Council spent £62k on leisure firm sale advice before deal collapsed
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Denbighshire Council has confirmed it spent £62,000 on expert advice for the now collapsed deal to sell its leisure company. The council released the figure after trade union Unison criticised the authority for its "botched" plan to sell Denbighshire Leisure Ltd.
The trade union commissioned an independent report carried out by the Association for Public Service Excellence (APSE), citing a "lack of transparency" in the council's "consultation and competitive tender processes". Unison says the report describes the decision-making process behind the failed £1.5m deal as "fundamentally flawed".
The council has hit back at the claims, saying they could have answered many questions within the report if they had been involved in the production of the document.
At a behind-closed-doors meeting in March, councillors backed the deal to sell DLL, with the council's eight leisure centres and other venues, with backing from private equity investor, Merseyside-based River Capital, by 20 votes to 17. The council claimed the deal would safeguard DLL's future, but the sale collapsed at the end of April, with the investors unhappy over leaks. Sign up for the North Wales Live newslettersent twice daily to your inbox.
The union later argued public money spent on leisure in Denbighshire should not go to companies looking to extract profit from the local community for a "quick buck". Unison Cymru/Wales regional organiser Tony Jones said: 'This report destroys the credibility of the decision-making process around the sale of Denbighshire's leisure facilities.
'It will be uncomfortable reading for some. But residents will question whether decisions were being made in their best interests and who was going to benefit most from the sale.
'The council spent huge sums of public money refurbishing these leisure facilities but then failed to explore all the options before deciding to privatise them.' He added: 'Now the original sale has collapsed, councillors should ensure they have a controlling interest in leisure facilities. Every penny spent on leisure in Denbighshire should be for the benefit of local people, not handed to company shareholders looking to make a quick buck.'
A statement from Denbighshire County Council said: 'The council has been made aware of a document produced by APSE Solutions and commissioned by Unison. This document was prepared without the council's involvement or consent.
'The document is therefore based on the instructions given by Unison and specifically states that it should not be relied upon by any other party. The document contains a disclaimer to the effect that it does not constitute legal advice, does not draw conclusions and does not make recommendations.
'The document raises many questions which could have been answered had APSE Solutions or Unison involved the council in the production of the document. The council committed to closer working with unions as proposal(s) progressed and arrangements had been put in place prior to the council being informed that it would not proceed.
'To be clear, in considering this proposal, the council sought independent, professional advice from external advisers. This advice covered a number of legal and other regulatory issues including:
The council's power to enter the transaction
The procurement and contract issues to be considered
Employment and human resource matters including pension provision and the Code of Practice on Employment Matters
Taxation
Subsidy control
Property issues
"The council also received independent advice as to the valuation of the company and other alternative options that may be available for the future of the company. The council has been asked about the costs of this proposal to date. The council has spent £62K to date on independent advice.'
The statement added: 'Although the proposal that generated this advice will not now proceed, much of that advice will be relevant to alternative models for the company and is not therefore an abortive cost. It should also be noted that this advice was sought in anticipation of a significant capital receipt of £1.5 million to be received by the council for the sale of the shares and the revised contractual relationship would not only have prevented existing costs from increasing, but would result in the fee paid by the council for the provision of leisure services reducing in each year of its operation over a ten-year period by 10%.
"This 10% reduction in year two would be £152k increasing cumulatively to a reduction of £930k by year 10.'
Public notices in your area
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Japanese rover smashes into moon in fresh disaster for embattled space company
Japanese company ispace has declared a second failure in a bid for its lunar lander to touchdown on the moon after communication was lost less than two minutes before the scheduled grounding A lunar lander from a Japanese company crashed while attempting a touchdown on the moon in the latest casualty in the commercial rush to the moon and the second failure for the same company. The Tokyo-based company ispace declared the mission a failure several hours after communication was lost with the lander. Flight controllers scrambled to gain contact, but were met with only silence and said they were concluding the mission. Communications ceased less than two minutes before the spacecraft's scheduled landing on the moon with a mini rover. Until then, the descent from lunar orbit seemed to be going well. CEO and founder Takeshi Hakamada apologized to everyone who contributed to the mission, the second lunar strikeout for ispace. Two years ago, the company's first moonshot ended in a crash landing, giving rise to the name 'Resilience' for its successor lander. Resilience carried a rover with a shovel to gather lunar dirt as well as a Swedish artist's toy-size red house for placement on the moon's dusty surface. Company officials said it was too soon to know whether the same problem doomed both missions. This is the second time that we were not able to land. So we really have to take it very seriously,' Hakamada told reporters. He stressed that the company would press ahead with more lunar missions. A preliminary analysis indicates the laser system for measuring the altitude did not work as planned, and the lander descended too fast, officials said. 'Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface,' the company said in a written statement. Moon missions had previously been the preserve of governments but it became a target of private outfits in 2019, with more flops than wins along the way. Launched in January from Florida on a long, roundabout journey, Resilience entered lunar orbit last month. It shared a SpaceX ride with Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost, which reached the moon faster and became the first private entity to successfully land there in March. Another US company, Intuitive Machines, arrived at the moon a few days after Firefly. But the tall, spindly lander face-planted in a crater near the moon's south pole and was declared dead within hours. Resilience was targeting the top of the moon, a less treacherous place than the shadowy bottom. The ispace team chose a flat area with few boulders in Mare Frigoris or Sea of Cold, a long and narrow region full of craters and ancient lava flows that stretches across the near side's northern tier. Plans had called for the 7.5-feet Resilience to beam back pictures within hours and for the lander to lower the piggybacking rover onto the lunar surface this weekend. Made of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic with four wheels, ispace's European-built rover — named Tenacious — sported a high-definition camera to scout out the area and a shovel to scoop up some lunar dirt for NASA. The rover, weighing just 5kgs, was going to stick close to the lander, going in circles at a speed of less than two centimetres per second. It was capable of venturing up to two-thirds of a mile from the lander and should be operational throughout the two-week mission, the period of daylight. Besides science and tech experiments, there was an artistic touch. The rover held a tiny, Swedish-style red cottage with white trim and a green door, dubbed the Moonhouse by creator Mikael Genberg, for placement on the lunar surface. Minutes before the attempted landing, Hakamada assured everyone that ispace had learned from its first failed mission. 'Engineers did everything they possibly could' to ensure success this time, he said. He considered the latest moonshot 'merely a steppingstone' to its bigger lander launching by 2027 with NASA involvement. Ispace, like other businesses, does not have 'infinite funds' and cannot afford repeated failures, Jeremy Fix, chief engineer for ispace's US subsidiary, said at a conference last month. While not divulging the cost of the current mission, company officials said it's less than the first one which exceeded £74million. Two other US companies are aiming for moon landings by year's end: Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin and Astrobotic Technology. Astrobotic's first lunar lander missed the moon altogether in 2024 and came crashing back through Earth's atmosphere. For decades, governments competed to get to the moon. Only five countries have pulled off successful robotic lunar landings: Russia, the US, China, India and Japan. Of those, only the US has landed people on the moon: 12 NASA astronauts from 1969 through 1972. NASA expects to send four astronauts around the moon next year. That would be followed a year or more later by the first lunar landing by a crew in more than a half-century, with SpaceX's Starship providing the lift from lunar orbit all the way down to the surface. China also has moon landing plans for its own astronauts by 2030.
Fashion United
an hour ago
- Fashion United
G-III reports ‘solid' quarterly figures and withdraws earnings forecast
US-based fashion conglomerate G-III Apparel Group Ltd. reported a decline in revenue for the first quarter of its 2025/26 financial year, in line with expectations. However, the group delivered a stronger-than-anticipated rise in profits. Overall, the parent company of brands such as Donna Karan, DKNY, Karl Lagerfeld and Sonia Rykiel exceeded market expectations with the figures it released on Thursday. However, because the potential impact of US customs policy is currently unforeseeable, the company withdrew its earnings forecasts for the full year. The parent company of brands including Donna Karan, DKNY, Karl Lagerfeld, and Sonia Rykiel published its latest results on Thursday. Despite the solid quarterly performance, the company cited uncertainty surrounding future US customs policy as a key risk factor and therefore withdrew its full-year earnings guidance. For the three months ended April 30, G-III generated group revenue of 583.6 million dollars, representing a four percent year-on-year decline. The company attributed the dip primarily to the conclusion of its licensing agreements for Calvin Klein jeans and sportswear. Commenting on the results, chairman and CEO Morris Goldfarb highlighted strong performances from the company's owned brands. DKNY, Karl Lagerfeld, and Donna Karan each achieved double-digit growth during the period. Overall, the group delivered 'solid results' in the first quarter, Goldfarb noted. Us customs policy creates uncertainty Although the group was able to reduce its operating expenses, operating profit fell by 37 percent to 8.5 million dollars. Due to lower financing costs, however, net profit attributable to shareholders increased by 34 percent to 7.8 million dollars. Diluted earnings per share increased from 0.17 dollars, exceeding expectations. Based on the available figures, management confirmed its revenue forecast for the full year. It therefore continues to expect revenues of approximately 3.14 billion dollars. However, the group withdrew the earnings guidance it had issued in March, citing 'uncertainties regarding tariffs and related macroeconomic conditions.' The company currently anticipates incurring additional costs of approximately 135 million dollars due to existing US import tariffs. In response, G-III stated it plans to mitigate the impact through adjustments in sourcing, selective price increases, and ongoing cost-saving initiatives. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@
Time Out Dubai
3 hours ago
- Time Out Dubai
Watch out for smarter AI-powered billboards on Sheikh Zayed Road from Multiply Media Group
Abu Dhabi-based investment holding company Multiply Group has united three major out-of-home advertising companies to launch Multiply Media Group (MMG). The UAE-headquartered media group officially launched during the World Out of Home Organisation (WOO) Annual Congress in Mexico City. So, what does this mean for the existing brands and the out-of-home (OOH) media sector? Fresh investments, innovative solutions on and better synergy across all the companies now working under one roof. But what does this mean for you? MMG aims to change how we all see ads while travelling around the city. Think personalised messaging about the products and services you genuinely want to learn more about, thanks to new and improved AI and data strategies. In fact, to celebrate the launch on Thursday June 5, you may have noticed digital billboards simultaneously lighting up as you whizz by on Dubai's Sheikh Zayed Road, a spectacle also appearing across several other cities globally at the same time. The three big names now under the MMG umbrella – BackLite Media, Viola Media and Media 247 – together manage 3,000 advertising units across the UAE, including over 75 premium sites dotted along Sheikh Zayed Road. Samia Bouazza, GCEO and Managing Director of Multiply Group, said: 'The launch of Multiply Media Group represents the most significant media consolidations in the UAE. By bringing together market-leading media assets under a single AI and tech-driven group, we are reinforcing our commitment to long-term value creation and shareholder returns.' James Bicknell, CEO of MMG, added: 'With MMG, we are not simply scaling up – we are scaling intelligently. 'Our mandate is clear: deliver context at scale and reach audiences where it truly matters, when it matters most. MMG is engineered to be agile, data-led and deeply integrated, enabling our clients to engage audiences with greater relevance, responsiveness, and resonance than ever before. This is more than media – it's momentum.' The new outdoor advertising conglomerate is also eyeing regional and international expansion – watch this space. Launching 2025.
