These mysterious objects born in violent clashes between young star systems aren't stars or planets
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Are they stars? Are they planets? Or are they neither? Some rogue planetary mass objects that wander the cosmos alone could be created when young star systems clash, meaning they represent an entire cosmic class of their own.
Free-floating, planetary mass objects are bodies with around 13 times the mass of Jupiter that are often found drifting through young star clusters, such as the Trapezium Cluster in Orion. Their origins posed a particular puzzle in 2023, when astronomers discovered 40 pairs of planetary mass objects called Jupiter-Mass Binary Objects, or JuMBOs, in the Orion nebula.
With masses lower than those of the smallest stars but greater than those of the most massive planets, the big question has been: Do these bodies form like stars or like planets? The problem is, however, that neither origin can account for the binary nature of JuMBOs — or, in fact, the overabundance of free-floating planetary mass objects in general.
"Planetary mass objects don't fit neatly into existing categories of stars or planets," Deng Hongping of the Shanghai Astronomical Observatory at the Chinese Academy of Sciences said in a statement. "Our simulations show they likely form through a completely different process — one tied to the chaotic dynamics of young star clusters."The new research has shown that these cosmic orphans could be forged when flattened clouds of gas and dust called "circumstellar disks" around infant stars violently interact. This violent interaction could be happening when the young stars are clustered together.
Previously, scientists theorized that free-floating planetary mass objects are simply rogue planets, ejected from their home star systems through interactions with passing stars or gravitational tussles with their own sibling planets.
However, the existence of pairs of JuMBOs has challenged this idea.
That's because it's difficult to explain how an event could be violent enough to eject a planet from its star system at high speeds while not separating it from a binary partner.
While it is conceivable that some freak event could cause this, the detection of 40 pairs of JuMBOs in one nebula suggests that whatever created them is more common than a one-off event.
Another "secret identity" suggested for free-floating planetary mass objects are brown dwarfs. These objects are thought to form like stars when dense patches in vast clouds of gas and dust collapse.
However, whereas stars gather mass from their prenatal envelopes of gas and dust until the pressure and temperature in their cores is sufficient to trigger the fusion of hydrogen to helium, the nuclear process that defines what a star is, brown dwarfs fail to harvest enough mass to trigger such a process. That leaves these "failed stars" with masses between 13 and 75 times that of Jupiter (0.013 to 0.075 times the mass of the sun).
Moreover, the chance of finding stars with binary partners decreases rapidly as their masses fall. So, while 75% of massive stars have a partner, only around 50% of stars with mass like the sun are in binaries. This binary rate drops to near zero for the smallest stars, so as stellar bodies with even smaller masses, there should be very little chance of finding brown dwarfs in binaries.Thus, if free-floating planetary mass objects are indeed brown dwarfs, the sheer number of them seen as binary systems is difficult to explain.
To get to the bottom of this mystery, Deng and colleagues performed a high-resolution hydrodynamic simulation of close encounters between two circumstellar disks around infant stars.
The team found that when these disks collide at speeds of around 4,500 to 6,700 miles per hour (7,242 to 10,783 kilometers per hour), at separations of around 300 to 400 times the distance between Earth and the sun, a "tidal bridge" of gas and dust is formed.
These tidal bridges collapse to create dense filaments of gas that break apart to make "seeds" of planetary mass objects, the team explains, with masses around 10 times that of Jupiter.
The simulations revealed that around 14% of these bodies are formed in pairs or triplets with separations around seven to 15 times the distance between the sun and Earth.
This would explain the abundance of JuMBOs in Orion.
The team's results are supported by the fact that disk encounters between stars are known to be common in dense stellar environments like that of Trapezium Cluster. That means these regions could generate hundreds of planetary mass objects, explaining their abundant populations in the cosmos.
Related Stories:
— The mystery of how strange cosmic objects called 'JuMBOs' went rogue
— Stars get ripped open like Christmas presents to create strange 'JuMBO' worlds
— James Webb Space Telescope glimpses Earendel, the most distant star known in the universe
"This discovery partly reshapes how we view cosmic diversity," team member Lucio Mayer from the University of Zurich said. "Planetary mass objects may represent a third class of objects, born not from the raw material of star-forming clouds or via planet-building processes, but rather from the gravitational chaos of disk collisions"
The team's research was published on Feb. 26 in the journal Science Advances.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
A star exploded in the Lupus constellation. Here's how to see the nova in the night sky this month
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An ordinarily dim star is making a brilliant appearance in the night sky after unleashing a powerful nova explosion, which has rendered it visible to the naked eye. The nova V462 Lupi was first discovered on June 12 by the Ohio State University-led All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN), as reported by Sky & Telescope. The star that spawned the nova is usually too dim to see with the naked eye, boasting an apparent brightness — or magnitude — of +22.3. However, the explosion of radiation thrown out by the nova caused it to brighten dramatically, making it appear as if a new star is shining in the night sky! Remember, the lower an object's magnitude, the brighter it is in the night sky. For reference, the human eye is capable of seeing stars with a magnitude of +6.5 or greater under dark sky conditions. A subsequent analysis of the star's light fingerprint by astronomer Yusuke Tampo of the University of Cape Town, South Africa led to the event being classified as a classical nova. This form of stellar explosion occurs when the gravitational influence of a white dwarf star orbiting in a binary system strips mass from its nearby companion. This process continues until the mass accumulated on the surface of the white dwarf is heated to the point that a cataclysmic fusion reaction becomes inevitable. The resulting explosion releases a colossal outpouring of radiation, which can be visible from Earth. Soon after its discovery on July 14, observers associated with the American Association for Variable Stars (AAVSO) reported that V462 Lupi was visible through a pair of 15x70 binoculars with a magnitude of around +7.9. The nova was observed to steadily brighten in the days following its discovery, eventually becoming visible to the naked eye around the middle of June. It subsequently crescendoed, with some reports placing its brightness at over +5.5. Sadly, the AAVSO light curve of V462 Lupi based on member observations appears to show that the nova is now on the decline. V462 Lupi will soon vanish from the night sky, but before it does, the dark skies around the new moon present a perfect time to head away from city lights to hunt down the ancient nova light. We would advise taking a pair of 10x50 binoculars, which will make it easier to spot the subsiding light of the nova while providing a wide field of view with which to observe the multitude of surrounding stars. The nova can be found in the patch of sky close to the bright stars Delta Lupi and Kappa Centauri in the constellation of Lupus, the wolf. Its exact location is best found with the aid of a star chart, which, as noted by Sky & Telescope, can be generated on the AAVSO website by typing 'V462 Lup' into the 'Pick a star' box and clicking 'Create a finder chart'. V462 Lupi will be easiest to spot for skywatchers in the southern hemisphere, where the nova will be highest in the post-sunset sky. However, the patch of sky containing the nova will also be visible close to the southern horizon for U.S. stargazers living in states closest to the equator, such as Texas, Florida, and Louisiana.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
'City killer' asteroid 2024 YR4 could shower Earth with 'bullet-like' meteors if it hits the moon in 2032
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. New simulations reveal that the infamous "city killer" asteroid 2024 YR4 could shower Earth with "bullet-like" debris if it hits the moon in seven years' time, potentially triggering an eye-catching meteor shower — and endangering the satellites that orbit our planet. 2024 YR4 is a potentially hazardous asteroid measuring roughly 200 feet (60 meters) across, making it large enough to wipe out a large urban area if it were to hit Earth head-on. It was first discovered in December 2024 but made headlines earlier this year when scientists first predicted that there was a chance it could smash into Earth on Dec. 22, 2032. The odds of a collision peaked at 3.1% in February, which was enough to prompt NASA to study it extensively. However, subsequent analysis revealed there is zero chance of it impacting our planet. But in April, researchers realized that, while Earth is no longer in the firing line, the space rock could still hit the moon. The odds of such a collision have grown slowly but steadily, and most recently jumped to 4.3% earlier this month. Experts will likely know the final likelihood by 2028, when the asteroid will make its next close approach to our planet. In a new study, uploaded June 12 to the preprint server arXiv, researchers ran computer simulations to model what a lunar impact might look like. The team estimated that up to 220 million pounds (100 million kilograms) of material could be ejected from the lunar surface. If 2024 YR4 hits the Earth-facing side of the moon — which is roughly a 50/50 chance — up to 10% of this debris could be pulled in by Earth's gravity over the following days, the scientists wrote. 2024 YR4 would be the largest space rock to hit the moon in "at least 5,000 years," study lead author Paul Wiegert, an expert in solar system dynamics at Western University in Ontario, Canada, who has also extensively studied the "God of Chaos" asteroid Apophis that will zip past Earth in 2029, told French news site AFP. The impact would be "comparable to a large nuclear explosion in terms of the amount of energy released," he added. Related: 'Just the tip of the iceberg': Why risky asteroids like 2024 YR4 will pester Earth for decades to come It is important to note that the new simulations (visible below) were created before the odds of a lunar impact rose from 3.8% to 4.3% on June 16, which slightly raises the chances of this scenario playing out. But it is still far from a certainty. The findings from the new study have also not yet been peer-reviewed. It is unlikely that any of the potential debris fragments will pose a risk to people on the planet's surface. Instead, we may be treated to a "spectacular" meteor shower as wayward fragments of rock burn up in Earth's atmosphere, which could last for several days and be seen by people across the globe, Weigert said. But while we will almost certainly be safe on the ground from any potential lunar meteor shower, our space-based infrastructure could be under threat. The amount of debris that could potentially be pulled close to Earth makes it around 1,000 times more likely that our satellites could be struck by a meteor. And by 2032, the number of spacecraft orbiting our planet is expected to rise significantly. "A centimeter-sized rock traveling at tens of thousands of meters per second is a lot like a bullet," Weigert said. Such an object could easily take out a satellite or cause critical damage to human-inhabited space stations, such as China's Tiangong station. (The International Space Station is scheduled to be decommissioned by 2030.) If the odds of a lunar impact increase further in the coming years, government agencies may make the decision to try and divert the asteroid's course to protect Earth's space assets. The asteroid would be a "good target" for testing our planetary defence capabilities, Weigert said. "I'm sure it will be considered." RELATED STORIES —An 'invisible threat': Swarm of hidden 'city killer' asteroids around Venus could one day collide with Earth, simulations show —No, NASA hasn't warned of an impending asteroid strike in 2038. Here's what really happened. —'Planet killer' asteroids are hiding in the sun's glare. Can we stop them in time? NASA already demonstrated its ability to redirect dangerous asteroids back in 2022, when it diverted the trajectory of the asteroid Dimorphos by slamming the DART probe into it. 2024 YR4 is only around half the size of that particular space rock. However, if we wait too long, it may become "dangerous" to try and alter the space rock's trajectory because a wrong move could put it onto a potentially catastrophic collision course with Earth, Weigert said. Some experts are also worried that the proposed cuts to NASA's budget by the Trump administration could make it harder to track dangerous asteroids, such as 2024 YR4, in the future.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists find new way of spotting invisible 'plasma bubbles' lurking in Earth's upper atmosphere
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists in China have developed a new way of spotting massive, invisible "plasma bubbles" lurking in Earth's upper atmosphere. The natural disturbances can disrupt GPS software and interfere with radio signals, but are incredibly hard to track. The bubbles, known as equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs), are found in the ionosphere — the region of the atmosphere over 30 miles (50 kilometers) above Earth's surface, where most of the gas has been ionized, or stripped of electrons, by solar radiation, transforming it into a sea of plasma. The bubbles are cavities within the ionosphere, similar to the holes within blocks of Swiss cheese, according to They form shortly after sunset, when the lack of sunlight causes a sudden halt in ionization, but they only appear close to the planet's magnetic equator, which is askew from the geographical equator. EPBs can grow to be anywhere from 6 to 60 miles (10 to 100 km) across, according to But as the plasma cavities are invisible to the naked eye, they have proved to be very hard to measure and accurately track in real time. But it's important to know where they are because they can disrupt GPS positioning software and interfere with radio signals that are bounced off the ionosphere over long distances, making them potentially dangerous in certain circumstances. Related: Earth grew an extra, never-before-seen 'radiation belt' after last year's supercharged solar storm — and it's probably still there In a new study, published May 9 in the journal Space Weather, scientists from China's National Space Science Center and the University of Beijing developed a new way of spotting EPBs by monitoring airglow. These shimmering aurora-like lights appear when plasma within the upper ionosphere cools overnight and recombines into gases, emitting energy in the form of light. The team realized that EPBs slightly alter the appearance of the airglow that forms above them. The researchers then trained a machine-learning program, using over 10 years' worth of airglow photography captured by the All-Sky Imager at Qujing Station in southern China, to search for the signs of airglow deformation. Their best model could accurately detect and measure the bubbles 88% of the time. "The test results verified that machine learning is an excellent method for automatically detecting and extracting EPB characteristics," the researchers wrote in the study. However, a major limitation of this method is that it only works when there is airglow present, which is never guaranteed and becomes a lot less common during periods of reduced solar activity, which can last for several years at a time. The researchers hope that their findings could help to prevent several issues surrounding EPBs. One potential issue is how the bubbles can interfere with GPS signals from satellites, potentially leading to errors in locational software. In 2024, a study published in the journal Satellite Navigation, revealed that the software used by airplanes is particularly prone to this interference, which can lead to them flying slightly off course. The chances of a collision or crash occurring as a result of this are minimal but not negligible, study researchers warned at the time. RELATED STORIES —NASA spots unexpected X-shaped structures in Earth's upper atmosphere — and scientists are struggling to explain them —Hidden tide in Earth's magnetospheric 'plasma ocean' revealed in new study —Eerie sounds triggered by plasma waves hitting Earth's magnetic field captured in new NASA sound clip EPBs can also disrupt radio signals by altering how they bounce off the ionosphere, which can be problematic in emergency scenarios. In 2014, researchers from the American Geophysical Union found that a large bubble in 2002 was partly responsible for a fatal U.S. military operation in Afghanistan. Radio operators were unable to warn a Chinook helicopter not to attempt to land on an enemy-controlled mountain top, leading to the vehicle crash-landing under enemy fire and three soldiers being killed in the ensuing firefight. The new findings could be used to create an early warning system for GPS and radio operators, enabling them to factor the disruptive cavities into their models and forecasts and avoid any potential worst-case scenarios.