Delhi HC restrains pizzerias infringing Domino's trademark
On May 28, the court in its order said, 'It is prima facie evident that the marks of the defendants (15 entities) are deceptively similar and phonetically identical to the plaintiff no 1 (Domino's intellectual property (IP) holder corporation), erstwhile trade name Dominick's Pizza.' As the dispute involved edible products, the court noted, the threshold for establishing deceptive similarity was lower than for other products.
Justice Saurabh Banerjee was hearing a suit filed by the popular chain Domino's Pizza, a Delaware-based corporation, seeking an ad interim injunction on 15 entities from using deceptively similar marks, such as 'Domnic's Pizza, Dominic Pizza, Dominic's Pizza, Domnik Pizza and Daminic Pizza'.
New Delhi, Jun 20 (PTI) The Delhi High Court has restrained 15 pizzerias from infringing the popular Domino's trademark, underscoring 'disastrous consequences' on human health if it was allowed to continue.
'In essence, any confusion between such products, if allowed to continue, can lead to disastrous consequences on human health. Therefore, this court has to adopt a more cautious and stringent approach for judging the likelihood of confusion and to exercise greater care,' the order read.
Ruling in favour of the corporation in the interim, the court restrained the outlets and their agents from using the 'nearly identical or deceptively similar marks' till the next date of hearing on September 17.
The court also directed online food aggregators Zomato and Swiggy to de-list, take down and suspend the identical or similar listings of the 15 entities from their mobile application, website or any other platform.
In the plea, the corporation said Domino's was founded in the year 1960 in Michigan, USA, by Tom Monaghan and his brother James when the brothers purchased Dominick's Pizza, a pizza store owned by Dominick DiVarti in Ypsilanti, Michigan, and in 1965, after the brothers purchased two more restaurants, the name was changed from Dominick's to Domino's Pizza.
According to the plea, there were over 21,000 Domino's Pizza stores across all continents, and the corporation had been continuously and uninterruptedly using the trademarks Domino's and Domino's Pizza. PTI MNR MNR AMK AMK
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cat fur found in kids' vest sold as '100% sheepskin' in Australia; forensic tests expose mislabeled items; sparks outrage
This is a representative AI image A children's vest sold as "100 per cent Australian sheepskin or wool" has turned out to be actually made from domestic cat and rabbit fur, setting off alarm bells among animal rights groups calling for a statewide ban. The shocking discovery was confirmed through forensic testing by UK-based fibre analysis firm Microtex, which revealed that the vest, sold by fashion brand Suttons UGG at a Melbourne shopping centre—was actually made using the fur of domestic cats and rabbits, as per reports. The investigation, led by advocacy group Collective Fashion Justice in collaboration with the Animal Justice Party, also uncovered two beanies with pom-poms being sold at Queen Victoria Market, which were falsely labelled as 100% acrylic. Testing revealed they contained fox and raccoon dog fur. The findings have prompted animal welfare organisations and the Animal Justice Party to demand a complete prohibition on fur sales across the state. "Every Victorian would be shocked to know that they could go to the store and accidentally buy something made from cat fur, when they may have a cat at home themselves," Collective Fashion Justice founder Emma Hakansson said. In a statement to the ABC, Suttons UGG, which operates retail stores in Sydney and Melbourne, admitted the label on the vest was "wrong." A spokesperson said the manufacturer had described the material as a "kind of special fur," but the company could not "100 per cent confirm" whether it included cat fur. Earlier this year, the Australian Fashion Council implemented restrictions, prohibiting fur, wild-animal skins, and wild feathers from fashion shows. In 2004, the Australian government enacted legislation prohibiting cat and dog fur imports and exports. A Consumer Affairs Victoria study in 2020 examining fur product labelling revealed inaccuracies in all independently tested items. Following these findings, warnings were issued to fur retailers. According to Sky News, Georgie Purcell, the Animal Justice Party MP representing Northern Victoria, has requested authorities to implement a complete ban on fur sales saying, "Consumers could be out there buying this, and then going out and wearing domestic cats."
The Print
19 minutes ago
- The Print
Sun TV Network defends promoter Kalanithi, says all legal obligations met
According to reports, Dayanidhi has sent a legal notice to his brother and several others, accusing them of 'fraudulent practices' and 'misgovernance' in taking control of Sun TV after their father Murasoli Maran's death in 2003. Defending its promoter Kalanithi, Sun TV Network in a regulatory filing said the agreements between the two brothers had been 'duly vetted' by 'intermediaries' concerned before the company's public issue. New Delhi, Jun 20 (PTI) A day after reports emerged of former Union minister Dayanidhi Maran accusing his brother of 'fraudulent practices' and 'misgovernance', the elder sibling Kalanithi-run Sun TV on Friday said the division between the promoter family done 22 years back was in compliance with all legal obligations. Dayanidhi, who is also a Lok Sabha member from the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), has sought to restore the company's shareholding structure to its pre-September 2003 status. The board of Sun TV Network is led by Kalanithi as Executive Director and Chairperson. His daughter Kavya Kalanithi Maran is also on the south-based broadcaster board. Kalanithi, as a promoter, owns 75 per cent shareholding in Sun TV Network. On Friday, Sun TV Network, in its regulatory filing said, 'The alleged matter dates back to 22 years when the company was a closely held private limited company.' Defending the promoter, it further stated, 'Statements allegedly made in the articles are incorrect, misleading, speculating, defamatory and not supported by facts or law'. 'We wish to inform that all acts have been done in accordance with legal obligations and the same had been duly vetted by concerned intermediaries before the public issue of the company,' it said. Moreover, Sun TV Network also said the media reports claiming a rift between the promoter Maran brothers 'does not have any bearing on the business of the company or its day-to-day functioning'. Sun TV Network also clarified that it is a 'family matter of the promoter' and is 'purely personal in nature'. Besides Kalanithi, financial institutions, including mutual funds and insurance companies, own 10.46 per cent of the shareholding of Sun TV and 6.87 per cent by the foreign portfolio investors. Chennai-based Sun TV Network is among India's leading media conglomerates, having 37 television channels in seven languages, with a reach of more than 140 million households in India. Besides, it also owns Sun Direct, a DTH (direct-to-home) platform and operates 69 FM radio stations under the brand names — Suryan FM, RED FM and Magic FM. It also operates three daily newspapers and six magazines. In addition, Sun TV Network owns the Sunrisers Hyderabad franchise of the Indian Premier League and Sunrisers Eastern Cape of Cricket South Africa's T20 League. For the 2024-25 financial year, the network's total consolidated income was Rs 4,712.60 crore, down 1.55 per cent. Its profit after tax was down 11.53 per cent to Rs 1,703.64 crore, against Rs 1,925.80 crore a year earlier. PTI KRH TRB This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Crack in the case: 280,000 eggs vanish from top US producer — then a bizarre ransom note shocks investigators
The Great Egg Heist: How 280,000 Eggs Vanished in a $100,000 Scam- A bizarre egg theft has stunned authorities, leaving one big question: how did 280,000 eggs—worth nearly $100,000—disappear from a Maryland farm without a trace? What began as a routine delivery ended with a criminal mystery, potential corporate controversy, and the involvement of America's largest egg producer—Cal-Maine Foods. How did 280,000 eggs just vanish from a Cal-Maine farm? On April 11, 2025, a truck rolled into Warwick, Maryland, to pick up 280,000 large and extra-large brown eggs from a Cal-Maine farm. The shipment was headed to Florida. Everything seemed normal—until it wasn't. Five days later, the eggs never arrived. When the Florida-based freight broker contacted the farm to confirm delivery, they were met with silence and confusion. The shipping documents were legitimate, but something didn't add up. The trucker listed on the paperwork wasn't the one who picked up the eggs. That's when the real drama began. In April 2025, a routine shipment of brown eggs was scheduled to be delivered from Maryland to Florida by a freight broker contracted with Cal-Maine Foods. But instead of arriving at its final destination, the shipment was rerouted to Staten Island, where it vanished without a trace. Live Events The shipment, which included 18 pallets of large and extra-large brown eggs, never reached the intended buyer. Who is behind the egg heist? According to law enforcement and industry insiders, the scam was part of an elaborate freight fraud operation . Here's how it unfolded: A con artist using the name "Bernardo" posed as a legitimate freight broker on a trucking platform. He hijacked the identity of a real trucking company to appear credible. The driver assigned to pick up the load had no idea he was delivering the shipment to the wrong location. Once the eggs were delivered to an unknown facility in Staten Island, the fraudster sent a bizarre ransom note demanding $7,500 through Zelle or wire transfer for the 'safe return' of the stolen eggs. Investigators believe the trucker was duped , not complicit, and authorities are still searching for the real 'Bernardo,' who remains at large. What is Cal-Maine saying about the theft? Cal-Maine has confirmed the disappearance of the egg shipment and is cooperating with federal authorities. However, the company is already facing scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Justice , which is investigating potential anti-competitive practices and pricing manipulation. Lawmakers are now weighing legislation that could cut federal subsidies to large egg producers like Cal-Maine if they are found to engage in market exploitation. Who is Cal-Maine foods and why does this matter? Cal-Maine Foods is the nation's largest egg supplier, producing more than 13 billion eggs each year. They supply to major retailers including Walmart, Costco, and various house brands like Eggland's Best and Land O'Lakes. Roughly one in five eggs sold in the U.S. comes from Cal-Maine. The stolen eggs were part of their recent $110 million expansion in Maryland, where they acquired 4,000 acres and 4.7 million hens from ISE America in 2024. Despite this, Cal-Maine remained quiet after the theft—refusing interviews and offering no public statement. Could this be linked to soaring egg prices and public outrage? In recent years, egg prices have surged due to outbreaks of bird flu and tight supply. At one point, federal agents were seizing eggs more often than drugs at the U.S. border. In March 2023, consumers were paying over $6–$10 per dozen. Meanwhile, Cal-Maine—who didn't lose any hens to bird flu—reported quarterly profits 169 times higher than the year before. Farmers and lawmakers have accused the company of price gouging. Angela Huffman, co-founder of Farm Action, even sent a formal complaint to the FTC and DOJ, asking them to investigate. By April 2025, the Justice Department confirmed it had launched an antitrust investigation into Cal-Maine and other major egg producers. Three days after Cal-Maine posted record profits and executives sold off millions in shares—280,000 eggs vanished. Was the egg heist an inside job or organized scam? Detective William Muller of Cecil County Sheriff's Office took over the case. Working with the freight broker, Minh Dang, investigators learned that the eggs had been picked up by someone posing as a legitimate trucker. The job had been posted on DAT, a major freight matching site. The thief, calling himself 'Bernardo,' passed all standard security checks. But the truck wash receipt pointed to a different name. Dang's calls were ignored—until one reply came in: 'You need to zelle or wire $7,500 if you want your eggs.' Detectives now suspect a freight fraud operation where criminals impersonate truckers to steal valuable goods. It's a growing trend in the logistics industry. But eggs—fragile and time-sensitive—were never a common target until prices exploded. What happened to the eggs after staten island? The hired trucker, who had no idea he was involved in a scam, followed orders and delivered the cargo—not to Florida, but to a random parking lot in Staten Island. There, a temporary loading dock was set up. He fell asleep in his cab and woke up to find the eggs—and the people—gone. Authorities believe the eggs were offloaded and likely sold to small grocery stores and bodegas in New York City. A local bagel shop owner joked he would've welcomed cheap eggs but was never approached. The investigation hit a dead end, with the scammer—still known only as 'Bernardo'—remaining at large. Why is cargo theft on the rise in 2025? The egg heist highlights a growing trend in organized cargo theft, especially of high-value consumer staples. Industry reports show a 35% increase in food and beverage cargo thefts in the U.S. since 2023. The reason? Surging food prices, labor shortages, and weak digital security in logistics systems have created the perfect storm. Eggs, in particular, have become a hot commodity. Prices soared in early 2025 after a severe avian flu outbreak, pushing wholesale egg prices up by nearly 28% year-over-year. Cal-Maine, which controls roughly 20% of the U.S. egg market, has come under fire for alleged price-gouging. Is this just the beginning of more food cargo thefts? Experts say freight fraud, especially involving perishable goods, is on the rise. The sharp increase in egg value made them a black-market commodity. Organized crime rings have adapted quickly, using phishing, stolen identities, and insider information to intercept shipments. In the case of Cal-Maine's heist, all signs point to a well-planned operation. The motive? It could've been financial, or even symbolic—a rebellious strike against what some see as corporate greed. Detective Muller believes price pressure, public frustration, and poor oversight created the perfect storm for a crime like this. What's next for cal-maine, the justice department, and America's egg supply? The egg market remains under scrutiny. Average carton prices are still 69% higher than a year ago, though they've dropped sharply since news of the DOJ investigation surfaced. A new bill introduced in Congress seeks to block federal relief funds from going to large egg corporations with record profits. Cal-Maine, for its part, denies all wrongdoing and says it's simply a 'price taker' in a complex supply chain. Angela Huffman, now back on her Ohio farm, says she's still watching the story unfold closely. 'It's about more than eggs,' she says. 'It's about fairness.' As for the Maryland farm, workers are beefing up their security—just in case the bunny, or someone much worse, tries again. FAQs: Q1: What is the Great Egg Heist involving Cal-Maine Foods? A: It's the theft of 280,000 eggs worth $100,000 from a Maryland farm through a freight scam. Q2: Why is Cal-Maine under investigation by the DOJ? A: The DOJ is investigating Cal-Maine for alleged price gouging and antitrust violations in the egg market.
