Black Mental Health Expert Clears Up Why Cassie Stayed With Diddy Through the Alleged Abuse
As more details emerge from Cassie Ventura's testimony in the federal sex trafficking trial against Sean 'Diddy' Combs, many are finding it hard to fathom just how and why she endured his alleged abuse for so long. But while social media 'doctors' chime in with their own ideas, the experts actually have something to say about it all.
As we've been reporting, Ventura and Diddy first got involved nearly two decades ago after she signed to Bad Boy Records in 2006. In the years that followed, their dynamic turned from producer/artist to that of boyfriend/girlfriend—but took a turn for the worst when alleged 'freak-offs' were introduced in the early years of their relationship.
According to Ventura's 2023 lawsuit and recent court testimony, 'freak-offs' were events where she was allegedly expected, coerced and forced to perform sexual acts with other men at Combs' pleasure, as noted by The Root staffer Kalyn Womack. But over time, those freak-offs became more and more frequent and began to cause issues between Ventura and Diddy. Those issues allegedly escalated into physical violence, consistent beatings and assault, and even rape on several occasions, according Ventura's testimony.
Yet and still, she and the Bad Boy producer didn't officially break things off until 2018. Seeing that as the case and after hearing additional specifics about their case, folks on social media—both Black men and women—are questioning why Ventura stayed with Combs so long if things were really so bad.
Well, according Dr. La Keita D. Carter, PsyD, a Baltimore-based licensed psychologist and trauma specialist, she explained that the abusers manipulative ways and words; trauma bonds; and paralyzing fear are all key factors that play a large part in why survivors choose to stay when they shouldn't.
'Abusers erode their victim's self esteem and self worth. They create situations where the victim is solely reliant on them and then feed them the idea that others have left them or don't care about them,' she explained to The Root. 'Over time, the victim starts to believe these ideas—ideas like they can't leave or they don't have a choice or the abuser's behavior is evidence of true love.'
Dr. Carter also went on to explain how trauma bonds—a.ka. the cycle of abuse followed by intense love and reconciliation in a toxic relationship—often makes the abused person 'hooked' into an awful merry-go-round. As a result, it makes it difficult to disrupt the pattern because the 'reconciliation process leaves the victim with hope that things will change.'
Naturally after suffering so much violence, fear is also a major part of this conversation as Ventura herself explained several times in her testimony that she often complied with Diddy's desires so that she or her loved ones wouldn't have to face alleged retaliation at his hands. When it comes to abuse survivors in general, that fear of something as harmful as the pain they're already enduring or worse is strong enough to keep them stagnant and can discourage them from trying to get out of the situation.
'Up to 75% of domestic violence-related homicides happen after the victim leaves or attempts to leave, according to the CDC,' Dr. Carter explained. 'Survivors of abuse are most at risk of serious injury or death in the first few weeks to months after leaving. This is why safety planning is so critical. Telling someone to 'just leave' could be deadly advice.'
And let's be clear: Ventura did try to escape as we all saw from the viral elevator lobby footage from 2016. But as Dr. Carter put it, trying to get out safely and with your life in tact can prove to be a much taller task than it appears on the surface. So it would behoove a lot of people to have a bit more grace and understanding when it comes to matters of this nature.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Bangladesh opens trial of deposed ex-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina
DHAKA, Bangladesh (AP) — A special tribunal set up to try Bangladesh's ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina began proceedings Sunday by accepting the charges against humanity filed against her in connection with a mass uprising in which hundreds of students were killed last year. Accepting the charges, the Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal directed investigators to produce Hasina, a former home minister and a former police chief before the court on June 16. Hasina has been in exile in India since Aug. 5, 2023, while former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan is missing and possibly also was in India. Former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun has been arrested. Bangladesh sent a formal request to India to extradite Hasina in December. State-run Bangladesh Television broadcast the court proceedings live. In an investigation report submitted on May 12, the tribunal's investigators brought five allegations of crimes against humanity against Hasina and two others during the mass uprising in July-August last year. According to the charges, Hasina was directly responsible for ordering all state forces, her Awami League party and its associates to carry out actions that led to mass killings, injuries, targeted violence against women and children, the incineration of bodies, and denial of medical treatment to the wounded. Three days after Hasina's ouster, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over as the nation's interim leader. In February, the U.N. human rights office estimated that up to 1,400 people may have been killed in Bangladesh over three weeks in the crackdown on the student-led protests against Hasina, who ruled the country for 15 years.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bangladesh opens trial of deposed ex-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina
DHAKA, Bangladesh (AP) — A special tribunal set up to try Bangladesh's ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina began proceedings Sunday by accepting the charges against humanity filed against her in connection with a mass uprising in which hundreds of students were killed last year. Accepting the charges, the Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal directed investigators to produce Hasina, a former home minister and a former police chief before the court on June 16. Hasina has been in exile in India since Aug. 5, 2023, while former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan is missing and possibly also was in India. Former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun has been arrested. Bangladesh sent a formal request to India to extradite Hasina in December. State-run Bangladesh Television broadcast the court proceedings live. In an investigation report submitted on May 12, the tribunal's investigators brought five allegations of crimes against humanity against Hasina and two others during the mass uprising in July-August last year. According to the charges, Hasina was directly responsible for ordering all state forces, her Awami League party and its associates to carry out actions that led to mass killings, injuries, targeted violence against women and children, the incineration of bodies, and denial of medical treatment to the wounded. Three days after Hasina's ouster, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over as the nation's interim leader. In February, the U.N. human rights office estimated that up to 1,400 people may have been killed in Bangladesh over three weeks in the crackdown on the student-led protests against Hasina, who ruled the country for 15 years.

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NHS surgeon who compared Islam to Nazism struck off
An NHS surgeon, who claimed he had been discriminated against at work, has been struck off for anti-Islamic posts comparing the religion to Nazism. Dr Keyur Buch also shared a post on X that claimed '99.8 per cent of terrorists across the world are Muslims'. The surgeon, currently based in Ahmedabad, India, was initially suspended from the register for just four months over the 'racially and religiously hostile' posts. A review panel has now found that the surgeon had 'persistently failed' to show insight into his actions and decided to strike Dr Buch from the General Medical Council (GMC) register. The medical practitioners tribunal reviewing his case heard that Dr Buch qualified in India in 1987 before moving to the UK in 1995. He left the country in 2016 but has remained on the GMC register. In July 2022 he gave an interview to a UK-based Asian newspaper alleging that a colleague had once told him he would 'never hire a brown person' and that the NHS was 'institutionally racist'. He was first reported for his 'hostile' posts in September 2022 by a fellow doctor and two members of the public, shortly after they were published. Dr Buch was initially suspended for four months following a hearing in 2023. The suspension was then extended by a further 12 months in April 2024. The review panel has now decided to strike Dr Buch off entirely, saying: 'A sanction of erasure was the only sanction that would address Dr Buch's persistent failure to demonstrate insight. 'The tribunal was satisfied that there was a lack of meaningful engagement from Dr Buch, and he had failed to demonstrate adequate development of insight or any remediation in the 16 months since he was suspended.' The 2023 hearing was told that the medical professional had made several inappropriate posts on an X account under the name 'Dr Keyur Buch | Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon'. In one of his posts he said: 'Just like Nazism and Communism, I5lam is a supremacist violent cult that needs to be got rid of because it harms Mu5lims and nonMus1ims alike.' Dr Buch also used the hashtag '#IslamIsTheProblem', linked 'Muslim schools' with 'Islamic terrorists' and referred to the Prophet Muhammad as 'MohMad'. In another post the surgeon claimed there was an 'invasion' of Pakistani Muslims on Hindus in the UK. Screenshots of his social media posts were sent to the GMC by a doctor and two members of the public who said they 'incited hate towards Muslims'. Dr Buch told the tribunal he 'acknowledged the upset and hurt caused' by his posts and claimed they were 'provoked' by the Leicester riots taking place at the time. He said the unrest between British Muslims and Hindus in the Midlands city, sparked by a cricket match, was 'personal' because a temple he used to visit in Leicester was attacked. He also said his account had been 'hacked' and the posts were written by others. The 2023 panel found the 'offensive nature' of the surgeon's statements had 'undermined' the integrity of doctors. They suggested he could assist future reviews by showing that he had taken steps to 'better understand' equality and diversity. The panel said: 'The offensive nature of Dr Buch's social media posts, irrespective of whether he felt at the time that they were provoked by emotive national events, were made to a significant audience and could be directly linked to his profession as an orthopaedic surgeon. 'Doctors, in all aspects of their lives, are expected to act with integrity to ensure that public trust in the medical profession is maintained. 'Dr Buch's actions undermined that.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.