Maths Support Funding A Mixed Bag Say Principals
"All new funding for curriculum is welcome funding," said Leanne Otene, President of the New Zealand Principals' Federation (NZPF), in response to the Minister of Education's announcement to fund the mathematics curriculum an additional $100m over four years.
The funding is intended for early intervention - $4million for maths checks at year 2 - $56 million for 143 full time maths intervention teachers for targeted support for years 0 - 6 students, and $40million for small group tutoring for up to 34,000 year 7 - 8 students.
On the year 2 maths check Otene said, "Our teachers already know the curriculum expectations at year 2, and teachers know which students are not meeting those expectations," she said.
"There is much research evidence to show that compulsory testing in primary school leads to negative unintended consequences which are not helpful," said Otene.
"What we need is additional support to help develop positive attitudes to maths, and build confidence in our young students," she said, "and $4 million won't be enough to do that.
"The $56 million for 143 new full time maths intervention teachers for our year 0-6 children would be very helpful," said Otene, " and if the Minister can find and appoint those teachers full time, that could make a difference,' she said.
"The remaining $40million for small group tutoring for year 7-8 students not yet meeting the curriculum expectations, is great, but it would be helpful to first see the outcome of the pilot study currently underway with these students," she said, "before committing to a particular course of action."
"The Minister has been clear that the maths intervention money is to target tier 2 support - targeted class intervention, rather than our most vulnerable students requiring tier 3 support," said Otene.
"We trust that the Minister is saving her biggest learning support funding boost for Budget Day," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
The clamour for a capital gains tax is pure political theatre
Being successful is no reason to be taxed, Gerrard Eckhoff writes. The pure theatre of Budget Day has passed, but not the predictable demand for more spending from the political left. These political parties are planning to rob Peter to pay Paul, courtesy of a capital gains tax (CGT) as they will effectively lock in the support and vote of Paul. Demanding money with menace usually results in jail time, unless you are a political party. In that case you get sentenced to an all-expenses-paid, three-year term in Wellington. It needs to be explained by the Left why it is so wrong to be able to sell your main asset untaxed after a lifetime of work and retire with some discretionary spending money. It is very clear the advocates of more and more tax believe that a CGT is needed to offset what they see to be the original sin of being productive and successful. At a time when productivity is so desperately needed, nearly 50% of our parliamentary representatives want to further tax the already productive — even more. The impact of a CGT on the elderly will be profound as the government takes another 30% of their retirement income but it is the young and their future that a CGT will ultimately destroy. The young will all be eligible for CGT on their assets at the end of their working life. Their assets such as land or a building in 50 years' time will be worth a few thousand percent more than its value today due to government-inspired inflation, so a $3m home will be commonplace. One particularly false belief is that all capital gain is unearned income. Not so. So many small businesses owners (70% of New Zealand businesses) invest in their enterprise to grow its base and resilience rather than pay themselves an income commensurate with the hours of work, the dollars invested, not to mention the risk involved. Paying staff, GST, rates, insurance and income tax etc takes first call on company expenditure as does the task of ensuring the business stays afloat. If a lifetime of work is to be taxed on the sale of the business, why bother to grow the asset, employ staff, pay GST, ACC levies and all manner of costs associated with business development? The hope for a comfortable retirement is rendered inert by a CGT, imposed on those who risk everything, by those who risk nothing. The much-vaunted Tax Working Group led by the late Sir Michael Cullen did not appear to fully understand the social upheaval a CGT will impose. Despite the vast number of reports promoting this tax, it is rare to read of the inevitable capital losses or how the benefit of more tax and spend by government, stimulates the economy. Nor is the impact of any capital gain being taxable ever openly discussed. Once this tax is invoked on the very wealthy — the less wealthy will also then be in line for promotion into the upper echelons of defined wealth and so on down the line — due to inflation. A CGT therefore will ultimately destroy the incentive to work, take risk and grow assets. The family farm or the urban family business face a very similar situation. So many families farmed their land or ran their business for little financial reward, drawing basic living expenses in order to grow the business — so why bother when a CGT is the major beneficiary of your years of hard work? A CGT will also ensure corporate farming replaces the family ownership of the business and highlights an inherent fault within our social structures — that of how to achieve an equitable succession within a family which is difficult enough without a CGT. A CGT is a racecourse certainty as soon as "the tax and spend gallery of the envious" get voted back in. Few members of the Left have ever owned and run a business so simply do not understand the implications of extra taxation on small businesses. Even if the spending power of the government is enhanced, the opportunity and advancement of the less well-off is not. Why is that? Socialism inherently wants success to fail and independence to become dependent — on the state. It is about power and control. It is incomprehensible that so many who contribute to society, are likely to watch the things they gave their life to lost to excessive taxation. They will not. Society functions due to two things — incentive and sanction. Incentives actually shape the future. Political silence over this issue can be taken as tacit approval of a CGT and its numerous close relatives — the land tax, the wealth tax, asset tax, inheritance tax which all hover over those who choose to take a risk to benefit themselves and their family. And that is why we all — but especially the young — face a very uncertain future under the politics of envy. — Gerrard Eckhoff is a former Act New Zealand MP.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Proposed Punishment For Te Pāti Māori MPs For Treaty Principles Haka Stands
Article – RNZ Opposition parties tried to reject the recommendation, but did not have the numbers to vote it down. Parliament has confirmed the unprecedented punishments proposed for Te Pāti Māori MPs who performed a haka in protest against the Treaty Principles Bill. Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi will be suspended for 21 days, and MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for seven days, taking effect immediately. Opposition parties tried to reject the recommendation, but did not have the numbers to vote it down. See how it all unfolded in Parliament The heated debate to consider the proposed punishment came to an end just before Parliament was due to rise. Waititi moved to close the debate and no party disagreed, ending the possibility of it carrying on in the next sitting week. Leader of the House Chris Bishop – the only National MP who spoke – kicked off the debate earlier in the afternoon saying it was 'regrettable' some MPs did not vote on the Budget two weeks ago. Bishop had called a vote ahead of Budget Day to suspend the privileges report debate to ensure the Te Pāti Māori MPs could take part in the Budget, but not all of them turned up. The debate was robust and rowdy with both the deputy speaker Barbara Kuriger and temporary speaker Tangi Utikare repeatedly having to ask MPs to quieten down. Tākuta Ferris spoke first for Te Pāti Māori saying the haka was a 'signal of humanity' and a 'raw human connection'. He said Māori had faced acts of violence for too long and would not be silenced by 'ignorance or bigotry'. 'Is this really us in 2025, Aotearoa New Zealand?' he asked the House. 'Everyone can see the racism.' He said the Privileges Committee's recommendations were not without precedent, noting the fact Labour MP Peeni Henare, who also participated in the haka, didn't face suspension. Henare attended the committee and apologised, which contributed to his lesser sanction. MP Parmjeet Parmar – a member of the Committee – was first to speak on behalf of ACT, and referenced the hand gesture – or 'finger gun' – that Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer made in the direction of ACT MPs during the haka. Parmar told the House debate could be used to disagree on ideas and issues, and there wasn't a place for intimidating physical gestures. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson said New Zealand's Parliament could lead the world in terms of involving the indigenous people. She said the Green Party strongly rejected the committee's recommendations and proposed their amendment of removing suspensions, and asked the Te Pāti Māori MPs be censured instead. Davidson said The House had evolved in the past – such as the inclusion of sign language and breast-feeding in The House. She said the Greens were challenging the rules, and did not need an apology from Te Pāti Māori. NZ First leader Winston Peters said Te Pāti Māori and the Green Party speeches so far showed 'no sincerity, saying countless haka had taken place in Parliament but only after first consulting the Speaker. 'They told the media they were going to do it, but they didn't tell the Speaker did they? 'The Māori party are a bunch of extremists,' Peters said, 'New Zealand has had enough of them'. Peters was made to apologise after taking aim at Waititi, calling him 'the one in the cowboy hat' with 'scribbles on his face'. He continued afterward, describing Waititi as possessing 'anti western values'. Labour's Willie Jackson congratulated Te Pāti Māori for the 'greatest exhibition of our culture in The House in my lifetime'. Jackson said the Treaty bill was a great threat, and was met by a great haka performance. He was glad the ACT Party was intimidated, saying that was the whole point of doing the haka. He also called for a bit of compromise from Te Pāti Māori – encouraging them to say sorry – but reiterated Labour's view the sanctions were out of proportion with past indiscretions in the House. Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said the debate 'would be a joke if it wasn't so serious'. 'Get an absolute grip', she said to the House, arguing the prime minister 'is personally responsible' if The House proceeds with the committee's proposed sanctions. She accused National's James Meager of 'pointing a finger gun' at her – the same gesture coalition MPs had criticised Ngarewa-Packer for during her haka – the Speaker accepted he had not intended to, Swarbrick said it was an example where the interpretation can be in the eye of the beholder. She said if the government could 'pick a punishment out of thin air' that was 'not a democracy', putting New Zealand in very dangerous territory. An emotional Maipi-Clarke said she had been silent on the issue for a long time, the party's voices in haka having sent shockwaves around the world. She questioned whether that was why the MPs were being punished. 'Since when did being proud of your culture make you racist?' 'We will never be silenced, and we will never be lost,' she said, calling the Treaty Principles bill was a 'dishonourable vote'. She had apologised to the Speaker and accepted the consequence laid down on the day, but refused to apologise. She listed other incidents in Parliament that resulted in no punishment. Maipi-Clarke called for the Treaty of Waitangi to be recognised in the Constitution Act, and for MPs to be required to honour it by law. 'The pathway forward has never been so clear,' she said. ACT's Nicole McKee said there were excuses being made for 'bad behaviour', that The House was for making laws and having discussions, and 'this is not about the haka, this is about process'. She told The House she had heard no good ideas from the Te Pāti Māori, who she said resorted to intimidation when they did not get their way, but the MPs needed to 'grow up' and learn to debate issues. She hoped 21 days would give them plenty of time to think about their behaviour. Labour MP and former Speaker Adrian Rurawhe started by saying there are 'no winners in this debate', and it was clear to him it was the government, not the Parliament, handing out the punishments. He said the proposed sanctions set a precedent for future penalties, and governments may use it as a way to punish opposition, imploring National to think twice. He also said an apology from Te Pāti Māori would 'go a long way', saying they had a 'huge opportunity' to have a legacy in The House, but it was their choice – and while many would agree with the party there were rules and 'you can't have it both ways'. Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi said there had been many instances of misinterpretations of the haka in The House and said it was unclear why they were being punished, 'is it about the haka… is about the gun gestures?' 'Not one committee member has explained to us where 21 days came from,' he said. Waititi took aim at Peters over his comments targeting his hat and 'scribbles' on his face. He said the haka was an elevation of indigenous voice and the proposed punishment was a 'warning shot from the colonial state that cannot stomach' defiance. Waititi said that throughout history when Māori did not play ball, the 'coloniser government' reached for extreme sanctions, ending with a plea to voters: 'make this a one-term government, enrol, vote'. He brought out a noose to represent Māori wrongfully put to death in the past, saying 'interpretation is a feeling, it is not a fact … you've traded a noose for legislation'.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Proposed Punishment For Te Pāti Māori MPs For Treaty Principles Haka Stands
Parliament has confirmed the unprecedented punishments proposed for Te Pāti Māori MPs who performed a haka in protest against the Treaty Principles Bill. Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi will be suspended for 21 days, and MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for seven days, taking effect immediately. Opposition parties tried to reject the recommendation, but did not have the numbers to vote it down. See how it all unfolded in Parliament The heated debate to consider the proposed punishment came to an end just before Parliament was due to rise. Waititi moved to close the debate and no party disagreed, ending the possibility of it carrying on in the next sitting week. Leader of the House Chris Bishop - the only National MP who spoke - kicked off the debate earlier in the afternoon saying it was "regrettable" some MPs did not vote on the Budget two weeks ago. Bishop had called a vote ahead of Budget Day to suspend the privileges report debate to ensure the Te Pāti Māori MPs could take part in the Budget, but not all of them turned up. The debate was robust and rowdy with both the deputy speaker Barbara Kuriger and temporary speaker Tangi Utikare repeatedly having to ask MPs to quieten down. Tākuta Ferris spoke first for Te Pāti Māori saying the haka was a "signal of humanity" and a "raw human connection". He said Māori had faced acts of violence for too long and would not be silenced by "ignorance or bigotry". "Is this really us in 2025, Aotearoa New Zealand?" he asked the House. "Everyone can see the racism." He said the Privileges Committee's recommendations were not without precedent, noting the fact Labour MP Peeni Henare, who also participated in the haka, didn't face suspension. Henare attended the committee and apologised, which contributed to his lesser sanction. MP Parmjeet Parmar - a member of the Committee - was first to speak on behalf of ACT, and referenced the hand gesture - or "finger gun" - that Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer made in the direction of ACT MPs during the haka. Parmar told the House debate could be used to disagree on ideas and issues, and there wasn't a place for intimidating physical gestures. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson said New Zealand's Parliament could lead the world in terms of involving the indigenous people. She said the Green Party strongly rejected the committee's recommendations and proposed their amendment of removing suspensions, and asked the Te Pāti Māori MPs be censured instead. Davidson said The House had evolved in the past - such as the inclusion of sign language and breast-feeding in The House. She said the Greens were challenging the rules, and did not need an apology from Te Pāti Māori. NZ First leader Winston Peters said Te Pāti Māori and the Green Party speeches so far showed "no sincerity, saying countless haka had taken place in Parliament but only after first consulting the Speaker. "They told the media they were going to do it, but they didn't tell the Speaker did they? "The Māori party are a bunch of extremists," Peters said, "New Zealand has had enough of them". Peters was made to apologise after taking aim at Waititi, calling him "the one in the cowboy hat" with "scribbles on his face". He continued afterward, describing Waititi as possessing "anti western values". Labour's Willie Jackson congratulated Te Pāti Māori for the "greatest exhibition of our culture in The House in my lifetime". Jackson said the Treaty bill was a great threat, and was met by a great haka performance. He was glad the ACT Party was intimidated, saying that was the whole point of doing the haka. He also called for a bit of compromise from Te Pāti Māori - encouraging them to say sorry - but reiterated Labour's view the sanctions were out of proportion with past indiscretions in the House. Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said the debate "would be a joke if it wasn't so serious". "Get an absolute grip", she said to the House, arguing the prime minister "is personally responsible" if The House proceeds with the committee's proposed sanctions. She accused National's James Meager of "pointing a finger gun" at her - the same gesture coalition MPs had criticised Ngarewa-Packer for during her haka - the Speaker accepted he had not intended to, Swarbrick said it was an example where the interpretation can be in the eye of the beholder. She said if the government could "pick a punishment out of thin air" that was "not a democracy", putting New Zealand in very dangerous territory. An emotional Maipi-Clarke said she had been silent on the issue for a long time, the party's voices in haka having sent shockwaves around the world. She questioned whether that was why the MPs were being punished. "Since when did being proud of your culture make you racist?" "We will never be silenced, and we will never be lost," she said, calling the Treaty Principles bill was a "dishonourable vote". She had apologised to the Speaker and accepted the consequence laid down on the day, but refused to apologise. She listed other incidents in Parliament that resulted in no punishment. Maipi-Clarke called for the Treaty of Waitangi to be recognised in the Constitution Act, and for MPs to be required to honour it by law. "The pathway forward has never been so clear," she said. ACT's Nicole McKee said there were excuses being made for "bad behaviour", that The House was for making laws and having discussions, and "this is not about the haka, this is about process". She told The House she had heard no good ideas from the Te Pāti Māori, who she said resorted to intimidation when they did not get their way, but the MPs needed to "grow up" and learn to debate issues. She hoped 21 days would give them plenty of time to think about their behaviour. Labour MP and former Speaker Adrian Rurawhe started by saying there are "no winners in this debate", and it was clear to him it was the government, not the Parliament, handing out the punishments. He said the proposed sanctions set a precedent for future penalties, and governments may use it as a way to punish opposition, imploring National to think twice. He also said an apology from Te Pāti Māori would "go a long way", saying they had a "huge opportunity" to have a legacy in The House, but it was their choice - and while many would agree with the party there were rules and "you can't have it both ways". Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi said there had been many instances of misinterpretations of the haka in The House and said it was unclear why they were being punished, "is it about the haka... is about the gun gestures?" "Not one committee member has explained to us where 21 days came from," he said. Waititi took aim at Peters over his comments targeting his hat and "scribbles" on his face. He said the haka was an elevation of indigenous voice and the proposed punishment was a "warning shot from the colonial state that cannot stomach" defiance. Waititi said that throughout history when Māori did not play ball, the "coloniser government" reached for extreme sanctions, ending with a plea to voters: "make this a one-term government, enrol, vote". He brought out a noose to represent Māori wrongfully put to death in the past, saying "interpretation is a feeling, it is not a fact ... you've traded a noose for legislation".
