logo
If Miliband doesn't U-turn, Britain could face power cuts in months

If Miliband doesn't U-turn, Britain could face power cuts in months

Yahoo29-04-2025

Watching the scenes from Spain and Portugal as Iberians stumbled around wondering what to do without any electricity prompted sepia-tinted memories of the black-outs here in the 1970s. In 1972, the miners went on strike in the middle of winter, reducing supplies to the power stations and triggering power cuts. I can remember doing my school homework by candlelight.
It happened again with another NUM strike starting in the autumn of 1973. On the day before the wedding of Princess Anne and Captain Mark Phillips, Conservative prime minister Edward Heath declared a state of emergency.
The Central Electricity Generating Board decided to switch off power on a rota basis between 7am and midnight every day, with blackouts lasting up to nine hours. Factories (remember those?) and businesses closed with more than a million workers laid off.
The use of electricity for floodlighting, advertising and for the heating of shops, offices and restaurants was banned. Households were without electricity for hours every day. The areas to lose power were listed in the papers each morning and television went off the air at 10.30.
Oil companies were ordered to cut deliveries to private and industrial consumers by 10 per cent, petrol coupons were issued, a 50mph speed limit introduced, a heating limit of 17C imposed on offices and commercial premises and street lighting dimmed.
From Jan 1, 1974 a three-day week took effect and in February Heath called an election with the question 'Who Governs?' only to receive the answer 'Not You Ted'. Labour were returned to office but the shock of that period would continue throughout the governments of Harold Wilson and James Callaghan, with national bankruptcy, rampant inflation and economic mayhem culminating in the Winter of Discontent.
But while it was difficult it was not a catastrophe. It was still possible to heat your home with coal, cook on gas, listen to a battery powered radio, pay for food in the shops with cash and make a phone call.
What was apparent on Monday in Spain and Portugal was the total dependence we now have on electricity-driven devices and how vulnerable modern society is to a collapse in the grid for whatever reason.
Everything stopped.
Rail transport was paralysed for hours, flights diverted and the Madrid metro shut down. On the roads traffic lights failed, causing huge jams. The mobile phone and internet networks collapsed, while shops closed their doors when their electronic tills failed.
We still don't know for certain what happened but the finger of scientific suspicion points to the heavy use of solar power. For those of us who have no clue how these things work, we are learning about the importance of inertia in electricity grids. In conventional power systems – fossil-fuel or nuclear – the large, heavy turbines continue to rotate at a constant speed through inertia even when power generation or demand changes.
With renewables, however, there is no inertia, which makes maintaining a stable grid frequency more difficult. This phenomenon is known to the people who run the system. National Grid boffins are trying to design a new approach to keep the system running at the right frequency with renewables. In some regions like South Australia, where there is a heavy use of solar power, systems operators allow gas generators to run to deliver inertia to the grid and maintain frequency.
This seems to be the most likely explanation for what happened in Iberia on Monday and applies to other renewable inputs like wind upon which we are expected increasingly to rely. Does Ed Miliband know about this potential vulnerability and if so why has he not told us about it?
Britain is particularly at risk both because of its switch to renewables as part of the Government's aim to decarbonise the grid by 2030 and its heavy reliance on imported electricity. We have been close this year. In January during an anti-cyclonic period of no sun or wind which the Germans call Dunkelflaute, a black-out was only averted because of electricity from Norway through the 450-mile interconnector.
But many Norwegians object to paying more for their domestic power to meet overseas demand for their power. They take issue with the poor energy decisions made by their neighbours, like Germany's ban on nuclear power. Now we can add the UK's mad dash to decarbonise the grid. Why do we assume that gas and oil will always be available from elsewhere – and why should we import it when it can be extracted from our own North Sea fields if new licences were allowed?
Mr Miliband has been on a mission recently to denounce all and sundry who dare to question the breakneck speed of his decarbonising agenda, though this is a con since we will still need gas as a back-up for the foreseeable future. The next few years will see our ageing nuclear power plants phased out leaving a gap before new ones are built so wind and solar will have to take up the load.
Yet we now discover that this is fraught with uncertainty. Not only are we being left exposed to any breakdown in international supplies but there are inherent issues with renewable generation that may not be resolved by 2030.
The problems may be with us now. The National Grid is investigating unexplained outages that hit the UK's system hours before Spain and Portugal were plunged into blackouts. There was also an unexplained failure of the Viking Link interconnector between the UK and Denmark.
A few years from now, maybe sooner, the UK will face the same problem as Spain and Portugal, only far worse. Just before the crash on Monday, solar was providing about 53 per cent of Spain's electricity with another 11 per cent from wind. Gas was providing only about 6 per cent. Ed Miliband wants Britain to be doing even more than this.
At least it is usually sunny on the Iberian peninsula so if they can solve the inertia problem they are blessed with copious solar power. Here, in a cold, high pressure winter with little wind and no sun, those power cuts of 1972/3 will no longer be a distant memory but a present-day reality.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Forcing rich pensioners to pay back winter fuel allowance would be tax ‘nightmare', Reeves warned
Forcing rich pensioners to pay back winter fuel allowance would be tax ‘nightmare', Reeves warned

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Forcing rich pensioners to pay back winter fuel allowance would be tax ‘nightmare', Reeves warned

Questions have been raised over Rachel Reeves' winter fuel U-turn after it emerged the government plans to reinstate the payments for all pensioners before attempting to claw it back from millions through higher taxes. The chancellor is expected to set out Labour's plans to reverse the controversial policy change at Wednesday's spending review, but fresh questions have been raised over how the government will distribute the payments. Reports suggest Ms Reeves will from this autumn restore the grants, worth up to £300, to the 10 million pensioners who had lost out. But only those in the bottom half of average incomes will keep the payments, with the top half of earners forced to repay the grant through higher tax bills over the course of the year. One option for the threshold at which pensioners are eligible is average household disposable income, currently around £37,000, The Times reported. Such a plan would resemble George Osborne's high income child benefit charge, which sees 1 per cent of total child benefit received taxed for every £100 earned over £60,000. It means that, over whatever threshold Ms Reeves sets for the payments, an amount will be clawed back from those on higher incomes. The plans could cost around £700 million, with the chancellor vowing to set out her plans to pay for the change at her autumn Budget. Dennis Reed, of over-60s campaign group Silver Voices, said the plans 'would be an administrative nightmare and would be likely to draw in many more pensioners into the tax system'. He told The Independent: 'The most cost effective solution is to restore the universal benefit and maybe fiddle around with the higher tax threshold in due course to target 'the millionaires'.' Mr Reed accused the government of 'casting around for ways to show it has not made a complete U-turn while gaining the political credit for doing so'. It comes after pensions minister Torsten Bell said there is no prospect of the winter fuel allowance being restored universally. He said: 'The principle I think most people, 95 per cent of people, agree, that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour made the previously universal payment means-tested in one of its first acts after taking office. Speaking in Manchester on Wednesday, Ms Reeves said: 'I had to make decisions last year to restore sound public finances, and that involved a number of difficult decisions around welfare, taxation and also public spending, including the decision to means-test winter fuel payments so only the poorest pensioners, those on pension credit, got it. 'But we have now put our public finances on a firmer footing. The economy is in a better shape, but we have also listened to the concerns that people had about the level of the means-test. 'So we will be making changes to that. They will be in place so that pensioners are paid this coming winter, and we'll announce the details of that and the level of that as soon as we possibly can.' The Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions have been asked to comment.

Minister Peter Kyle Boldly Compares Labour's Arrival In Government To Steve Jobs' Apple Takeover
Minister Peter Kyle Boldly Compares Labour's Arrival In Government To Steve Jobs' Apple Takeover

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Minister Peter Kyle Boldly Compares Labour's Arrival In Government To Steve Jobs' Apple Takeover

Labour's return to government is comparable to Steve Jobs' restoration of Apple, according to the science secretary Peter Kyle. The government's finances are under intense scrutiny right now ahead of next week's spending review where the chancellor will set out how much money each department will receive in the coming years. Labour has promised to fix the foundations of the country after 14 years of the Conservatives, and the economy did grow by more than expected in the first quarter of 2025 and increasing by 0.7% of gross domestic product. Interest rates have also dropped – but the government has faced public backlash over the way it has managed to claw back this cash. Labour chose to cut winter fuel payments from pensioners – a policy it is now looking at partially reversing – and to keep the Conservatives' two-child benefit cap. In comparison, Steve Jobs was ousted from his famous tech company in 1985 but returned to Apple in 1997 when it was on the cusp of going under, and helped to reinvent the world-famous firm. Pressed on how the government would try to revive the economy with its spending plans, Kyle told Sky News: 'The key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. 'Just bear in mind how Apple turned itself around. 'When Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. 'Now, Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, inventing a series of products like the iPod, now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions, there's going to be high growth, investing in our space sector – all these really highly innovative sectors.' 'When Steve Jobs came back to Apple they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office.'Science Sec. @peterkyle compares the government's record to Steve Jobs.#TrevorPhillipshttps:// Sky 501 & YouTube — Sky News (@SkyNews) June 8, 2025 Diane Abbott Slams Keir Starmer's Immigration Speech For Being 'Fundamentally Racist' Why Keir Starmer Believes It's Far Too Early To Write Reform UK's Political Obituary 'This Is Panic': Defence Secretary Forced To Deny Keir Starmer Is Rattled By Nigel Farage

Abbott calls Starmer's immigration comments ‘fundamentally racist' at rally
Abbott calls Starmer's immigration comments ‘fundamentally racist' at rally

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Abbott calls Starmer's immigration comments ‘fundamentally racist' at rally

Backbench Labour MP Diane Abbott has criticised Sir Keir Starmer's comments on immigration as 'fundamentally racist' at a protest rally, suggesting the Government was copying the rhetoric of Reform UK. Thousands of trade unionists, campaigners and activists gathered to 'send a message' to the Government at a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform in central London on Saturday. Former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and Ms Abbott were among those who gave speeches at the rally outside Downing Street following a march. Organisers The People's Assembly accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. The Prime Minister said the UK risked becoming 'an island of strangers' when he unveiled plans for tighter controls on immigration in a major speech last month, leading to a mixed reaction from different parties. Addressing the protest crowd in Whitehall, Ms Abbott – who was previously suspended by Labour in 2023 before being allowed to run in last year's general election – said there was an international struggle to 'fight the rich and the powerful (and) to fight the racists', including in her own party. The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP said: 'I was very disturbed to hear Keir Starmer on the subject of immigration. 'He talked about closing the book on a squalid chapter for our politics – immigrants represent a squalid chapter. 'He talked about how he thought immigration has done incalculable damage to this green and pleasant land, which, of course, is nonsense – immigrants built this land. 'And, finally, he said we risk becoming an island of strangers. 'I thought that was a fundamentally racist thing to say. It is contrary to Britain's history. 'My parents came to this country in the 50s. They were not strangers. They helped to build this country. 'I think Keir Starmer is quite wrong to say that the way that you beat Reform is to copy Reform.' Reform's leader Nigel Farage previously said his party 'very much enjoyed' Sir Keir's speech, as it showed he was 'learning a great deal' from them. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could be seen at the demonstration's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. Mr Corbyn, who also criticised Sir Keir's 'island of strangers' comments, told protesters at the rally: 'As the wars rage around the world – the killing fields in Ukraine and Russia, the abominable, deliberate starvation of children in Gaza and the genocide that's inflicted against the Palestinian people continues – surely to goodness we need a world of peace. 'We need a world of peace that will come through the vision of peace, the vision of disarmament and the vision of actually challenging the causes of war, which leads to the desperation and the refugee flows of today.' The Independent MP for Islington North urged protesters to 'go forward as a movement of hope, of what we can achieve together (and) the society we can build together'. The People's Assembly said trade unionists, health, disability, housing and welfare campaigners with community organisations came together for the protest under the slogan 'No to Austerity2.0'. A spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store