logo
Indigenous and climate advocates team up to take on global energy company and protect rock art

Indigenous and climate advocates team up to take on global energy company and protect rock art

Daily Mail​6 days ago

A bid to compel the government to consider a heritage application to protect Indigenous rock art is going to court as three environmental activists declare they 'successfully hoaxed' Woodside.
The preliminary hearing follows Environment Minister Murray Watt's interim approval of Woodside's North West Shelf extension until 2070, a controversial gas project in Western Australia.
The call has flared tensions, with environmental and Indigenous groups arguing it will slow efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions and have a ruinous effect on nearby ancient petroglyphs.
Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper said she was thrilled the case against the newly appointed environment minister was moving forward without further delays.
'It's rude to have someone waiting for such a long time,' the Save our Songlines co-founder said outside the Federal Court in Sydney.
The court determined Ms Cooper's case would be heard in the week of July 14.
Senator Watt attached heritage and air quality conditions to the approval and those are yet to be formally agreed to by the Australian energy giant.
Ms Cooper said the North West Shelf and other industrial developments at Woodside's Burrup Hub posed risks to the rock art - concerns and evidence laid out in full in a cultural heritage assessment the minister is yet to consider.
The Burrup Peninsula, in WA's Pilbara region and known as Murujuga to traditional owners, contains some of the world's largest and oldest collection of petroglyphs.
The 'section 10' heritage application was originally lodged in early 2022.
'I am furious that the minister would make a decision to lock in ongoing and irreversible damage to my country before addressing my application,' Ms Cooper said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the conditions attached to the pending approval of the North West Shelf extension would address concerns about the rock art.
'The local Aboriginal corporation there, I've met with them in the past, they're very supportive of industry,' he told ABC radio on Friday.
'They want to make sure there's protection, but they support those jobs and that economic activity.'
In a separate case, three protesters were fined $10,000 each after targeting a Woodside annual general meeting with stench gas and flares.
Disrupt Burrup Hub's Gerard Mazza, Jesse Noakes and Tahlia Stolarski pleaded guilty to charges laid over their protest at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre in April 2023.
'Today we were fined for attempting to create false belief - in other words, we pranked Woodside,' Ms Stolarski told supporters outside Perth District Court after the verdict.
'We are guilty of pulling off a highly successful hoax.
'One day, perhaps Woodside and the WA government will be pulled before a court like this one (and) be charged with much more serious crimes, and their victims will be future generations and all life on earth.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Monash staff say Woodside-backed climate conference highlights concerns about energy giant partnership
Monash staff say Woodside-backed climate conference highlights concerns about energy giant partnership

The Guardian

time12 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Monash staff say Woodside-backed climate conference highlights concerns about energy giant partnership

Monash University is under fire for an event at its Italian campus jointly organised with Woodside Energy, as staff criticise the institution for hosting 'shadowy conferences paid for by fossil fuel corporations' and a lack of transparency around the relationship. Monash co-hosted a 'climate change and energy transition' conference with the gas giant at the university's Prato campus in June 2024. The conference website, no longer directly available but accessible via the Wayback Machine, shows speakers were invited to submit papers on 'the role of climate activism/nimbyism' in 'thwarting emissions reductions' and how 'activism', 'lawfare' and 'cancel culture' were harmful to the energy transition. Woodside and Monash's current partnership, in place since 2019, gives the company naming rights to a building at one of the university's Melbourne campuses. The university is one of a number of leading Australian institutions criticised by climate activists for accepting sponsorship from Australia's biggest oil and gas company. Lincoln Turner, a senior lecturer in the School of Physics and Astronomy and part of Stop Woodside Monash, a group of staff and students campaigning to end the partnership, said Woodside was 'not even pretending' to transition to clean energy and was instead 'doubling down on oil and gas'. 'The university should not be continuing this relationship,' he said. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Woodside acted as partner and co-host for the Italian conference, and provided travel grants to some staff and students to attend. Three Woodside employees, including its head of partnerships, were on the conference organising committee, and two attended. Tim Wilson – then a former Coalition MP, who went on to defeat independent Zoe Daniel and reclaim the seat of Goldstein at last month's federal election, was a keynote speaker. According to Monash students and staff, the principal site page for the conference was removed soon after the event. Turner said it was 'highly unusual for a conference to apparently be 'covered up', with the website deleted and no trace of papers presented to be found, a matter of weeks after the conference concluded'. He said Stop Woodside Monash had struggled to get answers from university management about the details of its arrangement with Woodside. Astrophysicist Simon Campbell, also involved with the group, agreed it appeared the conference had been 'deliberately hidden or covered up, since to take a website offline requires someone to actively do that'. The Stop Woodside Monash campaign is backed by the university's student association and the National Tertiary Education Union. Monash branch president, Ben Eltham, said the union had 'deep concerns about the erosion of academic freedom in shadowy conferences paid for by fossil fuel corporations', particularly at a university he credited with a strong track record on climate and environmental issues. 'Once industry dictates the topics and framing of academic discourse, it's no longer engagement – it's simply PR,' Eltham said. A Woodside spokesperson said its contribution to the conference was funded through its pre-existing partnership agreement with Monash and that the speaker program had been collectively decided by the organising committee. 'Central to the conference was discussion on how climate change policies interact with economics, energy security, social policy and governance,' the spokesperson said. 'The conference underscored the need for a holistic approach that embraces diverse perspectives and solutions. 'It also highlighted the need for collaboration among academia, industry and government to overcome political polarisation and ensure inclusive decision-making processes. 'By fostering dialogue and knowledge exchange, the conference aimed to pave the way for more effective and sustainable solutions to the climate crisis.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Monash did not respond to detailed questions from Guardian Australia about the conference or the university's ongoing relationship to Woodside, but a spokesperson said the partnership is up for review this year. The university said, however, that it supports 'Woodside's transition to net zero by 2050' and is 'working to support Woodside to lead in producing, transporting and utilising hydrogen, ammonia and other fossil fuel substitutes at the scales required to transition to a net zero carbon future'. Woodside is also pursuing new and extended fossil fuel developments. In late May the federal government said it planned to approve an extension to the working life of the North West Shelf gas processing facility on the Burrup peninsula in northern Western Australia until 2070. The company plans to develop the $16bn Scarborough gas field and the $30bn Browse basin development to feed the facility for decades. Guardian Australia spoke to several staff, including some not involved with Stop Woodside Monash, who did not wish to be named for fear of professional retaliation or because they know researchers involved in the partnership. They said they were concerned about a lack of transparency from university leadership, risks to academic independence, the politicisation of the academy, and harm to Monash's reputation for work in areas including climate, environment and ecology. 'They [the university] are treating us like idiots, basically,' one said. John Cook, a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne who studies greenwashing, and a former academic at Monash, described such partnership arrangements as a 'much more insidious form of misinformation'. 'One way companies greenwash themselves is through association with universities like Monash,' Cook said. 'That's why [Woodside are] doing it, for the halo effect they're getting for being part of Monash.'

WA senator Dorinda Cox accuses Greens of being ‘deeply racist' and says ‘I am not a bully'
WA senator Dorinda Cox accuses Greens of being ‘deeply racist' and says ‘I am not a bully'

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

WA senator Dorinda Cox accuses Greens of being ‘deeply racist' and says ‘I am not a bully'

The former Greens senator Dorinda Cox has accused the Greens of being 'deeply racist' and insisted that she has never been a bully. Cox, a Noongar Yamatji woman and Western Australian senator, announced last Monday she had defected to Labor, saying her views were more closely aligned with Labor than the Greens. In a resignation letter sent to Greens leader Larissa Waters' office on Tuesday night, Cox claimed the party had 'cultural problems they refuse to acknowledge or address' and that she had experienced an 'unremitting campaign of bullying and dishonest claims'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'I have seen and survived trauma, discrimination and harassment in previous work environments. I have seen the impact of psycho social violence on my family and my community. I am not, and have never been, a bully. I do not perpetrate it,' she said. Cox has been the subject of a number of workplace behaviour complaints, as first reported by the Nine newspapers last October. At the time, the WA senator apologised for 'the distress this may have caused' but said there had been 'significant missing context' in the reports of bullying allegations within her office. Cox said in her letter that at the time she resigned, there were no grievances pending against her in the party's conflict resolution process, and none had been put to her during the period she was a senator. 'The Greens failed me as its last First Nations MP, and continue to fail First Nations people,' Cox wrote. 'In my experience, the Greens tolerate a culture that permits violence against First Nations women within its structures. In this respect, the party is deeply racist. 'Instead of dealing with its toxic culture, the Greens sought to shut me down. The Greens failed in their duty of care for my staff and me, and disregarded the reported and obvious impact of what was occurring.' Cox accused the federal and Western Australian Greens' leadership for embracing 'untrue' claims and amplifying them. The WA Greens announced an external inquiry into grievances it received against Cox in mid-January by former staff members within the party after the allegations were publicly reported. The inquiry has now ceased. The WA Greens said 'the co-convenors of Greens (WA) went to great lengths to ensure the process was culturally safe and delivered due process to all parties'. An Australian Greens spokesperson said the claims were 'disappointing' and ignored the 'substantive work undertaken by the party to find a resolution to the complaints made both by and against Senator Cox, and to address the breakdown in her relationship with Greens' First Nations members'. 'As the IPSC [Independent Parliamentary Standards Committee] and PWSS [Parliamentary Workplace Support Service] are the bodies created by Parliament to address complaints from staff, they can continue to investigate ongoing matters. This is unchanged by the senator's decision to move to a party that continues to destroy First Nations cultural history through approving coal and gas projects.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Anthony Albanese was asked about historical bullying complaints against Cox last Monday. The prime minister said Labor had 'examined everything that had been considered in the past' and felt that the 'issues were dealt with appropriately'. In October 2024, Cox said she took responsibility for 'any shortcomings' in her office and apologised for any distress that may have been caused but said there had been 'significant missing context' in the reports of bullying allegations within her office. Cox said she had an 'immense amount of respect and gratitude to my team who prepare and support me for the work I undertake' and that she had 'always taken a proactive approach to staff wellbeing, including my own' and had undertaken executive coaching and mentoring from former MPs. Cox's former colleague, Lidia Thorpe, revealed last week she was one of the people to complain to the parliamentary watchdog about Cox, disputing Albanese's claim that allegations about Cox had been 'dealt with'. Thorpe, a former Greens senator who is now independent, said she raised a complaint against Cox in late 2022 to the Greens' leader's office and PWSS. Thorpe formally submitted the complaint to the PWSS in March 2023. Thorpe said on Wednesday her case remained unresolved because Cox declined to attend a mediation. Thorpe, a Gunnai, Gunditjmara and Djab Wurrung senator, told ABC on Wednesday morning she had also experienced racism in the Greens. 'There's a lot of work that the Greens and many other organisations need to do to stamp [racism] out, particularly the parliament of this country,' she said.

Neither glib lines nor warm thoughts can hide the cynicism of Labor's North West Shelf decision
Neither glib lines nor warm thoughts can hide the cynicism of Labor's North West Shelf decision

The Guardian

time2 days ago

  • The Guardian

Neither glib lines nor warm thoughts can hide the cynicism of Labor's North West Shelf decision

Fans of naked political cynicism have had plenty to cheer of late. Those hoping for something more from their elected leaders – a bit of principle and coherency, say – have had no shortage of reasons to lament what Michael Stipe once called the downhill slide into abysmal. In Australia, there is cynicism right through the Albanese government's proposed approval of a 45-year life extension for one of the world's biggest gas developments. The 28 May announcement that Labor planned to greenlight the North West Shelf liquified natural gas (LNG) project, on the Burrup Hub in northern Western Australia, to run until 2070 came just 15 days after Murray Watt was sworn in as environment minister. The rapid turnaround suggests either departmental advice backing the decision was waiting for him when he arrived, or he digested it particularly quickly. The advice hadn't been available a few weeks earlier, when Watt's predecessor, Tanya Plibersek, delayed the decision until just beyond the election, saying officials needed more time. It is tempting to speculate what might have happened had the extension been announced prior to 3 May. Given the scale of Labor's victory, the impact may have been around the margins. It might have made things even tighter in Fremantle, where a community independent who ran hard against the extension, Kate Hulett, gave Labor's Josh Wilson a scare. It may have helped the Greens hang on in Melbourne and Brisbane, and added fuel to other climate-focused independent campaigns. We'll never know. What we do know is the North West Shelf extension is backed not just by the minister, but the prime minister and cabinet – and there was nothing particularly surprising about where they landed. It was only a year ago that the resources minister, Madeleine King, released a 'future gas strategy' that – for reasons not fully explained – assumed greater ongoing demand for the fossil fuel than any scenario proposed by the International Energy Agency, and declared new sources of the fossil fuel would be needed 'to 2050 and beyond'. Even with this factored in, the language Anthony Albanese used when asked about the decision was striking in its dismissiveness. His line varied a little depending on when you caught him, but included gas being needed for the Tomago aluminium smelter in New South Wales and to 'firm up' renewable energy in electricity grids on the east and west coasts. This was mostly dissembling, and nonsense. For now, at least, no fuel from the North West Shelf is used in the east. Only a fraction is directed to power plants in Perth's electricity grid, which requires relatively little gas and has other sources to draw from. Nearly all the gas from the Burrup Hub is shipped overseas or used on site during production. Albanese also justified decades-long gas expansion by saying Australia's 2050 target set was 'net zero, not zero' and 'you don't change a transition through warm thoughts, you do it through a concrete proposal'. True enough, if your goal is just to get through a press conference unscathed. But the former is a line most usually rolled out by people arguing against the need to act rapidly on climate – not a club Albanese would usually want to align himself with. The latter might be better saved for when you actually have a plan to reach net zero emissions across the economy. His government hasn't released one yet. It reinforces a perception that the prime minister's commitment to the climate crisis is too often built on the idea that being better than the Coalition – which went to the election promising nothing to address the climate crisis for at least the next decade and a long-term nuclear pledge that didn't add up – is enough. But that's not how it works. Labor did take strides on climate in the last term. Chris Bowen's renewable energy underwriting program – the capacity investment scheme – will help drive the construction of large-scale solar, wind and batteries needed to help replace creaky old coal plants. The parliament passed a long-promised vehicle efficiency standard to help clean up emissions from most new cars. A Future Made in Australia bill introduced by the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, offers billions in tax credits for green industries. A subsidy for household batteries is on the way. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion But national greenhouse gas emissions are not coming down at anything like the pace required. Last year they didn't come down at all. And there is an equally compelling list of policy areas that have not been addressed. Two stand out. The first is the reliance on often questionable carbon offsets that the owners of major industrial facilities can buy in lieu of making direct emissions cuts. Experts advise offsets cannot be used to justify expanding fossil fuel use if the world is going to limit climate breakdown. Instead, nature and other projects that draw down CO2 from the atmosphere will need to complement deep on-site cuts in fossil pollution. That isn't happening yet. The second is the unwillingness to come to grips with the impact of Australia's near world-leading fossil fuel exports. On this, the country needs more than simple lines. It's true that it can't fix the problem alone, and the answer is not as simple as turning off the fossil fuel tap. It's equally true that if the world is going to come to grips with the crisis, exporters and importers have to work together as rapidly as possible to find new solutions. Would anyone suggest Australia is taking this responsibility as seriously as it could? Labor has approved about 30 fossil fuel developments and expansions since it was elected in 2022. Choosing another path would need a whole-of-government response that prioritises the climate crisis in decision-making. It means leadership from the top in tackling what getting to net zero actually means. Albanese's public comments since the election have been running in the opposite direction. Meanwhile, Australia has been hit by simultaneous devastating drought and floods in neighbouring states. An unprecedented marine heatwave around the country has engulfed an area five times the size of the continent. It has contributed to havoc across the region, including a massive toxic algal bloom in South Australia and unprecedented damage to WA coral reef ecosystems that scientists have described as astounding and heart-breaking. Researchers say the 'sleeping giant' of Antarctica has awoken and is showing signs of abrupt changes that could affect us all. The World Meteorological Organization says the world is racing towards breaking temperature goals set out in the 2015 Paris climate agreement much faster than expected. Neither glib lines nor warm thoughts will help much in responding to these. Serious concrete proposals – both on across-the-board emissions cuts and adapting to what we're living through – are what's needed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store