&w=3840&q=100)
COAI urges equal cybersecurity rules for telcos, OTT communication apps
Industry body COAI on Tuesday said similar cybersecurity and regulatory rules should govern players, be it telecom operators or OTT communication applications.
In a statement on the 'need to address spam calls and messages', the association argued that for a number issued by a telco to a subscriber, the operator takes the onus and responsibility and if required, it can provide all assistance to enforcement agencies.
"However, in this same example, there could be instances whereby an OTT Communication Application used on the same number, may be utilised in another handset of the user, carried beyond the limits of a city/state, and may be used for illegal purposes.
"Here again, while the telecom number can only be traced to the city where the mobile is residing, there are no ways to trace the activities of the OTT Communication App which was initially issued on the mobile number, but is now running off a separate handset, while the SIM is on a different handset," said Cellular Operators' Association of India (COAI) - whose members include Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea.
The association highlighted the issue of the app and SIM not being tightly bound together after the installation of the said app.
"COAI feels that the cybersecurity measures need to be reinforced with clear outlines on the purpose, which is to free the people of such unwanted spam/fraud calls and messages to the maximum extent possible. For the same purpose, it may be judicious that similar cybersecurity and regulatory rules govern all the necessary players, such as TSPs or OTT Communication Applications," it said.
This can be the only way to provide relief to the people from such menace, COAI added.
It also drew attention to the issue of 'steganography' or the practice of concealing messages or information within other messages or objects, saying this makes the presence of the hidden message difficult to detect, thereby encouraging fraud.
"In this way, attackers can embed malicious code or scripts within seemingly harmless files, such as images or documents, to infect systems. This is a serious issue which needs to be looked at," COAI said.
COAI welcomed the decision of MeitY (IT Ministry) to take the lead to engage with stakeholders to tackle spam and scams from Over-The-Top (OTT) platforms, as conveyed during the meeting of the Joint Committee of Regulators (JCoR).
"This action by MeitY, apparently recognises the trend of the nuisance of Spam and Scam Calls increasingly shifting to the OTT platforms, especially with the robust measures being undertaken for Unsolicited Commercial Communications (UCC) by DoT along with the Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) over the telecom networks," SP Kochhar, Director General, COAI said.
Kochhar added: "Government has now given indication that applications running over the networks need to be controlled by the respective line ministries, rather than appointing the blame and further consequences like penalties, etc. to the TSPs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
UNESCO, MeitY launch exercise to assess India's AI readiness
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), the ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY), and law firm Ikigai Law (as the implementing partner) have launched a diagnostic exercise to assess India's artificial intelligence (AI) readiness. The exercise will involve UNESCO's AI Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM), a multi-dimensional tool aligned with the global standards set per the UN agency's 2021 recommendation on the Ethics of AI. The RAM, an extensive questionnaire, will assess India's AI preparedness in legal, socio-cultural, scientific and educational, economic, and technical/infrastructure aspects. Five consultations, each featuring breakout sessions on AI ethics, have been held over seven months as part of the process. A final stakeholder consultation was held in Delhi on Tuesday. People familiar with the matter said participants highlighted the lack of a unified data-sharing policy across states, the Centre, and private players, the lack of data interoperability, and the importance of being cautious with AI outputs. There was consensus that AI cannot function independently of intellectual property. A person aware of the discussions said models such as ChatGPT blur the lines between public domain and copyrighted material, prompting calls to revisit copyright law designed for the print era. The exercise will culminate in a report highlighting what is working, what is missing, and what can be done better by the year-end. 'The report will help us outline a strategy towards a safe, trustworthy, and responsible AI,' said MeitY additional secretary and India AI Mission CEO Abhishek Singh. He added that the exercise is meant to promote a pro-innovation approach with light-touch regulation focused on preventing user harm. Singh said four Indian startups have been selected to build foundation models tailored to local needs. He cited efforts to boost compute capacity to 34,000 GPUs and expand access to datasets through the AI Kosha platform. Ten countries have completed RAM reports. The assessment is underway in 72 others to identify gaps and opportunities in AI readiness, said UNESCO's Eunsong Kim. 'India is quite a unique story in the RAM conversation, because it is vast and diverse. It is also extremely vibrant in the AI ecosystem,' said Kim. Kim explained how the RAM reports benefited other nations, citing Chile's case, where the exercise improved cybersecurity, data protection, and digital policy. The process led to an AI task force and a national AI action plan in Indonesia, which is creating its RAM report. Experts cautioned that India's unique social and cultural complexities demand a deeper, more localised understanding, even as the RAM exercise offers a structured global framework. 'I do not think we fully understand the socio-economic impact AI will have on a country like India,' said Indian Institute of Technology Madras Centre for Responsible AI head B Ravindran. 'We talk about bias mitigation and explainability, often through a Western lens. But bias in India is far more complex than in the US. It is not just black and white, but every shade in between. And we have not systematically recorded that.'
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
No rollback of satcom recommendations, government to decide: Trai official
NEW DELHI: The telecom regulator's views were based on an extensive consultative process involving divergent views from multiple stakeholders, and could not be reconsidered, while it's for the government to take a final call, a senior regulatory official said. "We have duly followed the extensive and transparent consultative process with multiple stakeholders sharing divergent views. It is for the government to decide," a Trai official on the conditions of anonymity told ETTelecom, adding that "a level-playing field is out of question" in the current context. "Satellite communications or satcom is a complementary service to terrestrial network providers, with no question of a level playing field between the two. The ₹500 per subscription charge is aimed at enhancing coverage and encouraging space broadband providers to offer services across the country's rural landscape." Early this week, Delhi-based Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), which represents Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, in a letter to the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) said that the watchdog has "underestimated the potential capacities of satellite networks" while possibly overstating those of terrestrial networks. "Incorrect assumptions have led to unjustifiably low spectrum charges for satellite services relative to terrestrial networks," COAI director general SP Kochhar added in his letter to DoT secretary Neeraj Mittal. However, Trai, citing a huge capacity variation between the two sets of players, strongly defended its move. "In our recommendation, we have clearly brought out that there is no case of level-playing field between the satellite service providers and terrestrial service operators because of the huge difference of capacity between them," the senior official said. "So, the capacity of a typical satcom service provider in terms of the internet capacity, is of the order of maybe 0.5 to 1 or 2 percent of the capacity of a typical large terrestrial service provider. So there is no question of level-playing field. It is a complimentary service." The telco lobby group said that the planned capacity of Elon Musk-owned Starlink and Jeff Bezos led-Amazon Kuiper are expected to surpass the current capacity of Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea combined. The idea behind prescribing ₹500 additional charge for urban subscription, according to the official, was to "encourage and nudge satellite service providers" to offer services in the country's rural areas as well. "They can divert their capacity to urban areas to some extent, but we want to nudge them to focus on rural and remote regions. This is the background under which the recommendation was made," he added. Meanwhile, satcom players backed the regulator, and said Trai's views were aimed at bringing affordable space broadband services to bridge the existing digital divide. Telecom watchdog recommended administrative allocation of satcom spectrum with a fee pegged amounting to 4% of adjusted gross revenue (AGR), for a five-year term, and that can be extended by another 2 years. The 4% AGR fee applies to both geostationary and non-geostationary satellite operators. Trai's proposal to subsidise user terminals for satellite operators through the Digital Bharat Nidhi (DBN) fund further tilts the level playing field against the terrestrial operator, especially given that a majority of the DBN levy is contributed by telcos, Kochhar added in his letter. The regulatory official said that it has recommended facilitating a target set of users that the government might want to support in unserved or rural and remote areas. "The government can consider subsidising the cost of the terminal. It is for the government to make a decision based on a targeted group or category of users." Lately, the activity in India's nascent space-led communication services sector has intensified following the entry of spaceflight company SpaceX's satellite network Starlink, partnering with Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Jio and Sunil Mittal-driven Bharti Airtel.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
India's IT giants can't afford to sit out the AI race, says senior official
While startups and academic researchers have so far led India's push to build foundational artificial intelligence (AI) models, the country's legacy IT giants are unlikely to remain on the sidelines for long, according to Abhishek Singh, Additional Secretary at the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY). 'Given the capability that our IT industry has and what we are hearing about Infosys and TCs, all of them are working on AI-based applications,' Singh said at the Accel AI Summit, 2025 on Wednesday in Bengaluru. 'There will be a need for doing this and enhancing their capabilities.' Infosys and TCS have both begun ramping up investments in high-performance computing infrastructure, including Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), while simultaneously retraining thousands of employees in AI-related skills. Singh noted that these companies are already supporting global clients with AI-driven applications, and it's only a matter of time before they begin to roll out proprietary AI products and platforms. 'Otherwise for them to survive without AI, it will be very difficult,' he said. 'The whole world is going towards the adoption of AI.' He said whether it's software delivery, coding practices, SaaS implementation, or solutioning for enterprise clients, everything is being reshaped by AI. Singh believes the transformation underway across the global IT landscape will force India's large tech players to shift from primarily service-driven models to product-led AI innovation. The demand for intelligent applications and automation is only accelerating. And given their scale and customer base, India's top IT firms are well-positioned to deliver on that demand—if they move swiftly. While traditional IT services companies may not be leading the development of India's foundational AI models, they are quietly catalyzing a wave of innovation through internal transitions and ecosystem partnerships, according to Prashanth Prakash, founding partner of Accel India. Inside many large firms, there's an active rethink underway about what comes next in the age of AI. One notable trend, he noted, is senior leadership exiting established IT companies to launch or support new AI ventures. These leaders already understand enterprise pain points and high-impact use cases. They bring domain expertise and built-in demand. 'They're now partnering with VCs to build startups from the ground up,' he said. Another model emerging is through Global Capability Centers (GCCs) based in India. These units are increasingly approaching startups with concrete enterprise use cases and positioning themselves as early partners. They are asking the startups to take their workflows and reimagine them using AI agents or automation. This convergence of talent migration, early-stage venture activity, and enterprise-driven use case development, signals a deeper transformation within India's services ecosystem. 'I think we're seeing multiple ways in which there will be disruption within the context of the Indian services ecosystem,' said Prakash. AI regulations As artificial intelligence applications proliferate across sectors, the Indian government is also taking a pragmatic approach to regulation—aiming to ensure compliance with existing legal frameworks while avoiding heavy-handed restrictions that could stifle innovation, according to Singh of MeitY. 'Regulation will primarily be to ensure that any AI application that is developed is compliant with the legal framework and the laws as they stand,' Singh said. 'But we are not inclined to have something similar to the European Union's approach.' Instead, Singh explained, the government will rely on sector-specific and harm-based safeguards anchored in current statutes—such as the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP), the Information Technology Act, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which recently replaced the Indian Penal Code. Citing examples, Singh emphasised that generative AI models must be sensitive to local legal contexts. He gave the example of pre-natal sex determination, which is strictly prohibited in India. Yet, an AI model trained on global datasets might identify the sex of a fetus from an ultrasound image, violating Indian law. He said developers will need to ensure such models are adapted to local legal and ethical norms. The focus, Singh added, will be on preventing harm—such as the spread of deepfakes, misinformation, or content that could incite violence or infringe on individual rights. He was of the view that if an application risks violating the law or causing harm to individuals or communities, it will be regulated. However, Singh was clear that regulation would not come at the cost of technological progress. 'We are more inclined towards promoting AI application development rather than restricting it.'
