logo
Jasper County secures grant to extend pavement near Co-Line

Jasper County secures grant to extend pavement near Co-Line

Yahoo19-03-2025

Mar. 19—Jasper County approved a state grant and a professional services agreement last week to extend the existing Portland cement concrete (PCC) paving on South 128th Avenue East — also known as Cordova Avenue — near Co-Line Manufacturing, which is a project shared with the nearby Mahaska County.
County Engineer Michael Frietsch said Jasper County's application for the Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy (RISE) grant was approved by the Iowa Department of Transportation in November 2024. The grant will pay for half of the project, leaving the other half to be matched by the county.
However, because of the project's proximity to Mahaska County, the county is going to be splitting costs for its portion. Frietsch said he is going to draft a memorandum of understanding with Mahaska County to officially share the costs. He estimated the total project cost to be around $300,000.
"You're talking $150,000 will probably be covered by the grant, so $150,000 will be split between the counties," Frietsch said to supervisors at their March 11 meeting. "So I figure our share is going to be about $75,000 give or take. So a little bit less than what we were originally anticipating at least."
Frietsch noted IDOT reached out to him and said the grant agreement would allow the county to extend the pavement to 600 feet to where the vertical curvature ties back into the existing road. The county first began pursuing this project back in October 2024, and it ties into Co-Line's $4.2 million expansion.
In conjunction with the RISE grant agreement, the board of supervisors also approved a professional services agreement with Garden and Associates LTD to complete the final design of the extension. Frietsch said the county is in a position to return the final design by May and let the project in June.
The professional services agreement cost $15,000.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watchdog finds ‘rampant abuse' of remote work among federal employees during Biden administration
Watchdog finds ‘rampant abuse' of remote work among federal employees during Biden administration

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Watchdog finds ‘rampant abuse' of remote work among federal employees during Biden administration

A U.S. government watchdog found 'rampant abuse' of work-from-home policies by federal workers, according to a new report released on Friday. The Inspector General of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which oversees the federal workforce, found 'compliance failures and weak internal oversight' as the root cause of the problem. The report focused on procedures that allowed employees to work remotely, rather than whether they were effectively performing their jobs. The report sampled badging data, timesheet, and remote-work agreements of dozens of federal employees in 2024, during President Joe Biden's administration, following a 2023 request from Republican Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, who took issue with telework policies. 'Under the previous administration, OPMʼs telework and remote work policies were mismanaged and oversight was virtually nonexistent,' OPM Acting Director Chuck Ezell said in a statement. 'That era of telework abuse is over,' Ezell declared. 'At President Trumpʼs direction, OPM has restored in-person operations to ensure federal employees are working for the taxpayers.' On the first day of his second term, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies and departments to 'take all necessary steps to terminate remote work arrangements' and require employees to return to the office on a full-time basis. Federal employees were required to return on March 3; therefore, the findings and recommendations of the OPM report, which aimed to develop written procedures detailing internal controls concerning remote work, are now considered closed, according to the executive summary. OPM is the chief human resources agency and personnel policy manager for the federal government's 2.8 million employees. President Trump has claimed that many federal workers took on second jobs while still being paid by the federal government, or were not fulfilling their duties when working remotely. There was a dramatic increase in working from home during the Covid-19 pandemic in the first Trump administration. Based on a small sample of timesheets, the report found that 58.1 percent of the sampled employees failed to meet the minimum requirements for in-office work in 2024. According to OPM's inspector general, three in ten (29.7%) telework agreements had lapsed, 21 percent of those sampled had discrepancies in their paperwork, and 15 percent did not have any approved agreements on file. The report did not investigate why this was the case, but suggested that possible reasons included 'weak or missing management controls,' 'negligence or carelessness,' and 'intentional fraud or abuse.' Under the order signed by President Trump mandating a return to in-office work, limited exemptions are allowed as determined by departmental heads. Similarly, new internal controls and compliance reviews have been set for employees who continue to telework. When workers were summoned back into their offices five days per week in March, many were met with less-than-desirable conditions, from cramped workspaces to dirty bathrooms. In addition to the return to the office, the Trump administration also sought to cut costs by reducing space and staff. Multiple federal employees across various agencies and departments told news outlets at the time that they found themselves working elbow-to-elbow as staff consolidated into smaller workspaces. Understaffed cleaning crews are reportedly struggling to keep up with the demand for tidy spaces, resulting in dirty bathrooms with no paper towels. Some staff were asked to bring their own toilet paper or help out by taking their trash home, a federal employee told USA Today.

Yesway appears to be in talks to sell Iowa and Kansas c-stores to MegaSaver
Yesway appears to be in talks to sell Iowa and Kansas c-stores to MegaSaver

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Yesway appears to be in talks to sell Iowa and Kansas c-stores to MegaSaver

This story was originally published on C-Store Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily C-Store Dive newsletter. Yesway appears to be pursuing a sale of its convenience stores in Iowa and Kansas to Midwest c-store retailer MegaSaver, according to employees from 10 different Yesway locations across those states. It's unclear when the deal is set to materialize, although team members from three stores said they've been asked to tell customers that their Yesway loyalty points will expire in mid-August. These same employees said that if the deal finalizes, they've been told they would become MegaSaver team members. A deal would nearly double Nebraska-based MegaSaver's c-store count and introduce the company to Kansas while significantly spreading its footprint in Iowa. C-Store Dive first reported in February that Yesway intended to sell all 30 of its convenience stores across Iowa and Kansas by the end of 2025. At the time, a company spokesperson didn't offer specifics about why Yesway was taking this direction, only noting that its Iowa and Kansas stores didn't match the company's strategy. In a statement to C-Store Dive earlier this week, Yesway's spokesperson said that the Texas-based retailer 'has not yet sold its Iowa and Kansas-based stores.' The spokesperson did not respond to several follow ups about whether a deal with MegaSaver is in the works. Kamol Samiev, MegaSaver's vice president, said over the phone that he 'can't deny or confirm' a deal being in the works for Yesway's Iowa and Kansas c-stores. Meanwhile, Lu Qian, a corporate controller on MegaSaver's accounting team, said that she 'cannot share information at this time' regarding a potential deal. Back in February, Yesway's spokesperson said that after selling its stores in Iowa and Kansas, Yesway would reinvest the proceeds into c-stores 'that enable us to provide a better customer experience.' That may refer to Yesway's stores in the Southwest, where it's invested heavily in recent years and operates the bulk of its locations under the Allsup's banner. Founded in 2002, MegaSaver operates most of its stores around Omaha, Nebraska. Acquiring Yesway's roughly 30 stores in Iowa and Kansas would grow the company's network from about 42 stores in three states to over 70 locations across four states. Besides Omaha, the retailer has two locations in Iowa near the border of Nebraska and two others in the Fort Lauderdale and Coral Gables areas of Florida. Recommended Reading Yesway to sell all of its c-stores in Iowa and Kansas

Should I Keep Paying Rent Increases, or Dent My Savings With a Down Payment?
Should I Keep Paying Rent Increases, or Dent My Savings With a Down Payment?

New York Times

time11 hours ago

  • New York Times

Should I Keep Paying Rent Increases, or Dent My Savings With a Down Payment?

Q: I rent a one-bedroom in a high-rise doorman building with many amenities on the Upper West Side. The rent went up substantially in the second year of the lease, but I wasn't ready to move, so I renewed. Now I'm thinking it might be better to buy an alcove studio co-op apartment in the same neighborhood, rather than deal with rent increases. Even with monthly mortgage and maintenance, I'd probably save about $1,000 a month. But as a 65-year-old retiree, does it make sense to use a portion of my retirement savings as a down payment? Or should I keep the money in my investment account? A: You ask an age-old question: whether it's better to rent or to own. The answer will be different for everyone based on financial factors and lifestyle preferences. You said that you have calculated a $1,000-per-month savings with buying, but your analysis shouldn't stop there. Yes, your rent will likely go up every year, while your mortgage payments would be more stable. But co-op maintenance fees will rise and building assessments can arrive with little warning. 'When you own, everything is your problem,' said Ally Jane Ayers, co-founder of the investment firm Brooklyn Fi. Owning builds equity and can have tax benefits. But consider the lost investment income and mortgage interest payments. If you take money out of your retirement savings, be sure to account for the tax implications. If you need the money later, it will be tied up in your home. As an alternative, you could borrow against the value of your taxable brokerage accounts through a securities-backed line of credit, which keeps your portfolio intact and avoids the taxes generated by a withdrawal, Ms. Ayers said. Another consideration: How long will you live in a home that you purchase? It's difficult to recoup your costs if you won't be staying for seven to 10 years. The Upshot at The Times built a handy rent vs. buy calculator that adjusts based on your financial situation. There are other factors at play: If you are renting and have a bothersome neighbor, it will probably be easier to move than if you own your apartment. On the other hand, if you own and you don't like the kitchen, you can renovate. Finally, your move would diminish your living space, which shouldn't be overlooked, said Melissa Cohn, regional vice president at William Raveis Mortgage. 'If you're downsizing from a one-bedroom to a studio, you have to think about lifestyle and happiness in your home,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store