and they hate it. Trump is a strong leader and not easily cowed by the liberal media; that does not constitute a threat to democracy. In reality, the left is having a hissy fit that they can no longer run roughshod over the will of U.S. voters, a majority of whom elected Trump. 'We have the idea that the power of the government derives from the people, not from one man and not from one party' says Weingarten. Yes, that's the point of elections. Get over it. Liz Peek is a former partner of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim and Company. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
