Doug Ford has commanding lead with Ontario election just over a week away
With a little more than a week to go until election day, the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario holds a commanding 20-point lead over its nearest rival party.
A new Postmedia-Leger poll shows 48 per cent of Ontarians would cast a ballot for Doug Ford's PCs, while 28 per cent would vote for Bonnie Crombie's Liberals. Just 16 per cent say they will vote for the New Democrats led by Marit Stiles.
. The original election date was to be in June 2026.
Eighteen per cent of Ontarians say their impressions of Ford have improved since the start of the election and 16 per cent of Ontarians say the same thing about Crombie.
'In the snap election, in these unprecedented times, we've seen Ford's lead already,' said Jennifer McLeod Macey, senior vice-president, public affairs, with Leger. 'This really cements it.'
While 36 per cent say their impression of Ford has worsened over the course of the election campaign, he remains the leader that large minorities of Ontarians trust most to handle the issues facing the province. Ford's significant presence when it comes to dealing with the United States may have changed the trajectory of this election.
More than three times as many Ontarians (45 per cent) say they trust Ford to protect against U.S. aggression compared to the 13 per cent who say the same of Crombie.
'His response to that has really made him stand out, and maybe what would have happened in a snap election in other times would have been a different story,' said McLeod Macey.
Thirty-seven per cent of Ontarians identify Ford as the politician they trust most to grow the economy, compared to 16 per cent who say they most trust Crombie, and nine per cent who chose Stiles.
While Ford struggles on other fronts — he barely has the edge on Crombie on health care and education — he also enjoys significant leads on criminal justice and dealing with gridlock on Ontario's streets.
Ontario election 2025: Here's how to cast your vote on or before Feb. 27
Chris Selley: Doug Ford asks Ontarians to imagine the horrors of someone else being in charge
For Ontario voters, the single biggest issue going into the election is the cost of living, at 22 per cent, followed by trade with the United States at 11 per cent, which is tied with housing affordability. Other classic campaign issues, such as health care, education, public safety and climate change are priority issues for single-digit percentages of Ontarians, the polling shows.
'We do see that in tough economic times that social issues do decline. That particularly tends to be the case with things like climate change, the environment,' said McLeod Macey.
Overall, 33 per cent of Ontarians say they are satisfied with Ford's tenure as premier and will vote for him again. He was first elected in 2018. Thirty-six per cent, however, say they are dissatisfied and will vote for another party this time around.
There is one other wildcard at play: those who are unsure. Twelve per cent of those polled say they aren't sure who they'll vote for.
'So one thing I'm curious to see is what voter turnout will be on the day,' said McLeod Macey.
The PC's popularity is strongest in the Greater Toronto Area, with 58 per cent of Ontarians in that region saying they are leaning towards voting for Ford's party. At 40 per cent, the party's support is lowest in the northern part of the province. Crombie's Liberals are at their most popular in Metro Toronto, with 32-per-cent support, although this is still dwarfed by the 42 per cent in that area who say they'll be voting PC.
The NDP does best in the province's north, where 26 per cent say they'll cast a ballot for the party.
Ford's PCs are most popular, at 53 per cent, with those aged 55 and older. The party struggles comparatively among the younger cohort: 38 per cent of those between the ages of 18 and 34 say they will be voting PC.
That said, the PCs still have a fairly commanding lead across all age demographics. The Ontario Liberals have the support of 32 per cent of 18-to-34-year-olds, but that's still six points behind the PCs.
The polling was done between Feb. 14 and 16 using an online survey of 1,002 Ontario adults. The results have been weighted to ensure a representative sample of Ontario households. For comparison purposes, a probability sample of this size yields a margin of error no greater than plus or minus 3.09 per cent, 19 times out of 20.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
4 hours ago
- Business Wire
Ontario Unions to Picket Ford Fest in Solidarity with WSIB Strike
ETOBICOKE, Ontario--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Members of the Ontario Compensation Employees Union (OCEU/CUPE 1750), currently on strike, will be joined by the Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU/SEFPO), and other labour organizations today, June 13 th, at Ford Fest 2025 in Centennial Park, Etobicoke. The coordinated action comes as striking WSIB frontline staff enter over three weeks on the picket line, demanding fair wages, job security, and safer working conditions. With the Ford government continuing to ignore workers' calls and outsourcing Ontario jobs to the U.S., union solidarity is growing, and now it's going straight to the Premier's doorstep. Friday's picket action at Ford Fest aims to shine a spotlight on a broader crisis: the Ford government's pattern of attacking workers, undermining unions, and weakening the public services Ontarians rely on. Harry Goslin, President of OCEU/CUPE 1750 will join the Ontario Federal of Labour and unions across the province to demand action from the Government. Where: Centennial Park, 256 Centennial Park Rd, Etobicoke, ON M9C 5N3 When: Friday, June 13, 2025 5:00 p.m.- 9:00 p.m. 'While the Premier throws a party to celebrate his government, thousands of frontline public service workers are being disrespected, underpaid, and pushed to the brink,' said Harry Goslin, President of OCEU/CUPE 1750. 'We're here to remind Premier Doug Ford that public service workers keep this province running, and we won't be silent while he tears it down.' The picket line will be visible at Centennial Park. Media are invited to attend and speak with union leaders and members on-site. mb/cope491
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK civil servants revolt over ‘Israel's genocide'
British civil servants must stop helping Israel with 'potential war crimes' in Gaza, union bosses have demanded. The Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, which represents almost 200,000 civil servants across Whitehall, has advised members to 'stop all work within the civil service and its related areas which in any way potentially enables acts of genocide'. It has pledged to support civil servants who refuse to work on Israel and demanded that mandarins be given legal immunity for aiding potential 'war crimes'. Union chiefs want an urgent meeting with the Cabinet Office and have written to officials to 'seek assurances that members are protected from legal liability for any acts carried out by the state of Israel'. The move comes just days after about 300 Foreign Office officials were told to consider resigning after sending a letter to David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, warning against 'complicity' in Israel's actions. The letter cited the killing by Israeli forces of 15 aid workers in March and the blockade on aid into Gaza as examples of concerns. Sir Olly Robbins and Nick Dyer, two of the most senior mandarins in the Foreign Office, suggested that the complainants step down if they disagreed with the Government's policy. The response was said to have been met with fury in Whitehall, with one insider telling the BBC that there was a 'deep sense of disappointment that the space for challenge is being further shut down'. In a letter sent on Friday to Cat Little, the Cabinet permanent secretary, the PCS union said the Government's response to the concerns raised this week by civil servants was 'dismissive and inadequate'. It argued that the Government 'may be putting UK civil servants at risk of liability for crimes committed by the Israeli state and placing them in a position of conflict given their obligations under the civil service code'. Fran Heathcote, the general secretary of the PCS, said the union was 'extremely concerned that the Government continues to ignore our members' concerns that they may be held liable under international law for the war crimes being committed daily by the state of Israel'. Ministers' official line is that Israel is 'at risk' of breaching international law with its actions in Gaza, with 30 out of about 350 arms sales licences to Israel halted in September out of fear that the weapons may be used for war crimes. However, union bosses called on the Government to go further. Ms Heathcote said: 'Given the scale of the death toll and the depth of the destruction to Palestinian society in Gaza, this matter is urgent and government officials need to act quickly.' She argued that it was 'time for the UK Government to wake up and listen to its own workers'. Foreign Office bosses are said to back a 'healthy challenge' to policy, but have argued that it is up to civil servants to deliver the will of the Government. The PCS union has pledged to 'fully back any member facing any sort of disciplinary action for refusing to action or work on any arms export license to Israel'. A Foreign Office spokesman said this week that 'since day one, this Government has rigorously applied international law in relation to the war in Gaza' adding that it is 'the job of civil servants to deliver on the policies of the government of the day and to provide professional, impartial advice'. The Cabinet Office has been approached for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Ford's new energy plan for Ontario increases reliance on nuclear, fossil fuels
The Ford government is projecting a major shift toward nuclear power to meet rising electricity demand and support Ontario's transition to net-zero emissions by mid-century. Its newly released long-term Energy for Generations plan — billed as the province's first-ever integrated energy strategy — also shows an increased reliance on fossil fuels over the next decade, with emissions expected to rise before declining after 2030. The province describes the plan as 'a comprehensive roadmap to meet future energy needs, support new housing, and power the most competitive economy in the G7.' 'As energy demand soars, our plan leverages 'Made-In-Ontario' to build affordable, clean, and always reliable power, built by and for Canadians,' Ontario's Minister of Energy and Mines Stephen Lecce said in a statement. The plan will help the province meet growing electricity demand while achieving over 99 per cent zero-emissions electricity by 2050, he added. Critics say the plan misses key opportunities to scale-up renewables, puts energy affordability at risk and increases Ontario's dependence on foreign energy supplies. The plan projects total electricity production in 2050 to be just under 275 terawatt-hours (TWh), with nuclear making up the largest share at over 200 TWh. That means nuclear plants could supply more than 70 per cent of Ontario's electricity by 2050, up from about 50 per cent today. Currently, Ontario's nuclear fleet — Bruce, Darlington, and Pickering — provides 12,000 MW of capacity. The plan projects the province could need up to 17,800 MW of new nuclear power by 2050, equivalent to building five new Darlington stations. To support this buildout, the province says it is preparing new nuclear sites and has already begun early engagement with First Nation and local communities. A new nuclear technology panel will guide technology choices and project timelines, with input from Ontario Power Generation, Bruce Power, the Independent Electricity System Operator and government officials. The province says nuclear projects are complex and costly, and it plans to explore new ownership models and equity partnerships to attract private capital and help finance the expansion. It aims to attract investment from Canadian pension funds and institutional investors to 'keep more Canadian energy dollars working here at home,' the province said. Mark Winfield, professor at York University and co-chair of its Sustainable Energy Initiative, said the plan lacks a clear decision-making framework and basic accountability mechanisms. He said there is no process in place to evaluate whether the government's chosen energy path is the most affordable or lowest-risk for the province. 'There is no oversight or review process to assess whether this represents the least-cost or lowest-risk option for Ontario,' Winfield said. By 'review,' Winfield refers to independent assessments — such as those typically conducted by regulatory bodies or outside experts — that evaluate costs, risks, and alternatives before major infrastructure decisions are finalized. Winfield also questioned the long-term focus on nuclear. 'All of the proposed reactor technologies rely on enriched fuel that comes from the United States,' he said. 'This exposes Ontario to new energy security risks.' In recent months, the Ford government has committed billions to nuclear energy, announcing new builds and refurbishments it says will create tens of thousands of jobs. Earlier this year, it unveiled plans for a massive nuclear plant near Port Hope , projected to generate 10,000 megawatts — enough to power 10 million homes — though key details like costs and timelines remain undisclosed. Last week, the province introduced legislation to expand access to Ontario's public clean energy fund for nuclear projects. Industry groups welcomed Ontario's new energy plan, with major players praising the government's commitment to both nuclear power and natural gas. Enbridge Gas called the plan a 'clear affirmation' of the essential role natural gas will continue to play, citing its importance for affordability, grid stability and economic growth. The company said investments in gas infrastructure are foundational to Ontario's prosperity. The Organization of Canadian Nuclear Industries also applauded the plan, calling it a bold step toward clean energy leadership. The group highlighted Ontario's strong nuclear track record and said the proposed expansion — including large reactors and SMRs — positions the province to secure long-term clean energy supply. Aliénor Rougeot, climate and energy program manager at Environmental Defence, said Ontario's new energy plan could lead to higher household bills, more air pollution and increased reliance on the US fossil gas. While she welcomed the idea of a long-term, integrated approach, she argued that the plan should be replaced with one built on publicly shared modelling. To Rougeot, the most glaring problem is the plan's failure to prioritize wind and solar — Ontario's cheapest and cleanest energy sources. 'I kept flipping through the document, asking: Where are the renewables?' Rougeot said. The supply forecast is particularly troubling to her, as it shows Ontario having less wind and solar in 2050 than in 2030. She believes the refusal to give renewable energy a central role in the province's future grid will come at a high cost — both economically and environmentally. Wind and solar make up approximately nine per cent and two per cent of Ontario's current electricity generation, respectively. In its plan, the government says their role is expected to grow over time. Starting in 2025, nearly 3,000 megawatts of energy storage will be added to the grid. However, the plan argues that nuclear is more cost-effective and land-efficient than wind and solar. It claims that to generate the same amount of energy as a proposed 10,000 MW nuclear station at Wesleyville, Ontario would need roughly 100 times more land for solar and 500 times more land for wind. But new analysis suggests solar doesn't require large tracts of land — for example, more than half of Toronto's electricity needs could be met through rooftop and parking lot solar alone. A new report from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance argues that wind and solar could meet the same energy needs as the proposed Wesleyville nuclear station much faster and at far lower cost — potentially saving the province up to $19 billion annually. It highlights Ontario's untapped potential for offshore wind in the Great Lakes and large-scale solar at the Port Hope site. Another report warns that electricity from new nuclear could cost up to 3.6 times more than onshore wind, three times more than solar, and 1.7 times more than offshore wind. Lia Codrington, a senior analyst at the Pembina Institute, said the province's new energy plan represents a positive step toward long-term planning, noting that many jurisdictions around the world are already moving quickly toward clean energy and decarbonization. She viewed it as important for Ontario to follow that trend — and even potentially lead — by modernizing its electricity system. Codrington questioned the government's argument that land use limits renewable energy expansion. She said wind turbines allow for shared land use — such as farming — and solar panels can be installed on rooftops, parking lots, and other built environments. In her view, decisions about land use should reflect what Ontarians want in their communities when it comes to energy sources, not just technical comparisons in megawatts per square kilometre. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
