
Analysis: After months of campaigning, Quebec Liberals will elect their new leader on Saturday
Quebec Politics
By
QUEBEC — It has been a long process, often overshadowed by other events, but Quebec's Liberals will finally get their new leader on Saturday.
About 600 Liberals are expected to roll into the Quebec City convention centre this weekend to witness the election and the first moves of a successor to Dominique Anglade, who quit the leadership in November 2022.
She left politics after the Liberals obtained their worst electoral score ever in the Oct. 3, 2022 general election, which gave Premier François Legault's Coalition Avenir Québec a second mandate in office.
Many Liberals will arrive having already voted electronically or by phone for one of the five candidates in the leadership race. Others, who chose to wait, will cast their ballots on the site of the Centre des congrès, where the leadership convention is being held.
The candidates get one last time to make their pitch in speeches Saturday morning at 10 a.m.
The party has not provided an update on the percentage of votes cast to date, but sources said voting has been brisk. There have been no technical problems with the voting system.
The actual result of the vote will be announced around 4:15 p.m. Saturday followed by a speech by the winner.
For the party, the vote will mark the end of a long leadership process that kicked off officially in January but in reality started rolling informally long before that.
In June 2024, former Montreal mayor Denis Coderre was the first to say he wanted the job, followed in August by Charles Milliard, a pharmacist and former president of the Fédération des chambres de commerce du Québec.
Other candidates followed, defying early predictions that few contenders would emerge to lead a party so apparently out of step with Quebecers. After Milliard, Marc Bélanger, a lawyer specializing in international taxation, hopped into the race followed by former federal Liberal MP Pablo Rodriguez in September.
Beauce farmer and economist Mario Roy quietly entered the race in January by informing his local newspaper.
In March, the final candidate to step forward was former Roberval Liberal MNA Karl Blackburn, who had considered running earlier, then decided not to because of health reasons. Given a clean bill of health after the Christmas holidays, he entered the race March 30, rapidly collecting the necessary signatures and the $40,000 entry fee.
In theory, that would have meant six candidates in the race, but in February after the Liberal party's election committee said he did not fulfil all the requirements, Coderre dropped out of the race, leaving five people on the ballot for the June 14 vote. Coderre left complaining he was unfairly treated.
The official campaign, which included a total of six debates, kicked off Jan. 13 but was rapidly overshadowed by a series of events out of the control of the Liberals.
In delivering his end-of-session greetings June 6 in the legislature, interim Liberal leader Marc Tanguay, in his last hours in the role before being replaced June 14, used humour to say some times even the best-laid plans do not always pan out.
'What extraordinary timing (for the race),' he joked. 'Trump is elected, Trump imposes tariffs, the federal Liberals have a leadership race, there is a federal election, the Canadiens make the series, the Pope dies, a Pope is elected.
'June 14? Habemus papam in the Quebec Liberal Party. We can't wait, we can't wait.'
The candidates, nevertheless, cranked up their campaign machinery. While there was less of a buzz in the general population, Liberals, including many veterans who had not been seen in years, showed up for the debates.
Over the campaign, Rodriguez picked up the support of the greatest number of Liberal caucus members with a total of 10 MNAs on his team. Milliard got five. The other candidates got none.
During the debates, it became apparent the five candidates had similar policy positions — with nuances — but where they differed was in their backgrounds and personalities.
Rodriguez, who was perceived as the front-runner in the race, was often the main punching bag of the other candidates during debates. Blackburn, in particular, questioned whether it was a good idea to have a former federal MP from the Trudeau years lead the party when it desperately needs to woo francophone nationalists back into the fold.
Rodriguez countered saying since he was the best known of the candidates, the one with the most real political experience and that he stood the best chance of beating Legault and the Parti Québécois in the 2026 election.
The race helped the Liberals another way. As of the cutoff date to buy a membership and be eligible to vote in the leadership election, party membership had grown to 20,495 from an all-time low of about 10,000.
So who will win? It is almost impossible to predict given the voting system in place.
The party has opted for a points system with each of Quebec's 125 ridings assigned 3,000 points. Of the 3,000 points, 1,000 are in the hands of youth members ages 25 and under. To win, a candidate has to obtain a majority of the 375,000 points.
If no candidates gets a majority on the first ballot, a second is held between the two candidates with the most votes. That's why candidates were working hard until the last minute in the hopes of wooing Liberals into making their candidate their second or third choice.
But even after winning over the party, the winner faces other challenges in the coming weeks, starting with rebuilding a party on the outs with voters.
There is also the matter of a seat in the legislature. None of the candidates are elected. While the new leader might decide to wait until 2026 to run for office, a seat in the National Assembly would give the person greater visibility because the Liberals form the official opposition.
There is currently one vacant seat, Arthabaska, but no date has been set for a byelection. The riding was won in 2022 by the CAQ. The PQ, Quebec Conservatives and Québec solidaire have named their candidates, but the CAQ and Liberals have not.
In theory, the new leader could run there, but the risk of losing is probably too high. The last time Arthabaska voted Liberal was 2008.
There is another option. The winner could appeal to a member of the Liberal caucus to step aside and spark a byelection in a riding with deeper Liberal roots.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: Liberals' clean energy crusade has been a super disaster
The U.S. has cut emissions at almost double Canada's rate, without imposing a national carbon tax Get the latest from Lorrie Goldstein straight to your inbox Prime Minister Mark Carney answers a question during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. Photo by Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS Before Prime Minister Mark Carney attempts to turn Canada into a clean energy superpower he needs to explain why a decade of Liberal government policies intended to achieve this have been a massive failure on every front. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account According to the Liberal government's own estimate, as of April 2023 it had spent or committed over $200 billion of taxpayers' money to 149 government programs addressing climate change. In terms of the primary goal of this spending, reducing Canada's industrial greenhouse gas emissions to at least 40% below 2005 levels by 2030, the latest available government data from 2023 shows emissions were just 8.5% below 2005 levels. Achieving the Liberals' 2030 target will require the equivalent of eliminating all annual emissions from Canada's transportation and building sectors in seven years, which would inevitably cause a massive recession. When environmental commissioner Jerry V. DeMarco audited 20 of the government's 149 programs, he found fewer than half were on track to achieve their goals and of 32 additional measures the government claimed would assist in reaching the 2030 target, only seven were new. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. His audit uncovered examples where two different government programs were funding the same projects and reporting the same expected emission cuts, raising the possibility of double counting. Read More DeMarco said the government's lack of transparency in reporting emissions made it impossible for the average citizen to understand its claims. The computer modelling used to estimate emissions was also out of date and 'recent decreases to projected 2030 emissions were not due to climate action taken by governments, but were instead because of revisions to the data used in modelling.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. DeMarco noted that aside from falling far short of its emission targets, Canada has the worst record of reducing emissions of any member of the G7, including the U.S. The U.S. has cut emissions at almost double Canada's rate, without imposing a national carbon tax. In terms of getting value for money, auditor general Karen Hogan reported last year that in one of the government's 149 climate programs – the now-disbanded $1-billion Sustainable Development Technology Fund – there were 90 cases where conflict-of-interest rules were ignored in awarding $76 million worth of government contracts and 10 cases where $56 million was awarded to ineligible projects. DeMarco reported last week that despite spending over $6.6 billion on government programs to help Canadians adapt to more severe weather caused by climate change since 2015, the Liberals' national adaptation strategy, released in 2023, lacked essential elements to make it effective and progress since then has been slow. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Parliamentary budget officer Yves Giroux last year estimated the cost of government subsidies to Canada's auto sector to manufacture electric vehicles and batteries at up to $52.5 billion on 13 major projects – $31.4 billion, or 60%, paid by federal taxpayers and $21.1 billion, or 40%, paid by provincial taxpayers in Ontario and Quebec. That's $6.3 billion more than the announced investments of $46.1 billion the auto sector is contributing to these projects, with many now delayed due to slower than anticipated EV sales. While Canada's employment rate and economic growth are influenced by many factors, the Liberals have repeatedly promised since coming to power in 2015 that government spending on their climate policies would lead to significant increases in jobs and economic growth, which has not been the case. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Statistics Canada reported earlier this month that Canada's unemployment rate rose to 7% in May, the highest it's been since September 2016, excluding the 2020 and 2021 pandemic years, and a 12.9% increase from 6.2% a year ago in May. RECOMMENDED VIDEO When DeMarco reported in 2023 on the Liberals' so-called 'just transition' plan to assist energy sector workers to retrain for Canada's new green economy, he concluded it didn't exist, despite the government having promised it in 2019. 'We found that as Canada shifts focus to low-carbon alternatives, the government is not prepared to provide appropriate support to … workers in the fossil fuel sector,' DeMarco said. 'The transition was being handled on a business-as-usual basis, relying on existing program mechanisms such as the employment insurance program to deliver support.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. (Eventually the Liberals passed what they called the Canadian Sustainable Jobs Act in 2024, with many of these concerns still outstanding.) In terms of economic growth, Statistics Canada reported earlier this year that Canada's real GDP per capita, which measures economic output per person, adjusted for inflation, and is a widely accepted metric for measuring the standard of living, fell by 1.4% in 2024, following a decline of 1.3% in 2023. Over its near-decade in power, Canada's economic growth under the Liberals has been the lowest since the government of R.B. Bennett during the Great Depression. lgoldstein@ World Sunshine Girls Golf World Sunshine Girls

CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
Quebec Liberals to elect new leader today ahead of 2026 election
The Quebec Liberals' leadership race is coming to an end Saturday in Quebec City, where members are poised to elect their next leader. Whoever they chose will replace interim leader Marc Tanguay, who took over from Dominique Anglade after she stepped down in 2022, and represent the party at the next provincial election coming up in October 2026. All members registered with the party as of May 9 are eligible to cast a vote via preferential ballot. Votes are weighed by riding and age, meaning there's pressure for candidates to appeal to Quebec's different regions and young people. It can take up to two rounds of voting to decide a winner. Former federal minister Pablo Rodriguez is largely considered the front-runner in the race. He was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004, representing the Honoré-Mercier riding in Montreal. As part of former prime minister Justin Trudeau's government, he held various ministerial roles in cabinet, including most recently minister of transport. Rodriguez left cabinet and began sitting in the House as an Independent MP in September 2024 after announcing his pivot to provincial politics and his intention to run for the Quebec Liberal leadership. Running against Rodriguez is Karl Blackburn, who represented Roberval at the National Assembly from 2003 until 2007 under Jean Charest's Liberals. He's also the former president of a Quebec employers' group, the Conseil du patronat du Québec. Charles Milliard, another candidate, is a pharmacist by training and the former head of the Quebec Federation of Chambers of Commerce. Other candidates seeking the party's leadership are international trade lawyer Marc Bélanger and Mario Roy, an economist and farmer. The Liberals currently hold 19 out of 125 seats at the National Assembly.


Calgary Herald
4 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Bell: Good news? Danielle Smith and Mark Carney now talking big energy projects for Alberta
Well what do have here from the office of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith? Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney and Smith have now both named teams of negotiators 'for the purpose of collaborating on the advancement of major energy projects of national interest that involve Alberta.' Article content Article content The teams involve cabinet ministers and senior officials appointed to this 'federal-provincial Table.' Article content Article content In the case of Alberta, Smith has already said the team is two cabinet ministers — Jason Nixon and Rajan Sawhney — and two deputy ministers and Rob Anderson, the premier's right-hand man. Article content Article content Now a lot of what Smith said at the Global Energy Show in Calgary in answer to questions from the scribbler makes sense. Article content In Calgary, Smith said there are 'ways we can find accommodation' with Carney. Article content Along with the premier wanting a bitumen pipeline to the port of Prince Rupert in B.C., Alberta will also want changes to anti-oil policies cooked up when Justin Trudeau was the Liberal prime minister. Article content 'He has to say he's not having the emissions cap and that means not bringing it in. Not acting would be a positive,' says the premier. Article content Article content No Liberal cap on oil and gas emissions is one of the nine demands Smith has made to Carney. Article content Smith said in the past you can't really build more pipelines and increase oil production in a big way and have the cap. Article content Then there's the tanker ban off the west coast. How about only lifting the tanker ban around Prince Rupert? Article content 'On the issue of the tanker ban, maybe we come to an agreement that if all roads lead to the port of Prince Rupert just carve out Prince Rupert so you can protect the rest of the coast. I can live with that,' said Smith. Article content Article content Article content 'If he can accept that then I think we have some common ground.'