Claims Swirl Over Supposed Ukrainian Attack On Putin's Helicopter
There are conflicting claims that Russian President Vladimir Putin's helicopter came under attack from Ukraine while visiting a new nuclear power plant in the Kursk region.
A Russian commander said Putin's helicopter 'was at the epicenter of repelling a large-scale attack by Ukrainian Armed Forces drones during a visit to the Kursk region.' Ukrainian officials are pushing back against that claim, denying that any attack took place.
Ukraine tried to ATTACK Putin's helicopter mid-flight over KurskRussian Air Defense Division officer says Ukrainian drones attempted to swarm chopper flight pathRussian air defenses scrambled — worked perfectly and repelled the strike pic.twitter.com/BDmmrLMyvU
— RT (@RT_com) May 25, 2025
There is no dispute that Putin visited the new Kursk nuclear power plant on May 20. What happened while he was there is the center of controversy.
Russian President Vladimir Putin visits western Kursk region for first time since Russian forces ejected Ukrainian troops from area last month pic.twitter.com/GSrlHa8kTs
— TRT World Now (@TRTWorldNow) May 21, 2025
The Ukrainian Stratcom Center called the attack on Putin's helicopter 'a lie.'
'Pro-Kremlin media covering Putin's trip claimed that he moved through the region exclusively by car,' the Ukrainian Stratcom Center said on its Facebook page. 'Footage of the motorcade was shown on all federal TV channels. In addition…neither the Ministry of Defense, nor the Russian media and Telegram channels [reported] the attack of the UAV, which on scale would match the words of Dashkin.' That was a reference to Yuri Dashkin, commander of the air defense division, whose area of responsibility is the Kursk region. Dashkin on May 25 told the Russian RBC news outlet that during the president's visit, the Ukrainian military launched an ''unprecedented attack,' with air defense destroying 46 drones,' RBC reported.
'We simultaneously waged an anti-aircraft battle and ensured the safety of the president's helicopter in the air,' Dashkin said.
It is possible, however, that the helicopter was staged at a nearby airfield in case of an emergency.
Some Ukrainian media suggested that Dashkin's comments were an effort to bolster Putin's image as a combat commander.
'It is possible that all this is a lie to create a heroic halo for the 'bunker,'' asserted the Ukrainian CAPLIENKO_UKRAINE FIGHTS Telegram channel.
The War Zone cannot independently verify any of these claims regarding an attack on Putin's helicopter. However, there is no mention of it on Putin's official website, the Kremlin Telegram channel or the Russian Defense Ministry Telegram channel.
The back and forth over whether Putin's helicopter was attacked comes amid growing anger towards him from U.S. President Donald Trump over the course of the conflict. The American leader has expressed outrage on his social media channels over massive Russian attacks on Ukraine while he is trying to end the war.
'What Vladimir Putin doesn't realize is that if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD,' Trump said Tuesday morning on Truth Social. 'He's playing with fire!'
In a Sunday social media post, Trump called Putin 'crazy.'
'I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him,' Trump proclaimed on Truth Social. 'He has gone absolutely CRAZY! He is needlessly killing a lot of people, and I'm not just talking about soldiers. Missiles and drones are being shot into Cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever. I've always said that he wants ALL of Ukraine, not just a piece of it, and maybe that's proving to be right, but if he does, it will lead to the downfall of Russia! Likewise, President Zelenskyy is doing his Country no favors by talking the way he does. Everything out of his mouth causes problems, I don't like it, and it better stop…'
He expressed the same sentiment to reporters.
'I'm not happy with what Putin is doing,' Trump said. 'He's killing a lot of people and I don't know what the hell happened to Putin. I've always gotten along with him. But he's sending rockets into cities and I don't like it at all.'
Trump: "I'm not happy with what Putin is doing. He's killing a lot of people and I don't know what the hell happened to Putin. I've known him a long time … we're in the middle of talking and he's shooting rockets into Kyiv and other cities. I don't like it at all. I'm… pic.twitter.com/c5cd2YcGjJ
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 25, 2025
Meanwhile, Trump is 'seriously considering' lifting Biden-administration preclusions on the use of Western weapons two senior Western officials told the Kyiv Post on May 25.
'All the previously imposed restrictions – whether already eased or not – are currently under review as President [Trump] believes that the current status quo does not serve our common interests of bringing Russia to the [negotiation] table,' one official said without offering further details.
He is also contemplating new sanctions on Moscow, CNN reported.
'Options were drawn up in the past several weeks to apply new measures punishing Moscow, but so far, Trump has not approved them,' the network noted. 'The president said Sunday he would 'absolutely' consider new sanctions in the aftermath of a sustained missile and drone bombardment that left many dead.
The barrage was 'Russia's largest combined aerial attack since its full-scale invasion of February 2022,' BBC stated. 'At least 13 people were killed and dozens injured in Ukraine during the night between Saturday and Sunday after Russia fired 367 drones and missiles.'
In addition, between Sunday evening and Monday morning, the Russian army 'launched the largest number of drones against our cities and communities since the beginning of the full-scale war — 355 attack UAVs, mostly 'Shaheds,'' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated on X.
The BBC said 10 people were killed in that wave of attacks.
Our air defense forces and rescuers were working all night. The Russian army launched the largest number of drones against our cities and communities since the beginning of the full-scale war — 355 attack UAVs, mostly "Shaheds." There were also 9 cruise missiles. Sadly, there are… pic.twitter.com/5oXmv5zoy2
— Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) May 26, 2025
The Kremlin downplayed Trump's statements, suggesting he was merely frustrated by the pace of the ongoing peace talks.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday that those talks went 'hand in hand with an emotional overload of absolutely everyone and with emotional reactions.'
Putin, meanwhile, continued to claim Russia is the aggrieved party.
'Speaking on May 26 during a meeting with Russian business leaders, Putin echoed longstanding Kremlin narratives and suggested Russia was unfairly blamed for launching the war,' the Ukrainian United24 media outlet reported.
'Russia was forced to respond to what was happening in Ukraine and is being made out to be the guilty party, but Moscow did not organize the bloody coup of 2014,' Putin said.
In another blow to Trump's efforts, Russia's foreign minister Sergei Lavrov nixed his suggestion that negotiations be held at the Vatican, saying on May 23 Moscow 'has no plans for when or where the next meeting between the two nations will take place.'
Those talks are sputtering as each side conducts cross-border attacks.
Russia claims that between May 20 and May 23 that it shot down nearly 1,200 Ukrainian drones, including almost 800 inside Russia. Ukrainian officials say Kyiv was striking military targets.
'Ukraine conducted their most prolonged and intense drone attack on Russian regions following Vladimir Putin's refusal to agree to a ceasefire,' former Ukrainian presidential spokesperson Iuliua Mendel stated on X. 'The assault, which began on the evening of May 20 and continued nearly uninterrupted until the morning of May 23, targeted 15 Russian regions and occupied Crimea.'
All this comes as Russian forces are pushing deeper into eastern Ukraine and amassing tens of thousands of troops to attack the Sumy and Kharkiv regions. Exactly where the prospects of Trump's peace initiative stand isn't clear, but there are few to no indications that a breakthrough is close.
Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukrainian Air Force releases footage showing burning of downed Russian Su-35 fighter jet
The Air Force of Ukraine has released a video showing the downing of a Russian Su-35 fighter jet in Russiaʼs Kursk Oblast on 7 June. Source: Air Force of Ukraine on social media Details: The video shows the Russian fighter jet on fire. It is also stated that the Russians confirmed the loss of the fighter jet on a specialised Telegram channel, although they claim that the crew managed to survive. Background: On 7 June, a Russian Su-35 fighter jet was shot down in a successful operation by the Ukrainian Air Force in Russia's Kursk Oblast. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Graham wants to punish Russia with ‘bone-crushing' sanctions. It could backfire.
Sen. Lindsey Graham has pledged that his expansive sanctions bill would be 'bone crushing' for the Russian economy. But if enacted, the South Carolina Republican's proposal to impose 500 percent tariffs on any country that buys Russian energy would effectively cut the U.S. off from some of the world's largest economies — including allies in Europe. 'A 500 percent tariff is essentially a hard decoupling,' said Kevin Book, managing director of Clear View Energy Partners, an energy research firm. Graham appeared to acknowledge as much on Wednesday, when he proposed a broad carve-out for countries that provide aid to Ukraine. This exemption would spare the European Union, which continues to import almost 20 percent of its gas from Russia. But experts remain skeptical that the sky-high tariffs proposed in the Sanctioning Russia Act are in any way feasible. India and China buy roughly 70 percent of Russian energy exports, but several other countries that buy any oil, gas or uranium from Moscow — and aren't included in the carve-out — could also be exposed to tariffs under the bill. The United States, which is still reliant on imports of enriched uranium from Russia to fuel its nuclear reactors, could also run afoul of the bill. Edward Fishman, a senior researcher with the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, said countries in the crosshairs of the bill would struggle to halt their imports of Russian energy overnight. Tariffs of 500 percent on imports of goods made in China would send prices soaring, disrupt supply chains and could drive up U.S. unemployment to recessionary levels. Most likely, it would lead to a screeching halt in U.S. trade with China. 'It would hurt Americans quite a bit,' Fishman said. The legislation's goal, co-sponsored by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), is to starve Russia's war economy, which continues to earn hundreds of billions of dollars from energy exports. There is widespread support for the overall objective, with 82 senators signing on to Graham's bill so far, and growing support for a companion bill in the House. The bill is likely to change significantly as it moves through Congress and in consultations with the Trump administration, said Matt Zweig, senior policy director of FDD Action, a nonprofit advocacy organization affiliated with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. It may also take a long time. 'With sanctions legislation, you're also normally dealing with iterative processes where you would want to go through every nook and cranny,' Zweig said. Still, the widespread bipartisan support for the legislation suggests there is a high degree of support among lawmakers for tougher action on Russia. 'What Congress may be doing is pressuring the executive branch to act,' said Adam Smith, a partner at the law firm Gibson Dunn. 'There is a sense in the Senate that more sanctions on Russia need to be imposed, or ought to be imposed,' added Smith, who was a senior adviser to the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control during the Obama administration. Graham, the bill's most vocal Republican advocate, said as much in a meeting with reporters in Paris over the weekend, where he described the bill as 'one of the most draconian sanctions bills ever written.' 'The Senate is pissed that Russia is playing a game at our expense and the world's expense. And we are willing to do something we haven't been willing to do before — and that is go after people that have been helping Putin,' Graham said. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, dismissed concerns that the bill is too harsh. 'We need to make Putin understand he has to stop screwing around and come to the table. But we also need to follow it up and make clear we will be tough,' she said. Not everyone agrees. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has long been skeptical about the effectiveness of sanctions to change the behavior of U.S. adversaries, bashed the bill on Monday as 'literally the most ill-conceived bill I've ever seen in Washington,' he said. 'It would be a worldwide embargo on 36 countries.' Meanwhile, Russia and Ukraine have made little progress on peace talks. Officials from both countries met in Istanbul on Monday and agreed to a further prisoner swap, but failed to achieve any major breakthroughs. Graham and Blumenthal visited Ukraine, France and Germany during last week's congressional recess, where they discussed the sanctions bill, as well as efforts to push Russia to the negotiating table. The proposal has been welcomed by European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen, who met with Graham in Berlin on Monday. 'Pressure works, as the Kremlin understands nothing else,' Von der Leyen said in a statement. 'These steps, taken together with U.S. measures, would sharply increase the joint impact of our sanctions.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated Monday that the chamber could take up the legislation later this month. Republican senators have said they would like to secure the approval of the White House before moving forward. The proposed use of blanket tariffs to target countries that continue to do business with Russia's energy sector is novel and appears to be pitched to Trump's interests. On Tuesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump viewed sanctions as 'a tool in his toolbox,' but declined to comment about his position on the bill. Trump appeared to be inching closer toward supporting the bill in a post on Truth Social on Wednesday, which linked to an op-ed in The Washington Post supporting the legislation. Speaking in the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump indicated he wanted lawmakers to secure his approval before moving forward with the bill. 'They're waiting for me to decide on what to do,' he said, describing the legislation as a 'harsh bill.' The president has liberally wielded tariffs to advance his foreign policy agenda, but his implementation has been spotty. Wall Street has even adopted a trading strategy referencing Trump's capriciousness called TACO, which stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' Tariffs of 145 percent on China, imposed in April, lasted a month before being dramatically scaled back to make way for trade talks, which have so far failed to secure a breakthrough. As it stands, the bill includes some levers that Trump could pull to forestall the tariffs, requiring the president to make a formal determination that Russia is refusing to negotiate or has violated any future peace agreement. Nahal Toosi, Joshua Berlinger, Phelim Kine and Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Russian-backed paramilitary group assumes security role in Mali after Wagner pullout
The Africa Corps, a Kremlin-backed paramilitary force, announced it will maintain its presence in Mali following the recent departure of the Wagner mercenary group. The Africa Corps announced it will maintain its presence in Mali after Wagner's withdrawal. Wagner operated in Mali for over three years, reclaiming territories from Islamist militants. The Africa Corps aims to shift toward training local forces and supplying equipment. The Russian-backed Africa Corps has announced it will remain in Mali, following Wagner's decision to end its three-year mission fighting Islamist militants and begin withdrawing its forces. Wagner's involvement in Mali began after the country's military junta, which took power through two coups in 2020 and 2021, expelled French and United Nations troops who had been combating Islamist insurgents for nearly a decade. Wagner posted on social media that it had successfully reclaimed all of Mali's regional centers from Islamist forces, pushing them out and killing their commanders. Transition from Wagner to Africa Corps Following Wagner's exit, the Africa Corps was created with support from the Russian Defence Ministry after Wagner's founder, Yevgeny Prigozhin, and commander Dmitry Utkin led a failed mutiny against Russian army leadership and fled to Belarus, confirmed it would continue Russia's paramilitary presence in Mali. On its Telegram channel, the Africa Corps stated that Wagner's departure 'does not signify a loss of Russian influence,' adding, 'Russia does not lose ground, but on the contrary, continues to support Bamako now at a more fundamental level,' referring to Mali's capital city. Experts, including Ulf Laessing, head of the Sahel program at Germany's Konrad Adenauer Foundation, suggest this shift may signal a change in Russia's engagement from direct combat toward training local forces and providing equipment. Ongoing security challenges Despite the transition, Mali continues to face serious security threats. A series of recent attacks by Islamist insurgents reportedly killed more than 100 Malian soldiers and mercenaries. One bombing near Bamako targeted both Malian and Russian forces, illustrating the volatile situation. The insurgent group Jama'a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), active in the Sahel region, claimed responsibility for several recent attacks, further heightening the ongoing threat. The Malian defense ministry has not commented on the transition between Wagner and Africa Corps forces. Still, Russia's continuing paramilitary presence highlights the complex security landscape and Mali's reliance on foreign support to combat insurgency.
